Training and Detraining Effects on Functional Fitness after a Multicomponent Training in Older Women

Article (PDF Available)inGerontology 55(1):41-8 · June 2008with293 Reads
DOI: 10.1159/000140681 · Source: PubMed
Several studies have been carried out in order to evaluate the potential influence of increased physical activity on the health, biological ageing and functional ability of the elderly. However, only limited information is available on the effects of multicomponent training and detraining on functional performance. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of 8-month multicomponent training and 3-month detraining on the functional fitness of older women. Fifty-seven women were randomly assigned to an exercise (n = 32; 68.4 +/- 2.93 years) or a control group (n = 25; 69.6 +/- 4.20 years). The training program consisted of 2 sessions per week of aerobic, strength, balance and flexibility exercises. The functional fitness test battery was performed to assess the physical parameters associated with independent functioning in older adults. No significant changes were observed in body mass index and cardiovascular endurance as a result of the exercise training. Training induced significant (p < 0.05) improvements in chair stand (27.3%), arm curl (17.4%), chair sit-and-reach (17.4%), up-and-go (11%) and back scratch (14.5%) tests. However, both upper and lower body strength and upper and lower flexibility declined significantly after detraining in the exercise group. The results of this study highlight the negative effects of interrupting exercise on several physical parameters of functional fitness.
Fax +41 61 306 12 34
Clinical Section
Gerontology 297
DOI: 10.1159/000XXXXXX
Training and Detraining Effects on
Functional Fitness after a Multicomponent
Training in Older Women
M.J. Carvalho E. Marques J. Mota
Research Centre in Physical Activity Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto , Portugal
cantly after detraining in the exercise group. Conclusion:
The results of this study highlight the negative effects of in-
terrupting exercise on several physical parameters of func-
tional fitness.
Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Literature points out that regular physical activity
contributes to a healthy, independent lifestyle for older
individuals, with improvements in functional capacity
and quality of life
[1] .
Previous investigations have demonstrated that some
components of physical fitness in older adults can be im-
proved by exercise training
[26] . However, studies that
examined the changes induced through strength train-
ing are much more common than studies carried out
with multicomponent training. Multicomponent train-
ing is defined as a well-rounded program that includes
endurance, strength, coordination, balance and flexibil-
ity exercises. Current recommendations have recognized
that a combination of aerobic activity, strength training
and flexibility exercises is important for maintaining
physical function in older adults
[7–9] .
Some studies have described that both morphologic
and functional adaptations can decrease even after short
detraining periods
[10 –13] . Most studies of detraining in
Key Words
Elderly Physical performance measures Exercise training
Background: Several studies have been carried out in order
to evaluate the potential influence of increased physical ac-
tivity on the health, biological ageing and functional ability
of the elderly. However, only limited information is available
on the effects of multicomponent training and detraining
on functional performance. Objective: The purpose of the
present study was to investigate the effect of 8-month mul-
ticomponent training and 3-month detraining on the func-
tional fitness of older women. Methods: Fifty-seven women
were randomly assigned to an exercise (n = 32; 68.4 8 2.93
years) or a control group (n = 25; 69.6 8 4.20 years). The
training program consisted of 2 sessions per week of aero-
bic, strength, balance and flexibility exercises. The function-
al fitness test battery was performed to assess the physical
parameters associated with independent functioning in
older adults. Results: No significant changes were observed
in body mass index and cardiovascular endurance as a result
of the exercise training. Training induced significant (p !
0.05) improvements in chair stand (27.3%), arm curl (17.4%),
chair sit-and-reach (17.4%), up-and-go (11%) and back
scratch (14.5%) tests. However, both upper and lower body
strength and upper and lower flexibility declined signifi-
Received: October 10, 2007
Accepted: March 11, 2008
Published online: $ $ $
Prof. Maria Joana Carvalho
University of Porto, Faculty of Sport
Rua Dr. Plácido Costa 91
PT–4200-450 Porto (Portugal)
Tel. +35 122 507 4785, Fax +35 122 550 0689, E-Mail
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Accessible online at:
GER297.indd 1GER297.indd 1 30.05.2008 09:13:3030.05.2008 09:13:30
Gerontology 297
older people have examined the effect after a strength
training program and focused on different performance
measures of physical function, resembling the effects on
muscular strength, blood lipid concentration, flexibility,
mobility or anaerobic power
[3, 14–20] . Only few studies
have reported detraining evidence based on a combined
strength and aerobic exercise
[21, 22] or endurance train-
[23] , and they have not addressed functional fitness
response. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge,
only 2 studies have examined the functional fitness
changes following multicomponent detraining in elderly
[10, 11] . Two major shortcomings of those 2 stud-
ies are the small sample size and the lack of analysis of the
control group outcomes.
Despite evidence of physiological decline during de-
training, there is not enough data suggesting how long
the beneficial effects of training are maintained and how
functional fitness changes following the cessation of a
multicomponent training stimulus in older women.
