Content uploaded by Susanne Straif-Bourgeois
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Susanne Straif-Bourgeois on Nov 23, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Chronic Disease and Related Conditions at
Emergency Treatment Facilities in the New Orleans
Area After Hurricane Katrina
Andrea J. Sharma, PhD, MPH, Edward C. Weiss, MD, MPH, Stacy L. Young, MPH,
Kevin Stephens, MD, JD, Raoult Ratard, MD, MPH,
Susanne Straif-Bourgeois, PhD, MPH, Theresa M. Sokol, MPH,
Peter Vranken, DPh, and Carol H. Rubin, DVM
ABSTRACT
Background: Disaster preparations usually focus on preventing injury and infectious disease. However,
people with chronic disease and related conditions (CDRCs), including obstetric/gynecological condi-
tions, may be vulnerable to disruptions caused by disasters.
Methods: We used surveillance data collected after Hurricane Katrina to characterize the burden of visits
for CDRCs at emergency treatment facilities (eg, hospitals, disaster medical assistance teams, military
aid stations). In 6 parishes in and around New Orleans, health care providers at 29 emergency
treatment facilities completed a standardized questionnaire for injury and illness surveillance from
September 8 through October 22, 2005.
Results: Of 21,673 health care visits, 58.0% were for illness (24.3% CDRCs, 75.7% non-CDRCs), 29.1%
for injury, 7.2% for medication refills, and 5.7% for routine or follow-up care. The proportion of visits
for CDRCs increased with age. Among men presenting with CDRCs, the most common illnesses were
cardiovascular disease (36.8%), chronic lower-respiratory disease (12.3%), and diabetes/glucose
abnormalities (7.7%). Among women presenting with CDRCs, the most common were cardiovascular
disease (29.2%), obstetric/gynecological conditions (18.2%), and chronic lower-respiratory disease
(12.0%). Subsequent hospitalization occurred among 28.7% of people presenting with CDRCs versus
10.9% of those with non-CDRCs and 3.8% of those with injury.
Conclusions: Our data illustrate the importance of including CDRCs as a part of emergency response
planning. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2:27–32)
Key Words: surveillance, chronic disease, disasters, Louisiana, obstetrics
On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina made
landfall along the Gulf Coast of the United
States as a category 3 storm (winds 111–130
mph), resulting in widespread flooding of areas in and
around New Orleans. Disaster response traditionally
focuses on preventing injury and infectious disease.
1
However, among populations with a large burden of
chronic disease, management of chronic disease and
related conditions is essential to prevent severe ex-
acerbations or complications.
2,3
After Hurricane Kat-
rina, a limited-needs assessment conducted in evac-
uation centers demonstrated that the majority of
non–injury-related health care visits were for medi-
cation refills, oral health problems, or chronic disease
conditions.
4
Another survey reported that 41% of
evacuees had a history of at least 1 chronic disease.
5
There are almost no published data on the burden of
chronic conditions at emergency treatment facilities.
In response to Hurricane Katrina, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Lou-
isiana Department of Health and Hospitals imple-
mented active surveillance to monitor for injuries and
illnesses at functioning emergency treatment facilities
(eg, hospitals, disaster medical assistance teams, mil-
itary aid stations) in and around New Orleans.
6,7
The
objectives of the present analysis were to determine
the prevalence of visits for chronic disease and related
conditions (CDRCs) from September 8 to October
22, 2005, at emergency treatment facilities serving
the area, and to characterize the distribution of spe-
cific CDRCs by age and sex.
METHODS
On September 8, 2005, the Louisiana Department of
Health and Hospitals and the CDC established an
active surveillance system for injury and illness that
captured information from visits to functioning emer-
RESEARCH
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 27
https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0 Published online by Cambridge University Press
gency treatment facilities (eg, hospitals, disaster medical as-
sistance teams, military aid stations) providing acute care in
6 parishes (Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St Bernard, St
Charles, and St Tammany) in and around New Orleans.
