ArticlePDF Available

Parental Weight (Mis)Perceptions: Factors Influencing Parents’ Ability to Correctly Categorise Their Child’s Weight Status

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This study investigates parents' ability to correctly classify their child's weight status. The influence of parent and child socio-demographic and lifestyle factors on parental misclassification of their child's weight status is explored. A representative sample of Irish children (aged 5-12 (n = 596) years, aged 13-17 years (n = 441)) and their parents (n = 1885) were recruited to participate in a national dietary survey. Parental perceptions of their child's weight and their own weight were measured. Anthropometric measurements (weight and height) were objectively measured for parents and children. Body Mass Index (BMI) scores were derived and categorised as normal, overweight or obese using standard references. Over 80% of parents of overweight boys and 79.3% of parents of overweight girls reported their child's weight was fine for his/her height and age. Furthermore, 44.4% of parents of obese boys and 45.3% of parents of obese girls felt their child's weight was fine for their height and age. Parents were significantly less likely to be correct about their sons' weight status and more likely to be correct the older the child. Parents were over 86% less likely to be correct about their child's weight if their child was overweight and approximately 59% less likely to be correct if the child was obese, compared to parents of normal weight children. This research suggests that parents are failing to recognise overweight and obesity in their children with factors such as parental weight status, child's age and gender influencing this.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1 23
Maternal and Child Health Journal
ISSN 1092-7875
Matern Child Health J
DOI 10.1007/s10995-011-0927-1
Parental Weight (Mis)Perceptions: Factors
Influencing Parents’ Ability to Correctly
Categorise Their Child’s Weight Status
Eibhlin Hudson, Aileen McGloin & Aine
McConnon
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and
all rights are held exclusively by Springer
Science+Business Media, LLC. This e-offprint
is for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you
wish to self-archive your work, please use the
accepted author’s version for posting to your
own website or your institution’s repository.
You may further deposit the accepted author’s
version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s
request, provided it is not made publicly
available until 12 months after publication.
Parental Weight (Mis)Perceptions: Factors Influencing Parents’
Ability to Correctly Categorise Their Child’s Weight Status
Eibhlin Hudson Aileen McGloin Aine McConnon
ÓSpringer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Abstract This study investigates parents’ ability to cor-
rectly classify their child’s weight status. The influence of
parent and child socio-demographic and lifestyle factors on
parental misclassification of their child’s weight status is
explored. A representative sample of Irish children (aged
5–12 (n=596) years, aged 13–17 years (n=441)) and
their parents (n=1885) were recruited to participate in a
national dietary survey. Parental perceptions of their
child’s weight and their own weight were measured.
Anthropometric measurements (weight and height) were
objectively measured for parents and children. Body Mass
Index (BMI) scores were derived and categorised as nor-
mal, overweight or obese using standard references. Over
80% of parents of overweight boys and 79.3% of parents of
overweight girls reported their child’s weight was fine for
his/her height and age. Furthermore, 44.4% of parents of
obese boys and 45.3% of parents of obese girls felt their
child’s weight was fine for their height and age. Parents
were significantly less likely to be correct about their sons’
weight status and more likely to be correct the older the
child. Parents were over 86% less likely to be correct about
their child’s weight if their child was overweight and
approximately 59% less likely to be correct if the child was
obese, compared to parents of normal weight children. This
research suggests that parents are failing to recognise
overweight and obesity in their children with factors such
as parental weight status, child’s age and gender influ-
encing this.
Keywords Childhood weight Parents Perceptions
Obesity
Introduction
Obesity in childhood is now recognised as a global public
health issue [1,2]. Studies have shown that obesity in
childhood is likely to continue into adulthood, with BMI
becoming relatively fixed by adolescence [3,4]. Identifi-
cation of children who are overweight or at risk of over-
weight is therefore important to prevent future ill-health.
