Diphtheria-Like Illnesses Due to C. ulcerans • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • 395
M A J O R A R T I C L E
Investigations of 2 Cases of Diphtheria-Like Illness
Due to Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans
Tejpratap S. P. Tiwari,1Anne Golaz,1Diana T. Yu,3Kristen R. Ehresmann,4Timothy F. Jones,5Hal E. Hill,6
Pamela K. Cassiday,1Lucia C. Pawloski,1John S. Moran,1Tanja Popovic,2and Melinda Wharton1
1Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, and
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;
Epidemiology Prevention and Control, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul; and
Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, and
2Office of the Director, Centers for Disease
5Communicable and Environmental Disease Services,
3Thurston County Public Health and Social Services, Olympia, Washington;
6Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, Tennessee
by toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans. A fatal case occurred in a 75-year-old male Washington resident who was
treated with clindamycin but did not receive equine diphtheria antitoxin. A second, nonfatal case occurred in a
66-year-old female Tennessee resident who received erythromycin and diphtheria antitoxin.
Both case patients and close human and animal contacts were investigated by their respective state
C. ulcerans isolated from the patient who died was resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin. For
both isolates, conventional polymerase chain reaction results were positive for A and B subunits of diphtheria
toxin gene tox, and modified Elek tests confirmed toxin production. Thesourceofinfectionremainedundetermined
for both cases. Neither patient was up-to-date with diphtheria toxoid vaccination.
These case reports highlight the importance of early treatment with diphtheria antitoxin, the
selection of effective antimicrobial agents, and prevention through up-to-date vaccination.
We present 2 case reports in the United States and investigations of diphtheria-like illness caused
Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans was first isolated
from thethroat ofapatientwithrespiratorydiphtheria–
like illness in 1926 . Toxigenic strains of C. ulcerans
produce a diphtheria toxin that is similar to that pro-
duced by toxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphth-
eriae [2, 3]. Diphtheria toxin contributes to the for-
mation of a pseudomembrane that characterizes
respiratory diphtheria and may cause cardiac and neu-
rologic sequelae. C. ulcerans also produces a dermo-
necrotic toxin that is similar to that produced by Cor-
eynbacterium pseudotuberculosis .
C. ulcerans is a commensal in animals and has been
isolated from a wide host of domestic and wild animals
(table 1) [4–18]. These animals may serve as reservoirs
for human infection. C. ulcerans causesmastitisincattle
Received 19 June 2007; accepted 24 September 2007; electronically published
20 December 2007.
Reprints or correspondence: Dr. Tejpratap Tiwari, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, NCIRD/DBD/MVPD Branch, Mailstop C-25, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE,
Atlanta, GA 30333 (email@example.com).
Clinical Infectious Diseases2008;46:395–401
? 2007 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
and goats. Handling of infected dairy animals and con-
sumption of contaminated milk have been associated
with respiratory diphtheria–like disease caused by C.
ulcerans . C. ulcerans is also reported to cause cu-
taneous lesions in humans [20, 21].
The epidemiology of human infections caused by C.
ulcerans is not well known. As shown in table 2, re-
spiratory diphtheria–like illnesses caused by toxigenic
strains of C. ulcerans are increasingly reported from
developed countries [3–5, 22–41]. C. ulcerans ac-
counted for 21 (58%) of 36 human toxin-producing
isolates of Corynebacterium species in the United King-
dom from 1997 through 2002 ,3 (33%) of9isolates
in Canada from 1999 through 2003 , and 1 (33%)
of 3 isolates in Italy from 1990 through 2001 .
In the United States, 5 confirmed or probable cases
of respiratory diphtheria caused by C. diphtheriae (in-
cluding 1 imported fatal case) were reported during the
period 1999–2005. During the same period, theCenters
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) received
reports of 2 cases (1 fatal) of diphtheria-like illness
caused by C. ulcerans; prior to 1999, the last reported
case of diphtheria-like illness caused by C. ulcerans in
the United States occurred in 1996 . We report the
by guest on November 14, 2015
396 • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • Tiwari et al.
Table 1.Reported animal sources of toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans.