Therefore, the present study was designed to determine
the effect of multicomponent training on functional fit-
ness in older women following 8 months of training and
3 months of detraining.
Materials and Methods
Subjects and Experimental Design
Subjects were recruited through advertisements in the Porto
area newspapers for participation in this University-based study.
Sixty-five older women aged 64–85 years volunteered to partici-
pate in this study. Exclusion criteria included the following: being
active in the previous 2 years (engaging in at least 2 days a week
for 20 min or more of moderate to vigorous physical activities),
absence of 20% of the total sessions, absence of more than 8 con-
secutive sessions, smoking, registered blindness, severe hearing
impairment, uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, symptom-
atic cardiorespiratory disease, severe renal or hepatic disease, un-
controlled epilepsy, progressive neurological disease and chronic
disabling arthritis. Eight subjects were excluded due to illness (4
had musculoskeletal disorders, 1 had Parkinson’s disease) and
time constraints (n = 3).
Fifty-seven nonregular exercisers were randomly assigned to
a control group (CG) or an exercise group (EG). The participants
who were placed in the EG received an 8-month multicomponent
training program 2 days a week, while those in the CG main-
tained their physical activity routine.
Before conducting the study, all participants received a com-
plete explanation of the purpose, risks and procedures of the in-
vestigation, and provided written informed consent. The investi-
gation was in full compliance with the Helsinki declaration of
1975, as revised in 2004, and all methods and procedures were
approved by the Scientific Board of the Faculty of Sport of the
University of Porto.
At the final screening, all subjects underwent a medical evalu-
ation that included resting electrocardiography (SH-6340 DAAR;
Shiller), height, weight and blood pressure measurement. All sub-
jects were nonsmokers, free of cardiovascular disease and were
not taking any medications known to influence physical param-
eters of functional fitness. All participants had medical clearance
to participate in the testing and training sessions. Both groups
were then tested on 3 occasions (at baseline, after 8 months of
training and after 3 months of detraining).
M e a s u r e m e n t s
All measurements were performed by the same evaluator on
3 occasions: the first assessment was conducted prior the begin-
ning of training (last week of September), the second evaluation
took place after 8 months of training (first week of June) and the
last evaluation was conducted after 3 months of detraining (first
week of September).
All test stations were organized in a circuit, and the same con-
ditions were maintained for each test at all testing periods. On the
test day, subjects first completed 810 min warm-up led by a phys-
ical education instructor and then completed all test items.
Functional Fitness Test
This battery consists of 7 assessment items, designed and val-
idated to assess the physiological parameters that support physi-
cal mobility in older adults
[24] .
Lower body strength was measured using the 30-second chair
stand test. Participants were asked to sit on a 43-cm-high chair
with arms crossed at the wrists and held against the chest. Par-
ticipants completed as manystand ups as possible within 30 s.
The score was the total number of stands executed correctly with-
in 30 s. The reliability of this strength test is high (r = 0.92)
[24] .
Upper body strength was assessed using the arm curl test. Par-
ticipants performed as many biceps curls as possible in 30 s, using
a 2.27-kg dumbbell. The score was the total number of hand-
weight curls performed through the full range of motion in 30 s.
The arm curl test has good relative reliability across trials (r =
[24] .
Lower body flexibility was assessed using the chair sit-and-
reach test. The score was the best distance achieved between the
extended fingers and the tip of the toe, measured to the nearest
0.5 cm. The reliability of the chair sit-and-reach test is high (r =
[24] .
Upper body flexibility was assessed using the back scratch test.
The score was the shortest distance achieved between the extend-
ed middle fingers, measured to the nearest 0.5 cm. The reliability
of this test is high (r = 0.92)
[24] .
Agility/dynamic balance was assessed using the 8-foot up-
and-go test. The score was the shortest time to rise from a seated
position, walk 2.44 m (8 ft), turn, and return to the seated posi-
tion, measured to the nearest 1/10th s. The 8-foot up-and-go test
has showed a higher test-retest reliability of 0.90
[24] .
Aerobic endurance was measured using the 6-min walk test.
Participants were asked to walk as fast as possible for 6 min with
verbal encouragement given at 30-second intervals. The score was
the total distance walked in 6 min along a 45.72-meter rectangu-
lar course, which was marked every 4.57 m. The reliability of this
test is high (r = 0.91)
[24] .
The 6-min walk test was administrated on a different day. The
30-second chair stand, arm curl and 6-min walk tests involve,
GER297.indd 2GER297.indd 2 30.05.2008 09:13:4430.05.2008 09:13:44
Training and Detraining Effects on
Functional Fitness in Older Women
Gerontology 297
after a demonstration by the tester, a practice trial of 2 repeti-
tions, followed by 1 test trial. The best score of 2 trials was used
to evaluate performance in the chair sit-and-reach, back scratch
and 8-foot up-and-go tests. Full detailed information on test ad-
ministration and protocols can be found in Rikli and Jones
[24] .
