... Initially thought to be uniquely human (Corballis & Beale, 1983), these behavioral asymmetries have been demonstrated in a variety of different species and may be a characteristic of all vertebrates (e.g., Vallortigara, Chiandetti, & Sovrano, 2011;Versace & Vallortigara, 2015;Wells, 2003) with evidence for lateralization also being found in invertebrates (see Frasnelli, Vallortigara, & Rogers, 2012 for review). Examples of behavioral lateralization are broad; primates will more commonly use a specific hand for object manipulation (e.g., Chapelain, 2010), blue gourami (Trichogaster trichopterus) initially touch novel objects more often with their left fin (Bisazza, Lippolis, & Vallortigara, 2001), grey whales (Eschrichtius robustus) benthic forage more frequently with one side of their mouths (Woodward & Winn, 2006), dolphins exhibit asymmetries with listening response (Au, 1993;Au & Benoit-Bird, 2003), horses (Equus ferus caballus) tend to lead with a preferred foot (Murphy & Arkins, 2008), psittaformes and corvids tend to hold and manipulate food with a specific foot (Rogers, 2007), rodents and felines tend to reach towards objects with a preferred paw (e.g., Warren, 1980), and dogs show both an asymmetry with paw preferences (Berta, 2011) as well as tail-wagging when responding to varying stimuli (Quaranta, Siniscalchi, & Vallortigara, 2007). While hypotheses have been made as to the benefits of consistent behavioral lateralization, such as increasing brain efficiency to multitask (e.g., Rogers, Zucca, & Vallortigara, 2004), or increased social coordination (e.g., Ghirlanda & Vallortigara, 2004;Vallortigara & Rogers, 2005), some evidence suggests that asymmetric populations also receive benefits from the lack of uniform lateralization (Ghirlanda, Frasnelli, & Vallortigara, 2009). ...