Reference YearCountryAnimal sourceClinical presentation
Richardson ground squirrels
Labial lesion, rhinorrhea
Lung tissue, intestines (postmortem)
Chronic nasal discharge
Pneumonia, lung abscess, cervical
abscess, bite wounds
1967 United KingdomDairy herds
epidemiologic investigations of these 2 cases of respiratory
diphtheria–like illnesses caused by C. ulcerans in Washington
The Washington State Department of Health and the Tennessee
Department of Health conducted epidemiologic investigations
of patients A and B. The investigations included reviewingboth
patients’ medical records, identifying close household contacts,
obtaining nasopharyngeal swab specimens from contacts, of-
fering postexposure prophylaxis with penicillin or erythro-
mycin, and administering an age-appropriate diphtheriatoxoid
vaccine to those who were not current with vaccination. Per-
sonnel from the Minnesota Department of Health interviewed
family members and investigated cattle at the Minnesota dairy
farm visited by patient A. Oral and rectal swab specimens were
obtained from animal contacts of both patients.
Patient A (Washington).
Hispanic man presented to an emergency department with a
3-day history of sore throat with difficulty in swallowing and
fever. The result of a rapid streptococcal test of a throat swab
specimen was negative. The patient was prescribed erythro-
mycin and sent home; the patient reported allergies to ceph-
alosporins and penicillin. He returned to his primary care phy-
sician the next day because of persisting sore throat and
worsening difficulty swallowing and breathing, and he was hos-
pitalized. On examination, the patient’s oral temperature was
38.3?C, and he had copious nasopharyngeal secretions. Direct
laryngoscopic examination revealed ulceration, with yellowish
In 1999, a 75-year-old white non-
exudate on the posterior pharynx. His initial WBC count was
1500 cells/mm3, with 66% polymorphonuclear cells, 5% band
cells, and 23% lymphocytes. During the first 3 days of hospi-
talization, the patient received intravenous clindamycin.Onthe
fourth day after hospital admission, the drug was replaced with
metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin, after the local
laboratory reported that culture of throat specimens grew 4+
diphtheroids that did not show typical C. diphtheriae mor-
phology by methylene blue staining and after diphtheria was
excluded as a likely diagnosis. Although the patient had signs
of a diphtheria-like illness, diphtheria antitoxin was not re-
covered. The patient developed dyspnea and underwent intu-
bation after an episode of aspiration. His condition rapidly
deteriorated, with development of pulmonary edema and evi-
dence of cardiogenic shock. Despite nasotracheal intubation
and mechanical ventilation, the patient died on the following
The patient had a significant history of Felty syndrome and
had been receiving daily 10-mg doses of oral methylpredni-
solone for the preceding 11 years. He had no travel history
outside of the United States, but he had spent 2–3 days visiting
friends on a farm in Minnesota ∼10 days prior to the onset of
hisillness. The patienthadnohistoryofinteractingwithanyone
who had recently traveled abroad or any person with skin ul-
cers. He had reportedly received a booster tetanus and diph-
theria vaccination 112 years prior to this illness.
Postmortem examination demonstrated a thick, gray
membrane that extended from the throat into the bronchial
tree and into the esophagus. The membrane had sloughed in
some areas, and there was narrowing of the airways due to
edema. No significant inflammatory changes were noted in the
by guest on November 14, 2015
Diphtheria-Like Illnesses Due to C. ulcerans • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • 397
Table 2.Published case reports of diphtheria-like illness caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans, 1970–2006.
residenceSex Age Hospitalized
Probably a cat
myocardium or in peripheral nerves. Postmortem specimens
from the larynx, trachea, and lungs were obtained for culture
and conventional PCR testing .
Culture of throat specimens obtained during the laryngo-
scopic examination revealed heavy growth of diphtheroids(4+)
on day 3 of hospitalization. The isolates were forwarded to the
Washington State Department of Health Public Health Labo-
ratory (Shoreline, WA), where the agent was identified as C.
ulcerans 4 days after the patient died. The agent was resistant
to clindamycin and erythromycin but susceptible to penicillin,
sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, and cephalospo-
rins. The CDC confirmed these results and demonstrated the
presence of toxigenic C. ulcerans by the modified Elek test 
and by positive conventional PCR  for subunit A and sub-
unit B of the diphtheria toxin gene (tox). In addition, the
conventional PCR results were positive for the tox gene in
postmortem formalin-fixed tissue specimens from the larynx
and trachea but were negative in lung tissue specimens. Real-
time PCR  performed on this isolate revealed atypical am-
plification of subunit A and no amplification of subunit B of
the tox gene.
Patient B (Tennessee).