Body Mass Index
Height and body mass were recorded using a portable stadi-
ometer and balance weighing scales, respectively. Body mass in-
dex (BMI) was calculated using the standard formula: mass (kg)/
D e t r a i n i n g
Following completion of the multicomponent training, sub-
jects in the EG and the CG were instructed to carry on their nor-
mal lifestyles and avoid any type of systematic exercise for 12
weeks. During detraining, subjects were contacted systematically
to ensure that they were not engaged in regular exercise.
Attendance Rate
Attendance rate for the exercise group was calculated by divid-
ing the number of exercise sessions achieved by participants
by the full amount of sessions they were expected to perform
throughout the study (2/week ! 32 weeks = 64 sessions).
T r a i n i n g P r o t o c o l
The 8-month training protocol was held twice per week and
each session lasted about 60 min, in the same room, at 3 pm. The
sessions were conducted by a physical education instructor with
specialization in older adults training and consisted of 5 parts:
(1) Five to eight minutes of general warm-up activity, includ-
ing slow walk, calisthenics and stretching exercises, started off
the sessions.
(2) Aerobic exercises involving walking, jogging, dance, aero-
bics and step choreographies for 20–25 min, minimum of 10 min
per episode
[8] ; intensity was maintained at 12–14 in the Borg rat-
ing of perceived exertion (RPE)
[25] . Moreover, in order to evalu-
ate the intensity of aerobic exercises and detect workloads that rise
above moderate intensity, the talk test was also used.
(3) Muscular endurance exercises were performed in a circuit,
involving stair stepping, knee flexion, arm raise, shoulder abduc-
tion, shoulder adduction, shoulder rotation, squatting, biceps
curl, triceps extensions, toe raise, modified push-up, abdominal
crunch and hip extension, with a 40- to 60-second rest period be-
tween sets. Weight resistance was performed using elastic bands
and free weights. In order to allow a proper familiarization with
the exercises with the correct and safe technique of execution and
breathing, training intensity was lower during the first month.
Participants performed, initially, 8 repetitions in a single set. The
intensity gradually progressed over time from 12–13 RPE to 1416
RPE. The repetitions were increased until 15 and the number of
sets increased up to 3 (in those subjects that easily performed 12
or more repetitions in the 2 sets).
(4) Agility and reaction time exercises were mainly performed
with games, including changes of direction and velocity, response
to diverse stimulus, balance training with static (exercises pro-
gressing from feet apart to feet together and then to a single-leg
stance; thereafter, the same exercises were performed with eyes
closed; over time, the reliance on a hand support was gradually
decreased) and dynamic exercises (for example, walking on a
straight line, walking heel to toe) were performed using sticks,
balls and balloons for 510 min.
(5) At the end of each session, there was 5 min of a cool-down
period involving respiratory and flexibility exercises targeting the
upper and lower body (hands, triceps, lower back, chest, hip flex-
ors, quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, calf soleus and achil-
les tendon). The flexibility training included static and dynamic
stretching techniques. Subjects performed 34 repetitions for
each stretch; when performing a static stretch, the muscle was
lengthened across the joint, held in a position of mild discomfort
for a period of 10–30 s and then relaxed. The resting period ranged
from 30 to 40 s between stretches.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed with SPSS (version 15.0) for Windows.
Data are reported as means 8 SD. Descriptive statistics and tests
for normality (Shapiro-Wilks test) were performed for all out-
come variables.
Repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance was used
to examine differences within and between groups over time.
When F values were significant, post hoc mean comparisons were
analyzed with least significant difference multiple comparisons
test. The significance level was set at p ! 0.05.
The delta percentage ( %) was calculated via the standard for-
% = [(posttest score – pretest score)/pretest score] ! 100.
The meaningfulness of the outcomes was estimated through
the effect size (ES, means divided by the standard deviation): 0.2
or less is a small ES, about 0.5 is a moderate ES and 0.8 or more is
a large ES
[26] .
R e s u l t s
Of the 57 participants who underwent initial assess-
ment, 32 in the EG and 25 in the CG, none dropped out
of the program and all participants in the EG completed
the 8-month multicomponent training. Subjects in the
EG attended 91% of the exercise sessions (range 84100%).
There were no differences among the groups at baseline
for age, height, weight or BMI ( table 1 ).
Table 1. Physical characteristics of both EG (n= 32) and CG (n=
Age, years
68.482.93 69.684.20
Body height, cm
154.580.08 160.580.07
Body weight, kg
64.887.84 67.088.58
27.282.91 25.982.60
GER297.indd 3GER297.indd 3 30.05.2008 09:13:4430.05.2008 09:13:44
Gerontology 297
Table 2 shows the results for each of the functional fit-
ness tests and BMI for the EG at baseline, after training
and after detraining compared with the CG. The baseline
values for each of the functional fitness tests and BMI did
not differ between groups.
