Postgame Analysis: Using Video-Based Coaching for Continuous Professional Development

Center for Surgery & Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Impact Factor: 5.12). 01/2012; 214(1):115-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.009
Source: PubMed


The surgical learning curve persists for years after training, yet existing continuing medical education activities targeting this are limited. We describe a pilot study of a scalable video-based intervention, providing individualized feedback on intraoperative performance.
Four complex operations performed by surgeons of varying experience--a chief resident accompanied by the operating senior surgeon, a surgeon with less than 10 years in practice, another with 20 to 30 years in practice, and a surgeon with more than 30 years of experience--were video recorded. Video playback formed the basis of 1-hour coaching sessions with a peer-judged surgical expert. These sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded.
The sessions focused on operative technique--both technical aspects and decision-making. With increasing seniority, more discussion was devoted to the optimization of teaching and facilitation of the resident's technical performance. Coaching sessions with senior surgeons were peer-to-peer interactions, with each discussing his preferred approach. The coach alternated between directing the session (asking probing questions) and responding to specific questions brought by the surgeons, depending on learning style. At all experience levels, video review proved valuable in identifying episodes of failure to progress and troubleshooting alternative approaches. All agreed this tool is a powerful one. Inclusion of trainees seems most appropriate when coaching senior surgeons; it may restrict the dialogue of more junior attendings.
Video-based coaching is an educational modality that targets intraoperative judgment, technique, and teaching. Surgeons of all levels found it highly instructive. This may provide a practical, much needed approach for continuous professional development.

Download full-text


Available from: Sarah Peyre
  • Source
    • "Our results indicate that SPs who were trained with video appear to perform better than SPs trained without video in terms of the accuracy of the SP performance over four sequential portrayals. This is in line with studies showing that video improves performance (Shippey et al. 2011; Gupta & Sehgal 2012; Hu et al. 2012). The initial hypothesis that the combination of RMV and PFV in SP training would improve the accuracy of the SP portrayal most was not confirmed, although the effect size is slightly larger with RMV (Table 4). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: High-stake objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) with standardized patients (SPs) should offer the same conditions to all candidates throughout the exam. SP performance should therefore be as close to the original role script as possible during all encounters. In this study, we examined the impact of video in SP training on SPs’ role accuracy, investigating how the use of different types of video during SP training improves the accuracy of SP portrayal. Methods: In a randomized post-test, control group design three groups of 12 SPs each with different types of video training and one control group of 12 SPs without video use in SP training were compared. The three intervention groups used role-modeling video, performance-feedback video, or a combination of both. Each SP from each group had four students encounter. Two blinded faculty members rated the 192 video-recorded encounters, using a case-specific rating instrument to assess SPs’ role accuracy. Results: SPs trained by video showed significantly (p Discussion: Use of video during SP training enhances the accuracy of SP portrayal compared with no video, regardless of the type of video intervention used.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Medical Teacher
  • Source
    • "The social nature of action research makes it a collaborative activity (Somekh, 2006); that brings us to the second component of peer coaching. Peer coaching may be defined as a confidential process through which two or more professional colleagues work together to improve upon existing practices, expand, refine, and build new skills, share ideas, teach one another, conduct classroom research, and/or solve problems in the workplace (Hu et al., 2012). Peer coaching adds the benefit of collaboration to reflective practice and reduces the solitary nature of instructional practices; as a result it promotes a healthy and beneficial relationship between teachers. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to explore the impact of a professional development program on the teachers' pedagogical beliefs and practices. More specifically, the program endeavoured to design a prototype for teacher professional development in Indonesia that was sustainable and scalable. This one-year program built upon the participating teachers' existing practices, reinforced with the concept of reflection as a tool for ongoing inquiry of their own practices. The three major components of this program were: action research, peer-coaching and leadership support. By using a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative data collection, this study examined the changes in the participating teachers' beliefs and practices, and how these changes may be related to the professional development program. The key findings in this paper have highlighted the importance of (1) the clarity of both the content and the outline of the program, (2) applicable and suitable professional learning methods, (3) modelling, and (4) collaboration among teachers. The findings have also identified teachers' (limited) resources, such as time and access to facilities, to be taken into account when planning for professional development programs. The discussion focuses on the challenge to design professional development programs based on a belief-action relationship.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014
  • Source
    • "Measured results have included improved productivity, morale and team dynamics (Brumwell et al. 2006, Elliott 2006, Anderson et al. 2008, Grant et al. 2010). However , most coaching programmes are directed at coaching individuals such as executives, new nursing graduates and surgeons (Byrne 2007, Gawande 2011, Johnson et al. 2011, Hu et al. 2012). Individual mastery may result in one's own individual development, but the delivery and improvement of care and services requires interprofessional teams (Edmondson 2003, Batalden & Davidoff 2007, Nelson et al. 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimTo investigate health care improvement team coaching activities from the perspectives of coachees, coaches and unit leaders in two national improvement collaboratives. Background Despite numerous methods to improve health care, inconsistencies in success have been attributed to factors that include unengaged staff, absence of supportive improvement resources and organisational inertia. Methods Mixed methods sequential exploratory study design, including quantitative and qualitative data from interprofessional improvement teams who received team coaching. The coachees (n=382), coaches (n=9) and leaders (n=30) completed three different data collection tools identifying coaching actions perceived to support improvement activities. ResultsCoachees, coaches and unit leaders in both collaboratives reported generally positive perceptions about team coaching. Four categories of coaching actions were perceived to support improvement work: context, relationships, helping and technical support. Conclusions All participants agreed that regardless of who the coach is, emphasis should include the four categories of team coaching actions. Implications for nursing managementLeaders should reflect on their efforts to support improvement teams and consider the four categories of team coaching actions. A structured team coaching model that offers needed encouragement to keep the team energized, seems to support health care improvement.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013 · Journal of Nursing Management
Show more