Intervention categories for physiotherapists treating patients with internal medicine conditions on the basis of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health
Haute Ecole de Santé Geneva.International Journal of Rehabilitation Research (Impact Factor: 1.28). 04/2008; 31(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f4525c
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is considered to be a useful tool to overcome differences among different health professionals and to facilitate a common understanding of the patient and of what constitutes care. Three lists of ICF intervention categories for internal medicine have been developed. The next step of the development process is to address their content validity. The data for this study were derived from 300 clinical records. The study was conducted as a retrospective cross-sectional multicentre study in Switzerland. It was performed using convenience samples of records of patients with internal medicine conditions. The validation process enabled the identification of 36 ICF intervention categories in the acute, 41 in the rehabilitation and 38 in the long-term contexts. The developed lists might help define the core competencies of the profession of physiotherapy. These intervention categories are available for intervention documentation in a standardized common language, the ICF, and they offer the possibility of responding to the health-political demand for transparency regarding services offered by health care providers.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aims Rehabilitation services provide multidisciplinary management of complex clients and therefore require a multifactorial assessment tool to assess standards, discriminate between services and clients, and suggest areas requiring improvement. The World Health Organization International Classifi cation of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) provides a structure based on impairment, activity, participation and environment that may be a useful basis for assessing rehabilitation outcomes. The authors developed a set of clinical indicators including the Australian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine (AFRM) clinical indicators (which largely concern the rehabilitation process) and additional outcome measures based on the ICF domains, and undertook this pilot study to assess its usefulness.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.