Long-term follow-up after diagnosis resulting from newborn screening: Statement of the US Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases in Newborns and Children

Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics (Impact Factor: 7.33). 05/2008; 10(4):259-61. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b64f9
Source: PubMed


The US Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases in Newborns and Children provides guidance to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with heritable disorders, with a special emphasis on those conditions detectable through newborn screening. Although long-term follow-up is necessary to maximize the benefit of diagnosis through newborn screening, such care is variable and inconsistent. To begin to improve long-term follow-up, the Advisory Committee has identified its key features, including the assurance and provision of quality chronic disease management, condition-specific treatment, and age-appropriate preventive care throughout the lifespan of affected individuals. There are four components central to achieving long-term follow-up: care coordination through a medical home, evidence-based treatment, continuous quality improvement, and new knowledge discovery.

Download full-text


Available from: R Rodney Howell, Mar 12, 2014
  • Source
    • "The Children's Health Act of 2000 created an advisory committee within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to bring greater uniformity to the nation's NBS efforts [American Academy of Pediatrics , 2000]. A primary function of this committee, the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC), is to conduct evidence based reviews of proposed conditions to be added to a uniform NBS panel [Kemper et al., 2008]. When appropriate, the SACHDNC will recommend pilot studies to develop the evidence on which recommendations can be made. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A population-based pilot study of newborns screening for a rare genetic condition, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), is being conducted with funding from the National Institutes of Health. The first component of the study is to assess the ethical, legal, and social implications of population-based pilot studies with a focus on public engagement and parental decision-making for the proposed opt-out approach in this research. We conducted focus groups with members of the general public to ascertain attitudes about the pilot study and acceptability of an opt-out approach in two states, Colorado and Utah, where the pilot screening is being proposed (N = 70). We developed an informational video for the project and showed it to the groups prior to the discussion in order to inform participants about population-based research, newborn screening (NBS), permission/consent models, and SMA. Results indicated support for the conduct of pilot studies that is consistent with the current standard of practice for similar population-based programs. There was support for an opt-out approach for parental decision-making; however there was limited parental knowledge about population-based research, NBS and SMA. In general, our participants considered this pilot study to be low risk and of potential benefit to infants and families. The majority of participants were supportive of an opt-out approach with information delivered through various avenues © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2013 · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Source
    • "defined LTFU as, " … comprising assurance and provision of quality chronic disease management, conditionspecific treatment, and age-appropriate preventive care throughout the individual's lifespan. " The SACHDNC further acknowledged LTFU as necessary to maximize the benefit of NDBS diagnosis, expanding the concept from data management to systematic, comprehensive care of affected individuals (Kemper et al. 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine how US newborn dried bloodspot screening (NDBS) programs obtain patient-level data on clinical genetic counseling services offered to families of newborns identified through newborn NDBS and the extent to which newborns and their families receive these services. These data should serve to inform programs and lead to improved NDBS follow-up services. Collaborations were established with three state NDBS programs that reported systematically tracking genetic counseling services to newborns and their families identified through NDBS. A study protocol and data abstraction form were developed and IRB approvals obtained. Data from three state NDBS programs on a total of 151 patients indicated that genetic services are documented systematically only by metabolic clinics, most often by genetic counselors. Data from 69 endocrinology patients indicated infrequent referrals for genetic services; as expected higher for congenital adrenal hyperplasia than congenital hypothyroidism. Endocrinology patients were often counseled by physicians. While systematic tracking of genetic counseling services may be desirable for quality assurance of NDBS follow-up services, current systems do not appear conducive to this practice. Clinical records are not typically shared with NDBS programs and tracking of follow-up clinical genetic services has not been generally defined as a NDBS program responsibility. Rather, tracking of clinical services, while recognized as useful data, has been viewed by NDBS programs as a research project. The associated IRB requirements for patient-related research may pose an additional challenge. National guidance for NDBS programs that define quality genetic service indicators and monitoring responsibilities are needed. US experiences in this regard may provide information that can assist developing programs in avoiding tracking issues.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2011 · Journal of community genetics
  • Source
    • "Without additional data, we cannot determine whether the reported increase in CH prevalence in the US in recent decades [7] is real or artifactual, or the degree to which discontinuation of thyroid hormone treatment may be appropriate. Public health responsibility requires the collection of long-term follow-up data [26] to address these fundamental questions. Such data need to include findings from laboratory tests of thyroid hormone status and be representative of all children with CH, not just those managed by pediatric endocrinologists. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thyroid hormone treatment in children with congenital hypothyroidism can prevent intellectual disability. Guidelines recommend that children diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism through newborn screening remain on treatment to at least 3 years of age, after which a trial off therapy can determine which children have transient hypothyroidism. The purpose of this study was to describe the rate at which children with congenital hypothyroidism in the United States discontinue thyroid hormone treatment in early childhood. Retrospective analysis of the 2002-2006 MarketScan(R) Commercial Claims and Encounters research databases and the 2001-2005 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid databases. Children were classified as having congenital hypothyroidism based on billing codes and having filled a prescription for thyroid hormone treatment. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was used to determine discontinuation rates. There were a total of 412 Medicaid-enrolled children and 292 privately-insured children with presumed congenital hypothyroidism included in this study. The overall birth prevalence of congenital hypothyroidism across both datasets was about 1 per 2,300. By 36 months, the percentage who had discontinued thyroid replacement treatment was 38% (95% Confidence Interval: 32%-44%). Medicaid-enrolled children had a more rapid decline in the first 24 months of treatment compared to those with private insurance (P = 0.02). More than one-third of children treated for congenital hypothyroidism discontinued treatment within 36 months, which is inconsistent with current guidelines. It is not known how many of these children required continued treatment or experience adverse effects from discontinuation. These findings emphasize the critical need for follow-up systems to monitor the outcome of newborn screening.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2010 · BMC Pediatrics
Show more