Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens May Undermine “The Moral Sentiments”: Evidence from Economic Experiments

Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.
Science (Impact Factor: 33.61). 07/2008; 320(5883):1605-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1152110
Source: PubMed


High-performance organizations and economies work on the basis not only of material interests but also of Adam Smith's "moral sentiments." Well-designed laws and public policies can harness self-interest for the common good. However, incentives that appeal to self-interest may fail when they undermine the moral values that lead people to act altruistically or in other public-spirited ways. Behavioral experiments reviewed here suggest that economic incentives may be counterproductive when they signal that selfishness is an appropriate response; constitute a learning environment through which over time people come to adopt more self-interested motivations; compromise the individual's sense of self-determination and thereby degrade intrinsic motivations; or convey a message of distrust, disrespect, and unfair intent. Many of these unintended effects of incentives occur because people act not only to acquire economic goods and services but also to constitute themselves as dignified, autonomous, and moral individuals. Good organizational and institutional design can channel the material interests for the achievement of social goals while also enhancing the contribution of the moral sentiments to the same ends.

Download full-text


Available from: Samuel Bowles
  • Source
    • "Contrary to this, one pillar of behavioral science is based on the observation that people have nonstandard preferences and that their level of rationality is limited. For understanding anticorruption it is particularly important to recognize that people are trustworthy and willing to trust others (Berg et al. 1995, Camerer 2003), seek to take pride in their work, are intrinsically motivated and engage in charitable giving (Titmus 1971; Deci et al. 1999; Thomas 2009; Bowles 2008), and that they are responsive to encouragement, praise, expressions of gratitude and criticism (Masclet et al. 2003; Bénabou and Tirole 2003; Grant and Gino 2010). Based on these behavioral regularities, this study makes suggestions for improved policies and interventions. "
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: Governments, companies and organizations across the world have implemented strategies for countering corruption. A growing body of so-called best practice has emerged in the last 20 years. But some approaches have been criticized for being costly, ineffective or even counterproductive. This study illustrates this, using six examples, relating to the four-eyes principle, procurement, development aid, compliance statements, leniency and the tone at the top. Increasingly, behavioral science has provided insights on how to improve policies. These insights, along with experimental evidence, are applied to the six examples to provide direction to behaviorally better informed policies.
    Full-text · Working Paper · Dec 2015
  • Source
    • "Yet it is, in the final analysis, individuals who constitute a social world. Laws and formal practices may be created by a small group that can unilaterally enforce its will, but they often lag behind the conditions they ratify; when laws do appear, they have unpredictable effects on the minds of the people they concern [4] [5]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present three major transitions that occur on the way to the elaborate and diverse societies of the modern era. Our account links the worlds of social animals such as pigtail macaques and monk parakeets to examples from human history, including 18th Century London and the contemporary online phenomenon of Wikipedia. From the first awareness and use of group-level social facts to the emergence of norms and their self-assembly into normative bundles, each transition represents a new relationship between the individual and the group. At the center of this relationship is the use of coarse-grained information gained via lossy compression. The role of top-down causation in the origin of society parallels that conjectured to occur in the origin and evolution of life itself.
    Preview · Article · Dec 2015
  • Source
    • "Cooperation typically worsened especially after enforcement was later removed and cooperation became strictly volun- tary. The mechanisms that determine when enforcement will be beneficial are unclear (Bowles, 2008; Kerr, 2013), but many complementary theories have been proposed. First, enforcement may be perceived as coercive (Deci & Ryan, 1987; Ryan et al., 1983), undermining procedural justice and self-determination, and crowding out internalized motivation (Frey et al., 2004; Moller et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used psychological methods to investigate how two prominent interventions, participatory decision making and enforcement, influence voluntary cooperation in a common-pool resource dilemma. Groups (N=40) harvested resources from a shared resource pool. Individuals in the Voted-Enforce condition voted on conservation rules and could use economic sanctions to enforce them. In other conditions, individuals could not vote (Imposed-Enforce condition), lacked enforcement (Voted condition), or both (Imposed condition). Cooperation was strongest in the Voted-Enforce condition (Phase 2). Moreover, these groups continued to cooperate voluntarily after enforcement was removed later in the experiment. Cooperation was weakest in the Imposed-Enforce condition and degraded after enforcement ceased. Thus, enforcement improved voluntary cooperation only when individuals voted. Perceptions of procedural justice, self-determination, and security were highest in the VotedEnforced condition. These factors (legitimacy, security) increased voluntary cooperation by promoting rule acceptance and internalized motivation. Voted-Enforce participants also felt closer to one another (i.e., self-other merging), further contributing to their cooperation. Neither voting nor enforcement produced these sustained psychological conditions alone. Voting lacked security without enforcement (Voted condition), so the individuals who disliked the rule (i.e., the losing voters) pillaged the resource. Enforcement lacked legitimacy without voting (Imposed-Enforce condition), so it crowded out internal reasons for cooperation. Governance interventions should carefully promote security without stifling fundamental needs (e.g., procedural justice) or undermining internal motives for cooperation. © 2015 Society for Judgment and Decision making. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Judgment and decision making
Show more