Assessing Relationship Quality in Mandated Community Treatment: Blending Care With Control

Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-7083, USA.
Psychological Assessment (Impact Factor: 2.99). 01/2008; 19(4):397-410. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
Source: PubMed


Traditional measures of the therapeutic alliance do not capture the dual roles inherent in relationships with involuntary clients. Providers not only care for, but also have control over, involuntary clients. In 2 studies of probationers mandated to psychiatric treatment (n=90; n=322), the authors developed and validated the revised Dual-Role Relationships Inventory (DRI-R). The authors found that (a) relationship quality in mandated treatment involves caring and fairness, trust, and an authoritative (not authoritarian) style, (b) the DRI-R assesses these domains of relationship quality, is internally consistent, and relates in a theoretically coherent pattern with ratings of within-session behavior and with measures of the therapeutic alliance, relationship satisfaction, symptoms, and treatment motivation, and (c) the quality of dual-role relationships predicts future compliance with the rules, as assessed by probation violations and revocation. The DRI-R covaries with multiple domains more strongly than a leading measure of the therapeutic alliance, suggesting that it better captures the nature and effect of relationship quality in mandated treatment.

Download full-text


Available from: Devon L L Polaschek
  • Source
    • "These placements may exacerbate a traumatic or stress response because of the stress related to prolonged confinement (Ford et al., 2007). Thus, approaches to enforcement based on problem solving, incentivizing behavior, counseling , and persuasion may be more helpful for these youths than confrontation and negative pressure (Skeem, Louden, Polaschek, & Camp, 2007; Vidal & Skeem, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines how probation officers' (POs) knowledge of juveniles' trauma influences probation practices. The study was conducted with POs who responded to a Web-based survey (n = 308). The POs were directed to randomly select one juvenile from their caseload and to complete the Probation Practices Assessment Survey to assess their knowledge of the youth's lifetime trauma and past-year stressful life experience and their practice approaches. Nineteen percent of youths were reported as having had lifetime exposure to at least one type of trauma (for example, physical assault, sexual assault, witness violent death). The most common traumatic experience was sexual assault, with 11% of POs reporting this experience among the study youths. Structural equation modeling results indicated that POs' knowledge of cumulative exposure to trauma is associated with treatment-oriented probation and counseling approaches. Results of this study signal the importance of careful assessments of exposure to trauma and stressful life events among youths on probation. The use of specialized trauma-informed assessment strategies also are recommended to increase the sensitivity of juvenile justice programs to trauma.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2012 · Social work research
  • Source
    • "Data were collected by Skeem et al. (2007), who describe the basic study method in detail. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As the correctional population continues to increase, probation agencies struggle to adequately supervise offenders with unique needs, including those with mental disorder. Although more than 100 U.S. probation agencies have implemented specialty mental health case-loads, little is known about their practices. Based on detailed observations of 83 audio-taped meetings, we examined interactions between probationers and officers in a prototypic specialty agency, focusing on the extent to which practices comport with evidence-based risk reduction principles. We found that specialty officers (a) more frequently discussed probationers' general mental health than any individual criminogenic need, (b) chiefly questioned, directed, affirmed, and supported (rather than confronted) probationers, and (c) relied more heavily on neutral strategies and positive pressures (e.g., inducements) rather than negative pressures (e.g., threats of incarceration) to monitor and enforce compliance. Implications for "what works" to promote community integration for probationers with mental disorder are discussed.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2012 · Law and Human Behavior
    • "Specialized officers utilized the traditional approach toward supervision of monitoring and enforcement less and functioned more like case managers. In this capacity, the officers coordinated service delivery, advocated for social services and assisted offenders in achieving both their treatment and supervision goals (Skeem et al., 2007). Within the concept of mandated treatment, the relationship of the officer with the offender had a significant impact on the offender's success under supervision, and specialized officers who obtained compliance by using both therapeutic and social controls were more successful than those who took the traditional law enforcement approach of rule enforcement with little to no structured support. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Estimates of mental health disorders among youth involved with the juvenile justice system range from 50% to 75%, while general population prevalence is 9% to 20%. The system is ill-equipped to supervise these juveniles, and many are funneled deeper into the system due to noncompliance and often preventable problems. The authors used a retrospective design and evaluated a pre-adjudication diversion initiative utilizing specialized juvenile probation officers in Texas. Use of specialized supervision was effective at diverting youth with mental health needs from adjudication and increased participation and access to services by juveniles with such needs. Youth who received specialized supervision were significantly less likely to be adjudicated for the initial offense than those in a comparison group who received traditional supervision.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2012 · Criminal Justice and Behavior
Show more