Effect of endoscopic screening at 1-year intervals on the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea

Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Impact Factor: 3.5). 12/2011; 27(5):928-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07038.x
Source: PubMed


The recommended interval of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (GC) in a general population is 2 years in Korea. However, it has not been determined whether endoscopic screening with a shorter interval is beneficial, especially for high-risk groups.
A total of 415 patients with GC were categorized according to whether they had (vigilant screening group) or not (non-vigilant screening group) undergone endoscopic screening within 1 year before being diagnosed with GC. Clinicopathologic GC characteristics of the two groups were compared. Next, the same analyses were conducted in subgroups of patients with high risk for GC including males, current smokers, first-degree relatives of GC; and patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric atrophy, or intestinal metaplasia (IM).
The proportion of vigilant screening patients was 36.1%. Early gastric cancer (EGC) was more frequently observed in the vigilant screening group than the non-vigilant screening group (62.7% vs 49.4%, P = 0.009). In the high-risk factor analyses, EGC was more frequently detected among patients with severe IM in the vigilant screening group than the non-vigilant screening group (66.7% vs 35.5%, P = 0.047). In addition, more patients in the vigilant screening group had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; 26.7% vs 0%, P = 0.008) and had stage I (84.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.012) than in the non-vigilant screening group.
Endoscopic screening for GC at 1-year intervals would be beneficial for patients with severe IM in South Korea; this method could detect EGC for which the curative modality would be ESD.

10 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a specific high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) system for the optical recognition of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and the assessment of its correlation with histologic and clinical data. A total of 234 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an outpatient endoscopy suite for various indications were prospectively enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Gastric IM was diagnosed on the basis of three mucosal patterns identified using HD-WLE in a per-patient analysis. Histological evaluation was used as the gold standard, and special staining was conducted for subtyping of IM. Main outcome measurements were sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio of HD-WLE and secondary associations with histologic and clinical data. IM was found in 63/234 (27%) patients and low-grade dysplasia in 6/63 patients (9.5%). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and likelihood ratio of all mucosal patterns were 74.6, 94, 88% and 13, respectively. All clinically significant type III IM and dysplasia lesions were endoscopically detected. All nonvisible lesions were of types I and II with mild grade and no dysplasia. Ten patients were considered false positives and the lesions were associated with severe inflammation and antralization. The specific HD-WLE system showed satisfactory accuracy and high specificity during real-time, routine endoscopy practice. Specific mucosal patterns were correlated with level and grade of lesions. The sensitivity of the system is even higher when only clinically significant IM lesions are considered.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2014 · European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known about the effects of periodic endoscopic screening before detection of primary gastric cancer. We compared clinical outcomes in patients who did and did not undergo endoscopy before diagnosis. Between January 2009 and November 2011, 769 patients were referred to Asan Medical Center after diagnosis of gastric cancer. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients who had (n=512) and had not (n=257) undergone endoscopic screening before diagnosis of gastric cancer. Factors about resectability and possibility of endoscopic resection were analyzed. In the nonexamined group, 225 patients (87.5%) had resectable gastric cancers and were treated surgically (n=151, 67.1%) or by endoscopic resection (n=74, 32.9%). In the examined group, 493 (96.3%) had resectability and were resected surgically (n=243, 49.3%) or endoscopically (n=250, 50.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that symptoms, no endoscopic screening, and lower serum albumin were associated with unresectability. Of the 718 resectable tumors, 394 underwent surgery and 324 underwent endoscopic resection. Multivariate analysis showed that older age, no symptoms, ≤1 year interval endoscopy, and higher serum albumin were associated with endoscopic resection. Previous endoscopy can increase gastric cancer resectability. Moreover, a ≤1 year interval from endoscopic examination can increase the possibility of endoscopic resection.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2014 · Hepato-gastroenterology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite improvements in treatment modalities, gastric cancer is the second cause of mortality among Korean men and third among females in Korea. Korea implemented a gastric cancer screening program for the general population in 1999. However, the effectiveness and harms of gastric cancer screening using gastric endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series have not been fully evaluated. In an effort to evaluate the screening program, the Korean multidisciplinary expert committee for developing a gastric cancer screening guideline systematically reviewed the evidence regarding the benefits and harms of gastric cancer screening, and developed an evidence-based clinical guideline. There is 'low' level evidence that gastric cancer screening using gastric endoscopy or UGI series can reduce gastric cancer mortality for asymptomatic adults aged between 40 to 74 years. The benefits of gastric cancer screening using gastric endoscopy are substantially higher than its harms, while the benefits of screening with UGI series are moderately higher. We recommend that asymptomatic adults from 40 to 75 years of age undergo biannual gastric cancer screening using gastric endoscopy (recommendation B). Gastric cancer screening using UGI series in asymptomatic adults aged between 40 to 74 years may be recommended based on clinicians' judgment regarding the patient's risk and the patient's preference (recommendation C). There is insufficient evidence to assess the benefits and harms of gastric cancer screening for adults aged between 75 to 84 years (recommendation I). We recommend against gastric cancer screening for adults older than 85 years (recommendation D).
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · Journal of the Korean Medical Association
Show more