Excessive weight gain in childhood is a result of a number
of factors, including poor dietary, eating and exercise
habits. Such habits are believed to be shaped early in
childhood and are influenced greatly by factors such as
family environment and parental practices [5,6]. Parents,
in particular mothers, have a large role to play in the
development of food and exercise behaviours in childhood
[79]. As a result the involvement of parents in efforts to
address childhood overweight is critical to their success
[10]. However, parents are unlikely to implement changes
to their child’s diet or lifestyle unless they recognise the
need for such changes or perceive their child at risk
[11,12]. Therefore, an important first step in addressing
childhood overweight and obesity is ensuring parents rec-
ognise unhealthy weight levels in their children. Knowing
whether or not parents can correctly classify their child’s
weight status is important for the development and
E. Hudson
School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University,
Melbourne, Australia
A. McGloin
SafeFood, Block B Abbey Court, Dublin 1, Ireland
A. McConnon (&)
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science,
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
e-mail: aine.mcconnon@ucd.ie
123
Matern Child Health J
DOI 10.1007/s10995-011-0927-1
Author's personal copy
implementation of obesity prevention and treatment
programmes.
A number of studies have investigated the ability of
parents to correctly identify their child’s weight status
[1326]. Previous research has suggested an association
between certain child and parent characteristics, such as
socio-demographic and lifestyle variables, and parental
ability to recognise overweight in their child. Huang et al.
reported that parental assessment of their child’s weight
status was mainly associated with child characteristics,
with younger children and more overweight children less
likely to be correctly classified by their parents [19]. He
and Evans reported that parents were more likely to mis-
classify their sons’ weight than their daughters’ weight
[20]. Similarly Maynard et al. reported that mothers were
almost three times more likely to classify their at-risk
([85th to \95th BMI-for-age percentile) daughters as
being ‘‘overweight’’ as compared with their at-risk sons
[18]. Mamum et al. reported that gender, child dissatis-
faction, child dieting and maternal overweight were par-
ticularly associated with maternal misclassification of their
overweight child [27]. In terms of parental characteristics
associated with ability to correctly identify their child’s
weight status, parental education and weight status of the
mother have been associated, with overweight mothers less
likely to correctly identify their child’s overweight status
than normal weight mothers [15,20]. It has been reported
that mothers with lower educational attainment were more
likely to misclassify their child’s weight status [15].
Despite this growing body of evidence, no clear expla-
nation for the misperception of child weight status or risk
of overweight exists. The majority of research to date has
focused on children under 12 years of age [28] and often
relied on self-reported weight status [15], or only recorded
the weight status of the child [29,30]. The importance of
parental perception of child weight status is equally rele-
vant in older children, as children start to gain more control
over their own eating habits and the incidence of over-
weight and obesity continues to rise during this life period.
In addition, most previous studies have only assessed
parental perceptions of overweight children, without con-
sidering how parents of normal weight children perceive
their child’s weight status.
Building upon this research, the current study hypoth-
esises that parents of overweight or obese children
1
will be
less likely to correctly classify their child’s body weight
status. In addition, this study will examine the influence of
parent and child socio-demographic and lifestyle factors on
parental misclassification of their child’s weight status in
Ireland.
Methods
Participants
Data presented in this paper were collected as part of the
National Children’s Food Survey (data collection March
2003–2004) and the National Teen Food Survey (data col-
lection September 2005–2006). A more detailed account of
the samples and methodologies used can be found at http://
www.iuna.net. Twenty-eight primary schools and 32 sec-
ondary schools were selected from a database obtained from
the Department of Education and Science in Ireland.
2
The
selection of schools was stratified by urban/rural location,
gender mix, size of school and the level of disadvantage.
Once consent was obtained from the school, information
packs were sent to the parents, and those parents who agreed
to participate were included in the study. These surveys were
cross-sectional and recruited nationally representative sam-
ples of children aged 5–12 years (n=596) and 13–17 years
(n=441), and their parents, in the Republic of Ireland. A
total of 1037 children and 1885 parents were sampled, with
both parents participating for 82% of the children. Ethical
permission was obtained from the Federated Dublin Vol-
untary Hospitals and St James’s Hospital Joint Research
Ethics Committee. The research was conducted in accor-
dance with prevailing ethical principles.