After the 8-month training period, there was signifi-
cant improvement (p ! 0.05) in lower and upper strength,
lower and upper flexibility as well as agility/dynamic bal-
ance for the EG, whereas in the CG, results of the repeat-
ed-measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed
that all scores on the functional fitness tests were signifi-
cantly lower after 8 months than those observed at base-
line and that BMI was significantly higher.
In the EG, after 3 months of detraining, there was sig-
nificant loss in performance on chair stand, arm curl,
chair sit-and-reach and back scratch tests. Nevertheless,
chair stand (p ! 0.003) and chair sit-and-reach (p ! 0.003)
remained significantly higher than before training. In
the CG, no significant changes occurred in chair stand,
8-foot up-and-go, 6-min walk and BMI. However, like in
the EG, there were significant declines in arm curl, chair
sit-and-reach and back scratch after the following period
of 3 months.
Training resulted in a significant difference between
groups in chair stand (p ! 0.001), arm curl (p ! 0.001),
chair sit-and-reach (p ! 0.001), 8-foot up-and-go (p !
0.001), back scratch (p = 0.001) and 6-min walk (p = 0.003)
tests. Likewise, detraining analyses still showed a signif-
icant differences between groups in chair stand (p =
0.002), arm curl (p = 0.03), chair sit-and-reach (p ! 0.001),
8-foot up-and-go (p ! 0.001) and 6-min walk (p = 0.027)
The absolute changes over the 8-month intervention
and 3-months detraining periods for functional fitness
outcomes are presented in figure 1 . As illustrated, subjects
in the EG showed improved upper and lower strength
(+2.8 and +3.8 repetitions) as well as upper and lower
flexibility (+3.9 and +4.8 cm), but decreased time needed
Table 2. Changes of functional fitness tests and BMI over experimental protocol in both groups
mean 8 SD
mean 8 SD
Chair stand, repetitions B
0.979 2.355 0.131
–13.0 2.355 0.000
a, b
1.6 11.015 0.002
Arm curl, repetitions B
0.999 2.379 0.129
–10.9 80.228 0.000
a, b
–7.5 4.982 0.030
Chair sit-and-reach, cm B
1.000 3.550 0.065
–17.0 60.186 0.000
a, b
a, b
–17.5 63.352 0.000
Back scratch, cm B
0.958 0.379 0.540
–14.2 11.366 0.001
a, b
–8.1 3.493 0.067
8-foot up-and-go, s B
0.895 0.019 0.892
–6.5 42.624 0.000
–3.1 21.806 0.000
6-min walk, m B
0.951 0.469 0.496
–5.7 9.430 0.003
–1.9 5.191 0.027
0.763 2.642 0.110
1.9 1.150 0.288
0.4 1.086 0.302
B = Baseline; AT = after training; AD = after detraining; SP = statistical power.
Significant difference versus baseline, p < 0.05.
Significant difference versus after training, p < 0.05.
GER297.indd 4GER297.indd 4 30.05.2008 09:13:4530.05.2008 09:13:45
Training and Detraining Effects on
Functional Fitness in Older Women
Gerontology 297
to perform the 8-foot up-and-go test (0.7 s). The dis-
tance covered during the 6-min walk test also increased
(+15.8 m) after training, although not significantly. On
the other hand, all functional fitness outcomes were de-
creased in the CG after 8 months compared with base-
In the EG, there was significantly decreased upper and
lower strength (3.4 and –2.4 repetitions) as well as upper
and lower flexibility (3.7 cm and –2.8 cm) after 3 months
of detraining. On the other hand, the decrease in distance
covered during the 6-min walk test (–5 m), the more time
needed to perform the 8-foot up-and-go test (+0.1 s) and
the increase in BMI (+0.1) were not significant.
As shown in table 3 , the major training effect (ES =
1.8) was in the chair stand, arm curl and up-and-go tests
for the EG and in the chair stand (ES = 1.3) and arm curl
test (1.1) for the CG. Additionally, detraining endorsed a
large ES for the chair stand (ES = 0.8) and arm curl (ES =
1.7) tests in the EG. The ES was moderate for the chair
sit-and-reach test (ES = 0.5) and small (ES ^ 0.4) for the
other measurements in the CG.
The major finding of this study was that after 3 months
of detraining, older women were unable to maintain the
increases achieved, not only in lower and upper strength,
but also in lower and upper flexibility, after 8 months of
multicomponent training. Furthermore, the physical pa-
6-min walk (m)
8-foot up -and-go (s)
Back scratch
Chair sit-and-reach
Arm curl
Chair stand
6-min walk (m)
0.1 0.1
8-foot up -and-go (s)
Back scratch
Chair sit-and-reach
Arm curl
Chair stand
Fig. 1. Absolute mean changes in test results after 8-month training and 3-month detraining in both EG and CG.