6,7
Data were collected prospectively as facilities opened and
joined the surveillance system. Retrospective data were col-
lected from hospital facilities when available. This report
focuses on data collected from the 8 hospital and 21 nonhos-
pital facilities participating in the surveillance system from
September 8 to October 22, 2005.
Health care providers were instructed to complete a stan-
dardized 1-page case-report form for every patient visit to an
emergency treatment facility. The form was developed by the
CDC for use in clinical, posthurricane settings. Data were
collected on patient demographics and reason for visit (ie,
injury, illness, both illness and injury, medication refill, or
routine care or follow-up). Data also were collected on symp-
toms, mechanism of injury, primary clinical impressions (for
illness), preexisting conditions, and disposition (ie, hospital-
ized, discharged, left without treatment, left against medical
advice, transferred, expired, unknown) among visits for in-
jury and illness. For the purpose of this analysis, patients with
both illness and injury (n ⫽299) were combined with those
who had only illness (n ⫽15,069) into 1 illness category.
When data collection by health care providers was not prac-
tical, epidemiologists were assigned to abstract the medical
record.
To characterize CDRCs, health care providers were in-
structed to select 1 primary clinical impression for the most
severe complaint or condition from a checklist that included
the following categories: cardiovascular disease; cerebrovas-
cular diseases; hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, or diabetes mel-
litus; renal failure; and chronic lower respiratory disease. The
list included 13 other conditions that we considered non-
CDRC (eg, dehydration, heat-related illness, infectious dis-
eases, mental health–related conditions) and an “other” cat-
egory with space to record a clinical impression. To capture
CDRC data in the write-in fields, the following 7 additional
categories were created: dental; obstetric/gynecological
(women only); chronic gastrointestinal; chronic pain; hema-
tology/oncology; arthritis; and other chronic conditions. A
medical epidemiologist (E.C.W.) categorized subjects as hav-
ing a CDRC if they had a clinical impression consistent with
symptoms, acute events, or complications of a chronic con-
dition. In cases in which more than 1 clinical impression was
noted, a person was categorized as having a CDRC if 1
clinical impression was consistent with a CDRC.
Of the 26,230 visits recorded from September 8 to October
22, 2005, a total of 2200 (8.4%) were excluded because of
REASON FOR VISITDISPOSITION
Total number
of visits
n=21,673*
Illness
n=12,567
(58.0%)
Injury
n=6,308
(29.1%)
Medication Refill
n=1,557
(7.2%)
Follow-Up Visit
n=1,241
(5.7%)
CDRCs
n=3,054
(24.3%)
Disposition Data
Available
n=2,862
(93.7%)
Hospitalized
n=822
(28.7%)
Non-CDRCs
n=9,513
(75.7%)
Disposition Data
Available
n=8,859
(93.1%)
Hospitalized
n=966
(10.9%)
Disposition Data
Available
N=5,633
(89.3%)
Hospitalized
n=216
(3.8%)
*4,557 visits excluded from the analysis due to reason for visit was immunization (n=3) or unknown (n=358), or missing data on the following: primary clinical
impression (n=1510), mechanism of injury (n=329), or age and/or sex (n=2357).
CDRC = Chronic disease and related conditions.
FIGURE 1
Distribution of visits to emergency treatment facilities, by reason for visit and disposition, in New
Orleans area September 8 –October 22, 2005
Chronic Disease After Hurricane Katrina
28 Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness VOL. 2/NO. 1
https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0 Published online by Cambridge University Press
missing data regarding reason for visit (n ⫽358, 1.4%),
reason for visit was immunization (n ⫽3), or if the reason for
visit was known, data was missing on primary clinical im-
pression (n ⫽1510, 5.8%) or mechanism of injury (n ⫽329,
1.3%). An additional 2357 (9.0%) visits were excluded be-
cause of missing data about age or sex. A total of 21,673 visits
were included in the analysis.
