In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule depolymerization to processive chromosome motions

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 12/2007; 104(48):19017-22. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0709524104
Source: PubMed


Mitotic chromosome motions are driven by microtubules (MTs) and associated proteins that couple kinetochores to MT ends. A good coupler should ensure a high stability of attachment, even when the chromosome changes direction or experiences a large opposing force. The optimal coupler is also expected to be efficient in converting the energy of MT depolymerization into chromosome motility. As was shown years ago, a "sleeve"-based, chromosome-associated structure could, in principle, couple MT dynamics to chromosome motion. A recently identified kinetochore complex from yeast, the "Dam1" or "DASH" complex, may function as an encircling coupler in vivo. Some features of the Dam1 ring differ from those of the "sleeve," but whether these differences are significant has not been examined. Here, we analyze theoretically the biomechanical properties of encircling couplers that have properties of the Dam1/DASH complex, such as its large diameter and inward-directed extensions. We demonstrate that, if the coupler is modeled as a wide ring with links that bind the MT wall, its optimal performance is achieved when the linkers are flexible and their binding to tubulin dimers is strong. The diffusive movement of such a coupler is limited, but MT depolymerization can drive its motion via a "forced walk," whose features differ significantly from those of the mechanisms based on biased diffusion. Our analysis identifies key experimental parameters whose values should determine whether the Dam1/DASH ring moves via diffusion or a forced walk.

In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule
depolymerization to processive chromosome motions
Artem Efremov*
, Ekaterina L. Grishchuk*
, J. Richard McIntosh*
, and Fazly I. Ataullakhanov
*Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347;
National Research Center for
Hematology, Moscow 125167, Russia;
Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow 125315, Russia;
Physics Department
Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia; and
Center for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian
Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
Contributed by J. Richard McIntosh, October 6, 2007 (sent for review August 31, 2007)
Mitotic chromosome motions are driven by microtubules (MTs) and
associated proteins that couple kinetochores to MT ends. A good
coupler should ensure a high stability of attachment, even when
the chromosome changes direction or experiences a large opposing
force. The optimal coupler is also expected to be efficient in
converting the energy of MT depolymerization into chromosome
motility. As was shown years ago, a ‘‘sleeve’’-based, chromosome-
associated structure could, in principle, couple MT dynamics to
chromosome motion. A recently identified kinetochore complex
from yeast, the ‘‘Dam1’’ or ‘‘DASH’’ complex, may function as an
encircling coupler in vivo. Some features of the Dam1 ring differ
from those of the ‘‘sleeve,’’ but whether these differences are
significant has not been examined. Here, we analyze theoretically
the biomechanical properties of encircling couplers that have
properties of the Dam1/DASH complex, such as its large diameter
and inward-directed extensions. We demonstrate that, if the
coupler is modeled as a wide ring with links that bind the MT wall,
its optimal performance is achieved when the linkers are flexible
and their binding to tubulin dimers is strong. The diffusive move-
ment of such a coupler is limited, but MT depolymerization can
drive its motion via a ‘‘forced walk,’’ whose features differ signif-
icantly from those of the mechanisms based on biased diffusion.
Our analysis identifies key experimental parameters whose values
should determine whether the Dam1/DASH ring moves via diffu-
sion or a forced walk.
biased diffusion kinetochore mathematical model power stroke
energy-transducing coupler
hromosome segregation during cell division depends on the
activities of microtubules (MTs), which are cylindrical ar-
rangements of 13 linear polymers of
-tubulin dimers called
protofilaments (PFs) (1). Tubulin complexed with GTP elon-
gates PF ends, but this GTP is hydrolyzed soon after dimers have
added (2). The preferred confor mation of the GDP dimers is
more bent, so the PFs tend to curve (3, 4). In a growing MT, this
tendenc y is counteracted by a relatively straight ‘‘GTP cap,’’ but
if the terminal layers are lost, the PFs are no longer restrained
(1, 2). As they splay out, the dimers dissociate from their
longitudinal neighbors, and the MT shortens (5, 6). Conse-
quently, the ends of depolymerizing MTs in vitro and in vivo
display curved PFs (3, 5–9). Represent ative images of kineto-
chore MTs are shown in Fig. 1A; the length of PF flares in
anaphase mammalian cells is 53 7 nm, n 368 PFs (J.R.M.,
E.L.G., A.E., K. Zhudenkov, M. Morphew, et al., unpublished
It is well documented that MTs can move chromosomes or
microbeads that associate w ith their shortening ends (9–15).
Several hypotheses have explained these force-transducing at-
t achments with the help of a coupler that encircles the MT
(16–18). Movement in these models is driven ultimately by the
energy released during hydrolysis of tubulin-associated GTP
(12 k
T; k
, Boltzmann constant). However, the design of a
c oupler, e.g., its geometry and size and the nature of its
interaction with MTs, determines the fraction of this energy that
can be converted into useful work. Below we analyze several
biomechan ical designs, focusing on their efficiency and the
st ability of their attachment to the MT end.
