ArticlePDF Available

Commercial Features of Placebo and Therapeutic Efficacy

Authors:
In response to Dr Browning, I did not lay the problems
of general surgery “at the feet of primary care.” Having been
involved in an effort to undo the flawed sustainable growth
rate system for the past decade, I know that the system is
broken. In a rational world, specialties would unite to cor-
rect this flawed system, which seems cynically designed to
pit specialties against each other.
The calculations for physician compensation used in
the cited study of internal medicine reimbursement
3
cut
off in 2004 while the increases in evaluation and manage-
ment codes took place in 2004 through 2007. For
example, evaluation and management codes increased in
work relative value units from 2006 to 2007 (code 99213:
increase from 0.67 to 0.92 [37%]; code 99214: 1.10 to
1.42 [29%]; and code 99215: 1.77 to 2.00 [12.9%]). Fur-
thermore, this article has been rebutted.
4
The primary
care–specialty income gap has largely been corrected, at
an estimated cost of $4 billion.
5
I appreciate the enthusiasm of Dr Maa and colleagues
for the surgical hospitalist, particularly in emergency and
trauma care. However, I do not believe this is the answer
to the shortage of general surgeons, who not only do
emergency and trauma care but often perform endoscopy
and other general surgical operations in critical access
hospitals.
Philosophically, I have difficulty with medical or surgi-
cal hospitalists. My objection to the medical hospitalist
system is that patients may perceive that they are being
abandoned by their primary care physician at a time of
their most dire need—when they are sufficiently ill to
require hospitalization. I would hope that this sense of
abandonment is not present in a surgical hospitalist sys-
tem. When we train “physicians who operate,” we try to
instill judgment about the need for surgery. But if opera-
tion is required, the operator must be thoroughly compe-
tent. I believe that such decisions are more informed
when the physician/surgeon is familiar with the patient.
The surgical hospitalist system may aid trauma and emer-
gency care in urban centers but will not solve the access
problem in small rural hospitals.
Josef E. Fischer, MD
jfische1@bidmc.harvard.edu
Department of Surgery
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
Financial Disclosures: None reported.
1. Zuckerman R, Doty B, Gold M, et al. General surgery programs in small rural
New York state hospitals. J Rural Health. 2006;22(4):339-342.
2. Smart DR, ed. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the US, 2007. Chi-
cago, IL: American Medical Association; 2007.
3. Bodenheimer T, Berenson R, Rudolf P. The primary care-specialty income gap:
why it matters. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):301-306.
4. Rich WL III. The primary care-specialty income gap. Ann Intern Med. 2007;
146(12):895-896.
5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare program: revi-
sions to payment policies, five-year review of work relative value units, changes
to the practice expense methodology under the physician fee schedule, and other
changes to payment under part B. Fed Regist. 2006;71(231):69623-70251.
RESEARCH LETTER
Commercial Features of Placebo
and Therapeutic Efficacy
To the Editor: It is possible that the therapeutic efficacy of
medications is affected by commercial features such as lower
prices. Because such features influence patients’ expecta-
tions,
1
they may play an unrecognized therapeutic role by
influencing the efficacy of medical therapies, especially in
conditions associated with strong placebo responses.
2,3
To
investigate this possibility, we studied the effect of price on
analgesic response to placebo pills.
Methods. In 2006 we recruited 82 healthy paid volunteers
in Boston, Massachusetts, using an online advertisement. Each
participant was informed by brochur eabout a (purported) new
opioid analgesic approved by the Food and Drug Administra-
tion; it was described as similar to codeine with faster onset time,
but it was actually a placebo pill. After randomization, half of
the participants were informed that the drug had a regularprice
of $2.50 per pill and half that the price had been discounted to
$0.10 per pill (no reason for the discount was mentioned). All
participants received identical placebo pills and were paid $30.
Participants were blinded to the study purpose, and research-
ers were blinded to groupassignment. The study was approved
by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology institutional re-
view board, and all participants providedwritten informed con-
sent and were debriefed after the study.
The protocol followed an established approach for studying
pain.
4
Electrical shocks to the wrist were calibrated to each par -
ticipant’s pain tolerance. After calibration, participants received
the test shocks, rating the pain on a computerized visual ana-
log scale anchored by the labels “no pain at all” and “the worst
pain imaginable.” Participants received all possible shocks in
2.5-V increments between 0 V and their calibrated tolerance.