We describe the proportion of visits to emergency treatment
facilities by reason for visit and the distribution of CDRCs by
age group and sex. The distributions of CDRCs among men
and women were reported separately to account for an addi-
tional primary clinical impression (obstetric/gynecological)
among women. Disposition data were collected for 17,354 of
the 18,875 visits for injury or illness. In a subanalysis, we
describe the proportion of visits in which the disposition was
hospitalization. All of the data analyses were performed using
SAS software, version 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
RESULTS
Of the 21,673 visits, 58.0% presented for illness, 29.1% for
injuries, 7.2% for medication refills, and 5.7% for routine or
follow-up care (Fig. 1). Among visits for illness (n ⫽12,567),
75.7% were for non-CDRC illnesses (eg, dehydration, heat-
related illness, infectious disease, mental health) and 24.3%
were for CDRCs. The proportion of visits for illness due to
CDRCs increased with age, from 12.3% among patients ages
0 to 19 years to 40.9% among those ages 80 years or older
(Fig. 2).
Among the 3054 patients presenting with a CDRC, the most
common CDRCs were cardiovascular disease (32.8%), ob-
stetric/gynecological conditions (18.2%), and chronic lower
respiratory disease (12.1%; Table 1). Among the 1435 men
presenting with a CDRC, the most common CDRCs were
cardiovascular disease (36.8%); chronic lower respiratory dis-
ease (12.3%); and hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, or diabetes
mellitus (7.7%; Table 2). The proportion of men presenting
with cardiovascular disease increased with age from 14.0%
among those ages 0 to 19 years to 54.9% among those ages 80
years or older. Chronic lower respiratory disease was the most
common CDRC among men ages 0 to 19 years (54.7%) and
the second-most common CDRC among men in all age
groups 40 years or older (8.8%). Dental problems were the
most common CDRC among men ages 20 to 39 years
(20.2%).
Among the 1619 women presenting with a CDRC, the most
common CDRCs were cardiovascular disease (29.2%), ob-
stetric/gynecological conditions (18.2%), and chronic lower
respiratory disease (12.0%; Table 3). The proportion present-
ing for cardiovascular disease increased with age from 5.7%
among women ages 0 to 19 years to 46.2% among women
ages 80 years or older. Obstetric/gynecological conditions
were the most common CDRCs among women ages 0 to 19
years (33.6%) and 20 to 39 years (48.0%). Chronic lower
respiratory conditions were the second-most common CDRC
among women in all age groups (12.0%), affecting the great-
est proportion among women ages 0 to 19 years (28.7%).
Overall, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, or diabetes mellitus
was the fourth-most common CDRC category among women
(6.1%).
Among the 17,354 visits for which data on disposition were
available (Fig. 1), hospitalization was the disposition for
28.7% of people presenting with CDRCs compared with
10.9% with non-CDRC illness and 3.8% with injuries. Al-
though the proportion of visits for which the disposition was
hospitalization varied by sex and increased with age across all
reasons for visit (Fig. 3), within each age group hospitaliza-
tion was more common for visits for CDRCs than for visits
for either non-CDRCs or injuries.
12.3% 18.4% 24.9%
37.1% 40.9%
87.7% 81.6% 75.1%
62.9% 59.1%
0%
50%
100%
0-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 ≥80
Age Group (years)
non-CDRC
CDRC
FIGURE 2
Among visits for illness, the proportion with primary
clinical impressions related to chronic disease or
related conditions (CDRCs) or non-CDRCs by age group
TABLE 1
Total Number of People Presenting With Chronic
Disease and Related Conditions at Emergency
Treatment Facilities in New Orleans Area After
Hurricane Katrina, September 8 –October 22, 2005
Chronic Disease and Related Conditions
nⴝ3054
No. %
Cardiovascular disease 1001 32.8
Cerebrovascular disease 149 4.9
Hyper-/hypoglycemia, diabetes 209 6.8
Renal failure 77 2.5
Chronic lower respiratory disease 371 12.1
Dental problems 172 5.6
Obstetric/gynecological conditions 294 18.2*
Chronic gastrointestinal conditions 201 6.6
Chronic pain syndromes 132 4.3
Hematology, oncology 131 4.3
Arthritis 103 3.4
Other chronic conditions 214 7.0
*Percentage based on only the female population, n ⫽1619.