Table 3. ES of training and detraining in both EG and CG
Chair stand 1.80 0.80 1.30 0.07
Arm curl 1.80 1.70 1.10 0.40
Chair sit-and-reach 1.00 0.60 0.60 0.50
Back scratch 0.60 0.40 0.50 0.20
8-foot up-and-go 1.80 0.30 0.40 0.20
6-min walk 0.60 0.08 0.50 0.10
BMI 0.00 0.06 0.20 0.03
AT = After training; AD = after detraining.
GER297.indd 5GER297.indd 5 30.05.2008 09:13:4530.05.2008 09:13:45
Gerontology 297
rameters less affected by detraining were agility/dynam-
ic balance, aerobic endurance and BMI.
Although previous investigations have exposed an
age-related functional decline, the trainability of older
adults is well known
[27, 28] . Our data showed that train-
ing period improved performance in the chair stand, arm
curl, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch and up-and-go
tests. There were no significant increases on the 6-min
walk test and BMI. After 3 months of detraining, perfor-
mances in the chair stand, arm curl, chair sit-and-reach
and back scratch tests had declined significantly. There-
fore, these results suggest that exercise training has a po-
tential effect protecting participants against functional
declines associated with age. Further, our data also sug-
gest that detraining periods should be avoided.
Loss of muscle strength and mass with age in humans
is well documented
[7, 29] , these changes being most pro-
nounced in women
[7] . Increased physical activity has
been considered as an important therapeutic tool for the
attenuation of this loss. Our results are similar to those
studies that reported improved strength after multicom-
ponent training in older adults, assessed with arm curl
and chair stand tests
[2, 10, 30] . The underlying justifica-
tions of flexibility losses with aging have been associated
with muscle disuse and soft tissue restraints such as col-
lagen alterations, mechanical stress, degenerative diseas-
es and disuse
[7] , and are obviously related to a deteriora-
tion of functional abilities of older individuals
[6, 14] .
Studies have shown both significant positive and no sig-
nificant effects of exercise on a range of motion of joints
in older adults, depending on the duration of the pro-
gram, sample size, rate of attrition, measurement tech-
nique and the training protocol
[5, 31, 32] . The results of
the present study demonstrated that older women were
able to gain significant upper and lower body range of
motion after 8 months of training. A stretching compo-
nent targeting the major muscle groups and performed in
all training sessions might have been the primary reason
for improved flexibility scores in our study. Although our
flexibility exercises had only been performed twice per
week during the training period, the minimal amount
recommended by the ACSM
[7] was performed.
The 6-min walk test has been recognized as an indica-
tor of aerobic endurance
[24] that is widely associated
with the functional capacity to perform various activities
of daily living
[7, 33] . Although most studies reported that
multicomponent training can help to maintain and im-
prove endurance performance in elderly
[2, 4, 34, 35] , no
significant increase in 6-min walk test performance was
found in the present study. The reasons for this inconsis-
tency might be the differences in methods used to deter-
mine aerobic endurance, intensity and the nature of
training between the present study and previous studies.
Although our aerobic exercises were in accordance with
the recommended duration and intensity [7] , probably
the frequency twice per week was not enough to signifi-
cantly improve the aerobic capacity of our sample. Fur-
thermore, the use of the Borg RPE scale
[25] may have
influenced our results. Despite being a common and rea-
sonably valid scale to evaluate and quantify physical ac-
tivity intensity and therefore being considered a useful
instrument for aerobic exercise prescription
[9] , the sub-
jectively perceived exertion can underestimate relative
exercise intensity.
The improvements in agility/dynamic balance sup-
port the concept that older adults are able to improve
their agility and balance by multicomponent training
4, 30, 34]
. Probably, these agility/dynamic balance im-
provements might be related to increased muscular
strength observed during the training period. In fact, Ry-
ushi et al.
[36] demonstrated that better balance was due
to rises in muscular strength in older adults. Addition-
ally, specific balance activities used in the present study
may possibly have stimulated additional benefits
[9] . Be-
cause the present training protocol intended to improve
functional capacity and not especially to reduce body
weight, minimal effects on BMI were found. Further-
more, the results support the concept that physical exer-
cise alone without dieting (caloric restriction) seems to
have only a modest effect on total body mass and fat mass
[37, 38] .