In 2005, a 66-year-old white, non-
Hispanic woman complained of fatigue, sore throat, and dif-
ficulty in swallowing. Her symptoms worsened, and on the
following afternoon, she presented to the emergency depart-
ment of a local hospital. She was afebrile (oral temperature,
37.1?C) and had sinus tachycardia, with a heart rate of 105
beats per min. A throat examination revealed an erythematous
palate and edematous pharynx and uvula, with a covering ex-
udate that extended into the nasopharynx. CT of the neck
confirmed marked edema of the uvula and soft palate and
demonstrated near obliteration of the nasopharynx but did not
suggest epiglotitis or a retropharyngeal abscess. The result of a
rapid streptococcal test was negative.
by guest on November 14, 2015
398 • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • Tiwari et al.
Table 3.Results of contact investigations of case patients A and B.
Case patient A
Case patient B
No. of household contacts
Result of culture of throat swab specimens obtained from contacts
(no. of persons with the result/no. of persons tested)
Postexposure antimicrobial prophylaxis
Negative (6/6)Negative (6/6)
Intramuscular benzathine penicillin
Tetanus and diphtheria vaccine
given to all
Tetanus and diphtheria vaccine
given to all
Horses (4), dogs (2)
Animal contacts (no. of patients with the contact)
Results of culture of swab specimens obtained from animal contacts
Minnesota farm investigation
Farm household contacts
Results of culture of nasal and throat swab specimens obtained
… Negative for C. ulcerans
Tetanus and diphtheria vaccine
given to 5 adults
Negative for C. ulcerans
Results of culture of swab specimens obtained from dairy animals
The patient was hospitalized and initially received methyl-
prednisolone, ceftriaxone, and clindamycin and, later, eryth-
romycin and ampicillin/sulbactam. At hospital admission, her
WBC count was 12,600 cells/mm3, with 86% granulocytes and
7% lymphocytes. During the night, the patient developed re-
spiratory difficulty, with oxygen desaturation to 68%. There
was no clinical evidence of neurological abnormality or cardiac
abnormality by electrocardiogram. By the following morning,
the palatine erythema and edema had worsened, her voice be-
came more muffled, and her breathing became noisy. The pa-
tient underwent emergency intubation and taken to the op-
erating room, where tracheostomy was performed. During
tracheostomy, an extensive, thick, yellowish, fibrinous, slough-
ing membrane was noted to cover the lower half of the uvula,
extensively coating the posterior aspect of the soft palate and
the entire nasopharynx and extending into the trachea. The
membrane measured about5?3
by peeling and suctioning, leaving behind an intact mucosa
with mild, punctate bleeding. Directlaryngoscopicexamination
demonstrated a normal hypopharynx, larynx, and epiglottis.
There was marked swelling of the soft palate and pharynx. The
with 60,000 U of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT) obtained on the
same day from the CDC. Throat swab specimens wereobtained
for C. diphtheriae testing. The patient had an uneventful
At the Tennessee State Health Department laboratory(Nash-
ville, TN), cultures of throat specimens grew black colonies on
tellurite media that were suggestive of Corynebacteriumspecies.
The isolate and membrane specimen were identified as C. ul-
cerans at the CDC. The organisms were susceptibletopenicillin,
cm. It was graduallyremoved
erythromycin, clindamycin, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin. Re-
sults of conventional PCR were positive for both subunit A
and subunit B of the tox gene. However, real-timePCRrevealed
atypical amplification of subunit A and no amplification of
subunit B. Toxin production in the isolate was demonstrated
by a positive modified Elek test result. A commerciallaboratory
reported the serum antibody level to diphtheria toxin to be
0.036 IU/mL (protective level, ?0.1 IU/mL) in this patient.
The patient had not received vaccination against diphtheria
during the previous 30 years. She lived in a farmhouse with
her husband and had not traveled during the 2-week period
before onset of illness. She seldom had direct contact with the
animals, although she owned 4 horses and 2 dogs; she did not
own dairy animals. Her close and frequent contacts included
her children and their families.Onedaughterhadfrequentclose
contacts with immigrants from Central America. Members of
her church had recently returned from a 1-week cruise to the
Caribbean that included island stops.
As shown in table 3, no specimen
from human and animal contacts of either case patient grew
Several published case reports have linked human C. ulcerans
infections to consuming unpasteurizedmilkfrominfectedcows
or having close contact with infected dairy animals [13, 18,
19]. However, in the majority of reports, patients neither con-
sumed raw milk nor had contact with dairy animals (table 2).