Biased Diffusion of a Cylindrical Coupler. The 40-nm-long ‘‘sleeve,’’
proposed by Hill, had numerous binding sites for enclosed
tubulin dimers (Fig. 1B) (19, 20). Because protein–protein
interactions act over very short dist ances, the sleeve could be
only 0.1–0.2 nm wider than the MT, whose outside diameter is
25 nm. The interaction between a dimer and a binding site in the
sleeve was postulated to decrease the total MT-sleeve energy by
2.5 k
T, but the activation energy for the transitions between the
binding sites was 0.1–0.2 k
T. These assumptions are key for
MT-dependent motility in this model. As the sleeve diffuses on
Author contributions: F.I.A. designed research; A.E. performed research; E.L.G. and F.I.A.
analyzed data; and E.L.G. and J.R.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
This article contains supporting information online at
© 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
sreknil htiw gnir
a b c d e
Fig. 1. Structure of kinetochore MT ends and models for force-bearing
ring-like coupling. (A) Axial slices from electron tomograms of kinetochore
MTs from PtK1 (a and b), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (c), S. cerevisiae (d and
e). PFs have extensive flare (arrows) but different lengths. (B) In Hill’s model,
a sleeve has 65 low-affinity-binding sites along each PF (20). This mechanism
does not use the PF’s power stroke, because a MT tip is buried in a narrow
sleeve. (C) A PF power stroke pushes with maximal force on a ring, which is
10-nm wider than the MT. This mechanism has no restrictions on PF length.
(D) In the electrostatic model, the ring moves at the ends of the curved PFs,
which therefore extend only 1 dimer beyond the ring (based on ring diam-
eter and PF curvature). (E) A model that combines the power stroke, as in C,
and attributes ring–MT interaction to site-specific protein–protein bonds, as in
B, but the bonds are now formed by the linkers. The resulting motions are
significantly different from those in other models.
www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0709524104 PNAS
November 27, 2007
vol. 104
no. 48
Page 1
the MT surface, it adopts a MT-sleeve overlap that minimizes the
system’s energy; with no opposing load, the steady state is
achieved when 90–95% of binding sites are occupied (20, 21). As
the MT shortens by loss of tubulin dimers through the narrow
channel of a sleeve, sleeve diffusion relocates the bonds to
preserve the overlap, thereby causing the sleeve to move with the
MT end. With increased opposing force, the amount of overlap
decreases; a 15-pN tension leads to c omplete loss of attach-
ment. This coupler has relatively low ef ficiency (20%), because
100% efficiency, when all of the energy of GTP hydrolysis is
c onverted into useful work, would produce 80 pN (20–22).
A lthough a coupler with Hill’s design has not yet been found,
this physically solid model has had a significant impact on
think ing in the mitosis field. Since the model was proposed,
however, it has been learned that the ends of shortening MTs,
including those at k inetochores, display flared PFs, a feature that
is not compatible with the above mechanism. A long narrow
sleeve (or a shorter ring) can reside only over the cylindrical part
of the wall, away from the tip where the PFs flare. When the
sleeve is over the wall, all of its binding sites are occupied, so its
dif fusion is not biased. However, a sleeve (or a ring) with
str ucture similar to Hill’s proposal might be biased to move with
a shortening MT by some other mechanism, as has been
proposed for directed motions of various microobjects (23–26).
Power Stroke Mechanism. Bending PFs have been proposed to
move a circular coupler by pushing on it directly (Fig. 1C) (12,
27). Indeed, the existence of a PF power stroke has been
ex perimentally confir med with nonencircling c ouplers (13).
A nalysis of force transduction by a ring coupler with a model that
t akes into account current k nowledge of the PF bending pathway
suggests that the ef ficiency of a ring coupler can be very high, but
it depends strongly on ring diameter (22, 28). A narrow ring,
similar to Hill’s sleeve, constricts PF bending, and the resulting
force is 10 pN (22). Maximal ef ficiency (90%) is achieved by
a ring with diameter 35–40 nm, which is similar to the inner
diameter of a Dam1 ring (29, 30). Such a wide ring could bind
directly to the MT wall only when positioned asymmetrically, but
Dam1 rings appear to be coaxial with MTs. Further more, Dam1
rings assemble spontaneously around MTs, strongly suggesting
there is an interaction between the ring’s inner surface and the
MT wall (29, 30). We have hypothesized that such binding might
be accomplished by ‘‘linkage’’ bet ween Dam1 heterodecamers
and tubulin dimers (22), an idea that is supported by recent
str uctural studies of Dam1–MT complexes (29, 31, 32). There are
indications that the linking structure is flexible, but its exact
properties are unknown (30–32).
A n electrostatic mechanism has been also proposed for c ou-
pling a 32-nm ring to MTs (33) in which PFs bend, as in ref. 22.
This ring is proposed to interact weakly with the MT wall (12 k
per ring) over a 3.5-nm gap between these str uctures. Ring and
tubulin are also supposed to have opposite charges, so the ring
is attracted strongly to the splayed PFs. In this model, ring
movement is promoted by the instantaneous removal of terminal
dimers; the ring is always at the PF ends, where it transduces
12-pN force (Fig. 1D). MTs are described as nonhelical
(although MTs in vivo are helices), so the terminal dimers on all
PFs must dissociate synchronously. These restrictions appeared
to us ill-justified, so we sought a different approach.
A Combined Approach to Examine MT-Dependent Movements of
Various Ring Couplers. Tools are now available to build a versatile
model that addresses the mechanisms of Dam1 motility. For
example, thermal motions of the coupler (essential in a biased-
dif fusion mechanism) can be analyzed with a Hill-like coupler,
which assumes an ex plicitly defined energy relationship with
tubulin. It is reasonable, though, to change the dimensions of the
c oupler, as well as its number of tubulin-binding sites, to match
those of the Dam1 ring. The impact of a PF power stroke can best
be analyzed as in refs. 22 and 28, because this approach takes into
ac count the energetics of tubulin–tubulin interactions during PF
bending in a 13 3 MT (13 PFs arranged in a three-start helix).
Because the molecular details of Dam1–tubulin interactions are
not known, the model should explore the unknown parameters,
e.g., the number of subun its per ring, the number of bonds to the
MT wall, and the flexibility of linkers. Below, we define the
design of such a c oupler.
