Ultra-high field parallel imaging of the superior parietal lobule during mental maze solving

Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Experimental Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.04). 07/2008; 187(4):551-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1318-8
Source: PubMed


We used ultra-high field (7 T) fMRI and parallel imaging to scan the superior parietal lobule (SPL) of human subjects as they mentally traversed a maze path in one of four directions (up, down, left, right). A counterbalanced design for maze presentation and a quasi-isotropic voxel (1.46 x 1.46 x 2 mm thick) collection were implemented. Fifty-one percent of single voxels in the SPL were tuned to the direction of the maze path. Tuned voxels were distributed throughout the SPL, bilaterally. A nearest neighbor analysis revealed a "honeycomb" arrangement such that voxels tuned to a particular direction tended to occur in clusters. Three-dimensional (3D) directional clusters were identified in SPL as oriented centroids traversing the cortical depth. There were 13 same-direction clusters per hemisphere containing 22 voxels per cluster, on the average; the mean nearest-neighbor, same-direction intercluster distance was 9.4 mm. These results provide a much finer detail of the directional tuning in SPL, as compared to those obtained previously at 4 T (Gourtzelidis et al. Exp Brain Res 165:273-282, 2005). The more accurate estimates of quantitative clustering parameters in 3D brain space in this study were made possible by the higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios afforded by the higher magnetic field of 7 T as well as the quasi-isotropic design of voxel data collection.

Download full-text


Available from: Ute Goerke
  • Source
    • "Given the involvement of the PPC in the control of attention , one might expect to observe a set size effect in this region because the demand on visual attention presumably increases with set size. For example, it is reasonable to think that the number and direction ( Jerde et al., 2008; Gourtzelidis et al., 2005) of covert shifts of attention would increase with the number of potential targets, and loaddependent increases have been observed in PPC for attention and working memory (Mayer et al., 2007). However, we did not find a set size effect in PPC. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We test theories about the functional organization of the human cortex by correlating brain activity with demands on perception versus action selection. Subjects covertly searched for a target among an array of 4, 8, or 12 items (perceptual manipulation) and then, depending on the color of the array, made a saccade toward, away from, or at a right angle from the target (action manipulation). First, choice response times increased linearly as the demands increased for each factor, and brain activity in several cortical areas increased with increasing choice response times. Second, we found a double dissociation in posterior cortex: Activity in ventral regions (occipito-temporal cortex) increased linearly with perceptual, but not action, selection demands; conversely, activity in dorsal regions (parietal cortex) increased linearly with action, but not perceptual, selection demands. This result provides the clearest support of the theory that posterior cortex is segregated into two distinct streams of visual processing for perception and action. Third, despite segregated anatomical projections from posterior ventral and dorsal streams to lateral pFC, we did not find evidence for a functional dissociation between perception and action selection in pFC. Increasing action, but not perceptual, selection demands evoked increased activation along both the dorsal and the ventral lateral pFC. Although most previous studies have focused on perceptual variables (e.g., space vs. object), these data suggest that understanding the computations underlying action selection will be key to understanding the functional organization of pFC.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2011 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Source
    • "Research on the neural basis of the set size effect is challenging, because a change in set size may modify the perceptual and cognitive demands of a task. For example, a change in set size may vary the amount of visual information in the display, thereby altering brain activity in low-level visual areas; or it may differentially engage attentional areas, such as the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) (Robinson et al., 1995; Corbetta & Shulman, 2002; Jerde et al., 2008); or it may vary the number of potential targets for attention and action, thereby changing the demands on target selection; and so on. It is thus not surprising that neuroimaging studies have reported a set size effect in different brain regions (e.g. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The set size effect in visual search refers to the linear increase in response time (RT) or decrease in accuracy as the number of distractors increases. Previous human and monkey studies have reported a correlation between set size and neural activity in the frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS). In a recent functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we did not observe a set size effect in the superior precentral sulcus (sPCS, thought to be the human homolog of the FEF) and IPS in an oculomotor visual search task (Ikkai et al., 2011). Our task used placeholders in the search array, along with the target and distractors, in order to equate the amount of retinal stimulation for each set size. We here attempted to reconcile these differences with the results from a follow-up experiment in which the same oculomotor visual search task was used, but without placeholders. A strong behavioral set size effect was observed in both studies, with very similar saccadic RTs and slopes between RT and set size. However, a set size effect was now observed in the sPCS and IPS. We comment on this finding and discuss the role of these neural areas in visual search.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2011 · European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Source
    • "Interestingly, submillimeter resolution was only reported in those 7-T studies employing partial brain coverage. Isotropic or quasi-isotropic voxels allow for a more accurate estimate of active regions [20], but it is difficult to cover the entire brain in the z-dimension with a reasonable TR and TE without the possibility of acceleration in the z-dimension. This requires a receive array coil with a very high number of coils combined with either a 3D readout [21] or a multi-slice selection approach which provides additional speed-up factors in the slice-select direction [22]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this investigation, high-resolution, 1x1x1-mm(3) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 7 T is performed using a multichannel array head coil and a surface coil approach. Scan geometry was optimized for each coil separately to exploit the strengths of both coils. Acquisitions with the surface coil focused on partial brain coverage, while whole-brain coverage fMRI experiments were performed with the array head coil. BOLD sensitivity in the occipital lobe was found to be higher with the surface coil than with the head array, suggesting that restriction of signal detection to the area of interest may be beneficial for localized activation studies. Performing independent component analysis (ICA) decomposition of the fMRI data, we consistently detected BOLD signal changes and resting state networks. In the surface coil data, a small negative BOLD response could be detected in these resting state network areas. Also in the data acquired with the surface coil, two distinct components of the positive BOLD signal were consistently observed. These two components were tentatively assigned to tissue and venous signal changes.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2009 · Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Show more