Chronic Disease After Hurricane Katrina
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 29
https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0 Published online by Cambridge University Press
DISCUSSION
Hurricane Katrina created substantive public health and
medical challenges, especially in southern Louisiana, where
the subsequent flooding of New Orleans imposed cata-
strophic public health conditions. Several large hospitals
were rendered inoperable. Nearly all of the smaller treatment
facilities and pharmacies were shut down, leaving people
with chronic medical conditions without access to their usual
sources of medical care and medications.
8
In this article, we
have described the relevance of CDRCs in medical response.
After Hurricane Katrina, CDRCs accounted for a significant
proportion of visits to emergency treatment facilities in and
around New Orleans for illness, particularly among people
ages 60 years or older. The burden was magnified by the high
rate of hospitalization among those presenting with CDRCs.
Cardiovascular disease, chronic lower respiratory disease, ob-
stetric/gynecological conditions, and hyperglycemia, hypo-
glycemia, or diabetes were the most common CDRCs. Al-
though not as common, cerebrovascular disease and renal
failure often require immediate interventions with medica-
tion or dialysis to prevent further morbidity or mortality.
Disaster preparations usually focus on preventing injury and
infectious disease. Disaster preparedness also includes plan-
ning for the needs of people who are vulnerable to the stresses
and disruptions caused by the disaster. This includes people
with either recognized or unrecognized chronic medical con-
ditions. Preparations for controlling chronic diseases and
adverse pregnancy outcomes following a disaster can be
guided to some degree by the predisaster disease burden, by
an awareness of the immediate CDRC needs for specialty
TABLE 2
Number of Men Presenting at Emergency Treatment Facilities for Chronic Disease and Related Conditions After
Hurricane Katrina, by Age Group, in New Orleans Area September 8 –October 22, 2005
Chronic Disease and Related Conditions
0–19 y 20–39 y 40–59 y 60–79 y 80ⴙy Total
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Cardiovascular disease 12 14.0 59 22.4 209 36.0 181 47.3 67 54.9 528 36.8
Cerebrovascular disease 0 0 7 2.7 32 5.5 28 7.3 6 4.9 73 5.1
Hyper-/hypoglycemia, diabetes 2 2.3 18 6.8 57 9.8 25 6.5 8 6.6 110 7.7
Renal failure 0 0 5 1.9 23 4.0 15 3.9 8 6.6 51 3.6
Chronic lower respiratory disease 47 54.7 33 12.6 47 8.1 41 10.1 8 6.6 176 12.3
Dental problems 4 4.7 53 20.2 39 6.7 9 2.4 1 0.8 106 7.4
Chronic gastrointestinal conditions 11 12.8 20 7.6 43 7.4 25 6.5 8 6.6 107 7.5
Chronic pain syndromes 4 4.7 17 6.5 22 3.8 3 0.8 1 0.8 47 3.3
Hematology, oncology 2 2.3 22 8.4 25 4.3 18 4.7 7 5.7 74 5.2
Arthritis 0 0 7 2.7 38 6.5 17 4.4 0 0 62 4.3
Other chronic conditions 4 4.7 22 8.4 46 7.9 21 5.5 8 6.6 101 7.0
Total 86 100.0 263 100.0 581 100.0 383 100.0 122 100.0 1435 100.0
TABLE 3
Number of Women Presenting at Emergency Treatment Facilities for Chronic Disease and Related Conditions After
Hurricane Katrina, by Age Group, in New Orleans Area September 8 –October 22, 2005
Chronic Disease and Related Conditions
0–19 y 20–39 y 40–59 y 60–79 y 80ⴙy Total
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Cardiovascular disease 7 5.7 36 8.8 160 30.9 191 47.8 79 46.2 473 29.2
Cerebrovascular disease 0 0 4 1.0 22 4.3 34 8.5 16 9.4 76 4.7
Hyper-/hypoglycemia, diabetes 5 4.1 10 2.5 44 8.5 34 8.5 6 3.5 99 6.1
Renal failure 0 0 3 0.7 7 1.4 13 3.3 3 1.8 26 1.6
Chronic lower respiratory disease 35 28.7 43 10.5 64 12.4 35 8.8 18 10.5 195 12.0
Dental problems 5 4.1 30 7.4 26 5.0 4 1.0 1 0.6 66 4.1
Obstetric/gynecological conditions 41 33.6 196 48.0 44 8.5 5 1.3 8 4.7 294 18.2
Chronic gastrointestinal conditions 12 9.8 17 4.2 30 5.8 22 5.5 13 7.6 94 5.8
Chronic pain syndromes 5 4.1 30 7.4 43 8.3 7 1.8 0 0 85 5.3
Hematology, oncology 5 4.1 15 3.7 14 2.7 18 4.5 5 2.9 57 3.5
Arthritis 0 0 2 0.5 22 4.3 12 3.0 5 2.9 41 2.5
Other chronic conditions 7 5.7 22 5.4 42 8.1 25 6.3 17 9.9 113 7.0
Total 122 100.0 408 100.0 518 100.0 400 100.0 171 100.0 1619 100.0
Chronic Disease After Hurricane Katrina
30 Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness VOL. 2/NO. 1
https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0 Published online by Cambridge University Press
care and medications, and by the capacity of the health care
delivery system in the area.
