Article

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Vitamin C Deficiency in North and South India: A Two Centre Population Based Study in People Aged 60 Years and Over

Aravind Eye Hospital Pondicherry, Pondicherry, India.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 12/2011; 6(12):e28588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028588
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Studies from the UK and North America have reported vitamin C deficiency in around 1 in 5 men and 1 in 9 women in low income groups. There are few data on vitamin C deficiency in resource poor countries.
To investigate the prevalence of vitamin C deficiency in India.
We carried out a population-based cross-sectional survey in two areas of north and south India. Randomly sampled clusters were enumerated to identify people aged 60 and over. Participants (75% response rate) were interviewed for tobacco, alcohol, cooking fuel use, 24 hour diet recall and underwent anthropometry and blood collection. Vitamin C was measured using an enzyme-based assay in plasma stabilized with metaphosphoric acid. We categorised vitamin C status as deficient (<11 µmol/L), sub-optimal (11-28 µmol/L) and adequate (>28 µmol/L). We investigated factors associated with vitamin C deficiency using multivariable Poisson regression.
The age, sex and season standardized prevalence of vitamin C deficiency was 73.9% (95% confidence Interval, CI 70.4,77.5) in 2668 people in north India and 45.7% (95% CI 42.5,48.9) in 2970 from south India. Only 10.8% in the north and 25.9% in the south met the criteria for adequate levels. Vitamin C deficiency varied by season, and was more prevalent in men, with increasing age, users of tobacco and biomass fuels, in those with anthropometric indicators of poor nutrition and with lower intakes of dietary vitamin C.
In poor communities, such as in our study, consideration needs to be given to measures to improve the consumption of vitamin C rich foods and to discourage the use of tobacco.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Ravindran Ravilla
    • "Therefore, vitamin deficiencies are more frequently encountered. According to a recent study based on Indian population, vitamin C deficiency was found in a substantial proportion of the older population.[14] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This case reports a rare condition of scurvy which posed a diagnostic difficulty. However, a thorough medical and diet history, along with clinical and histopathological examination aided in prompt diagnosis and successful management of the case. Occurrence of scurvy in today's contemporary society is said to be rare. Lack of fresh fruits and vegetables in the diet can lead to this condition. Diagnosis may be difficult due to its rarity and presence of non specific symptoms, which may pose a challenge to the clinician. A comprehensive history, clinical examination along with clinical and histopathological features led to arrive at a proper diagnosis. Local procedures and systemic therapy aided in the successful management of the case. A marked improvement in the gingival status and in the physical well being of the patient resulted after treatment. This case report describes the various manifestations of scurvy that posed a diagnostic challenge to the clinician. This condition which can be fatal if untreated can be easily prevented with inclusion of healthy food in the diet and modification in the lifestyle.
    No preview · Article · May 2013 · Dental research journal

  • No preview · Article · Nov 2012 · Archives of ophthalmology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: “Risk” factors as mentioned in the title should refer to factors that have been found to increase the probability of acquiring a disorder. Risk factors do not automatically imply causality which can be demonstrated by aging: it is a risk factor for the three disorders in the title, but it is not the cause of these disorders. Causality can be assumed by the weight of evidence from a number of studies including strength, consistency, temporality, biologic gradient, plausibility, coherence, and experimental evidence, but causality is never definite. “Even the most careful and detailed mechanistic dissection of individual events cannot provide more than associations, albeit at a finer level” (Rothmann 1998). One epidemiological design to establish causality is a clinical trial in which we rely on randomization to balance treated or exposed groups and non-treated or non-exposed groups. A clinical trial, however, may have more problems obtaining well-balanced controls, and in case of diseased persons, its results are not necessarily applicable to the general population. In general, participants in clinical trials will be healthier than the normal population and that also may make their results less generalizable to the target population. Prospective studies that follow groups with specific risk factors for incidence of disease can also be powerful because of the temporality. However, population-based studies which follow groups over time may suffer from a lack of power when the disease of interest is relatively rare, but their advantage above clinic-based case–control studies is that the selection of controls from a population is often less biased. Also it should be kept in mind that access to clinical care may vary widely worldwide and that clinic-based study results may not be applicable to other populations. In one recent population-based study from the USA, for example, about 60 % of the participants had no health insurance (Choudhury et al. 2011). Even within a Canadian clinic, poorer patients declined more expensive treatment (Chew et al. 2005).
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2013
Show more