Anthropometric Measures
Anthropometric measurements of the children (n=1034)
and their parents (n=907 mothers, n=671 fathers) were
taken. Weight was measured in duplicate to the nearest
0.1 kg and height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm.
Adiposity was assessed using Body Mass Index (BMI),
which was calculated by weight (kg) divided by height
squared (m
2
). Parental BMI were categorised as normal
weight (\25 kg/m
2
), overweight (25.0–29.9) or obese
(C30) based on World Health Organisation (WHO) cut-
offs. The UK 1990 BMI reference curves for boys and girls
were used to define BMI category for the children. A BMI
between the 91st and 98th percentile is classified as over-
weight and a BMI on or above the 98th percentile is
classified as obese [31].
Questionnaire Measures
Parents’ perceptions of their child’s weight and parents’
perceptions of their own weight were recorded in a ques-
tionnaire. They were asked to indicate if they agreed with
the statement ‘‘My child/teenager’s weight is fine for
1
The terms child and children are used to refer to those aged
5–17 years old.
2
This is the government body responsible for education in Ireland.
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
his/her age and height’’. Parents were also asked if they
thought their own weight was fine for their age.
Data on age, gender, marital status, education level and
occupation of the parents as well as number of people
living in the household and the type of area the family live
in (urban/rural) were collected in the study and used in the
current analysis. From the dietary data collected, the per-
centage energy from fat was used as a marker for healthy
eating and mean hours of physical activity per week as a
marker of physical activity level.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Stata for Windows
version 9.2 (Stata Corp, Texas, USA). Descriptive statistics
on parents’ perception of both their child and their own
weight were examined in relation to actual body weight
status. Factors influencing parental ability to correctly
identify their child’s weight status were investigated using a
logistic model. This model included demographic variables,
variables which may influence child weight status (markers
of diet and physical activity level) and maternal variables.
Parental misperception regarding their child’s weight is
modelled in the equation below using logistic regression:
d
Correct ¼b0þb1Overweight þb2Obese þb3SES
þb2Education þb3Xþb4Z
where X includes other parental and household variables
(such as maternal weight status, maternal age, household
size and the type of area) and where Z includes child
characteristics (such as child age, gender, weight status,
diet and activity levels). Marginal effects rather than raw
coefficients are reported as the latter are not directly
interpretable. Following this analysis a Receiver Operator
Characteristic (ROC) curve was produced. This procedure
produces a measure called the area under the curve (AUC)
[32]. This measures the predictive power of the logistic
model in discriminating between parents that can and
cannot correctly evaluate their child’s weight.
Parental misclassification of child’s weight, the binary
dependent variable, was constructed using responses to the
question on (1) whether the parent thinks their child’s weight
is fine for the child’s age and height and (2) BMI classifi-
cation of the child. A parent was classified as correct if their
child’s BMI was categorised as normal and the parent said
that their child’s weight was fine or if their child was over-
weight/obese and the parent said that their child’s weight was
not fine. However, a parent was classified as incorrect if their
child was of normal weight and they said that their child’s
weight was not fine or if the parent said their child’s weight
was fine and their child was overweight/obese.
3
A variable was also constructed to investigate whether
parents accurately perceived their own weight based on (1)
responses to the question ‘‘My weight is fine for my age’ and
(2) their BMI score. Parents were classified as correct if their
BMI was normal and they thought their weight fine for their
height and age or their BMI was not normal and they said
their weight was not fine. Conversely, a parent was classified
as incorrect if their BMI was normal and they said their
weight was not fine or if their BMI was not normal and they
said their weight was fine. Child BMI was controlled for in
the analysis to account for the influence of child body size.
Results
Descriptive Statistics
The characteristics of the respondents are presented in
Table 1. Most of the children (79.4%, n=823) were of
normal weight. However, 50.4% (n=457) of mothers and
75.3% (n=512) of fathers were overweight or obese.
Most parents completed second level education, with
76.3% (n=756) of mothers and 70.1% (n=620) of
fathers having attained Leaving Certificate.