Regarding the effects of detraining in functional fit-
ness, the results of this study demonstrated that func-
tional gains observed during the training period decrease
after 3 months of detraining. While multicomponent
studies have shown similar decreases in strength, aerobic
endurance and agility/dynamic balance
[10, 11] , our data
differ from those reported by previous studies who
showed that increases in muscle strength can be main-
tained after 24 weeks
[11] , 27 weeks [6] and 31 weeks [15]
of detraining in older adults. However, both Schlicht et
[6] and Hakkinen et al. [15] examined the effects of
detraining after single-focus strength training. More-
over, the initial levels of physical activity and functional
capacity, gender differences, duration of the detraining
period, age and the method of evaluation used could be
possible explanations for the discrepancy between re-
sults. It is important to note that losses in muscular
strength have been related to difficulties in daily living
activities such as climbing stairs, walking, transfers, gait,
GER297.indd 6GER297.indd 6 30.05.2008 09:13:4530.05.2008 09:13:45
Training and Detraining Effects on
Functional Fitness in Older Women
Gerontology 297
balance, falling, dressing and shopping [39] . Therefore,
these negative effects of detraining in functional fitness
will probably compromise the capacity of older adults to
accomplish daily tasks more easily and with less fatigue.
Our findings that upper and lower flexibility decreased
after detraining are consistent with previous multicom-
ponent training studies in older people
[10, 11] . However,
that even after 3 months of detraining, the chair sit-and-
reach test performance remained significantly higher
than before training suggests the higher value of physical
activity programs in older women. Emphasis on flexibil-
ity training may help to retain functionality that is im-
portant for autonomy as well as for fall and injury preven-
tion of older adults
[28] .
This study has some important limitations. First, there
was no assessment of subjects’ daily physical activity lev-
els and dietary regimens throughout the investigation.
Second, there was no assessment of subjects’ physical ac-
tivity during detraining. Since seasonality may influence
physical activity patterns
[40] and considering that the 3
months of detraining were carried out in the summer, a
more precise quantification of the physical activity levels
of our sample would be of importance. However, even
hypothesizing that these could enhance physical activity
levels during the detraining period, there were signifi-
cant decreases in the performance of several functional
fitness tests. At last, there were no follow-up data during
the detraining period for both groups.
In summary, the results of the present study high-
that a period of 3 months of detraining following 8
months of multicomponent training significantly im-
pairs the major part of the favorable functional changes
obtained after training. Muscle strength was the compo-
nent of functional fitness most affected by detraining.
Therefore, our data reinforce the idea that older adults
should be engaged in a systematic exercise program
throughout life in order to improve or maintain func-
tional performance.
1 Stewart KJ: Physical activity and aging. Ann
NY Acad Sci 2005;
1055: 193–206.
2 Toraman NF, Erman A, Agyar E: Effects of
multicomponent training on functional fit-
ness in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2004;
12: 538–553.
3 Fatouros IG, Kambas A, Katrabasas I, Niko-
laidis K, Chatzinikolaou A, Leontsini D,
Taxildaris K: Strength training and detrain-
ing effects on muscular strength, anaerobic
power, and mobility of inactive older men
are intensity dependent. Br J Sports Med
39: 776–780.
4 Nelson ME, Layne JE, Bernstein MJ, Nuern-
berger A, Castaneda C, Kaliton D, Hausdorff
J, Judge JO, Buchner DM, Roubenoff R,
Fiatarone Singh MA: The effects of multi-
dimensional home-based exercise on func-
tional performance in elderly people. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;
59: 154
5 Barbosa AR, Santarem JM, Filho WJ, Maruc-
ci Mde F: Effects of resistance training on the
sit-and-reach test in elderly women. J
Strength Cond Res 2002;
16: 14–18.
6 Schlicht J, Camaione DN, Owen SV: Effect of
intense strength training on standing bal-
ance, walking speed, and sit-to-stand perfor-
mance in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci
Med Sci 2001;
7 ACSM: American college of sports medicine
position stand. Exercise and physical activity
for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;
30: 9921008.
8 McDermott AY, Mernitz H: Exercise and
older patients: prescribing guidelines. Am
Fam Physician 2006;
74: 437–444.
9 Cress ME, Buchner D, Prohaska T, Rimmer
J, Brown M, Macera C, DePietro L, Chodz-
ko-Zajko W: Best practices for physcial ac-
tivity programs and behavior counseling in
older adults populations. Eur Rev Aging
Phys Act 2006;
3: 34–42.
10 Toraman NF, Ayceman N: Effects of six
weeks of detraining on retention of func-
tional fitness of old people after nine weeks
of multicomponent training. Br J Sports Med
39: 565–568; discussion 568.
11 Toraman NF: Short term and long term de-
training: Is there any difference between
young-old and old people? Br J Sports Med
39: 561–564.
12 Taaffe DR, Marcus R: Dynamic muscle
strength alterations to detraining and re-
training in elderly men. Clin Physiol 1997;
13 Sforzo GA, McManis BG, Black D, Luniew-
ski D, Scriber KC: Resilience to exercise de-
training in healthy older adults. J Am Geriatr
Soc 1995;
43: 209–215.
14 Fatouros IG, Kambas A, Katrabasas I, Le-
ontsini D, Chatzinikolaou A, Jamurtas AZ,
Douroudos I, Aggelousis N, Taxildaris K:
Resistance training and detraining effects
on flexibility performance in the elderly are
intensity-dependent. J Strength Cond Res
20: 634–642.