In 2 recent reports, human infection followedcontactwithdogs
with chronic labial ulceration, rhinorrhea, and sneezing [4, 5];
by guest on November 14, 2015
Diphtheria-Like Illnesses Due to C. ulcerans • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • 399
in 1 report, the same C. ulcerans strain was isolated from both
the patient and her dog . Although a human case resulted
from possible exposure to an infected stray cat with rhinorrhea
, in another report, close household contacts of 2 infected
cats with rhinorrhea did not acquire infection . In our re-
ports, nasal and rectal specimens from dairy animals, horses,
and dogs were culture negative for C. ulcerans, suggesting that
there might be other reservoirs and/or novel ways of
The clinical features of diphtheria-like illness caused by C.
ulcerans are similar to those of clinical respiratory diphtheria,
and laboratory investigations, treatment, public health re-
sponse, and preventiveinterventionsareidenticalforthe2types
of infection. Infection with C. ulcerans or C. diphtheriae should
be considered in the differential diagnosis of membranous
pharyngitis. Culture of throat specimens is the gold standard
for diagnosis of diphtheria-like illness caused by C. ulcerans.
Although no special culture medium is required for growth,
media such as Tinsdale or tellurite agar are useful for rapidly
identifying potentially pathogenic Corynebacterium species.
Growth of diphtheroids not showing typical morphology for
C. diphtheriae by methylene blue staining does not rule out
clinical diphtheria or exclude C. ulcerans. A modified Elek test
is used to confirm toxin production. A positive result of con-
ventional PCR of isolates or tissue specimens detects the pres-
ence of subunits A and B of the tox gene but does not confirm
whether the strain is producing toxin. PCR may be particularly
useful to detect the presence of a strain containing the tox gene
when antimicrobial therapy is initiated prior to specimen col-
lection. A newly developed but not commercially availablereal-
time PCR test  is used at the CDC to provide more rapid
results than conventional PCR for C. diphtheriae. However, in
this report, real-time PCR analysis of C. ulcerans isolates from
both case patients produced atypical amplification of subunit
A and no amplification of subunit B. Although conventional
PCR to detect the presence subunits A and B of the tox gene
may be useful for screening for C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans,
these findings indicate that additional studies are required to
determine the role of real-time PCR testing of toxigenic C.
C. ulcerans causes severe diphtheria-like illness, and patients
often require hospitalization (table2).Asforclinicaldiphtheria,
the mainstay of treatment is equine DAT. Providers should
promptly administer DAT to a patient with respiratory diph-
theria–like illness, after testing for sensitivity to DAT and with-
out awaiting laboratory confirmation. Failure or delay in ad-
ministering DAT can lead to a fatal outcome. The dose of DAT
varies from 40,000 IU to 100, 000 IU and depends on the site
and extent of the membrane and the duration of symptoms.
In the United States, DAT is available from the CDC under a
US Food and Drug Administration–approved Investigational
New Drug protocol and can be obtained by contacting the
Director’s Emergency Operations Center at the CDC .
Although antimicrobial agents are not a substitute for DAT,
they eliminate C. ulcerans from the respiratory tract and,
thereby, limit toxin production, reduce disease severity if ad-
ministered early, and halt potential transmission. In vitro stud-
ies have demonstrated that C. ulcerans is susceptible to a wide
range of antimicrobial agents . The recommended anti-
microbial agents and their dosage for treatment and postex-
posure prophylaxis are the same as those for treatment of clin-
ical diphtheria. Generally, erythromycin and penicillin are
effective and are the preferred antimicrobial agents for treat-
ment of respiratorydiphtheria–likeillnesscausedbyC.ulcerans.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of respiratory diph-
theria–like illness caused by a C. ulcerans strain that was re-
sistant to erythromycin and clindamycinbutsusceptibletopen-
icillin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, and
cephalosporins. The finding of an erythromycin-resistantstrain
of toxigenic C. ulcerans highlights the importance of testing
strains of this organism for susceptibility to antimicrobialsused
for treatment and/or postexposure prophylaxis.
