Article

Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices in Community Mental Health: A Mixed-Method Study of Practitioner Experience

School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Community Mental Health Journal (Impact Factor: 1.03). 04/2008; 44(5):347-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-008-9136-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

This mixed method study examined practitioners as they adopted four evidence-based practices (EBPs) in a community mental health center. In-depth semi-structured interviews; a measure of EBPs attitudes; and a final focus-group were used over a 2-year study period to assess 14 mental health practitioners on one immersion team. The framework for data collection was adapted from organizational theories that view culture and climate as mediating factors. Analysis of practitioner themes demonstrated that there were facilitating and impeding factors in the adoption process. Practitioners reported positive changes in their individual competency but two years was inadequate for training on four EBPs. Involvement of agency administration and consistent supervision were regarded by practitioners as crucial to successful adoption of EBPs.

Full-text preview

Available from: seattleimplementation.org
  • Source
    • "The process of mixing methods in the large majority (n = 18) of these studies involved embedding the qualitative study within the larger quantitative study. In one study (Gioia and Dziadosz 2008 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases related to the phenomenon of interest. Although there are several different purposeful sampling strategies, criterion sampling appears to be used most commonly in implementation research. However, combining sampling strategies may be more appropriate to the aims of implementation research and more consistent with recent developments in quantitative methods. This paper reviews the principles and practice of purposeful sampling in implementation research, summarizes types and categories of purposeful sampling strategies and provides a set of recommendations for use of single strategy or multistage strategy designs, particularly for state implementation research.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2013 · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • Source
    • "Similarly to step 4, schools of social work faculty can act as consultants to agencies who are interested in conducting efficacy or outcome studies. The extent to which faculty members can be involved could be limited to a brief consultation, or they could extend to a partnership role where they are involved more extensively with the evaluation process of an intervention (Bellamy et al., 2007;Gioia & Dziadosz, 2008). Many practitioners are eager to be involved from the ground-up in research projects and would welcome researchers to play a role in this aspect of the implementation process (Nelson et al., 2006;Pollio, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The translation and adoption of evidence-based practice principles has proved to be more difficult than researchers anticipated. Schools of social work are in a unique position to support this process within their home communities. Using the evidence-based practice process steps outlined by previous researchers, this article identifies specific strategies that schools of social work can adopt to support their broader communities as they attempt to adopt and sustain empirically supported interventions.
    Preview · Article · Oct 2010 · Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
  • Source
    • "Simple designs were observed in single studies that have a limited objective or scope. For instance, in seeking to determine whether the experience of using mixed methods accounted for possible changes in attitudes towards their use, Gioia and Dziadosz (2008) used semi-structured interview and focus group methods to obtain first-hand accounts of practitioners’ experiences in being trained to use an EBP, and a quantitative measure of attitudes towards the use of EBPs to identify changes in attitudes over time. In contrast, complex designs usually involve more than one study, each of which are linked by a set of related objectives. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes the application of mixed method designs in implementation research in 22 mental health services research studies published in peer-reviewed journals over the last 5 years. Our analyses revealed 7 different structural arrangements of qualitative and quantitative methods, 5 different functions of mixed methods, and 3 different ways of linking quantitative and qualitative data together. Complexity of design was associated with number of aims or objectives, study context, and phase of implementation examined. The findings provide suggestions for the use of mixed method designs in implementation research.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2010 · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Show more