15 Hakkinen K, Alen M, Kallinen M, Newton
RU, Kraemer WJ: Neuromuscular adapta-
tion during prolonged strength training, de-
training and re-strength-training in middle-
aged and elderly people. Eur J Appl Physiol
83: 51–62.
16 Ivey FM, Tracy BL, Lemmer JT, NessAiver
M, Metter EJ, Fozard JL, Hurley BF: Effects
of strength training and detraining on mus-
cle quality: Age and gender comparisons. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;
B157, discussion B158–B159.
17 Lemmer JT, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Tracy
BL, Ivey FM, Metter EJ, Fozard JL, Fleg JL,
Hurley BF: Age and gender responses to
strength training and detraining. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 2000;
32: 1505–1512.
18 Elliott KJ, Sale C, Cable NT: Effects of resis-
tance training and detraining on muscle
strength and blood lipid profiles in post-
menopausal women. Br J Sports Med 2002;
36: 340–344.
19 Smith K, Winegard K, Hicks AL, McCartney
N: Two years of resistance training in older
men and women: the effects of three years of
detraining on the retention of dynamic
strength. Can J Appl Physiol 2003;
28: 462
20 Porter MM, Nelson ME, Fiatarone Singh
MA, Layne JE, Morganti CM, Trice I, Econo-
mos CD, Roubenoff R, Evans WJ: Effects of
long-term resistance training and detrain-
ing on strength and physical activity in older
women. J Aging Phys Activ 2002;
10: 260
GER297.indd 7GER297.indd 7 30.05.2008 09:13:4530.05.2008 09:13:45
Gerontology 297
21 Teixeira-Salmela LF, Santiago L, Lima RC,
Lana DM, Camargos FF, Cassiano JG: Func-
tional performance and quality of life related
to training and detraining of community-
dwelling elderly. Disabil Rehabil 2005;
22 Tokmakidis SP, Volaklis KA: Training and
detraining effects of a combined-strength
and aerobic exercise program on blood lipids
in patients with coronary artery disease. J
Cardiopulm Rehabil 2003;
23: 193–200.
23 Fatouros IG, Jamurtas AZ, Villiotou V,
Pouliopoulou S, Fotinakis P, Taxildaris K,
Deliconstantinos G: Oxidative stress re-
sponses in older men during endurance
training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Ex-
erc 2004;
36: 2065–2072.
24 Rikli RE, Jones CJ: Development and valida-
tion of a funcional fitness test for comunity-
residing older adults. J Aging Phys Activ
7: 129–161.
25 Borg G: Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales.
Champaign, Human Kinetics, 1998.
26 Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ: Re-
search Methods in Physical Activity. Cham-
paign, Human Kinetics, 2005.
27 Spirduso WW: Physical Dimensions of Ag-
ing. Champaign, Human Kinetics, 1995.
28 ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and
Prescription, ed 6. Philadelphia, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
29 Larsson L: Histochemical characteristics of
human skeletal muscle during aging. Acta
Physiol Scand 1983;
117: 469–471.
30 Toraman F, Sahin G: Age responses to mul-
ticomponent training programme in older
adults. Disabil Rehabil 2004;
26: 448–454.
31 Herriott MT, Colberg SR, Parson HK, Nun-
nold T, Vinik AI: Effects of 8 weeks of flexi-
bility and resistance training in older adults
with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;
32 Girouard CK, Hurley BF: Does strength
training inhibit gains in range of motion
from flexibility training in older adults? Med
Sci Sports Exerc 1995;
27: 1444–1449.
33 Shephard RJ: Exercise and aging: extending
independence in older adults. Geriatrics
48: 61–64.
34 Capodaglio P, Capodaglio EM, Ferri A, Sca-
glioni G, Marchi A, Saibene F: Muscle func-
tion and functional ability improves more in
community-dwelling older women with a
mixed-strength training programme. Age
Ageing 2005;
34: 141–147.
35 Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Trueblood
PR, Loy S, Harker JO, Pietruszka FM, Rob-
bins AS: Effects of a group exercise program
on strength, mobility, and falls among fall-
prone elderly men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med
Sci 2000;
36 Ryushi T, Kumagai K, Hayase H, Abe T,
Shibuya K, Ono A: Effect of resistive knee ex-
tension training on postural control mea-
sures in middle aged and elderly persons. J
Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 2000;
37 Bouchard C, Depres JP, Tremblay A: Exercise
and obesity. Obes Res 1993;
1: 133–147.
38 Stefanick ML: Exercise and weight control.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1993;
21: 363–396.
39 Carmeli E, Reznick AZ, Coleman R, Carme-
li V: Muscle strength and mass of lower ex-
tremities in relation to functional abilities in
elderly adults. Gerontology 2000;
46: 249–
40 Plasqui G, Westerterp KR: Seasonal varia-
tion in total energy expenditure and physical
activity in dutch young adults. Obes Res
12: 688–694.