3
Whether previously diagnosed or
not, chronic illnesses can be exacerbated by disaster condi-
tions (eg, lack of food or water, extreme heat or cold, physical
and mental stress).
9–12
Therefore, active surveillance of
CDRCs following a disaster can help tailor disaster response
efforts. For example, data could be used to direct essential
resources—such as health care providers, medications, or
equipment—to potential shortage areas.
13
Without appropri-
ate care following a disaster, patients with chronic stable
conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or dialy-
sis-dependent renal failure, may experience severe exacerba-
tions or complications such as heart attack, diabetic ketoac-
idosis, or even death.
To improve surveillance for chronic disease following a di-
saster, a questionnaire that limits the potential for misclassi-
fication is needed. Since Hurricane Katrina, surveillance
questionnaires have been updated to distinguish between
exacerbations of chronic illness and presentation for stable
chronic conditions, as well as presentation for pregnancy
complications versus gynecological conditions not related to
pregnancy.
13
Ideally, the questionnaire would be added to the
forms already used by disaster medical assistance teams, and
could be integrated into the medical record with ease.
The findings in this article are subject to several limitations.
First, the surveillance system was not specifically designed to
detect CDRCs. Substantial ambiguity occurred in the symp-
toms and diagnoses reported, resulting in probable misclassi-
fication; however, an effort was made to classify CDRCs
conservatively. Second, our estimates of CDRCs may be low
because we did not include mental health disorders, medica-
tion refills, or follow-up care visits. Mental health was not
included as a chronic condition because the category descrip-
tion did not differentiate chronic mental health conditions
from acute disorders related to the disaster. Similarly, the
underlying medical condition of those requiring medication
refills or follow-up care was not ascertained; therefore, the
proportion of visits for CDRCs remains unknown. Third,
owing to the mass evacuation of the New Orleans area, the
loss of health care infrastructure, and the lack of baseline
data, determining the absolute burden of CDRCs on the
health care system was not possible and generalizability to
future disasters is limited. Fourth, prospective data collection
began on September 8. Thus, there is little information on
the distribution of visits in the first week after the hurricane.
Finally, the proportion of obstetric/gynecological visits result-
ing from complications of pregnancy is not known; however,
write-in data suggest that at least 25% of visits were preg-
nancy related.
Despite these limitations, this report contains important in-
formation about medical needs following a disaster. Because
of the substantial burden of CDRCs, these findings highlight
the importance of emergency response plans and improved
active surveillance to address chronic diseases, especially
among older adults, and to protect the health of pregnant
women. Rapid initiation of surveillance following a disaster is
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
sCRDCsCRDC-noN
y
rujn
Is
CRD
C
sCRDC-noN
y
r
u
jn
I
Reason for Visit
0-19 y
20-39 y
40-59 y
60-79 y
≥80 y
N
EMOWN
E
M
FIGURE 3
Proportion of visits for which disposition was hospitalization by sex, age, and
reason for visit
Chronic Disease After Hurricane Katrina
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 31
https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0 Published online by Cambridge University Press
crucial to accurately characterize the burden of disease and
direct the appropriate essential resource needs to emergency
treatment facilities in the area. The findings underscore a
need for including chronic disease care and prevention of
complications in predisaster planning and postdisaster sur-
veillance.