Because of the rare possibility of transmission to close con-
tacts from patients with diphtheria-like illness caused by C.
members and other persons who have intimatephysicalcontact
or direct exposure to respiratory secretions of a case patient or
to animals infected with C. ulcerans. In this report, C. ulcerans
was not isolated from any close contacts (human or animal),
and this finding is consistent with other case reports [3–5, 22–
41]. Nevertheless, close face-to-face contacts of patients should
receive postexposure chemoprophylaxis after nasopharyngeal
and throat swab specimens are obtained for culture and should
be placed under surveillance for a week for evidence of disease
Up-to-date immunization with a diphtheria toxoid vaccine
will prevent diphtheria and diphtheria-like illness caused by C.
ulcerans by maintaining adequate levels of antibodies to diph-
theria toxin. In this report, both case patients were older adults
who were not up-to-date with booster immunization against
diphtheria. Because diphtheria or diphtheria-like illness caused
by C. ulcerans may not provide an adequate protectiveimmune
response, case patients should receive an age-appropriatediph-
theria toxoid vaccine during the convalescent period. Close
contacts of case patients should also receive an age-appropriate
diphtheria toxoid vaccine according to the childhood, adoles-
cent, and adult immunization schedules, as recommended by
the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The Ad-
all children receive a routine series of a pediatric diphtheria
toxoid vaccine (diphtheria and tetanus toxiods and acellular
pertussis antigen vaccine and diphtheria and tetanus toxiods)
by guest on November 14, 2015
400 • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • Tiwari et al.
at ages 2, 4, 6, and 12 months and between 4 and 6 years of
age. Adolescents should receive a booster dose with tetanus
toxoid and reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis
vaccine, preferably between 11 and 12 years of age, and then
tetanus and diphtheria vaccine every 10 years thereafter during
adulthood [52, 53]. For added protection against pertussis,
adults who have notpreviouslyreceivedadoseoftetanustoxoid
and reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine
should receive a single dose of such vaccine to replace the next
dose of tetanus and diphtheria vaccine .
In summary, heightened clinical awareness of respiratory
diphtheria–like illness caused by C. ulcerans is critical for early
recognition and prompt administration of treatment with DAT
and appropriate antimicrobial agents. Finding of a strain re-
sistant to first-line antimicrobials highlights the need for an-
timicrobial susceptibility testing of C. ulcerans. Using real-time
PCR to rapidly confirm the presence of the tox gene in C.
ulcerans may lead to false-negative results, and this test requires
further evaluation for toxigenic C. ulcerans isolates. Lastly, age-
appropriate vaccination with diphtheria toxoid vaccines and
timely decennial boosters should be encouraged to prevent
We thank Dr. Marsha Goldoft, Mary Perry, HeidiKassenborg,LoriStork,
Sue Johnson, Dr. Valerie Boaz and the staff of the Chattanooga/Hamilton
County Health Department, Henrietta Hardin, Chung Kim Marston, Eliz-
abeth Mothershed, and Dr. Pekka Nuorti.
Potential conflicts of interest.
All authors: no conflicts.
1. Gilbert R, Stewart C. Corynebacterium ulcerans: a pathogenic micro-
organism resembling C. diphtheriae. J Lab Clin Med 1926;12:756–761.
2. Wong P, Groman N. Production of diphtheria toxin by selectedisolates
of Corynebacterium ulcerans and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.
Infect Immun 1984;43:1114–6.
3. Sing A, Bierschenk S, Heesemann J. Classical diphtheria caused by
Corynebacterium ulcerans in Germany: amino acidsequencedifferences
between diphtheria toxins from Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C.
ulcerans. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:325–6.
4. Aaron L, Heurtebise F, Bachelier MN, Guimard Y. Pseudomembranous
diphtheria caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans (in French). Rev Med
5. Lartigue M-F, Monnet X, Le Fleche A, et al. Corynebacterium ulcerans
in an immunocompromised patient and her dog. J Clin Microbiol
6. Morris WE, Uzal FA, Cipolla AL. Pyogranulomatous meningoenceph-
alitis in a goat due to Corynebacterium ulcerans. Vet Rec 2005;156:
7. Foster G, Patterson T, Howie F, et al. Corynebacterium ulcerans in free-
ranging otters. Vet Rec 2002;150:524.
8. Taylor DJ, Efstratiou A, Reilly WJ. Diphtheria toxin production by
Corynebacterium ulcerans from cats. Vet Rec 2002;150:355.