GER297.indd 8GER297.indd 8 30.05.2008 09:13:4530.05.2008 09:13:45
    • "Other measures of physical fitness seem to exhibit greater declines in performance than functional mobility. For example, significant declines in strength [22, 33, 34], reactive balance [35], reaching [22], chair stand repetitions [22], chair rising time [36], 6-min walk distance [36], and flexibility [36] have been observed. This literature suggests that these measures may present signs of deterioration before functional mobility perhaps because the TUG involves a number of balance systems. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Background and aimsThe purpose was to explore the impact of balance and mobility training (BMT), balance and mobility plus cognitive training (BMT + C) and no training on the timed up and go (TUG), TUG cognitive (TUGcog), and TUG manual (TUGman) in older adults. A preliminary experiment examined the stability of these TUG measures over a 5-week period in older adults. Methods Fifteen participants in the BMT group (70.2 ± 3.2 years) and 14 participants in the BMT + C group (68.7 ± 5.5 years) trained one-on-one, 3×/week for 12 weeks on a balance obstacle course. The BMT group and the BMT + C group completed two or three tasks simultaneously, respectively. Fifteen participants in the control group received no training (66.7 ± 4.2 years). The TUG, TUGcog, and TUGman were measured in seconds at baseline, after the 12-week training, and after the 12-week follow-up. During the preliminary experiment, ten participants (67.0 ± 6.9 years) completed the three TUG measures 1/week for 5 weeks. ResultsBoth the BMT and BMT + C groups, but not the control group, exhibited significantly faster TUG, TUGcog, and TUGman after the intervention and maintained these improvements at the 12-week follow-up. No differences between the BMT and BMT + C groups emerged. The preliminary experiment showed that the three TUG measures were stable across five testing sessions. Discussion and conclusionBoth training groups improved functional mobility after the interventions and sustained these improvements over 12 weeks. This is likely not a function of repeating the TUG, TUGcog, and TUGman tests since no repeated exposure effect was shown.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2016
    • "Os decréscimos observados na força muscular poderão resultar em parte, pelos fatores neurais que com a sua não ativação levam a alterações na velocidade e frequência de ativação e na sincronização das unidades motoras (Fleck & Kraemer, 2004 ). Comparando os resultados obtidos ao nível da força muscular verificamos que estes estão em linha com os de Carvalho et al. (2009) no teste de levantar e sentar (decréscimos de 9%) e são inferiores no teste de flexão do antebraço (19%), com a mesma duração de três meses de destreino, e inferiores aos de Toraman (2005), que observou após seis semanas de destreino decréscimos de 24% no teste de levantar e sentar e 15% no teste de flexão do antebraço, e após cinquenta e duas semanas de destreino decréscimos de 74% no teste levantar e sentar e 44% no teste de flexão de antebraço. A diminuição da força muscular poderá ser um dos motivos para a quebra de 3%-8% na performance do teste de agilidade\equilíbrio, e para a quebra de 4%-6% na capacidade cardiorrespiratória observados no nosso estudo. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: A atividade física proporciona benefícios para a saúde e qualidade de vida de mulheres idosas. Ainda são escassos os estudos longitudinais em mulheres idosas com duração superior a um ano de prática de exercício físico. Assim o objetivo do estudo foi analisar os efeitos de três anos de treino multicomponente na capacidade funcional de mulheres idosas. Métodos: 51 mulheres (66.7±5.30 anos e 159±0.11cm) participaram ao longo de três anos num programa constituído por períodos de nove meses de treino multicomponente seguidos de três meses de destreino. As avaliações decorreram no início/fim de cada período de treino e destreino. Resultados: No 1º, 2º e 3º ano verificaram-se aumentos estatisticamente significativos em todos os parâmetros da capacidade funcional (p<0.05). No entanto, o 2º ano revelou ser o período de treino onde observamos os maiores aumentos nos testes T6M (7.43%), SA (383.33%), AC (40.33%), FA (13.05%) e LS (12.5%) (p<0.05). Os testes T6M, LS, FA, AC, SA melhoraram entre 4.17% a 576.60% em todos os períodos de treino e diminuíram entre 3.21% a 85.31% em todos os períodos de destreino. Conclusões: Três anos de treino multicomponente contribuíram para a melhoria da capacidade funcional em mulheres idosas, principalmente no 2º ano de intervenção.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015
    • "Over the last few years, we have come across the term successful aging, which refers to physiological and psychological characteristics of and individual rather than population average [14]. Most of aging-associated factors may be positively affected by regular exercise [3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 23, 26, 28]. Among important terms used in the field of physical activity and inactivity of older people is the term 'functional fitness', which includes components such as lower and upper body muscle strength, lower and upper body flexibility, aerobic endurance, motor agility/dynamic balance, and body-mass index [26]. "
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Motricidade
Show more