Content uploaded by Ion Anghelescu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ion Anghelescu
Content may be subject to copyright.
536 Am J Psychiatry 165:4, April 2008
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
ment of acute agitation in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry
2002; 59:441–448
5. Meehan K, Zhang F, David S, Tohen M, Janicak P, Small J, Koch
M, Rizk R, Walker D, Tran P, Breier A: A double-blind, random-
ized comparison of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular in-
jections of olanzapine, lorazepam, or placebo in treating
acutely agitated patients diagnosed with bipolar mania. J Clin
Psychopharmacol 2001; 21:389–397
6. Wright P, Birkett M, David SR, Meehan K, Ferchland I, Alaka KJ,
Saunders JC, Krueger J, Bradley P, San L, Bernardo M, Reinstein
M, Breier A: Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of
intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular haloperidol in
the treatment of acute agitation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychi-
atry 2001; 158:1149–1151
CRISTIAN DAMSA, M.D.
Geneva, Switzerland
ERIC ADAM, M.Sc.
Liège, Belgium
CORALIE LAZIGNAC, M.D.
ADRIANA MIHAI, M.D.
Geneva, Switzerland
FRANCOIS DE GREGORIO, M.D.
Liège, Belgium
Geneva, Switzerland
JOSEPH LEJEUNE, M.D.
Liège, Belgium
SUSANNE MARIS, M.Sc.
EMMANUEL CLIVAZ, M.D.
Geneva, Switzerland
MICHAEL H. ALLEN, M.D.
Denver, Colo.
The authors report no competing interests.
This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060946) was accepted
for publication in October 2007.
Improvement in Refractory Obsessive
Compulsive Disorder With Dronabinol
TO THE EDITOR: It has been reported that 40%–60% of pa-
tients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not re-
spond to first-line treatment. Treatment options for these pa-
tients include switching to another agent or augmentation
(1). We report on two patients with treatment-resistant OCD
and comorbid axis I disorders who responded to an augmen-
tation with the cannabinoid dronabinol.
“Mrs. L” was a 38-year-old woman who was admitted
with recurrent major depression and OCD (Yale-Brown Ob-
sessive Compulsive Scale score: 20) after outpatient treat-
ment with paroxetine (60 mg) for 8 months and cognitive
behavioral therapy (CBT) were not efficacious. Switching
to clomipramine (300 mg) resulted in partial response af-
ter 12 weeks of treatment. Based on the patient’s report
that smoking marijuana usually relieved her symptoms,
an augmentation with dronabinol (2.5%; 10 mg t.i.d.) was
started. The prior medication was continued. While un-
dergoing treatment with dronabinol (2.5%), the patient’s
OCD symptoms decreased significantly within 10 days
(Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score: 10).
“Mr. K” was a 36-year-old man with schizophrenia and
OCD who was admitted for deterioration of psychotic and
obsessive symptoms (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive
Scale score: 23). During his course of illness, Mr. K had
been treated with antipsychotics (including haloperidol,
olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and aripiprazole),
both in monotherapy and in combination with selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors. His OCD symptoms in par-
ticular remained predominately treatment resistant.
Treatment with clozapine (400 mg), which he had already
received for more than 1 year (in combination with parox-
etine [60 mg] for 13 weeks) resulted only in partial re-
sponse of his psychotic and OCD symptoms. Switching par-
oxetine to clomipramine (for another 10 weeks), followed
by an additional course of 18 electroconvulsive therapy
treatments (right unilateral high dose), did not improve
the patient’s psychotic or OCD symptoms significantly. Af-
ter the addition of dronabinol to ongoing treatment with
clomipramine (150 mg) and clozapine (400 mg), a signifi-
cant reduction of OCD symptoms was observed within 2
weeks (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score: 15).
In order to prevent psychotic deterioration, dronabinol
(2.5%) was carefully increased to 10 mg b.i.d.
Apart from anticholinergic symptoms that preceded the
addition of dronabinol (patient 1: dry mouth, constipa-
tion; patient 2: constipation, hypotension), both patients
reported no side effects. In particular, there was no dete-
rioration of psychotic or mood disorder symptoms.
Based on data from case reports and small clinical trials
suggesting that cannabinoids can reduce symptoms of tic dis-
order (2) and on findings from genetic studies linking tic dis-
order with OCD (3), we hypothesized that cannabinoids
FIGURE 1. Scores of Agitated Patients After the First Intramuscular Injection With Olanzapine
a
t=10.59, p<0.0001
b
t=12.00, p<0.0001
c
t=11.43, p<0.0001
40
30
20
10
35
25
15
5
0
40
30
20
10
35
25
15
5
0
0
2
4
6
7
5
3
1
Score on Agitated
Behavior Scale
b
Score on Clinical Global
Impression, Severity Rating
c
Score on Positive and
Negative Syndrome Scale,
Excited Component
a
Baseline DischargeAfter 2
Hours
Baseline DischargeAfter 2
Hours
Baseline DischargeAfter 2
Hours
Am J Psychiatry 165:4, April 2008 537
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
might also reduce OCD symptoms. Moreover, there is evi-
dence suggesting that besides serotonergic and dopaminer-
gic systems, glutamatergic hyperactivity is involved in the
pathophysiology of OCD (4, 5). This view is supported by data
suggesting the efficacy of glutamate modulating drugs, such
as topiramate, memantine, riluzole, or N-acetylcysteine, in
the treatment of OCD (6). It has been reported that canna-
binoids inhibit glutamate release in the CNS (7, 8). Addition-
ally, cannabinoid type 1 (CB
1
) receptors are distributed abun-
dantly in the striatum (8), a brain region frequently associated
with OCD. Hence, it can be speculated that the anti-obsessive
effect observed in our patients may have been a consequence
of the glutamate modulation of the cannabinoid dronabinol.
