Polysegmental innervation of the medial paraspinal lumbar muscles
Clinic for Rheumatology, Spinal Disorders and Neuromuscular Diseases, Mediclin Seidel-Klinik, Hebelweg 4, 79435, Bad Bellingen, Germany.European Spine Journal (Impact Factor: 2.07). 03/2008; 17(2):300-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0529-1
A retrospective analysis was performed in a nine month period of the electrophysiological data, imaging and clinical findings of patients with monoradicular disc herniation compressing either the L5 or the S1 nerve root. The primary purpose of the analysis was to determine the distribution of pathological spontaneous activity in the medial paraspinal muscles on electromyographic examination in monoradicular L5 and S1 nerve root compression syndromes. Anatomically, the medial paraspinal muscles receive their innervation from a single root while the iliocostalis muscles and the longissimus muscle are thought to be innervated by multiple nerve roots. In the analysis, in single nerve root lesion of the L5 or S1 nerve root, electromyography of the medial paraspinal muscles revealed pathological spontaneous activity one to three vertebrae cranial to the disc herniation with extension to the opposite side of the lesion. In conclusion, the medial paraspinal muscles might be thought to be innervated by one single nerve root on anatomical studies, electrophysiologically the extension of axonal lesion signs of one single lumbar nerve root is much broader. The widespread distribution of the L5 and S1 nerve root must be taken into consideration on electromyographic examination of the medial paraspinal muscles.
Full-text previewDOI: · Available from: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Experimental study of changes in muscle recruitment during trunk extension exercise at 40% of the repetition maximum, because of induced muscle pain. To investigate the effect of lumbar muscle pain on muscle activity of the trunk muscles using muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging. Changed muscle recruitment in patients has an important impact on the etiology and recurrence of low back pain. The mechanisms of these changes in muscle activity are still poorly understood. An experimental study investigating the cause-effect relationship of muscle pain on muscle recruitment patterns can help to clarify these mechanisms. In 15 healthy subjects, the muscle activity of the lumbar multifidus, lumbar erector spinae, and psoas muscles was investigated with muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements at rest and after trunk extension exercise at 40% of repetition maximum were performed without and with induced pain. The lumbar multifidus and lumbar erector spinae were significantly active during the trunk extension exercise, whereas the psoas showed no significant activity. The activity of the lumbar multifidus, lumbar erector spinae, and psoas muscles, was reduced bilaterally and multilevel during the exercise with unilateral low back muscle pain. These data demonstrate that unilateral muscle pain can cause hypoactivity of muscles during trunk extension at 40% of the repetition maximum. The changes were not limited to the side and level of pain. Moreover, the inhibition was not limited to the multifidus muscle; also the lumbar erector spinae and psoas muscles showed decreased activity during the pain condition. Further research has to assess possible compensation mechanisms for this reduced activity in other muscles.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Variation in the number of lumbar vertebrae occurs in a small portion of the population. Either the fifth lumbar vertebra shows assimilation to the sacrum or the first sacral vertebra shows a lumbar configuration, resulting in 4 or 6 lumbar vertebrae, respectively. Etiologically, lumbar nerve root syndrome is diagnosed by comparing the anatomical level of the disc herniation to the compressed nerve root and to the pattern of the peripheral sensory and motor deficit. In case of a variation in the number of lumbar vertebrae, defining the lumbar nerve roots becomes difficult. Variations in the number of lumbar vertebrae make the landmarks (the twelfth rib and the first sacral vertebra) unreliable clues to define the nerve roots. The allocation of the clinically damaged segment to the spinal disorder seen in imaging studies is essential for differential diagnosis and spine surgery. A retrospective study was conducted of clinical, electrophysiological, and imaging data among inpatients over a period of 21 months. Eight patients who had isolated monosegmental discogenic nerve root compression and a variation in the number of lumbar vertebrae were selected. Seven patients presented with 6 lumbar vertebrae, and 1 patient presented with 4 lumbar vertebrae and disc herniation on 1 of the 2 caudal levels. Compression of the second-to-last nerve root in patients with 6 lumbar vertebrae resulted either in clinical L-5 or S-1 syndrome, or a combination of both. Compression of the last caudal nerve root resulted in a clinical S-1 nerve root syndrome. The findings suggest that the dermatomyotomal supply of the lumbosacral nerve roots can vary in patients with a variation in the number of lumbar vertebrae, and a meticulous clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological examination is essential.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the cross-sectional area (CSA) of both paraspinal and psoas muscles in patients with unilateral back pain using MRI and to correlate it with outcome measures. 40 patients, all with informed consent, with a minimum of 3 months of unilateral back pain with or without sciatica and one-level disc disease on MRI of the lumbosacral spine were included. Patients were evaluated with self-report measures regarding pain (visual analogue score) and disability (Oswestry disability index). The CSA of multifidus, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum and psoas was measured at the disc level of pathology and the two adjacent disc levels, bilaterally. Comparison of CSAs of muscles between the affected vs symptomless side was carried out with Student's t-test and correlations were conducted with Spearman's test. The maximum relative muscle atrophy (% decrease in CSA on symptomatic side) independent of the level was 13.1% for multifidus, 21.8% for erector spinae, 24.8% for quadratus lumborum and 17.1% for psoas. There was significant difference (p<0.05) between sides (symptomatic and asymptomatic) in CSA of multifidus, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum and psoas. However, no statistically significant correlation was found between the duration of symptoms (average 15.5 months), patient's pain (average VAS 5.3) or disability (average ODI 25.2) and the relative muscle atrophy. In patients with long-standing unilateral back pain due to monosegmental degenerative disc disease, selective multifidus, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum and psoas atrophy develops on the symptomatic side. Radiologists and clinicians should evaluate spinal muscle atrophy of patients with persistent unilateral back pain.