SENSE factors for reliable cortical thickness measurement

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 03/2008; 40(1):187-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.013
Source: PubMed


The purposes of this study were to examine the effect of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) factors on cortical thickness measurements and to determine which SENSE factor to use to reliably measure cortical thickness in 3.0 T and 1.5 T T1-weighted MRI images. The 3D T1-TFE images were acquired from 11 healthy volunteers with 6 different SENSE acceleration factors from 1.0 (without SENSE acceleration) to 4.0 on a 1.5 T scanner, and 9 different SENSE factors from 1.0 to 6.0, plus a second-day 1.0 acquisition on a 3.0 T scanner. Cortical thickness was calculated for the entire cortical surface that was further subdivided into 33 regions. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed that the main effect of SENSE factors (F=12.485, df=7, p=0.006) was a significant underestimation of cortical thickness at SENSE 5.0 (p=0.022) and 6.0 (p=0.011) at 3.0 T and at SENSE 4.0 (p<0.000) at 1.5 T. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that thickness measurements at the insula, superior temporal sulcus, the medial part of the superior frontal lobe, and cingulate cortex are highly affected by SENSE factors. SENSE factors affect thickness estimation more significantly at 1.5 T and thus 1.5 T imaging provides less reliable estimates using SENSE techniques. Faster imaging can be done without too much loss of reliability using a high SENSE factor, such as 3.0, at 3.0 T with acquisition time being inversely proportional to the SENSE factor.

Download full-text


Available from: Hae-Jeong Park, Jan 09, 2015
  • Source
    • "In light of the conservative acceleration factor used, this result is in agreement with another study of cortical thickness reliability and acceleration employing sensitivity encoding (SENSE)-based (Pruessmann et al., 1999) techniques (Park et al., 2008); the present study extends these results to cortical and subcortical volumetric measures for GRAPPA-based acceleration. Scanning time is often a constraint in structural neuroimaging studies, either in practical terms for research subjects or financially for investigators. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have contributed greatly to the study of neurodegenerative processes, psychiatric disorders, and normal human development, but the effect of such improvements on the reliability of downstream morphometric measures has not been extensively studied. We examined how MRI-derived neurostructural measures are affected by three technological advancements: parallel acceleration, increased spatial resolution, and the use of a high bandwidth multiecho sequence. Test-retest data were collected from 11 healthy participants during 2 imaging sessions occurring approximately 2 weeks apart. We acquired 4 T1-weighted MP-RAGE sequences during each session: a non-accelerated anisotropic sequence (MPR), a non-accelerated isotropic sequence (ISO), an accelerated isotropic sequence (ISH), and an accelerated isotropic high bandwidth multiecho sequence (MEM). Cortical thickness and volumetric measures were computed for each sequence to assess test-retest reliability and measurement bias. Reliability was extremely high for most measures and similar across imaging parameters. Significant measurement bias was observed, however, between MPR and all isotropic sequences for all cortical regions and some subcortical structures. These results suggest that these improvements in MRI acquisition technology do not compromise data reproducibility, but that consistency should be maintained in choosing imaging parameters for structural MRI studies.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2008 · NeuroImage
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To explore the morphological aspects of the functional reorganization of the blind's visual cortex, we analyzed the regional cortical thickness and cortical surface area in the congenitally blind subjects (CB) compared to the late-onset blind (LB) and sighted controls (SC). Cortical thickness was calculated from high-resolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance images of 21 young CB (blind from birth, mean age=27.1 yr), 12 LB, and 35 young SC. Analysis of covariance of cortical layer thickness with global thickness, age, and gender as covariates was done node-by-node on the entire cortical surface. Further analysis of mean thickness and surface area was performed for 33 automatically parceled cortical regions. Voxel-based morphometry was also conducted to compare results with cortical thickness and surface area. We found increased cortical thickness in the regions involved in vision and eye movement, such as the pericalcarine sulcus, cingulate cortex, and right frontal eye field, but cortical thinning in the left somatosensory cortex and right auditory cortex of CB compared to SC. CB had significantly reduced surface extent in the primary and associated visual areas, which explains volumetric atrophies in the visual cortex of CB despite increased cortical thickness. Conversely, LB tended to have cortical thinning in the primary visual cortex with a slight or no significant reduction in the surface extent. These morphological alterations in CB may indicate cortical reorganization at the visual cortex in connection with other sensory cortices.
    No preview · Article · May 2009 · NeuroImage
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human precentral and postcentral cortical areas interact to generate sensorimotor functions. Recent imaging work suggests that pre- and postcentral cortical thicknesses of an individual vary over time-scales of years and decades due to aging, disease, and other factors. In contrast, there is little understanding of how thicknesses of these areas vary in an individual over time-scales of minutes and weeks. This study used longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computational morphometry approaches in 5 healthy subjects to assess how mean thicknesses, and intra- and interhemispheric relationships in mean thicknesses, of these areas vary in an individual subject over minutes and weeks. Within each individual, absolute differences in thicknesses over these times were small and similar in the precentral (mean = 0.02-0.04 mm) and postcentral (mean = 0.03-0.05 mm) areas. Each individual also had a consistent intrahemispheric disparity and interhemispheric asymmetrical or symmetrical relationship in thicknesses of these areas over these times. The results provide new understanding of within-individual cortical thickness variability in these areas and raise the possibility that longitudinal thickness profiling can provide a baseline definition of short time-scale thickness variability that can be used to detect acute and subacute changes in pre- and postcentral thicknesses at an individual subject level.
    Preview · Article · Oct 2009 · Cerebral Cortex
Show more