Since it is well known that cannabinoids may trigger psy-
chotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia (8), caution
is warranted when prescribing for patients with a history of
the disorder.
References
1. Kaplan A, Hollander E: A review of pharmacologic treatments
for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54:
1111–1118
2. Müller-Vahl KR, Schneider U, Prevedel H, Theloe K, Kolbe H,
Daldrup T, Emrich HM: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is
effective in the treatment of tics in Tourette syndrome: a 6-
week randomized trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64:459–465
3. Shavitt RG, Hounie AG, Rosário Campos MC, Miguel EC:
Tourette’s syndrome. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2006; 29:471–
486
4. Arnold PD, Sicard T, Burroughs E, Richter MA, Kennedy JL:
Glutamate-transporter gene SLC1A1 associated with obsessive-
compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63:769–776
5. Chakrabarty K, Bhattacharyya S, Christopher R, Khanna S:
Glutamatergic dysfunction in OCD. Neuropsychopharmacology
2005; 30:1735–1740
6. Pittenger C, Krystal JH, Coric V: Glutamate-modulating drugs as
novel pharmacotherapeutic agents in the treatment of obses-
sive-compulsive disorder. NeuroRx 2006; 3:69–81
7. Fujiwara M, Egashira N: New perspectives in the studies on en-
docannabinoid and cannabis: abnormal behaviors associate
with CB1-receptor and development of therapeutic applica-
tion. J Pharmacol Sci 2004; 96:363–366
8. Pacher P, Bátkai S, Kunos G: The endocannabinoid system as
an emerging target of pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol Rev 2006;
58:389–462
FRANK SCHINDLER, M.D.
ION ANGHELESCU, M.D., P
H.D.
FRANCESCA REGEN, M.D.
MARIA JOCKERS-SCHERUBL, M.D., P
H.D.
Berlin, Germany
The authors report no competing interests.
This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07061016) was accepted
for publication in September 2007.
Maintenance Treatment With Transcranial
Magnetic Stimulation in a Patient With Late-
Onset Schizophrenia
TO THE EDITOR: A recent meta-analysis (1) concluded that re-
petitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) efficiently
reduces resistant auditory hallucinations in patients with
schizophrenia (effect size=0.76). Nevertheless, treatment is
presently only provided over short periods of time, and little is
known about longer-term impact. Maintenance treatment
protocols have been developed, and we previously described
a case report involving a maintenance protocol with a weekly,
once-a-day stimulation (2); however, we failed to demon-
strate long-term benefits. To our knowledge, the case pre-
sented below is the first report of a twice-daily transcranial
magnetic stimulation as efficacious for auditory hallucina-
tions, both in acute and maintenance treatment.
“Ms. A,” a 55-year-old right-handed, postmenopausal
woman who had DSM-IV late-onset schizophrenia with an
illness duration of 2 years, was referred for transcranial
magnetic stimulation treatment. She was noted to have
benzodiazepine addiction involving the use of lorazepam
(9 mg/day). She had been suffering from resistant audi-
tory hallucinations for 2 years (very frequent and loud,
with >5 critical and command voices). She was unrespon-
sive to four antipsychotic medication trials lasting > 4
months each, including haloperidol (5 mg/day), amisul-
pride (1200 mg/day), olanzapine (15 mg/day), and risperi-
done (8 mg/day). A detailed assessment did not reveal
any other pathology or transcranial magnetic stimulation
contraindications. Auditory hallucinations were assessed
using the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (3), and pos-
itive symptoms were assessed using the Scale for the As-
sessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Lorazepam with-
drawal was completed without exacerbation of the
psychotic symptoms (Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale
score: 34). Four months after her initial presentation, the
patient gave informed consent and was included in a
transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol. Twice-a-day,
1000 low-frequency repetitive stimulations (1 Hz) were
administered to the temporoparietal cortex at 100% of
motor threshold over a 5-day period. The patient’s cur-
rent dose of risperidone was maintained during treat-
ment with transcranial magnetic stimulation. After the
first course, auditory hallucinations were moderately im-
proved, with a 35% reduction in her Auditory Hallucina-
tion Rating Scale score, which did not change over the
next several months, as observed in a follow-up assess-
ment. However, the patient’s general SAPS score im-
proved, with a 30% reduction in severity.
Six months after the first course of transcranial mag-
netic stimulation therapy, the patient presented with a
relapse of hallucinations. A new transcranial magnetic
stimulation course, with the same parameters, was con-
ducted. This second course was followed by a once-per-
month, twice-daily maintenance protocol (one session in
the morning, the other in the afternoon on the same day).
The patient’s auditory hallucinations were greatly im-
proved, by 80%, and her SAPS score decreased from 38 to
16. This maintenance course was associated with a remis-
sion of auditory hallucination symptoms, with a stabiliza-
tion of SAPS scores at 10 over the next 6 months. Pres-
ently, more than 1 year later, Ms. A is not receiving any
antipsychotic medication, and her Auditory Hallucination
Rating Scale and SAPS scores remain at 0.
Our case raises the question as to whether twice-daily
transcranial magnetic stimulation may be useful in some pa-
tients as a possible maintenance intervention. Certainly, fur-
ther research will help us to understand whether the benefits
observed in this single case might also be evident in larger
studies.