9. Tejedor MT, Martin JL, Lupiola P, Gutierrez C. Caseous lymphadenitis
caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans in the dromedary camel. Can Vet
10. Bergin IL, Chien CC, Marini RP, Fox JG. Isolation andcharacterization
of Corynebacterium ulcerans from cephalic implants in macaques.
Comp Med 2000;50:530–5.
11. Hommez J, Devriese LA, Vaneechoutte M, Riegel P, Butaye P, Hae-
sebrouck F. Identification of nonlipophilic corynebacteriaisolatedfrom
dairy cows with mastitis. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:954–7.
12. Olson ME, Goemans I, Bolingbroke D, Lundberg S. Gangrenous der-
matitis caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans in Richardsongroundsqui-
rells. JAVMA 1988;193:367–8.
13. Hart RJ. Corynebacterium ulcerans in humans and cattle in North
Devon. J Hyg (Lond) 1984;92:161–4.
14. Stanica E, Maximescu P, Stoian C, Pop A, Oprisan R, Potorac E. Level
of antitoxic immunity and carriage of diphtheria bacilli in horsesunder
present circumstances of dimunition of morbidity of diphtheria (in
French). Arch Roum Pathol Exp Microbial 1968;27:552–62.
15. Panaitescu M, Maximescu P, Michel J, Potorac E. Respiratory patho-
gens in non-human primates with special reference toCorynebacterium
ulcerans. Lab Anim 1977;11:155–7.
16. Fox JG, Frost WW. Corynebacterium ulcerans mastitis in a bonnet
macaque (Macaca radiata). Lab Anim Sci 1974;24:820–2.
17. May BD. Corynebacterium ulcerans in monkeys. Lab Anim Sci 1972;
18. Higgs TM, Smith A, Cleverly LM, Neave FK. Corynebacterium ulcerans
infections in a dairy herd. Vet Rec 1967;81:34–5.
19. Bostock AD, Gilbert FR, Lewis D, Smith DC. Corynebacteriumulcerans
infection associated with untreated milk. J Infect 1984;9:286–8.
20. Wagner J, Ignatius R, Voss S, et al. Infection of the skin caused by
Corynebacterium ulcerans and mimicking classical cutaneous diphthe-
ria. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:1598–600.
21. Sing A, Hogardt M, Bierschenk S, Heesemann J. Detection of differ-
ences in the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of diphtheria toxin
from Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans caus-
ing extrapharyngeal infections. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:4848–51.
22. Elden S, Coole L, Efstratiou A, Doshi N. Laboratory-confirmed case
of toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans in the United Kingdom. Euro
Surveill 2007;12:E070329.3. Available at: http://www.eurosurveillance
.org/ew/2007/070329.asp#3. Accessed 10 April 2007.
23. Health Protection Agency. A case of diphtheria caused by toxigenic
Corynebacterium ulcerans. Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly 2006;16:
News. Available at: http://www.hpa.org.uk/cdr/archives/2006/cdr0406
.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2007.
24. Health Protection Agency. Case of toxigenic Corynebacteriumulcerans.
Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly 2004;14:News. Available at: http://
www.hpa.org.uk/cdr/archives/2004/cdr0304.pdf. Accessed 10 April
25. Hatanaka A, Tsunoda A, Okamoto M, et al. Corynebacterium ulcerans
diphtheria in Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:752–3.
26. von Hunolstein C, Alfarone G,ScopettiF,etal.Molecularepidemiology
and characteristics of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacte-
rium ulcerans strains isolated in Italy during the 1990s. JMedMicrobiol
27. Kaufmann D, Ott P, Ruegg C. Laryngopharyngitis by Corynebacterium
ulcerans. Infection 2002;30:168–70.
28. Visser LG, Peek N, Schippers EF, et al. Nasopharyngeal Corynebacte-
rium ulcerans diphtheria in The Netherlands. Eurosurveillance Wkly
6. Available at: http://www.eurosurv.org/2002/020214.html. Accessed
12 December 2007.
29. Wellinghausen N, Sing A, Kern WV, Perner S, Marre R, Rentschler J.
A fatal case of necrotizing sinusitis due to toxigenic Corynebacterium
ulcerans. Int J Med Microbiol 2002;292:59–63.