Stimulation at each intensity level was carried out twice for each
participant (before and after taking the pill), and the change
in reaction to the stimulation was assessed. V isual analog scale
ratings were converted to a 100-point scale, the postpill score
for each voltage was subtracted from the prepill score, and the
mean of these differences was calculated for each participant.
The per centage of participants experiencing a mean score re-
duction vs increase was compared between the 2 groups using
a 2-tailed
2
test. Because stronger pain may be associated with
stronger placebo responses,
5
we also compared r esults for the
50% most painful shocks for each participant. In addition, mean
differ ences at each voltage between the 2 groupswer e compar ed
overall with a sign test and individually with F tests. A P value
of .05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were per-
formed using SPSS version 15 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).
Results. Patient characteristics are shown in the T
ABLE.In
the regular-price group, 85.4% (95% confidence interval [CI],
74.6%-96.2%) of the participants experienced a mean pain re-
duction after taking the pill, vs 61.0% (95% CI, 46.1%-75.9%)
in the low-price (discounted) group (P =.02). Similar results
LETTERS
1016 JAMA, March 5, 2008—Vol 299, No. 9 (Reprinted) ©2008 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
at INSEAD, on March 4, 2008 www.jama.comDownloaded from
occurredwhen analyzing only the 50% most painful shocks for
each participant (80.5% [95% CI, 68.3%-92.6%] vs 56.1% [95%
CI, 40.9%-71.3%], respectively; P =.03).
Considering all voltages tested, pain reduction was greater
for the regular-price pill (P .001). In addition, for 26 of
29 intensities (from 10 to 80 V), mean pain reduction was
greater for the regular-price pill (F
IGURE).
Comment. These results are consistent with described phe-
nomena of commercialvariables affectingquality expectations
1
and expectations influencing therapeutic efficacy.
4
Placebo re-
sponses to commer cial featureshavemany potential clinical im-
plications. For example, they may help explain the popularity
of high-cost medical therapies (eg, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors)
over inexpensive, widely available alternatives (eg, over-the-
counter nonsteroidalanti-inflammatory drugs) and why patients
switchingfr om branded medicationsmayr eportthattheir generic
equivalents are less effective. Studies of real-worldeffectiveness
may be more generalizable if they reflect how medications are
sold in addition to how they are formulated. Furthermore, cli-
nicians may be able to harness quality cues in beneficial ways,
6
for example, by de-emphasizing potentially deleterious com-
mercial factors (eg, low-priced, generic).
These findings need to be replicated in broader popula-
tions and clinical settings to better understand how commu-
nicating quality cues with patient populations can maximize
treatment benefits and patient satisfaction.
Rebecca L. Waber, BS
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Baba Shiv, PhD
Stanford University
Stanford, California
Ziv Carmon, PhD
INSEAD
Singapore
Dan Ariely, PhD
ariely@mit.edu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Author Contributions: Dr Ariely had full access to all of the data in the study and
takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Waber, Shiv, Carmon, Ariely.
Acquisition of data: Waber.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Waber, Ariely.
Drafting of the manuscript: Waber, Shiv, Ariely.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Waber, Shiv,
Carmon, Ariely.
Statistical analysis: Waber, Ariely.
Obtained funding: Ariely.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Waber.
Study supervision: Ariely.
Financial Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Massachusetts Instituteof Technology.
Role of the Sponsor: The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of the study;
the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the preparation,
review, or approval of the manuscript.
Additional Contributions: Taya Leary, MS, Tom Pernikoff, BS, and John Keefe, BS, all
with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology at the time of this study, provided as-
sistance in datacollection. Mr Keefe receivedcompensation for thisrole. Andrew Lippman,
PhD, Massachusetts Instituteof Technology, provided logisticalsupport and MarkVangel,
PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital, provided statistical assistance. Neither received
compensation for these roles.
1. Rao AR, Monroe KB. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buy-
ers’ perceptions of product quality. J Marketing Res. 1989;26(3):351-357.
2. Benedetti F. How the doctor’s words affect the patient’s brain. Eval Health Prof.
2002;25(4):369-386.
3. Koshi EB, Short CA. Placebo theory and its implications for research and clini-
cal practice. Pain Pract. 2007;7(1):4-20.
4. Berns GS, Chappelow MC, Zink CF, Pagnoni G, Martin-Skurski ME. Neurobio-
logical substrates of dread. Science. 2006;312(5774):754-758.