Mathematical Model
Model Assumptions. The coupler is a ring with a fixed inner
diameter of 33 nm. As in the above models, the coupler is solid
and does not deform.
1. Because Dam1 complexes bind MT walls, we assume the ring
has extensions that bridge the gap between the ring subunits
and tubulin dimers in the wall of a straight MT. Each subunit
has 4-nm-long linkers; for simplicity, we model them as rods
(Fig. 1E).
2. We assume a direct and specific interaction between tubulin
and the linker, characterized by negative potential energy d:
where k
and r
are parameters for the depth and width
of the potential well, respectively;
is the distance between
the MT-proximal end of the linker and the closest binding site
on the MT wall; for simplicity, the sites on the MT wall are
positioned in the middle of tubulin’s outer surface. The
interaction sites used for model calculations should not be
c onfused with real contacts between Dam1 heterodecamers
and tubulin dimers. The interacting proteins usually form
various bonds (electrostatic, hydrophobic, and others) be-
t ween multiple amino acid residues. Specific binding is char-
acterized by strong forces that act over a short range (34) and
are described appropriately by the above equation. The exact
parameters of the Dam1–tubulin interaction, k
and r
however, are not known. Cosedimentation of Dam1 c om-
plexes with taxol-stabilized MTs estimated a dissociation
c onstant at 0.2
M (29), which suggests an interaction free
energy of 15 k
T for each Dam1 subunit w ith the MT wall.
This value may overestimate Dam1-tubulin binding, e.g.,
because of the unk nown strength of interactions bet ween the
ring subunits. We will therefore analyze model solutions for
a range of Dam1-tubulin binding energies (parameter k
4. We assume that each tubulin dimer binds a single linker,
based on analogy with other MT-binding proteins, such as
k inesins (35). We did explore models based on two Dam1-
binding sites per tubulin dimer, but the results gave a poor
description of the Dam1 ring’s properties (below).
Mathematical Modeling and Data Analysis. A133 MT was modeled
as an ensemble of subunits c onnected by fixed ‘‘interaction
points’’ with explicitly defined energy relationships, based on our
original model (28) [Fig. 2A; see supporting information (SI)
Text and SI Table 1]. Here, however, a tubulin monomer is the
un it structure, which allows intradimer bending (4). We also take
ther mal fluctuations into ac count (SI Text). The position of the
ring coupler is defined by the three coordinates of its center
) and its Euler’s angles (
, and
) (Fig. 2B and SI Table
2). Linkers, which are rigid, lie in the plane of the ring. A detailed
description of the ring and its interaction with the MT is provided
in SI Text. The model c ontains no additional assumptions that
would bias the ring’s diffusion. Numerical calculations were
carried out with the Metropolis method for Monte-Carlo sim-
ulation (36). Errors are standard deviations.
www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0709524104 Efremov et al.
Page 2
Rigid Linkers Decrease the Number of Dam1–MT Connections, Thereby
Reducing the Affinity of This Coupler for the MT Wall.
First, we
c onsidered geometrical aspects of how a rigid 33-nm ring with
linkers would for m connections with the wall of a 133 MT.
There is a mismatch between the symmetry of such a MT and the
Dam1 ring, which is thought to have 16 subunits (31, 37). We
have examined the minimum energ y configurations for rings
with 13–25 subunits. When linkers are modeled as stiff 4-nm
rods, three or fewer linkers can bind dimers in the MT wall (Fig.
2C). Additional bonds are sterically prohibited by the inc om-
patibilities of a helical MT and a rigid planar ring. A small
number of c onnections is disadvantageous, because it impairs
the stabilit y of ring–MT attachment. If the energy of a single
Dam1-tubulin bond is 2 k
T, similar to the sleeve–MT bond
(20), the paraxial force that would detach the 13 subunit ring
f rom the MT end is only 4 pN. Stronger binding increases the
st ability of attachment, but it is still far f rom the maximum
possible, because of the limited number of ring–MT bonds. In
rings w ith more subun its, the number of possible ring–MT
c onnections is even smaller, so this conclusion is independent of
the number of ring subunits.
Rigid Dam1–Tubulin Linkers also Limit the Efficiency of Energy Trans-
As a MT begins to depoly merize, bending PFs push on
the c oupler. The total paraxial force on the ring can be esti-
mated, as in the model with noninteracting ring (22), but here the
force is applied to the linkers. As the PFs bend, all linkers are
af fected, regardless of whether they have for med a bond with the
MT wall. The geometrical differences between the noninteract-
ing ring (22) and the c oupler considered here are not important.
Indeed, a 33-nm ring with any number of nondeformable
4-nm-long linkers is mechanically equivalent to a narrow ring.
Therefore, the force experienced by a ring w ith rigid linkers is
virtually identical to that calculated for a rigid ring with a
diameter 26 nm. For example, when the free energy of a
dimer–linker bond is 2 k
T, the maximal force generated is
only 12 pN; for stronger binding, it is even smaller.
Based on these considerations, we conclude that couplers with
stif f linkers are far from optimal. To examine the ef fect of
flexible linkers, we modeled them as linear rods that could
stretch and compress along their length (parameter k
) and
bend away from the ring’s plane (parameter k
)(SI Text).
