Article

Recognition of facial emotions among maltreated children with high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder

Department of Psychology, University of California, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Child Abuse & Neglect (Impact Factor: 2.47). 02/2008; 32(1):139-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to examine processing of facial emotions in a sample of maltreated children showing high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Maltreatment during childhood has been associated independently with both atypical processing of emotion and the development of PTSD. However, research has provided little evidence indicating how high rates of PTSD might relate to maltreated children's processing of emotions.
Participants' reaction time and labeling of emotions were measured using a morphed facial emotion identification task. Participants included a diverse sample of maltreated children with and without PTSD and controls ranging in age from 8 to 15 years. Maltreated children had been removed from their homes and placed in state custody following experiences of maltreatment. Diagnoses of PTSD and other disorders were determined through combination of parent, child, and teacher reports.
Maltreated children displayed faster reaction times than controls when labeling emotional facial expressions, and this result was most pronounced for fearful faces. Relative to children who were not maltreated, maltreated children both with and without PTSD showed enhanced response times when identifying fearful faces. There was no group difference in labeling of emotions when identifying different facial emotions.
Maltreated children show heightened ability to identify fearful faces, evidenced by faster reaction times relative to controls. This association between maltreatment and atypical processing of emotion is independent of PTSD diagnosis.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Amanda E Guyer
    • "The overarching premise of these approaches is that individuals with varying social class develop different styles of cognition as a reaction to their sociocultural contexts. Most notably, lower-class individuals are shown to be better at social-cognitive tasks involving contextual information than higher-class individuals since individuals with low social class are encouraged to be sensitive to social contexts (e.g., other individuals,Kraus, Côté, & Keltner, 2010;Masten et al., 2008). Building on this literature, the present research investigated social class differences in response inhibition. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An emerging literature suggests that lower-class individuals value ‘adjusting’ and ‘fitting-in’ whereas higher-class individuals emphasize ‘personal control’ and ‘influencing.’ Thus, we hypothesized that individuals with low subjective social class (i.e., those who think that their rank in the social hierarchy is low) would show enhanced performances in a response-inhibition task, compared to individuals with high subjective social class (i.e., those who think that their social rank is high). Supporting this prediction, Study 1 found that one's perception of their social class was negatively associated with inhibition (i.e., lower class → better inhibition). However, subjective social class was not associated with working memory capacity. This suggests that the predicted effect of lower class is inhibition specific. Furthermore, Study 2 established the critical role of subjective social class in this process by manipulating participants' subjective social class. Study 2 also showed that individual differences in inhibitory tendency mediated the corresponding differences in response inhibition. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that perceived lower-class is associated with enhanced performance in response inhibition.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2016 · Personality and Individual Differences
  • Source
    • "Child maltreatment has been empirically connected to the experience of more negative emotions, such as fear, anger, and distress (Paivio & Laurent, 2001; Pollak et al., 1998), as well as many adult psychiatric diagnoses in which negative emotion plays a prominent role, such as depression (Hill, 2006; Wise, Zierler, Krieger, & Harlow, 2001), anxiety (MacMillan et al., 2001), and posttraumatic stress disorder (Widom, 1999). Along with heightened levels of negative emotion, early maltreatment has also been shown to foster hypersensitivity to negative emotions (Curtis & Cicchetti, 2013; Luke & Banerjee, 2013; Masten et al., 2008; Pollak, Cicchetti, Hornung, & Reed, 2000; Romens & Pollak, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined the link between experiencing multiple types of child maltreatment and intentions to control emotion during charged discussions with intimate partners in adulthood, and whether the link is mediated by intensity of negative emotions. Using video recall, 97 couples rated their levels of emotions and intentions to control emotion during charged discussions with partners. Number of types of child maltreatment reported was linked with effort to control emotion, and the relationship was partially mediated by intensity of participants’ feelings of hostility. For men, the link was also partially mediated by self-reported sadness and anxiety. Findings underscore the importance of attending to abuse survivors’ experiences of and attempts to manage intense emotions in treatment, particularly in couples therapy.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma
  • Source
    • "For example, Kimonis , Frick, Cauffman, Goldweber, and Skeem (2012) found that male juvenile offenders with secondary-CU traits were more responsive to images involving others' emotional distress than were youth with primary-CU traits; similarly, Sink and Kerig (2011) found that youth with secondary-CU traits were more accurate than those with primary CU in recognizing selfconscious emotions such as disgust. The alternative construction that acquired CU arises as a function of trauma, however, suggests the need to attend to the parallel program of research investigating emotion recognition among traumatized youth, which indicates a heightened reactivity to negative emotions displayed by others (Leist & Dadds, 2009; Masten et al., 2008; Pollak, 2008). Therefore, further research is needed to understand emotion processing among youth who are simultaneously high in CU as well as trauma exposure. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study tested theories regarding differences in emotion processing among youth characterized by primary versus acquired callous-unemotional (CU) traits in a sample of 417 detained adolescents (306 boys, 111 girls). Mixture modeling identified 2 groups of youth high in CU, but with different levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms consistent with theoretical conceptualizations of acquired CU as being linked to trauma. Differences between the 2 groups of youth were investigated regarding 3 dimensions of emotion processing: emotion regulation, numbing, and recognition. Compared to youth classified in the primary group, youth classified as acquired CU demonstrated greater difficulty with lack of clarity (OR = 0.53), and nonacceptance of emotions, (OR = 0.57), general numbing of emotions (OR = 0.87), and recognition of disgust (OR = 0.18). Differences in emotion processing reported by youth in the 2 groups are consistent with theories regarding acquired callousness as related to emotional detachment in the aftermath of posttraumatic distress. The results of the current study have implications for the classification of primary and acquired CU, as well as the clinical treatment of youth with these characteristics.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · Journal of Traumatic Stress
Show more