5. Price DD, Fields HL. The contribution of desire and expectation to placebo an-
algesia: implications for new research strategies. In: Harrington A, ed. The Placebo
Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Uni-
versity Press; 1999:118-119.
6. Gracely RH, Dubner R, Deeter WR, Wolskee PJ. Clinicians’ expectations influ-
ence placebo analgesia. Lancet. 1985;1(8419):43.
Table. Comparison of Participants Assigned to Regular-Price Placebo
vs Low-Price (Discounted) Placebo
Regular Price
(n = 41)
Low Price
(n = 41)
P
Value
Women, No. (%) 27 (65.9) 24 (58.5) .50
Age, mean (SD), y 30.9 (12.4) 30.0 (11.4) .74
Calibrated maximum tolerance,
mean (SD), V
51.8 (18.7) 54.9 (23.3) .50
Shocks received, No. (SD) 18.2 (7.2) 18.6 (9.1) .80
Change in pain scores
a
All shocks,
No. (%) [95% CI]
Pain reduction 35 (85.4)
[74.6-96.2]
25 (61.0)
[46.1-75.9]
.02
b
Pain increase 6 (14.6)
[3.8-25.5]
16 (39.0)
[24.1-54.0]
Highest-intensity shocks only,
No. (%) [95% CI]
c
Pain reduction 33 (80.5)
[68.3-92.6]
23 (56.1)
[40.9-71.3]
.03
b
Pain increase 8 (19.5)
[7.4-31.6]
18 (43.9)
[28.7-59.1]
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
a
Comparison of participants experiencing a mean reduction in pain after vs before the
placebo pill was administered (visual analog scale point reduction between 0.01 and
48.4) and those experiencing a mean increase in pain (visual analog scale point in-
crease between 0 and 29.2).
b
Two-tailed
2
test.
c
Highest 50% of shocks by intensity.
Figure. Pain Ratings by Voltage Intensity
35
10
25
20
15
30
5
0
–5
No.
Regular price
Low price
Shock Intensity, V
Mean Difference
10
41
Placebo price
Regular
Low
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
41 41 40 37 31 27 23 21 20 18 14 12 9 8
41 41 41 40 38 31 29 27 24 19 17 11 7 5 4
Mean difference in pain ratings, after vs before placebo, by voltage intensity. Higher
value indicates greater pain reduction. The table depicts the intensity of the shocks
and the number of observations in the regular-price and low-price conditions. P
value is less than .05 for the shock intensities 27.5 V through 30.0 V, 35.0 V through
75.0 V, and 80.0 V.
LETTERS
©2008 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, March 5, 2008—Vol 299, No. 9 1017
at INSEAD, on March 4, 2008 www.jama.comDownloaded from
... Placebo analgesia is a well-documented phenomenon in which a person reports that pain weakens when she believes that an analgesic agent has been administered, even if only a placebo was given (e.g., Amanzio et al., 2001;Bingel et al., 2011;Waber et al., 2008) 2 . It is proposed that the analgesic effect occurs due to the function of descending pathways, which modulate spinal activity by release of endogenous opioids (see Atlas and Wager, 2012;Heinricher andFields, 2013, andWiech, 2016 for a review). ...
... This claim is also strengthened by the fact that the way in which beliefs and expectations relevant for placebo analgesia are processed is heavily influenced by background propositional knowledge and other cognitive information. For instance, the occurrence and strength of placebo analgesia is influenced by observing another person receiving similar treatment (Bieniek and Bąbel, 2022;Colloca and Benedetti, 2009), the presence of a medical setting (Bingel et al., 2011), and the perceived quality of analgesic substance (Waber et al., 2008). While the presence of a cognitive penetration of sensory systems is controversial, it is common for mechanisms of central cognition to influence each other. ...
... Nevertheless, it is unlikely that EBMs play only a passive role. The beliefs and expectations relevant for placebo analgesia are not somehow passively transmitted, but are generated relying on a variety of information regarding other beliefs about the current situation and a background knowledge about painkillers and the medical setting (e.g., Bieniek and Bąbel, 2022;Colloca and Benedetti, 2009;Waber et al., 2008). In fact, the role of EBMs is likely to be far less passive than that of nociceptive mechanisms providing input to the spinal pain gates. ...