Model calculations show that 10-fold variations in a linker’s
longitudinal stiffness have little effect on model solutions (not
shown), so this parameter was fixed at k
0.13 N/m for all
our calculations. For a linker 4 1 1 nm, the corresponding
Young modulus is 5 10
, close to that of globular proteins
and MTs (38). The flexural rigidit y k
was varied from 5–2,000
T/Rad. As described above, very rigid linkers (2,000 k
Rad) are equivalent to a narrow rigid ring, which is a poor
transducer (22). When linkers are very soft ( 5 k
T/Rad), their
impact on the mechanics of the system is negligible; the ring
behaves like the 33-nm ring that does not interact with the MT
wall (22). Thus, this parameter was examined over a range of
20–200 k
T/ Rad. A 10-fold change in linker-bending stiffness in
this range does not appreciably af fect the ring’s properties, e.g.,
its diffusion, so all calculations were carried out for k
The Preferred Configuration of the Dam1 Ring Is Tilted Relative to the
MT Axis. When linkers are flexible, they can reach more binding
sites on the MT surface, so a 13-subunit ring can establish
c onnections with 13 dimers in the MT wall. However, rings with
more subun its can still bind only 13 sites, because the number of
bonds is limited by the number of PFs in the MT. To establish
more bonds, the linkers in a 33-nm Dam1 ring with 15–25
subun its would have to stretch 1.5-fold, an implausible sce-
nario. Because the free energ y of the ring–MT system is deter-
mined by the number of protein–protein bonds est ablished, not
the number of available linkers, rings with more subunits should
behave much like a ‘‘minimal’’ ring with only 13 subunits per
PF #1
tilting angle
theory; one bond per dimer
0.27 ± 0.07, N=586
0.25 ± 0.15, N=28
theory; two bonds per dimer
0.11 ± 0.07, N=282
tilting angle (Rad)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.70.6
# of ring
occupied site
binding site
Fig. 2. Ring with linkers on a 133 MT. (A) Interaction points between dimers (light,
tubulins; dark,
tubulins). Each dimer interacts at seven points; four are
lateral bonds (blue dots) with adjacent PFs (green), and three are longitudinal junctions, one within the dimer and two with dimers in the same PF (red dots).
The Dam1 linker binds to a tubulin monomer (yellow dot). Axis z coincides with the MT axis and points to its plus end; x and y axes lie in a perpendicular plane,
and x points to PF no. 13. (B) Angular variables of ring orientation. (C) MT wall-ring configurations as calculated in the model. Purple lines show ring backbones.
(D) Shown is a 13-fold ring, but similar models can be drawn for a range of ring symmetries, because the number of bonds is defined by the MT surface, which
has a lower radial symmetry than the ring. (E) Preferred ring orientations. A ring that is perfectly perpendicular to the MT axis would correspond to a central
dot, where
0. The ring is sensitive to the MT seam, as seen from the nonsymmetric distribution of data points relative to the orange line. (F) Experimental
tilting angles were estimated from electron micrographs of Dam1 rings decorating taxol-stabilized MTs (29, 30). The resulting distribution is statistically identical
(95% confidence, Mann–Whitney t test) to that calculated from our model, assuming a single binding site per dimer. Highly tilted rings in some EM images could
have resulted from specimen distortions that frequently accompany the negative staining procedure.
Efremov et al. PNAS
November 27, 2007
vol. 104
no. 48
Page 3
linkers. We have therefore carried out all calculations with rings
of 13 subunits, each of which has a flexible linker.
When such a ring encircles a MT, it orients to maximize the
number of Dam1–tubulin bonds, while minimizing their total
bending deformations, thus min imizing the total system’s en-
ergy. Calculations show there are several configurations with
similarly low energies, but in all of them, the ring is tilted relative
to the MT axis (Fig. 2D). Fig. 2E shows projections of the unit
vector normal to the ring (red arrow on Fig. 2B) onto the plane
perpendicular to the MT axis (dark circle on Fig. 2B), as viewed
f rom the MT-plus end. Each dot corresponds to a configuration
characterized by the ring’s tilting angle
(radii of the diagram’s
circles show sin
with 0.05 increments; scale on the left) relative
to positions of the dif ferent PFs (the numbered radial spokes).
The dots are distributed nonuniformly because of the MT’s
helicit y and asymmetry, which results from its seam. Most
f requently, the ring is oriented so its ax is forms a 15–16° angle
with PF no. 5.
We have compared the predicted distribution of
s with the
orient ations of Dam1 rings, as visualized by electron microscopy
(Fig. 2F). If there is only one Dam1-binding site per dimer
(assumption 4), the degrees of tilting of the theoretical ring
c orrespond well with those obtained by experiment. If the linkers
have one bond per monomer, the predicted average tilting angle
is 2.4-fold smaller than that observed. In general, more binding
sites per tubulin dimer should lead to a less pronounced tilting,
whereas rings that do not have specific binding sites on MT
surfaces should have no tilt.
A Weakly Bound Ring Will Follow a Shortening MT End via Biased
Diffusion. After eliminating unimportant parameters and unfa-
vorable designs, we analyzed the dif fusion of the resulting
c oupler on a MT. When ring–MT interaction is very weak ( k
2 k
T), ring diffusion is fast and depends little on bond
strength (Fig. 3A). For stronger binding (2–5 k
T), the depen-
dence is exponential, and a 1-k
T change reduces diffusion
10-fold. This result is almost insensitive to the exact value of
linker flexibilit y within the above-deter mined range. Experi-
ments suggest that Dam1 complexes diffuse on an MT surface
250-fold slower than in solution (30, 37). If these complexes are
the MT-encircling rings, this implies relatively weak Dam1-
tubulin binding, which matches the model c oupler with k
4 k
As a MT shortens, the random walk of such a ring becomes
biased (Fig. 3B; SI Mov ie 1). When the ring approaches the MT
end, its motion in this direction is interrupted, because the flared
PFs present a significant barrier; the energ y required to
straighten them, so the ring c ould slide over that area, is 12 k
per tubulin dimer. This energ y is so high the ring’s thermal
energy is not sufficient to pass this barrier. Although technically
the PFs push on the weakly bound ring when it comes in contact,
this aspect of their interactions is mechanically insignificant,
because of the low resist ance to ring sliding.
