Article

Mind at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the “default system” of the brain

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
Consciousness and Cognition (Impact Factor: 2.31). 07/2008; 17(2):457-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The "default system" of the brain has been described as a set of regions which are 'activated' during rest and 'deactivated' during cognitively effortful tasks. To investigate the reliability of task-related deactivations, we performed a meta-analysis across 12 fMRI studies. Our results replicate previous findings by implicating medial frontal and parietal brain regions as part of the "default system". However, the cognitive correlates of these deactivations remain unclear. In light of the importance of social cognitive abilities for human beings and their propensity to engage in such activities, we relate our results to findings from neuroimaging studies of social cognition. This demonstrates a remarkable overlap between the brain regions typically involved in social cognitive processes and the "default system". We, henceforth, suggest that the physiological 'baseline' of the brain is intimately linked to a psychological 'baseline': human beings have a predisposition for social cognition as the default mode of cognizing which is implemented in the robust pattern of intrinsic brain activity known as the "default system".

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Simon B Eickhoff
  • Source
    • "Originally, this approach used a separate neuroimaging experiment performed to constrain both analysis (i.e., increasing sensitivity) and interpretation of the actual study. If intersubject variability is not of interest, it can be an attractive option to consolidate the location of the functional process of interest by means of quantitative image-based (i.e., using whole-brain activation maps; Dehaene et al., 2003; Schilbach et al., 2008) or coordinate-based (i.e., using peak activation information; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Radua and Mataix-Cols, 2009; Wager et al., 2007) meta-analysis. The resulting ROI would then statistically constrain the most robust location of activation convergence underlying the process of interest across various subjects, study designs, and laboratories. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regional specialization and functional integration are often viewed as two fundamental principles of human brain organization. They are closely intertwined because each functionally specialized brain region is probably characterized by a distinct set of long-range connections. This notion has prompted the quickly developing family of connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) methods in neuroimaging research. CBP assumes that there is a latent structure of parcels in a region of interest (ROI). First, connectivity strengths are computed to other parts of the brain for each voxel/vertex within the ROI. These features are then used to identify functionally distinct groups of ROI voxels/vertices. CBP enjoys increasing popularity for the in-vivo mapping of regional specialization in the human brain. Due to the requirements of different applications and datasets, CBP has diverged into a heterogeneous family of methods. This broad overview critically discusses the current state as well as the commonalities and idiosyncrasies of the main CBP methods. We target frequent concerns faced by novices and veterans to provide a reference for the investigation and review of CBP studies.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Human Brain Mapping
    • "Focusing on the DMN also serves as a demonstration of MVS influencing a network associated with higher cognitive functions. The role of the DMN for higher cognitive function and the interaction of the vestibular system with higher cognitive function, especially the impact of vestibular imbalance on cognitive disorders were discussed recently (Hanes and McCollum, 2006;Schilbach et al., 2008;Smith and Zheng, 2013;Mast et al., 2014). Our hypothesis was that (i) the " unmodulated " parts of the DMN should scale in accordance with the well-known sublinear increase of fMRI signal between field strength (Triantafyllou et al., 2005;Duyn, 2012), when no additional neural effect related to field strength was present, i.e., MVS was not present. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Strong magnetic fields (>1Tesla) can cause dizziness and it was recently shown that healthy subjects (resting in total darkness) developed a persistent nystagmus even when remaining complete motionless within a MR tomograph. Consequently, it was speculated that this magnetic vestibular stimulation (MVS) might influence fMRI results, as nystagmus is indicative of an imbalance in the vestibular system, potentially influencing other systems via multisensory vestibular interactions. The objective of our study was to investigate whether MVS does indeed modulate BOLD signal fluctuations. We recorded eye movements, as well as, resting-state fMRI of 30 volunteers in darkness at 1.5 tesla and 3.0 tesla to answer the question whether MVS modulated parts of the default mode resting-state network (DMN) in accordance with the Lorentz-force model for MVS, while distinguishing this from the known signal increase due to field strength related imaging effects. Our results showed that modulation of the default mode network occurred mainly in areas associated with vestibular and ocular motor function, and was in accordance with the Lorentz-force model, i.e. double than the expected signal scaling due to field strength alone. We discuss the implications of our findings for the interpretation of studies using resting-state fMRI, especially those concerning vestibular research. We conclude that MVS needs to be considered in vestibular research to avoid biased results, but it might also offer the possibility to manipulate network dynamics and may thus help in studying the brain as a dynamical system.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · NeuroImage
    • "In this context, the self-referential processing is the core of what constitutes the 'experiential self'. The accumulation of empirical data in neuroscience (Craik et al. 1999; Kircher et al. 2000; Gusnard et al. 2001; Gusnard 2005; Spreng and Grady 2010; Fingelkurts and Fingelkurts 2011; Qin and Northoff 2011), including the study of direct causal relationship between brain activity and self-consciousness (Lou et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2013), has lead researchers to a suggestion that the brain default mode network (DMN) is a most probable neural correlate for the sense of self 1 (Christoff et al. 2003; Wicker et al. 2003; Gusnard 2005; Buckner and Carroll 2007; Schilbach et al. 2008; Fingelkurts et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using theoretical analysis of self-consciousness concept and experimental evidence on the brain default mode network (DMN) that constitutes the neural signature of self-referential processes, we hypothesized that the anterior and posterior subnets comprising the DMN should show differences in their integrity as a function of meditation training. Functional connectivity within DMN and its subnets (measured by operational synchrony) has been measured in ten novice meditators using an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording in a pre-/post-meditation intervention design. We have found that while the whole DMN was clearly suppressed, different subnets of DMN responded differently after 4 months of meditation training: The strength of EEG operational synchrony in the right and left posterior modules of the DMN decreased in resting post-meditation condition compared to a pre-meditation condition, whereas the frontal DMN module on the contrary exhibited an increase in the strength of EEG operational synchrony. These findings combined with published data on functional-anatomic heterogeneity within the DMN and on trait subjective experiences commonly found following meditation allow us to propose that the first-person perspective and the sense of agency (the witnessing observer) are presented by the frontal DMN module, while the posterior modules of the DMN are generally responsible for the experience of the continuity of 'I' as embodied and localized within bodily space. Significance of these findings is discussed.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Cognitive Processing
Show more

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on ResearchGate. Read our cookies policy to learn more.