Article
Full-text available
Discussions concerning the modularity of the pain system have been focused on questions regarding the cognitive penetrability of pain mechanisms. It has been claimed that phenomena such as placebo analgesia demonstrate that the pain system is cognitively penetrated; therefore, it is not encapsulated from central cognition. However, important arguments have been formulated which aim to show that cognitive penetrability does not in fact entail a lack of modularity of the pain system. This paper offers an alternative way to reject the modularity of the pain system, which is independent from, but consistent with, the presence of cognitive penetration. It is proposed that, given the current knowledge regarding the functioning and the structure of the pain system, there are good reasons to accept that certain central cognitive mechanisms are part of the pain system. It is argued that such a 'cognitive constitution' of the pain system entails that the pain system is not modular.
... Finally, low-cost SSRIs are covered by insurance and there is no cost to the patient, which argues against a placebo effect. 53 However, the possibility of a placebo effect can only be completely ruled out by an RCT. but perhaps also of a group of initially healthy people who were fully employed. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
After Covid-19 infection, 12.5% develops post-Covid-syndrome (PCS). Symptoms indicate numerous affected organ systems. After a year, chronic fatigue, dysautonomia and neurological and neuropsychiatric complaints predominate. In this study, 95 PCS patients were treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This study used an exploratory questionnaire and found that two-thirds of patients had a reasonably good to strong response on SSRIs, over a quarter of patients had moderate response, while 10% reported no response. Overall, patients experienced substantial improved well-being. Brainfog and sensory overload decreased most, followed by chronic fatigue and dysautonomia. Outcomes were measured with three different measures that correlated strongly with each other. The response to SSRIs in PCS conditions was explained by seven possible neurobiological mechanisms based on recent literature on PCS integrated with already existing knowledge. Important for understanding these mechanisms is the underlying biochemical interaction between various neurotransmitter systems and parts of the immune system, and their dysregulation in PCS. The main link appears to be with the metabolic kynurenine pathway (KP) which interacts extensively with the immune system. The KP uses the same precursor as serotonin: tryptophan. The KP is overactive in PCS which maintains inflammation and which causes a lack of tryptophan. Finally, potential avenues for future research to advance this line of clinical research are discussed.
... Finally, low-cost SSRIs are covered by insurance and there is no cost to the patient, which argues against a placebo effect. 32 However, the possibility of a placebo effect can only be completely ruled out by an RCT. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
After Covid-19 infection, 12.5% develop a post-Covid-syndrome. Symptoms affect numerous organ systems, but after one year they are mainly neurological and neuropsychiatric in nature. There is evidence that treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during Covid-19 infection decreases the likelihood of a post-Covid condition, but there is no known research on treating post-Covid syndrome itself with SSRIs. This study used an exploratory questionnaire and found that 63,4% of 95 post-Covid syndrome patients reported a reasonably good to strong response to an SSRI. Outcomes were measured with three different measures that correlated strongly with each other. Brainfog and sensory overload decreased the most. Patients experienced improved well-being. The response to SSRIs in post-Covid conditions was explained by seven possible neurobiological mechanisms as reported in the recent literature. The promising results of this study should be followed by a randomized controlled trial.
... Several factors may be considered by treatment providers and consumers when supplying or purchasing medicine [26]. We found that the stated country of manufacture (source) of medicine was viewed as a proxy for quality, with suspicion of medicines made in India, China and Nigeria, which mirrors similar findings from other studies [10,14,27,28]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Poor-quality medicines pose a significant challenge for health systems in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs),with recent deaths in multiple countries following ingestion of substandard cough syrups emphasising the need for quality-assurance of medicines in our increasingly interconnected global markets. Research also suggests that the source (country of manufacture) and type of medicine (generic/brand) are perceived to be associated with medicine quality. This study explores perceptions of medicines quality among national stakeholders of a medicines quality assurance system (MQAS) in sub-Saharan Africa. Through semi-structured interviews (n = 29) with managers from organisations responsible for the MQAS, public-sector doctors and nurses, and regulated private-sector pharmacists in three urban centres in Senegal in 2013. A thematic approach to analysis was undertaken with themes organised under three main categories, the source of drugs, the type of medicine, and medicines storage. A key emerging theme was the perception of the inferior quality of generic medicines, especially those produced in Asia and Africa, as they were lower in cost and thus believed to be less effective in alleviating symptoms than their brand versions. Medicines in Senegal's less regulated (informal) street markets were also thought to be of poor-quality as they were not subjected to national regulatory processes or stored appropriately, resulting in exposure to direct sunlight and high temperatures. In contrast, the interviewees expressed confidence in medicines quality within the regulated sectors (public and private retail pharmacies) attributed to stringent national medicines regulation, secure medicines supply chains and adequate technical capacity to survey and analyse for medicines quality. Also, the views expressed typically described a medicine's quality in terms of its effectiveness in alleviating the symptoms of ill health (efficacy of a medicine).These perceptions may have implications for developing national medicines policy, the procurement and supply of affordable medicines and consumers' decision-making when purchasing medicines. Indeed, a proclivity for supplying and purchasing more expensive brand medicines may act as a barrier to accessing essential medicines.