Weakly Bound Rings Are Energy-Efficient, but Have a Low Stability of
Attachment. We examined the force-transduction by a weakly
bound ring (k
1–6 k
T) by analyzing its motions under a
load that was distributed evenly among its subun its. In vivo,a
Dam1 ring is probably attached to a chromosome via other
proteins that transmit the load in roughly this fashion (Fig. 3C
Inset). Unlike Hill’s sleeve, this coupler slows with increasing
resistance (Fig. 3C). Even a small load retards the weakly bonded
ring significantly, but this ring stalls only when the opposing force
is 60–70 pN. Because the maximal force that is energetically
possible from a disassembling MT is 80 pN (22), the weakly
bound ring achieves up to 90% efficiency in energy transduction.
What happens when this ring stops moving toward the MT
minus end? The ring blocks separation of lateral tubulin–tubulin
bonds downstream from the ring, and ring motion in the opposite
direction is blocked by flared PFs. Such a ring is stalled on the
MT, but it w ill not det ach so long as there are some splayed PFs
upstream from the ring. However, as the longitudinal bonds
bet ween tubulin dimers in the flared PFs dissociate, the PFs
upstream from the ring will shorten and no longer protect the
ring from detachment. If the opposing force exceeds what is
required to break all ring–MT bonds, the ring will disconnect
f rom the MT end. Strikingly, the detachment force for a weakly
bound ring is 15 pN, significantly less than its stalling force in
the presence of flared PFs (Fig. 3D). This feature of a weakly
bound ring seems highly disadvant ageous for use as a coupler in
Strongly Bound Ring Couplers Move via a Forced Walk Mechanism. If
the energy of the linker–tubulin binding is large (k
T), the dynamic and c oupling properties of the ring change
dramatically. Such rings would show negligible diffusion
per sec), but bending PFs can exert enough force
to displace them in a robust and deter ministic manner. This
c ontrasts with the salt atory motions of a weakly bound coupler
(Fig. 4A), so we call such motilit y a ‘‘forced walk.’’ Ring
movements w ill be unidirectional, although they occur by
various paths, even when calculations are repeated for rings
w ith the same binding energy and initial c onditions (Fig. 4A).
The paths dif fer because of the variable pauses, which fre-
quently interrupt the ring’s motion and PFs splitting. The
pausing is caused by the stochastic behav ior of individual PFs
and the random transitions of the ring bet ween suc cessive
preferred positions on the MT lattice (SI Movie 2). As a PF
bends and pushes on the associated linker, the linker remains
at its binding site but bends away f rom ring’s plane, ac cumu-
lating energ y in linker strain. The linker’s transition to the
next-closest binding site occurs abruptly with an 8-nm step (SI
Mov ie 3). The center of the ring moves less regularly, because
the ring can form up to 13 linker-mediated bonds with the MT
(Fig. 4B). Interestingly, when the same ring is placed on a
nonhelical MT (130), the ring does not move under the
depoly merization force. MT helicity is sign ificant, because it
01234 5
, binding energy (k
opposing load (pN)
µ )
, binding energy (k
0 5 10 15
5 k
13 k
time (msec)
0 50 100 150 200
MT end
Fig. 3. Role of the ring-MT-binding energy. (A) Ring diffusion on the MT
surface is fast only for k
6 k
T. (B) Thermal motions of a weakly bound
ring (k
3 k
T) are biased by the shortening MT end (shown is the z
coordinate of the uppermost lateral bond between two adjacent PFs). (C)
Force-velocity curves for weak and strong binding. (D) Detachment force
grows for stronger linker-tubulin binding, but the stalling force gets smaller.
www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0709524104 Efremov et al.
Page 4
allows linkers to step asynchronously, thereby min imizing the
energ y barriers for ring transitions.
The number of bonds that can form between the MT and the
ring is independent of linker-binding strength. The detachment
force, however, increases with g rowing linker affinity (Fig. 3D).
Tension applied to the coupler provides a load that slows ring
movement (Figs. 3C and 4C). The dwell periods become longer,
and when ring–MT binding is very strong, the ring stalls even
under a small load (Fig. 3D). When k
13 k
T, the ring will
maint ain attachment, even when stalled at a blunt MT end,
thereby increasing the fidelit y of its MT-dependent motion.
Thus, strong ring–MT binding improves the coupler’s stability of
att achment but reduces the load it can carry.
Specifying the Ring’s Design. We have developed a versatile
molecular-mechan ical model of ring–MT coupling by combining
highlights from previous theoretical approaches; assumptions
about binding energetics, and mechanical forces that act bet ween
bending PFs and the ring. Dif ferent aspects of these interactions
were analyzed to narrow the range of important model param-
eters. This approach has identified two possible mechan isms for
movement for a Dam1-like ring, both of which differ sign ificantly
f rom the mechanism proposed by Hill and Kirschner (19, 20).
The two modes of movement and other ring characteristics have
been explained in terms of specific features of the coupler’s
design. For example, that Dam1 rings are sign ificantly wider than
MTs (29, 30) is important for maximizing force transduction
(22). The exact number of subun its in the ring is virtually
inc onsequential (when it is 13, the number of PFs in a MT), but
the number of bonds that can be formed between the ring and
the MT wall is critical. The latter is greatly influenced by the
flexibility of the binding structures. We have chosen linkers
whose flexibility is just enough to maximize the number of bonds
yet not limit the force transduction processes. The main model
c onclusions, however, are unchanged w ith a 10-fold change of
this parameter. Recent str uctural studies indicate that the core
of the ring, not just the linkers, may be flexible (31, 32). The
mechan ical properties of a rigid ring with flexible linkers should
be highly similar to those of a flexible ring with rigid linkers, but
this issue will require further work.
