Article

Stress Effects on Lung Function in Asthma are Mediated by Changes in Airway Inflammation

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Psychosomatic Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.47). 06/2008; 70(4):468-75. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816f9c2f
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To examine the association of changes in current negative mood and long-term daily hassles with changes in lung function and airway inflammation in patients suffering from asthma and in healthy controls. Associations between psychological factors and asthma symptoms have been documented, but the relationship between airway inflammation and psychological factors has been largely unexplored.
Data were analyzed from 46 asthma patients and 25 controls who completed questionnaires on current mood and daily hassles at two assessments 3 months apart. Lung function was measured by spirometry (forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))) and airway inflammation by the fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO). Regression analyses controlling for allergen load and air pollution (ozone) were calculated to study the association between changes in psychological factors and changes in lung function and airway inflammation, and to examine the mediational role of airway inflammation in the stress-lung function association.
In patients with asthma, increases in negative affect were associated with decreases in FEV(1) and increases in FeNO. For daily hassles, a reverse pattern of associations was found, with decreases in daily hassles linked to decreases in FEV(1) and increases in FeNO. Mediation analyses showed that FeNO was a significant mediator of the association of both negative affect and daily hassles with lung function changes. No significant associations were found for healthy controls.
Psychological variables are consistently associated with spirometric lung function and airway inflammation in asthma patients. For asthma patients, effects of acute negative affect must be distinguished from more chronic distress due to daily hassles.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: David Rosenfield
  • Source
    • "In vivo infection and inflammation in the lung tissue of CCl4 treated rats show the deleterious effects of CCl4. Edema and inflammatory responses of lungs are positively linked with the function of lungs, together with the oxygenation index and the airway pressure [38]. Lung injuries and inflammation can be attenuated by inhibiting the production of ROS. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the current study protective effect of ethanol extract of Pistacia chinensis bark (PCEB) was investigated in rats against CCl4 induced lung and thyroid injuries. PCEB dose dependently inhibited the rise of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, hydrogen peroxide, nitrite, and protein content and restored the levels of antioxidant enzymes, that is, catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione-S-transferase, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and quinone reductase in both lung and thyroid tissues of CCl4 treated rats. Decrease in number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and hemoglobin and T3 and T4 content as well as increase in monocytes, eosinophils, and lymphocytes count with CCl4 were restored to normal level with PCEB treatment. Histological study of CCl4 treated rats showed various lung injuries like rupture of alveolar walls and bronchioles, aggregation of fibroblasts, and disorganized Clara cells. Similarly, histology of CCl4 treated thyroid tissues displayed damaged thyroid follicles, hypertrophy, and colloidal depletion. However, PCEB exhibited protective behaviour for lungs and thyroid, with improved histological structure in a dose dependant manner. Presence of three known phenolic compounds, that is, rutin, tannin, and gallic acid, and three unknown compounds was verified in thin layer chromatographic assessment of PCEB. In conclusion, P. chinensis exhibited antioxidant activity by the presence of free radical quenching constituents.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · BioMed Research International
  • Source
    • "In contrast, Ritz et al. (2011) found that, in both healthy and asthmatic participants, acute psychosocial laboratory stress led to an increase in airway NO at the point when cortisol was the highest after stress, whereas Chen et al. (2010) found elevations of airway NO following a stressful interview in asthmatic children with low socioeconomic status. Another study found that higher momentary negative affect was related to greater airway NO levels; in contrast, daily hassles in the previous three months were related to lower airway NO in asthma patients but not in healthy controls (Kullowatz et al., 2008). Taken together, these findings suggest that the relationship between psychological factors and NO may differ depending on the psychological construct that is examined. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychosocial factors such as social support and depression have long been associated with health outcomes. Elevated depressive symptoms are usually associated with worse health outcomes, whereas social support has been related to improvements in health. Nitric oxide levels are an important marker of both cardiovascular health and immune function. Research suggests that exhaled nitric oxide is affected by stress, negative affect, and depression; however, the effect of social support has not been previously explored. Thus, we sought to examine the association of social support, negative affect, and depression with exhaled nitric oxide in a group of 35 healthy individuals (10 males and 25 females) with a mean age of 20.5years across five weekly assessments. Results showed that changes in social support within individuals were positively associated with levels of exhaled nitric oxide independent of other psychosocial factors. Further exploration of the health implications of this positive relationship between airway nitric oxide and social support is necessary.
    Full-text · Article · May 2014 · International journal of psychophysiology: official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
  • Source
    • "In contrast, Ritz et al. (2011) found that, in both healthy and asthmatic participants, acute psychosocial laboratory stress led to an increase in airway NO at the point when cortisol was the highest after stress, whereas Chen et al. (2010) found elevations of airway NO following a stressful interview in asthmatic children with low socioeconomic status. Another study found that higher momentary negative affect was related to greater airway NO levels; in contrast, daily hassles in the previous three months were related to lower airway NO in asthma patients but not in healthy controls (Kullowatz et al., 2008). Taken together, these findings suggest that the relationship between psychological factors and NO may differ depending on the psychological construct that is examined. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychosocial factors such as social support and depression have long been associated with health outcomes. Elevated depressive symptoms are usually associated with worse health outcomes, whereas social support has been related to improvements in health. Nitric oxide levels are an important marker of both cardiovascular health and immune function. Research suggests that exhaled nitric oxide is affected by stress, negative affect, and depression; however, the effect of social support has not been previously explored. Thus, we sought to examine the association of social support, negative affect, and depression with exhaled nitric oxide in a group of 35 healthy individuals (10 males and 25 females) with a mean age of 20.5 years across five weekly assessments. Results showed that changes in social support within individuals were positively associated with levels of exhaled nitric oxide independent of other psychosocial factors. Further exploration of the health implications of this positive relationship between airway nitric oxide and social support is necessary.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014
Show more