Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik mit dem NEO−Fünf−Faktoren-Inventar: Die 30−Item−Kurzversion (NEO−FFI−30) [Personality diagnostics with the NEO−Five−Factor Inventory: The 30-Item-Short-Version (NEO-FFI-30)]

Die Institutsangaben sind am Ende des Beitrags gelistet.
PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie (Impact Factor: 1.02). 08/2008; 58(6):238-45. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986199
Source: PubMed


Over these past years, German researchers have shown much interest for Costa and McCrae's five factor model as well as for their instrument: the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory . Nevertheless, results from a recent survey study using the German version of the NEO-FFI on a representative population sample (n = 1908) have reported problems to replicate the factor structure of the instrument. Insufficient psychometric indices of single items led to partly unsatisfactory scale values. A logical consequence of this was the development of a short version of the instrument with better psychometric properties. This article reports item and scale values of the NEO-FFI-30 for the German population sample. The five scales reach good internal consistency and are highly correlated with the original NEO-FFI scales. Furthermore, the influence of sociodemographic variables and correlations with the Giessentest appear to be very similar for both the original instrument and the short version. Moreover, the factor structure was replicated in an independent sample of 2508 adults. Results confirm the reliability, and factor and construct validity of this economic instrument without any significant loss in information.

  • Source
    • "Personality. The Big Five personality traits were measured using the German NEO-FFI questionnaire (Körner et al., 2008). It contained the five scales with six items each: "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A note of caution against treating diversity faultlines as social category salience and against treating diversity beliefs as a trait In this paper, we tested two implicit assumptions from diversity research: That faultlines are synonymous to social categorizations and are hence detrimental for group performance in diverse groups and that diversity beliefs are a stable trait. In a laboratory study, we found that experimentally induced faultlines were not related to perceptions of salient social categories. Further, perceptions of social categories moderated the relationship between diversity faultlines and an observational measure of information elaboration: If perceptions of social categories were low, diversity faultlines were positively related to elaboration. In another study with longitudinal field data, we tested whether diversity beliefs change over time as a result of experiences in diverse teams. Diversity beliefs predicted team performance only if they were elicited in close temporal proximity to the performance measure, and current diversity beliefs were shaped by prior diversity beliefs and prior identification with a diverse team. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Sep 2010
  • Source
    • "u & Ostendorf , 1993 ) with 30 items was used instead of the BFI ( see Körner et al . , 2008 , who reported a satisfactory level of internal con - sistency and validity ) . Six items each measured the Big Five dimensions . The correlations with the full scale mea - sures were high and ranged from r = . 88 for Openness to r = . 93 for Neuroticism ( Körner et al . , 2008 ) . Participants had to indicate the extent of their agreement to each item by ratings on a five - point Likert scale . The reliabilities of the scales in the present study ranged from α = . 69 for Extra - version to α = . 87 for Neuroticism ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, the common dimensional-structure of measures of Big Five personality, social attitudes, personal values, conservatism, and ideological beliefs (right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation) was investigated in two convenience samples of adults (Study 1, paper-and-pencil, N = 302; Study 2, Internet, N = 154). A principal components analysis resulted in a three-factor solution in both samples. In particular, a strong ideology factor emerged that can be interpreted as representing an ideological belief system. It is characterized by a right-wing, conservative orientation, social prejudice, ideological beliefs, the value orientations of self-enhancement, low self-transcendence, and the personality trait of low Openness to Experience. The other two factors comprised socially desirable personality traits and values, and a blend of personality and personal-value orientations characterized by energy, activity, openness, and curiosity, respectively. The results are interpreted in relation to recent structural and process models of personality, ideological beliefs, and social attitudes.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2009 · Journal of Individual Differences
  • Source

    Full-text · Article · Apr 2011 · International Journal of Epidemiology
Show more