30. Communicable Disease Report. Three cases of toxigenic Corynebac-
terium ulcerans infection. CDR Wkly 2000;6:1. Available at: http://
www.hpa.org.uk/cdr/archives/2000/cdr0600.pdf. Accessed 12 Decem-
31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Respiratory diphtheria
caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans–Terre Haute, Indiana, 1996.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46:330–2.
by guest on November 14, 2015
Diphtheria-Like Illnesses Due to C. ulcerans • CID 2008:46 (1 February) • 401 Download full-text
32. Dessau RB, Brandt-Christensen M, Jensen OJ, Tonnesen P. Pulmonary
nodules due to Corynebacterium ulcerans. Eur Respir J 1995;8:651–3.
33. Hust MH, Metzler B, Schubert U, Weidhase A, Seuffer RH. Toxic
diphtheria caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans. Dtsch Med Woch-
34. Kisely SR, Price S, Ward T. Corynebacterium ulcerans: a potential cause
of diphtheria. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev 1994;4:R63–4.
35. de Carpentier JP, Flanagan PM, Singh IP, Timms MS, Nassar WY.
Nasopharyngeal Corynebacterium ulcerans: a differentdiphtheria.JLar-
yngol Otol 1992;106:824–6.
36. Gubler JG, Wust J, Krech T, Hany A. Classical pseudo membranous
diphtheria caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans (in German). Schweiz
Med Wochenschr 1990;120:1812–6.
37. Leek MD, Sivaloganathan S, Devaraj SK, Zamiri I, Griffiths GD, Green
MA. Diphtheria with a difference—a rare Corynebacteriumfatalitywith
associated apoptotic cell death. Histopathology 1990;16:187–9.
38. Pers C. Infection due to “Corynebacterium ulcerans,” producing diph-
theria toxin—a case report from Denmark. Acta Pathol Microbiol Im-
munol Scand [B] 1987;95:361–2.
39. Siegel SM, Haile CA. Corynebacterium ulcerans pneumonia.SouthMed
40. Meers PD. A case of classical diphtheria, and other infections due to
Corynebacterium ulcerans. J Infect 1979;1:139–42.
41. Fakes RW, Downham M. Toxic reaction to Corynebacterium ulcerans.
42. Kelly C, Efstratiou. Seventh International Meeting of the European
Laboratory Working Group on Diphtheria—Vienna, June 2002. Euro
43. DeWinter LM, Bernard KA, Romney MG. Human clinical isolates of
Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans collected in
Canada from 1999 to 2003 but not fitting reported criteria for cases
of diphtheria. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:3447–9.
44. Von Hunolstein C, Alfarone G, Scopetti F, et al. Molecular biology and
characteristics of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacteriumul-
cerans strains isolated in Italy during the 1990s. J Med Microbiol
45. Nakao H, Popovic T. Development of a direct PCR assay for detection
of the diphtheria toxin gene. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:1651–5.
46. Engler KH, Glushkevich T, Mazurova IK, George RC, Efstratiou A. A
modified Elek test for detection of toxigenic corynebacteria in the
diagnostic laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:495–8.
47. Mothershed EA, Cassiday PK, Pierson K, Mayer LW, Popovic T. De-
velopment of a real-time fluorescence PCR assay for rapid detection
of diphtheria toxin gene. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4713–9.
48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notice to readers: avail-
ability of diphtheria antitoxin through an investigational new drug
protocol. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:413.
49. Soriano F, Zapardiel J, Nieto E. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Co-
rynebacterium species and other non–spore-forming gram positive ba-
cilli to 18 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;
50. Bonnet JM, Begg N.T. Control of diphtheria: guidance for consultants
in communicable disease control. Commun Dis Public Health 1999;
51. American Academy of Pediatrics. Diphtheria. In: Pickering LK, Baker
CJ, LongSS,McMillanJA, eds.Redbook:2006reportoftheCommittee
on Infectious Diseases. 27th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Acad-
emy of Pediatrics, 2006:277–81.
52. Centers for Disease Control andPrevention.Generalrecommendations
on immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices. MMWRMorbMortalWklyRep2006;55(RR-
53. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing tetanus, diph-
theria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid,reduced
diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines: recommendations
of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55(RR-3):1–50.
54. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing tetanus, diph-
theria, and pertussis among adults: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced
diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine: recommendationsof
the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and rec-
ommendation of ACIP, supported by the Healthcare Infection Control
Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), for use of Tdap among
health-care personnel. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55(RR
by guest on November 14, 2015