Article

Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Is Inconsistently Regionalized in the United States

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke Children's Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 08/2008; 122(1):e172-80. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-3399
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death in children. On the basis of evidence of better outcomes, the American College of Surgery Committee on Trauma recommends that children with severe traumatic brain injury receive care at high-level trauma centers. We assessed rates of adherence to these recommendations and factors associated with adherence.
We studied population and hospital discharge data from 2001 from all of the health care referral regions (n = 68) in 6 US states (Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Virginia). We identified children with severe traumatic brain injury by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes and American College of Surgery Committee on Trauma criteria. We defined "high-level centers" as either level I or pediatric trauma centers. We considered an area to be well regionalized if >or=90% of severe traumatic brain injury hospitalizations were in high-level centers. We also explored how use of level II trauma centers affected rates of care at high-level centers.
Of 2117 admissions for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury, 67.3% were in high-level centers, and 87.3% were in either high-level or level II centers. Among states, 56.4% to 93.6% of severe traumatic brain injury admissions were in high-level centers. Only 2 states, Massachusetts and Virginia, were well regionalized. Across health care referral regions, 0% to 100% of severe traumatic brain injury admissions were in high-level centers, and only 19.1% of health care referral regions were well regionalized. Only a weak relationship existed between the distance to the nearest high-level center and regionalization. The age of statewide trauma systems had no relationship to the extent of regionalization.
Despite evidence for improved outcomes of severely injured children admitted to high-level trauma centers, we found that almost one third of the children with severe traumatic brain injury failed to receive care in such centers. Only 2 of 6 states and less than one fifth of 68 health care referral regions were well regionalized. This study highlights problems with current pediatric trauma care that can serve as a basis for additional research and health care policy.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Gilles Clermont
  • Source
    • "Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (US) pediatric population (Hartman et al. 2008; Halldorsson et al. 2007). TBI results in substantial health care costs and many survivors experience permanent disability (Reid et al. 2001; Howard et al. 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) greatly contributes to morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. We examined potential urban/rural disparities in mortality amongst Oregon pediatric patients with TBI treated in trauma hospitals. We conducted a retrospective study of children ages 0–19 using the Oregon Trauma Registry for years 2009–2012. Geographic location of injury was classified using the National Center for Health Statistics Urban/Rural Classification Scheme. Incidence rates were calculated using Census data for denominators. Associations between urban/rural injury location and mortality were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for potential confounders. Generalized estimating equations were used to help account for clustering of data within hospitals. Of 2794 pediatric patients with TBI, 46.6 % were injured in large metropolitan locations, 24.8 % in medium/small metropolitan locations, and 28.6 % in non-metropolitan (rural) locations. Children with rural locations of injury had a greater annualized TBI incidence rate, at 107/100,000 children per year, than those from large metropolitan areas (71/100,000 per year). Compared to children injured in urban locations, those in rural locations had more than twice the crude odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95 % CI, 1.6–4.0). This association remained significant (OR, 1.8; 95 % CI, 1.04–3.3) while adjusting for age, gender, race, insurance status, injury severity, and type of TBI (blunt vs. penetrating). We observed higher rates of TBI and greater proportions of severe injury in rural compared to urban areas in Oregon. Rural children treated in the trauma system for TBI were more likely to die than urban children after controlling for demographic and injury factors associated with urban/rural residence. Further research is needed to examine treatment disparities by urban/rural location. Future work should also identify interventions that can reduce risk of TBI and TBI-related mortality among children, particularly those who live in rural areas.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015
  • Source

    Preview · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El principal objetivo de este consenso es aumentar entre los médicos que tratan a pacientes con lesiones cerebrales la percepción sobre la incidencia y los riesgos de hipopituitarismo en pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) y/o hemorragia cerebral. La importancia de este problema no sólo está relacionado con el TCE �que es frecuente�, sino porque es muy prevalente en la población joven. Las consecuencias del TCE se caracterizan por una serie de síntomas que dependen del tipo de secuelas en relación con la disfunción neuroendocrina. Los signos y síntomas del hipopituitarismo a menudo se confunden con las secuelas del TCE. La deficiencia de hormonas hipofisarias conlleva una capacidad de rehabilitación subóptima como consecuencia de no haberse reconocido y tratado las deficiencias hormonales subyacentes. Este consenso se basa en opiniones de expertos sobre pacientes que han sufrido TCE o hemorragia cerebral que deberían ser evaluados con la finalidad de explorar la función hipofisaria y, si fuese necesario, administrar el tratamiento sustitutivo.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2009 · Endocrinología y Nutrición
Show more