Strength of Ring–MT Binding. The parameter that is most crucial
for MT-dependent ring movement is the strength of linker
binding to the MT wall. We have analyzed couplers with a 1- to
T range of this energy, which encompasses the strengths of
t ypical protein–protein interactions as well as the various esti-
mates of Dam1–tubulin-binding energy. Some dat a support the
idea that Dam1–MT interactions are weak. The measured
dif fusion of the Dam1 c omplexes that were interpreted as rings
(37) suggests that Dam1–tubulin-binding energy is 4 k
T (Fig.
3A). The forces that detach Dam1-coated microbeads from
shorten ing MTs in vitro are 3 pN (14), implying even weaker
binding (2 k
T, Fig. 3D). Without knowledge of the pathway
for Dam1 oligomerization and MT binding, the Dam1–MT
dissociation constant determined biochemically (29) does not
define binding energy unambiguously and can be used only as an
upper estimate (15 k
T). However, the MT affinity of a mut ant
Dam1 complex w ith reduced ability to form rings is the same as
that of wild-type Dam1 (29, 32), suggesting that a large fraction
of the observed interaction corresponds to Dam1–MT binding.
We therefore think this energy is toward the upper end of the
range considered.
Biased-Diffusion Mode. When the binding is relatively weak ( 6
T), the ring dif fuses fast (1–10
per sec), and its diffusion
will be biased by MT shortening. The latter motion, however, is
produced by a mechanism that is dif ferent f rom Hill’s model, in
which the sleeve moves directionally only when MT is not fully
inserted. Ring motions are affected simply by the presence of the
flared PFs at the shortening MT end. Such a coupler, in
principle, can move under a large opposing load, but for loads
12 pN, its retention by the MT end depends entirely on the
presence of flared PFs. If the PFs should happen to shorten, the
ring would sw iftly be removed from the MT end, even by a small
load. If the Dam1-tubulin binding is 1–3 k
T, ther mal motions
would detach such rings from a ‘‘blunt’’ MT end almost every
time they approach it, even without a load. Most of the plus ends
of MT growing in vitro are blunt, although some have long PF
extensions (5, 6). These, however, are curved only gently com-
pared with the PFs on depoly merizing MTs (39) and are unlikely
to prevent detachment of 33-nm rings from growing MT tips, as
suggested in ref. 14. Thus, the MT attachment of the weakly
bound ring should be highly vulnerable to variations in the rate
and direction of MT length change. In vivo, moving chromo-
somes f requently pause and even reverse their direction. There-
fore, for this coupling to be biologically successful, there must be
some additional mechanism that ensures its attachment. For
example, the stability of Dam1 ring attachment might be aug-
mented by other kinetochore proteins and/or proteins that bind
MT plus ends (40). Such interactions are possible, but their
ef fects on ring motility are speculative.
Forced Walk. A similar c oupler with stronger MT binding provides
an attractive solution to the above problem. Such rings w ill
dif fuse by undetectable amounts under normal experimental
c onditions. They can, however, be forced to walk by the action
of PF power strokes. The persistent association of such a ring
with the MT wall just below the PF flare is a natural consequence
of its design and does not require additional assumptions. Rings
that bind very strongly (15 k
T) would maintain their associ-
ation with MT ends of any geometry, even under a large
opposing force (Fig. 3D). Such rings, however, move very slowly
with the shrinking MT end, and they will stall frequently (Fig.
4D), so very strong binding may not be optimal. Microbeads
c oated by Dam1 heterodecamers maintain attachment to MT
tips, even as the MT elongates (14), a behavior more consistent
time (sec)
)mn( ecnatsid delevart
0.4 1.0 1.6 2.2
0 pN
15 pN
30 pN
35 pN
n( ecnats
id de
time (msec)
0 500 1000 1500
0 100 200 300 400
ring's center
linker # 1
linker # 9
= 13 k
ir eht
µ )
, binding energy (k
0 5 10 15
10 kT
12 kT
14 kT
15 kT
time (msec)
Fig. 4. Forced walk of the ring. (A) With increasing ring-tubulin affinity, the
ring steps slower. The irregular features of ring forward motion are caused by
the stochasticity and asynchrony in PF splitting and walking of different
linkers. (B) The linkers step asynchronously (shown are the z coordinates of
their MT-associated ends) and in 8-nm steps (arrows point to some), whereas
the steps of the ring’s center are more variable in size. (C) With increasing load,
the duration of ring pauses increases, and the ring walks more slowly (k
T). (D) The rate of coupler’s movement with the depolymerizing MT end is
a blueprint for the strength of its affinity to the MT wall and thus for the
mechanism of its motion.
Efremov et al. PNAS
November 27, 2007
vol. 104
no. 48
Page 5
with weak Dam1–MT binding that per mits ring diffusion. How-
ever, these movements were seen in the absence of soluble
bead-f ree Dam1, and it remains to be determined whether such
c oupling is ring-based.
Our model defines an inverse relationship between the effi-
cienc y of force transduction and the stabilit y of c oupler attach-
ment, leav ing a relatively narrow window of ‘‘successful’’
ring–MT bond energies, i.e., those in which c oupler performance
is optimal by the postulated standards (Fig. 3D, shaded area). A
c ompromise bet ween reduced efficiency of force transduction
and increased strength of attachment appears important for the
c oupler in an organism like Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where a
k inetochore is st ably attached to only one MT (41, 42). We
therefore favor a tight-binding mechanism with k
T and consider it better suites for budding yeast than the one
based on biased diffusion. However, a choice between different
c oupler designs is impossible on strictly theoretical grounds. For
example, although the forces that oppose kinetochore motions
may be large in some organisms (43), in budding yeast, their size
has not been measured.