... Studies have shown that treatments involving acupuncture or medical devices tend to produce stronger effects than inert pills. 39,40,41 Similarly, placebo procedures that appear more costly tend to be more effective. 42,43 The various objects in the physical setting as well as the experimenter's behavior can demonstrate cues of credibility and competence, which additionally can promote placebo effects. ...
Article
Full-text available
Placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard of evaluating treatment efficacy in clinical research. Neuromodulation is emerging as an important treatment pathway for many neuropsychiatric conditions, and placebo control arms of these trials require careful design with unique considerations (e.g., sham devices that mimic active stimulation, blinding effectiveness). Inherent to placebo-controlled trials are ethical concerns, such as deception, and potential harm of not receiving the active treatment. In this article, we outline important ethical considerations of placebo-controlled trials across neuromodulation approaches and provide recommendations on how ethical principles can be adhered to going forward. We specifically address issues of autonomy and respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Within the context of this ethical framework, we also discuss factors influencing placebo effects in neuromodulation, the importance of adequate blinding, and alternative trial designs that could be considered.
Book
Placebo effects raise some fundamental questions concerning the nature of clinical and medical research. This Element begins with an overview of the different roles placebos play, followed by a survey of significant studies and dominant views about placebo mechanisms. It then critically examines the concept of placebo and offers a new definition that avoids the pitfalls of other attempts. The main philosophical lesson is that background medical theories provide the ontology for clinical and medical research. Because these theories often contain incoherent and arbitrary classifications, the concept of placebo inherits the same messiness. The Element concludes by highlighting some impending challenges for placebo studies.
Article
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis worldwide, affecting ~500 million people, yet there are no effective treatments to halt its progression. Without any structure-modifying agents, management of OA focuses on ameliorating pain and improving function. Treatment approaches typically have modest efficacy, and many patients have contraindications to recommended pharmacological treatments. Drug development for OA is hindered by the gradual and progressive nature of the disease and the targeting of established disease in clinical trials. Additionally, new medications for OA cannot receive regulatory approval without demonstrating improvements in both structure (pathological features of OA) and symptoms (reduced pain and/or improved function). In clinical trials, people with OA show high 'placebo responses', which hamper the ability to identify new effective treatments. Placebo responses refer to the individual variability in response to placebos given in the context of clinical trials and other settings. Placebo effects refer specifically to short-lasting improvements in symptoms that occur because of physiological changes. To mitigate the effects of the placebo phenomenon, we must first understand what it is, how it manifests, how to identify placebo responders in OA trials and how these insights can be used to improve clinical trials in OA. Leveraging placebo responses and effects in clinical practice might provide additional avenues to augment symptom management of OA.
Chapter
Full-text available
With the development of the variously named photographic processes in the mid-19th century, an element of modernity was born. Photography has the contradictory potential of being both a measuring instrument and a creator of worlds, an objectification tool and an illusionary tool at the same time. Shortly after the discovery of photography, it was already being used for visualization of the most diverse kinds. In addition to planetary movements and X-rays, they also put ghosts on paper, thus initiating a discussion between spiritualists and rationalists about the conditions of empiricism. Exemplary for this relationship is a dispute between the anthropologist Edward Tylor and the naturalist and spiritualist Alfred Russel Wallace. Here, another distortion arising from the use of photography as an epistemological tool also comes to the fore. However, these lay not only in the over-interpretation of artifacts or bodily affectation (as was the case in ghost photography), but also in the illusion of the assumption of neutrality of anthropological photography collection, which created the illusion of the disembodied gaze.
