The impact of an electronic health record on nurse sensitive patient outcomes: An interrupted time series analysis

Article (PDF Available)inJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association 19(4):615-20 · December 2011with199 Reads
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000504 · Source: PubMed
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of electronic health record (EHR) implementation on nursing care processes and outcomes. Interrupted time series analysis, 2003-2009. A large US not-for-profit integrated health care organization. 29 hospitals in Northern and Southern California. An integrated EHR including computerized physician order entry, nursing documentation, risk assessment tools, and documentation tools. Percentage of patients with completed risk assessments for hospital acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) and falls (process measures) and rates of HAPU and falls (outcome measures). EHR implementation was significantly associated with an increase in documentation rates for HAPU risk (coefficient 2.21, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.75); the increase for fall risk was not statistically significant (0.36; -3.58 to 4.30). EHR implementation was associated with a 13% decrease in HAPU rates (coefficient -0.76, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.16) but no decrease in fall rates (-0.091; -0.29 to 0.11). Irrespective of EHR implementation, HAPU rates decreased significantly over time (-0.16; -0.20 to -0.13), while fall rates did not (0.0052; -0.01 to 0.02). Hospital region was a significant predictor of variation for both HAPU (0.72; 0.30 to 1.14) and fall rates (0.57; 0.41 to 0.72). The introduction of an integrated EHR was associated with a reduction in the number of HAPUs but not in patient fall rates. Other factors, such as changes over time and hospital region, were also associated with variation in outcomes. The findings suggest that EHR impact on nursing care processes and outcomes is dependent on a number of factors that should be further explored.
    • "The observation of fewer complications in the intervention group suggests the combination of a practical risk identification strategy and a team approach to integrating care may be more successful than an identification strategy (e.g., SPICES) alone. Similarly, experience with the impact of EMRs on inpatient outcomes is mixed, particularly for adverse events during hospitalization (Buntin, Burke, Hoaglin, & Blumenthal, 2011; Furukawa, Raghu, & Shao, 2010; Dowding, Turley & Garrido, 2012 ). A report by one academic medical center suggests that EMRs may support the implementation of team-based care (O'Leary et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Background: Extended hospital stays and complications are common among older adults and may lead to morbidity and loss of independence. Specialized geriatric units have been shown to improve outcomes but, with the growing numbers of older adults, may be difficult to scale to meet needs. Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate a quality improvement initiative that redesigned unit-based workflow and trained interprofessional teams on general medical/surgical units to create care plans for vulnerable older adults using principles of comprehensive geriatric assessment and team management. Method: The evaluation included a cluster randomized controlled trial of 10 medical/surgical units and intention-to-treat analysis of all patients meeting risk screening criteria. Results: N = 1,384, median age = 80.9 years, and 53.5% female. Mean difference in observed vs. expected length of stay was 1.03 days shorter (p = .006); incidence of complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.98) and transfer to intensive care (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.25-0.79) lower among patients admitted to intervention units; incidence of discharge to institutional care was higher (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.06-1.93). Mortality during hospitalization (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.37-1.11) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Reorganizing general medical/surgical units to provide team-based interprofessional care can improve outcomes among hospitalized older adults.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015
    • "At an organisational level the nurse managers we spoke to clearly the ability to use data from KP HealthConnect™ to audit and monitor care quality on a shift by shift basis. In a separate study we have demonstrated that the introduction of KP HealthConnect™ was associated with an improvement in outcomes for patients related to pressure ulcers but not falls [41]. However, what is not clear is if or how the behaviors we observed in this study are related to the observed improvements in patient outcomes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Purpose: To explore how nurses use an integrated Electronic Health Record (EHR) in practice. Methods: A multi-site case study across two hospitals in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Non-participant observation was used to explore nurses' use of the EHR, while semi-structured interviews with nurses and managers explored their perceptions of the EHR and how it affected their practice. Data were analyzed thematically using codes derived deductively from the literature and inductively from the data. Results: Key themes arising from the analysis suggest that the EHR changed various elements of the way nurses practiced. Introducing the EHR was thought to have improved communication, ease of access to information and the safety of medication administration processes. At an organizational level, there was variability in how the EHR was used to support care documentation and initiatives to improve the quality of care provided by nurses. Conclusion: The EHR was perceived to improve efficiency, safety and communication by the majority of nurses who were interviewed. However, it is likely that a number of other factors such as individual nurse's characteristics and organizational culture influence how an EHR can be used effectively to improve outcomes for patients.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014
    • "Our results indicate that many of the priorities identified and presented 15 years ago at Medinfo in Seoul, South Korea by Brennan and colleagues are still deemed valid by both US and international respondents. The sophistication of nursing informatics research has also increased with a move away from descriptive and feasibility studies to more complex multi-method and trial designs that focus on measurement of the impact of technologies on nursing practice and on the quality and safety of care provided by nurses [10,11]. However, despite these advancements, it is apparent from our survey results that internationally there is a need to develop the evidence base further to explore how we can best support nursing practice and improve the quality of care provided to patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The Nursing Informatics International Research Network (NIIRN) is a group of experts who are collaborating on the development of internationally relevant research programs for nursing informatics. In this paper we outline key findings of a survey exploring international research priorities for nursing informatics. The survey was available online during May-August 2012. Respondents were asked to rate each of 20 listed research topics in terms of respondent's views of its priority for nursing informatics research. 468 completed surveys were received representing respondents from six World Health Organization regions. The two most highly ranked areas of importance for research were development of systems to provide real time feedback to nurses and assessment of the impact of HIT on nursing care and patient outcomes. The lowest ranked research topics were theory development and integrating genomic data into clinical information systems. The identification of these priorities provides a basis for future international collaborative research in the field of nursing informatics.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013
Show more