Experimental Approaches to Study the Mechanism of Dam1 Motility.
If the Dam1 ring is similar to our theoretical ring, our results
suggest that its mechanism of motility in vitro can be determined
by characterizing ring motion at a depolymerizing MT end. If the
ring moves by biased diffusion, the MT end serves only to ratchet
the ring’s random walk. Thus, the coupler’s speed will be
deter mined simply by the rate of MT depoly merization (Fig. 4D).
The same result is expected in an electrostatic model (33), as well
as in any other model in which the ring slides freely on the MT
surface (37). If the ring binds strongly, however, it will reduce the
rate of MT disassembly. A reduced rate of PF splitting has been
verified experimentally for the force-transducing couplers under
opposing tension (13, 44). Examination of the Dam1 ring’s
motilit y in the absence of a load, however, is lacking. Additional
infor mation will be available from an analysis of mutant Dam1
c omplexes with reduced MT binding (29). If strong ring–MT
binding is facilitated by linkers, complexes with reduced binding
linker should slow MT depolymerization less than wild type. If,
however, these linkers serve other purposes, e.g., if they facilit ate
the sliding (32, 37), the above mutant should retard MT disas-
sembly more than wild type. Ex perimental testing of these
predictions should help clarify the mechanism of Dam1 ring
motilit y.
We thank M. Molodtsov, N. Goudimchuk, and other members of the
McIntosh and At aullakhanov laboratories for help and assistance and
A. I. Vorobjev for support. We are also grateful to D. Dr ubin, G. Oster,
K. Bloom, J. Scholey, and D. Odde for discussions. This work was
supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM33787 (to J.R.M.)
and U.S. Civ ilian Research and Development Foundation Grant
CGP2006B#2863 (to F.I.A. and J.R.M.).
1. Desai A, Mitchison T (1997) Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13:83–117.
2. Nogales E (2001) Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Str uct 30:397–420.
3. Muller-Reichert T, Chretien D, Severin F, Hyman AA (1998) Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 95:3661–3666.
4. Wang HW, Nogales E (2005) Nature 435:911–915.
5. Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E, Milligan RA (1991) J Cell Biol 114:977–991.
6. Chretien D, Fuller SD, Karsenti E (1995) J Cell Biol 129:1311–1328.
7. VandenBeldt KJ, Barnard RM, Hergert PJ, Meng X, Maiato H, McEwen BF
(2006) Curr Biol 16:1217–1223.
8. O’Toole ET, McDonald KL, Ma¨ntler J, McIntosh JR, Hyman AA, Mu¨ller-
Reichert T (2003) J Cell Biol 163:451–456.
9. Grishchuk EL, McIntosh JR (2006) EMBO J 25:48884896.
10. Coue M, Lombillo VA, McIntosh JR (1991) J Cell Biol 112:1165–1175.
11. Lombillo VA, Stewart RJ, McIntosh JR (1995) Nature 373:161–164.
12. Koshland DE, Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW (1988) Nature 33:499–504.
13. Grishchuk EL, Molodtsov MI, Ataullakhanov FI, McIntosh JR (2005) Nature
14. Asbury CL, Gest aut DR, Powers AF, Franck AD, Dav is TN (2006) Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 103:9873–9878.
15. Tanaka K, Kitamura E, Kit amura Y, Tanaka TU (2007) J Cell Biol 178:269
16. Inoue S, Salmon ED (1995) Mol Biol Cell 6:1619–1640.
17. Gardner MK, Odde DJ (2006) Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:639647.
18. Mogilner A, Wollman R, Civelekoglu-Scholey G, Scholey J (2006) Trends Cell
Biol 16:88–96.
19. Hill T, Kirschner MW (1982) Int Rev Cytol 78:1–125.
20. Hill T (1985) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:44044408.
21. Joglekar AP, Hunt AJ (2002) Biophys J 83:42–58.
22. Molodtsov MI, Grishchuk EL, Efremov AK, McIntosh JR, Ataullakhanov FI
(2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4353–4358.
23. Peskin CS, Oster GF (1995) Biophys J 69:2268–2276.
24. Tao YC, Peskin CS (1995) Biophys J 75:1529–1540.
25. Saffarian S, Qian H, Collier I, Elson E, Goldberg G (2006) Phys Rev E
26. Mendez V, Fedotov S, Campos D, Horsthemke W (2007) Phys Rev E 75:011118.
27. Mitchison TJ (1988) Annu Rev Cell Biol 4:527–549.
28. Molodtsov MI, Ermakova EA, Shnol EE, Grishchuk EL, McIntosh JR,
Ataullakhanov FI (2005) Biophys J 88:3167–3179.
29. Westermann S, Avila-Sak ar A, Wang, H.-W., Niederstrasser H, Drubin DG,
Nogales E, Barnes G (2005) Mol Cell 17:277–290.
30. Miranda JL, De Wulf P, Sorger P, Harrison SC (2005) Nat Struct Mol Biol
31. Miranda JJ, King DS, Harrison SC (2007) Mol Biol Cell 18:2503–2510.
32. Wang HW, Ramey VH, Westermann S, Leschziner AE, Welburn JP, Nakajima
Y, Drubin DG, Barnes G, Nogales E (2007) Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:721–726.
33. Liu J, Onuchic JN (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18432–18437.
34. Jiang L, Gao Y, Mao F, Liu Z, Lai L (2002) Proteins 46:190–196.
35. Kikkawa M, Ishikawa T, Wakabayashi T, Hirokawa N (1995) Nature 376:274–277.
36. Heermann DW (1990) Computer Simulation Methods in Theoretical Physics
(Springer, New York).
