Nursing Home Care Quality: Insights From a Bayesian Network Approach

Department Managment Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
The Gerontologist (Impact Factor: 3.21). 07/2008; 48(3):338-48. DOI: 10.1093/geront/48.3.338
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this research is twofold. The first purpose is to utilize a new methodology (Bayesian networks) for aggregating various quality indicators to measure the overall quality of care in nursing homes. The second is to provide new insight into the relationships that exist among various measures of quality and how such measures affect the overall quality of nursing home care as measured by the Observable Indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality Instrument. In contrast to many methods used for the same purpose, our method yields both qualitative and quantitative insight into nursing home care quality.
We construct several Bayesian networks to study the influences among factors associated with the quality of nursing home care; we compare and measure their accuracy against other predictive models.
We find the best Bayesian network to perform better than other commonly used methods. We also identify key factors, including number of certified nurse assistant hours, prevalence of bedfast residents, and prevalence of daily physical restraints, that significantly affect the quality of nursing home care. Furthermore, the results of our analysis identify their probabilistic relationships.
The findings of this research indicate that nursing home care quality is most accurately represented through a mix of structural, process, and outcome measures of quality. We also observe that the factors affecting the quality of nursing home care collectively determine the overall quality. Hence, focusing on only key factors without addressing other related factors may not substantially improve the quality of nursing home care.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bakgrunn: Dette notatet skisserer metode og arbeidsform for delprosjektet som skulle vurdere kvalitetssystemer for pleie-og omsorgstjenestene inkludert lege-virksomhet i institusjon. Data er samlet inn med systematiske litteratursøk (12. juli 2010), kontakt med fagmiljøer, eksperter og kommuner, samt en pilotun-dersøkelse. Hovedkonklusjon: Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) kan bru-kes for å videreutvikle kvalitetsindikatorer for pleie-og omsorgstjenesten slik at både struktur og prosessmål dekkes. Det bør vaere mulig å fi nne elementer i RAI som kan kobles mot Individbasert Pleie-og omsorgs Statistikk (IPLOS). Tilba-kemelding må følges opp med individuelt tilrettelagt veiledning for å fremme kvalitetsutvikling. Publisering/tilbakemelding av kvalitetsindikatorer i seg selv betyr verken at de blir brukt eller at dataene påvirker brukernes valg eller tjenes-teyternes praksis.
    Preview · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes. Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials investigating quality of care in for-profit versus not-for-profit nursing homes. A comprehensive search yielded 8827 citations, of which 956 were judged appropriate for full text review. Study characteristics and results of 82 articles that met inclusion criteria were summarised, and results for the four most frequently reported quality measures were pooled. Included studies reported results dating from 1965 to 2003. In 40 studies, all statistically significant comparisons (P<0.05) favoured not-for-profit facilities; in three studies, all statistically significant comparisons favoured for-profit facilities, and the remaining studies had less consistent findings. Meta-analyses suggested that not-for-profit facilities delivered higher quality care than did for-profit facilities for two of the four most frequently reported quality measures: more or higher quality staffing (ratio of effect 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.14, P<0.001) and lower pressure ulcer prevalence (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.98, P=0.02). Non-significant results favouring not-for-profit homes were found for the two other most frequently used measures: physical restraint use (odds ratio 0.93, 0.82 to 1.05, P=0.25) and fewer deficiencies in governmental regulatory assessments (ratio of effect 0.90, 0.78 to 1.04, P=0.17). This systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence suggests that, on average, not-for-profit nursing homes deliver higher quality care than do for-profit nursing homes. Many factors may, however, influence this relation in the case of individual institutions.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2009 · BMJ (online)
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Norwegian Knowledge Center for the Health Services was commissioned by The Department of Health and the Directorate of Health, to survey and recommend elements to be included in a national quality system for the primary health services. These are the main recommendations from the present report:  The goals for a national quality system for the primary health care should be documentation and visibility of quality, learning and quality improvement in a coordinated way, in all four levels of services; the health care worker /patient level, the health organizational level, the municipality level and the national level.  In order to efficiently contribute to quality improvement, a partnership model for development and implementation should be adopted, with involvement of patients and users, and all stakeholders in the process.  Patients and users need available and understandable information about quality of the services, and should to a larger extent than today be given the opportunity to query information on quality and safety, and contribute in the development of quality of the services.  The quality of the services should be measured and visualized in a way that is useful for patients and health workers own quality improvement work.  The development of quality indicators for all services in primary health care is an essential element of a national quality system. These should be developed according to the principles outlined in the report: Conceptual Framework for a National Healthcare Quality Indicator System in Norway - Recommendations (8).  The lack of IKT programmes, equipment, coordination and functions in relation to possible retrieval, processing, and analysing data is a major obstacle for documentation of the quality of the services.  In order to compare measures for quality through benchmarking, structured and goal oriented processes need to be in place in each of the services. This can be done in relation to local challenges, or by regional or national processes.  Leaders on the national and municipality levels, and the leaders of the individual services, should to a larger extent than today query about quality of the services and make sure documentation of quality is in place. Annual quality reports from the individual services and the municipalities. In addition there is 9 Key messages a need for more focus on patient safety, and a system for registering unwanted incidents may be established, as it is in the specialized health care services. The focus for such a registry should be on understanding the mechanisms and learning.  To have the right competence in place is important to ensure and develop quality in the primary health care services. Both professional knowledge and quality improvement knowledge is important to ensure and develop quality of the services. Knowledge and skills in both evidence based practice and quality improvement is should to a larger extent than today be included in the basic education of health care workers, as well as in their postgraduate further education.  More research is needed about quality improvement in the primary care sector. Improvement projects should be followed by evaluation, as should the implementation of a national quality system in the primary care services.  To give push, pull and direction in the quality documentation, visualization and improvement work, we propose establishing a unit with particular responsibility to develop and implement at national quality system for the primary health services. Such a unit needs to coordinate and further develop the work already in place today, and establish technical and process support for the locally based quality improvement work. The main focus of the work should be learning and quality improvement, and user involvement is understood.  Anchoring the work in the health laws would be a tremendous help in getting increased focus and resources for an increased and coordinated effort towards better quality. Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet og Helsedirektoratet
    Preview · Article · Jan 2010
Show more