About the Authors
Drs Sharma, Weiss, and Vranken are with the Epidemic Intelligence Service,
Office of Workforce and Career Development, CDC; Ms Young and Dr Rubin
are with the Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National
Center for Environmental Health, CDC; Dr Stephens is with the City of New
Orleans Health Department; and Drs Ratard and Straif-Bourgeois and Ms Sokol
are with the Office of Public Health, Louisiana Department of Health and
Hospitals.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrea J. Sharma, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop K-26, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta,
GA 30341-3724 (e-mail: ajsharma@cdc.gov).
Received for publication August 17, 2007; accepted December 5, 2007.
Authors’ Disclosure
The findings in this report are based, in part, on contributions by the many
men and women who provided emergency treatment services throughout the
greater New Orleans area during the disaster response, the Greater New
Orleans Public Health Response Team, and the National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. The findings and
conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the views of the CDC.
ISSN: 1935-7893 © 2008 by the American Medical Association and Lip-
pincott Williams & Wilkins.
DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0
REFERENCES
1. Noji EK, ed. The Public Health Consequences of Disasters. New York:
Oxford University Press; 1997.
2. Mokdad AH, Mensah GA, Posner SF et al. When chronic conditions
become acute: prevention and control of chronic diseases and adverse
health outcomes during natural disasters. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online], vol
2. November 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/Pcd/issues/2005/nov/05_0201.htm.
Accessed January 22, 2008.
3. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Link MW et al. Chronic disease in health emer-
gencies: in the eye of the hurricane. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online], vol 3.
April 2006;3. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/apr/05_0235.htm. Ac-
cessed January 22, 2008.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update on CDC’s response
to Hurricane Katrina. US Department of Health and Human Services,
CDC Web site. September 19, 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/od/katrina/09-
19-05.htm. Accessed January 22, 2008.
5. The Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University
Survey Project. Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees. Henry J Kaiser
Family Foundation Web site 2005. http://www.kff.org/newsmedia/upload/
7401.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2008.
6. Lopez C, Bergeron T, Ratard R et al. Injury and illness surveillance in
hospitals and acute-care facilities after hurricanes Katrina and Rita—
New Orleans area, Louisiana, September 25-October 15, 2005. MMWR
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:35–38.
7. Williams W, Guarisco J, Guillot K et al. Surveillance for illness and
injury after hurricane Katrina—New Orleans, Louisiana, September
8-25, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:1018–1021.
8. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. The
White House Web site. February 23, 2006. http://www.whitehouse.gov/
reports/katrina-lessons-learned.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2008.
9. Kirizuka K, Nishizaki H, Kohriyama K et al. Influences of the great
Hanshin-Awaji earthquake on glycemic control in diabetic patients.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;36:193–196.
10. Kario K, McEwen BS, Pickering TG. Disasters and the heart: a review
of the effects of earthquake-induced stress on cardiovascular disease.
Hypertens Res. 2003;26:355–367.
11. Sengul A, Ozer E, Salman S et al. Lessons learnt from influences of the
Marmara earthquake on glycemic control and quality of life in people
with type 1 diabetes. Endocr J. 2004;51:407–414.
12. Trichopoulos D, Katsouyanni K, Zavitsanos X, Tzonou A, Dalla-Vorgia
P. Psychological stress and fatal heart attack: the Athens (1981) earth-
quake natural experiment. Lancet. 1983;1:441–444.
13. Active public health surveillance in clinical care settings. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention Web site. July 24, 2006. http://www.
bt.cdc.gov/disasters/hurricanes/asccs.asp. Accessed January 22, 2008.
Chronic Disease After Hurricane Katrina
32 Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness VOL. 2/NO. 1
https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0 Published online by Cambridge University Press