37. Westermann S, Wang HW, Avila-Sak ar A, Drubin DG, Nogales E, Barnes G
(2006) Nature 440:565–569.
38. Munson KM, Mulugeta PG, Donhauser ZJ (2007) J Phys Chem B 111:5053–
39. Chretien D, Jainosi I, Taveau JC, Flyvbjerg H (1999) Cell Struct Funct
40. Dav is TN, Wordeman L (2007) Trends Cell Biol 17:377–382.
41. Winey M, Mamay CL, O’Toole ET, Mastronarde DN, Giddings TH, Jr,
McDonald KL, McIntosh JR (1995) J Cell Biol 129:1601–1615.
42. Pearson CG, Yeh E, Gardner M, Odde D, Salmon ED, Bloom K (2004) Curr
Biol 14:1962–1967.
43. Nicklas RB (1983) J Cell Biol 97:542–548.
44. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Gonen T, Dav is TN, Asbury CL (2007)
Nat Cell Biol 9:832–837.
www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0709524104 Efremov et al.
Page 6
  • Source
    • "In later versions of these models, the splaying tendency of GDP-tubulin protofilaments to curve in this manner provides a " power stroke " that pulls on centromeric chromatin through kinetochore fibrils [11] . Other models utilize ring-like coupling kinetochore Dam1/DASH complexes for this coupling [12]. Ndc80 is another kinetochore-based molecule that has been implicated in poleward force generation [1] . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Recent experiments revealing nanoscale electrostatic force generation at kinetochores for chromosome motions have prompted models for interactions between positively charged molecules in kinetochores and negative charge at and near the plus ends of microtubules. A clear picture of how kinetochores and centrosomes establish and maintain a dynamic coupling to microtubules for force generation during the complex motions of mitosis remains elusive. The molecular cell biology paradigm requires that specific molecules, or molecular geometries, for polar force generation be identified. While progress has been made regarding explanations of kinetochore-based chromosome motility, molecular machinery for chromosome poleward movements at centrosomes has yet to be identified. The present work concerns polar generation of poleward force in terms of experimentally known electric charge distributions at microtubule minus ends and centrosomes interacting over nanometer distances.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014 · Cell Division
  • Source
    • "0,c ,1) and simulate the model for various values of c within this range [44]. Unless otherwise specified, all of our data presented here is obtained using a value of c ,0.4 [44,57]. Unconstrained kMT dynamical parameters during anaphase and G1 are presented inTable 1 and inTable S3 in File S1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: In the budding yeast, centromeres stay clustered near the spindle pole bodies (SPBs) through most of the cell cycle. This SPB-centromere proximity requires microtubules and functional kinetochores, which are protein complexes formed on the centromeres and capable of binding microtubules. The clustering is suggested by earlier studies to depend also on protein-protein interactions between SPB and kinetochore components. Previously it has been shown that the absence of non-essential kinetochore proteins of the Ctf19 complex weakens kinetochore-microtubule interaction, but whether this compromised interaction affects centromere/kinetochore positioning inside the nucleus is unknown. We found that in G1 and in late anaphase, SPB-centromere proximity was disturbed in mutant cells lacking Ctf19 complex members,Chl4p and/or Ctf19p, whose centromeres lay further away from their SPBs than those of the wild-type cells. We unequivocally show that the SPB-centromere proximity and distances are not dependent on physical interactions between SPB and kinetochore components, but involve microtubule-dependent forces only. Further insight on the positional difference between wild-type and mutant kinetochores was gained by generating computational models governed by (1) independently regulated, but constant kinetochore microtubule (kMT) dynamics, (2) poleward tension on kinetochore and the antagonistic polar ejection force and (3) length and force dependent kMT dynamics. Numerical data obtained from the third model concurs with experimental results and suggests that the absence of Chl4p and/or Ctf19p increases the penetration depth of a growing kMT inside the kinetochore and increases the rescue frequency of a depolymerizing kMT. Both the processes result in increased distance between SPB and centromere.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · PLoS ONE
  • Source
    • "omplexes from budding yeast have also been shown to synergize in forming load - bearing attachments to depolymerizing microtubules ( Lampert et al . , 2010 ; Tien et al . , 2010 ) . The models previously described for the Ndc80 and Dam1 complexes were under the implicit assumption that each complex interacts with the straight microtubule lattice ( Efremov et al . , 2007 ; Hill , 1985 ) . Here , we demonstrated that the human Ska1 complex autonomously tracks with depolymerizing micro - tubules . We propose that the Ska1 complex remains associ - ated with depolymerizing microtubules by not only associating with and diffusing along the straight microtubule lattice , but also by interacting with the curved"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To ensure equal chromosome segregation during mitosis, the macromolecular kinetochore must remain attached to depolymerizing microtubules, which drive chromosome movements. How kinetochores associate with depolymerizing microtubules, which undergo dramatic structural changes forming curved protofilaments, has yet to be defined in vertebrates. Here, we demonstrate that the conserved kinetochore-localized Ska1 complex tracks with depolymerizing microtubule ends and associates with both the microtubule lattice and curved protofilaments. In contrast, the Ndc80 complex, a central player in the kinetochore-microtubule interface, binds only to the straight microtubule lattice and lacks tracking activity. We demonstrate that the Ska1 complex imparts its tracking capability to the Ndc80 complex. Finally, we present a structure of the Ska1 microtubule-binding domain that reveals its interaction with microtubules and its regulation by Aurora B. This work defines an integrated kinetochore-microtubule interface formed by the Ska1 and Ndc80 complexes that associates with depolymerizing microtubules, potentially by interacting with curved microtubule protofilaments.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2012 · Developmental Cell
Show more