A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Pathogens, Personality, and Culture: Disease Prevalence Predicts
Worldwide Variability in Sociosexuality, Extraversion, and Openness to
Experience
Mark Schaller and Damian R. Murray
University of British Columbia
Previous research has documented cross-cultural differences in personality traits, but the origins of those
differences remain unknown. The authors investigate the possibility that these cultural differences can be
traced, in part, to regional differences in the prevalence in infectious diseases. Three specific hypotheses
are deduced, predicting negative relationships between disease prevalence and (a) unrestricted sociosex-
uality, (b) extraversion, and (c) openness to experience. These hypotheses were tested empirically with
methods that employed epidemiological atlases in conjunction with personality data collected from
individuals in dozens of countries worldwide. Results were consistent with all three hypotheses: In
regions that have historically suffered from high levels of infectious diseases, people report lower mean
levels of sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness. Alternative explanations are addressed, and possible
underlying mechanisms are discussed.
Keywords: culture, disease prevalence, extraversion, openness to experience, sociosexuality
People’s personalities differ, and some of that individual vari-
ability is geographically clumped. But why is that so? How are we
to understand the origins of regional differences in personality? A
complete response to that question will surely require attention to
many different processes operating at different levels of analysis.
Here, we focus on one previously unidentified contributor to those
differences. We report empirical results indicating that specific
kinds of cross-cultural differences in personality result, in part,
from regional differences in the prevalence of infectious disease.
Cross-Cultural Differences in Personality
In recent years, several ambitious programs of research have
collected data from dozens of countries worldwide as a means of
documenting cross-cultural differences on various kinds of per-
sonality traits. These investigations assessed personality traits at
the individual level of analysis, with standard trait assessment
instruments, and on the basis of these data computed mean trait
scores at the regional level of analysis.
For example, Schmitt (2005) and his collaborators in the Inter-
national Sexuality Description Project assessed worldwide vari-
ability in chronic tendencies toward either a “restricted” or “unre-
stricted” sociosexual style. (Among other things, more highly
unrestricted individuals seek more sexual variety, are more com-
fortable with casual sexual encounters, and have more sexual
partners across their lifetime.) The results document considerable
regional variability on this trait. In addition, several international
teams of researchers have assessed worldwide variability along the
Big Five personality traits of agreeableness, conscientiousness,
extraversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience (McCrae,
2002; McCrae, Terracciano, & 79 members of the Personality
Profiles of Cultures Project, 2005; Schmitt et al., 2007). The
results document regional differences along all five fundamental
dimensions of personality.
These results, and others like them, are invaluable assets to the
scientific study of individual differences and culture. Newer in-
vestigations have been addressing the consequences that these
cultural differences may have (e.g., on health outcomes and social
policy decisions; McCrae & Terracciano, 2008). To date, however,
almost no research whatsoever has addressed why these worldwide
differences in personality profiles exist in the first place.
Psychology, Ecology, and the Origins of Culture
Many factors may have contributed to cross-cultural differences
in personality. Some of those causes may be idiosyncratic to the
unique histories of specific populations. Although important, anal-
yses of idiosyncratic circumstances don’t easily yield conclusions
that are predictive on a more global scale. It is toward discovering
a more complete (and more broadly predictive) explanation for the
origins of cross-cultural differences that it is useful to consider
how basic human tendencies, operating in conjunction with vary-
ing ecological conditions, can produce cross-cultural differences
Mark Schaller and Damian R. Murray, Department of Psychology,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
This research was supported by research grants from the University of
British Columbia Hampton Fund and the Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council of Canada. Thanks to Emma Buchtel, Steve Heine, and
Ara Norenzayan for helpful comments and suggestions. Thanks also to
Robert McCrae, Antonio Terracciano, and their collaborators on the Per-
sonality Profiles of Cultures Project for generously providing us with the
opportunity to do secondary analyses on their facet-level findings prior to
the publication of those findings.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mark
Schaller, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136
West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. E-mail:
schaller@psych.ubc.ca
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Copyright 2008 by the American Psychological Association
2008, Vol. 95, No. 1, 212–221 0022-3514/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212
212
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.