Article

Prevalence of Mental Illness in Immigrant and Non-Immigrant U.S. Latino Groups

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.3). 04/2008; 165(3):359-69. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07040704
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Although widely reported among Latino populations, contradictory evidence exists regarding the generalizability of the immigrant paradox, i.e., that foreign nativity protects against psychiatric disorders. The authors examined whether this paradox applies to all Latino groups by comparing estimates of lifetime psychiatric disorders among immigrant Latino subjects, U.S-born Latino subjects, and non-Latino white subjects.
The authors combined and examined data from the National Latino and Asian American Study and the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, two of the largest nationally representative samples of psychiatric information.
In the aggregate, risk of most psychiatric disorders was lower for Latino subjects than for non-Latino white subjects. Consistent with the immigrant paradox, U.S.-born Latino subjects reported higher rates for most psychiatric disorders than Latino immigrants. However, rates varied when data were stratified by nativity and disorder and adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic differences across groups. The immigrant paradox consistently held for Mexican subjects across mood, anxiety, and substance disorders, while it was only evident among Cuban and other Latino subjects for substance disorders. No differences were found in lifetime prevalence rates between migrant and U.S.-born Puerto Rican subjects.
Caution should be exercised in generalizing the immigrant paradox to all Latino groups and for all psychiatric disorders. Aggregating Latino subjects into a single group masks significant variability in lifetime risk of psychiatric disorders, with some subgroups, such as Puerto Rican subjects, suffering from psychiatric disorders at rates comparable to non-Latino white subjects. Our findings thus suggest that immigrants benefit from a protective context in their country of origin, possibly inoculating them against risk for substance disorders, particularly if they emigrated to the United States as adults.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Glorisa Canino
  • Source
    • "The change of values structure in traditional societies is coupled with transformation of ethnic identity of their representatives, with its blurring, i.e. the increase of indefiniteness or marginality. Acculturation and acculturation stress act as conditions that, beyond doubt, promote the development of alcohol addiction (Epstein, Botvin & Diaz, 2000; Alegria et al., 2008). "

    Preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
  • Source
    • "Int J Ment Health Addiction among immigrants. Previous findings are mixed as to whether immigrants are in the risk group for mental health problems in general (e.g., Bhugra and Jones 2001; Algeria et al. 2008). However, previous research has found that there is a higher prevalence of problematic video gaming in East Asian populations, as compared to Western European, North American and Australian populations (King et al. 2012), which might lend support to the idea that immigrants from this region might be more susceptible to develop video game addiction, because of their general interest for gaming, and not because of immigration. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Video gaming has become a popular leisure activity in many parts of the world, and an increasing number of empirical studies examine the small minority that appears to develop problems as a result of excessive gaming. This study investigated prevalence rates and predictors of video game addiction in a sample of gamers, randomly selected from the National Population Registry of Norway (N=3389). Results showed there were 1.4 % addicted gamers, 7.3 % problem gamers, 3.9 % engaged gamers, and 87.4 % normal gamers. Gender (being male) and age group (being young) were positively associated with addicted-, problem-, and engaged gamers. Place of birth (Africa, Asia, South-and Middle America) were positively associated with addicted-and problem gamers. Video game addiction was negatively associated with conscientiousness and positively associated with neuroticism. Poor psychosomatic health was positively associated with problem-and engaged gaming. These factors provide insight into the field of video game addiction, and may help to provide guidance as to how individuals that are at risk of becoming addicted gamers can be identified.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
    • "S tudies typically find that foreign-born Hispanics/Latinos have lower morbidity and mortality than U.S.-born Hispanics/Latinos (Abraído-Lanza et al., 1999). Recent studies focused on mental health also find lower rates of psychological disorders among foreign-born Hispanics/Latinos compared to U.S.-born Hispanics/Latinos (Alegria et al., 2008; Cook et al., 2009; Vega et al., 2004). These lower rates of mental health problems among the foreign-born puzzle public health researchers given that Hispanic/Latino immigrants typically have low socioeconomic backgrounds and are exposed to stressful conditions during and after their migration to the U.S., two factors associated with poorer mental health (Cook et al., 2009; Vega et al., 2004; Ornelas and Perreira, 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the association between exposure to the U.S. and symptoms of poor mental health among adult Hispanic/Latinos (N = 15,004) overall and by Hispanic/Latino background. Using data from the Hispanic Community Health Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), we estimated logistic regressions to model the risk of moderate to severe symptoms of psychological distress, depression, and anxiety as a function of years in the U.S. and six key psychosocial risk and protective factors. In unadjusted models, increased time in the U.S. was associated with higher risk of poor mental health. After adjustment for just three key factors-perceived discrimination, perceived U.S. social standing, and the size of close social networks-differences in the odds of poor mental health by years in the U.S became insignificant for Hispanics/Latinos overall. However, analyses by Hispanic/Latino background revealed different patterns of association with exposure to the U.S. that could not be fully explained.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2015 · The Journal of nervous and mental disease
Show more