Chapter
Full-text available
The theories of magic by Edward Burnett Tylor, James George Frazer and Emile Durkheim are the starting point for the following reflections on the relationship between magic and technology, as their theorizing takes place against the backdrop of a forming modern industrial society and the rebalancing relationships within the concepts are also negotiated. Moreover, the categories they created were considered the basis for the academic discussion of magic until the middle of the 20th century. On the basis of the universal anthropological theories on magic, it can be understood that the universal theories were never really only directed at "the others", but also attempts to define modern society. Even though anthropology primarily sketched a pleasing picture of the West, modernity is conceived as a rupture in both Tylor, Frazer and Durkheim, and in the course of this, modern man and modern society are central epistemological interests of their research. The recognition of the self-reference of the theories of Tylor, Frazer and Durkheim creates the possibility of using them to draw conclusions about the problem constellations of the societies of the time. At a time when the Western world was itself undergoing the greatest upheaval in its history in its transformation into a modern industrial society, a polemicizing definition of magic had political potential. The unified devaluation of non-European cultures legitimized colonial conquests and proselytizing. On the other hand, the myth of technology as the sole factor of prosperity helped to hide the colonial raids whose resources made industrialization possible in the first place. But neither exclusion nor attempts at order could conceal the fact that the different cultures had entered into mutual exchange. Thus, it was the descriptions of foreign cultural ritual action that gave rise to new varieties of magical rituals that can be described as typically modern forms of magic.
Article
Full-text available
Although placebo effect is a common phenomenon in medicine and research, its mechanisms are not well understood. With the advent of modern medicine, placebo became a symbol for an outdated, morally questionable practice implying deceit and paternalism. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing amount of rigorous research into the mechanisms of placebo response and placebo analgesia with most studies coming from the field of pain medicine. New theories on placebo mechanisms have shown that placebo represents the psychosocial aspect of every treatment and the study of placebo is essentially the study of psychosocial context that surrounds the patient. Therefore, its understanding is essential for researchers and all medical practitioners, particularly those dealing with patients suffering from pain, depression, and motor disorders. In this article, we review the theories on placebo mechanisms and discuss their implications for clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.
Article
The authors integrate previous research that has investigated experimentally the influence of price, brand name, and/or store name on buyers' evaluations of prod¬uct quality. The meta-analysis suggests that, for consumer products, the relation¬ships between price and perceived quality and between brand name and perceived quality are positive and statistically significant. However, the positive effect of store name on perceived quality is small and not statistically significant. Further, the type of experimental design and the strength of the price manipulation are shown to significantly influence the observed effect of price on perceived quality.
Article
Clinicians have long known that context is important in any medical treatment and that the words and attitudes of doctors and nurses can have great impact on the patient. There is now experimental evidence indicating that the medical context influences specific neural systems. The importance of the context is shown by the lesser effectiveness of hidden administrations of analgesics compared with open ones. Because the placebo effect is a context effect, its study has been useful in clarifying this complex issue. There are now several lines of evidence that placebo analgesia is mediated by endogenous opioids and placebo motor improvement by endogenous dopamine. Moreover, a placebo treatment is capable of affecting many brain regions in depressed patients. All these studies, taken together, lead to a neurobiological understanding of the events occurring in the brain during the interaction between the therapist and his or her patient.
Article
Given the choice of waiting for an adverse outcome or getting it over with quickly, many people choose the latter. Theoretical models of decision-making have assumed that this occurs because there is a cost to waiting—i.e., dread. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we measured the neural responses to waiting for a cutaneous electric shock. Some individuals dreaded the outcome so much that, when given a choice, they preferred to receive more voltage rather than wait. Even when no decision was required, these extreme dreaders were distinguishable from those who dreaded mildly by the rate of increase of neural activity in the posterior elements of the cortical pain matrix. This suggests that dread derives, in part, from the attention devoted to the expected physical response and not simply from fear or anxiety. Although these differences were observed during a passive waiting procedure, they correlated with individual behavior in a subsequent choice paradigm, providing evidence for a neurobiological link between the experienced disutility of dread and subsequent decisions about unpleasant outcomes.
Placebo theory and its implications for research and clinical practice
  • E B Koshi
  • C A Short
Koshi EB, Short CA. Placebo theory and its implications for research and clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2007;7(1):4-20.
The contribution of desire and expectation to placebo analgesia: implications for new research strategies
  • D D Price
  • H L Fields
Price DD, Fields HL. The contribution of desire and expectation to placebo analgesia: implications for new research strategies. In: Harrington A, ed. The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1999:118-119.