4
Over half
(51.3%, n=522) of the sample was classified as being of
high socioeconomic status based on occupation.
5
Parental Perceptions
Table 2shows how parents perceived their child’s weight
by gender and measured weight status. While only 6.3%
(n=26) of parents of normal weight boys and 2.5%
(n=10) of parents of normal weight girls incorrectly state
that their child’s weight was not fine for his/her height and
age, 83.3% (n=45) of parents of overweight boys and
79.3% (n=46) of parents of overweight girls (incorrectly)
state their child’s weight was fine for his/her height and
age. Furthermore, 44.4% (n=20) of parents of obese boys
and 45.3% (n=24) of parents of obese girls said their
child’s weight was fine for their height and age. In sum, a
substantial number of parents of overweight/obese children
did not recognise that their child’s weight was not fine for
their height and age. In addition, 13.3% (n=6) of parents
of obese boys compared to only 3.8% (n=2) of parents of
obese girls didn’t know if their weight was fine or not.
Although the cell sizes are too small to perform analysis,
3
No children in the sample were underweight.
4
This is the qualification obtained on the successful completion of
exams at the end of second level education (or high-school) in
Ireland, usually at the age of 18.
5
However, this category included Professional, Managerial and
Technical occupations.
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
this finding may suggest that another aspect of weight
perception related to gender. Reiterates the gender differ-
ence that exists in parental perceptions of their children’s
weight status and may suggest that weight problems are
more difficult to identify in boys.
Table 3shows how parents perceived their own weight.
In contrast to their perception of their child’s weight, the
majority of mothers were accurate in their judgement of
their own weight. Almost 62% (n=160) of overweight
mothers and 95.2% (n=120) of obese mothers recognised
that their weight was not fine for their age. These results
suggest that although parents fail to recognise overweight/
obesity in their children, mothers are more likely to rec-
ognise overweight/obesity in themselves. However, less
than a third of overweight fathers (28.6%, n=32) recog-
nised that their weight was not fine for their age, suggesting
that overweight fathers may have difficulty recognising
overweight in themselves.
Multivariate Logistic Regression
Table 4shows the factors affecting the probability of a
parent being correct about their child’s weight status for all
children in Column 1.
6
The results of a separate analysis
for overweight and obese children are presented in Column
2. Results based on analysis of all children are discussed
first. The AUC based on our logistic regression is 0.92.
7
This is illustrated in Fig. 1. This is a positive indicator of
Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample
All Boys Girls
Children Parents Children Parents Children Parents
All
(n=1037)
Mothers
a
(n=998)
Fathers
(n=887)
Boys
(n=519)
Mothers
(n=501)
Fathers
(n=454)
Girls
(n=518)
Mothers
(n=497)
Fathers
(n=433)
Age (mean) 11.7
(n=1037)
42.6
(n=998)
43.6
(n=887)
11.8
(n=519)
42.95
(n=501)
43.83
(n=454)
11.66
(n=518)
42.27
(n=497)
43.38
(n=433)
BMI category (%)
Normal 79.4
(n=823)
49.6
(n=450)
24.7
(n=166)
80.54
(n=418)
49.11
(n=221)
25.3
(n=84)
78.34
(n=405)
50.11
(n=229)
24.19
(n=82)
Overweight 11
(n=114)
33.6
(n=305)
51.6
(n=346)
10.6
(n=55)
33.33
(n=150)
49.7
(n=165)
11.41
(n=59)
33.92
(n=155)
53.39
(n=181)
Obese 9.6
(n=99)
16.8
(n=152)
23.7
(n=159)
8.86
(n=46)
17.56
(n=79)
25
(n=83)
10.25
(n=53)
15.97
(n=73)
22.42
(n=76)
Education level (%)
Leaving certificate
or equivalent
76.3
(n=756)
70.1
(n=620)
75.56
(n=374)
70.67
(n=318)
77.02
(n=382)
69.43
(n=302)
Socioeconomic status (%)
Low SES (semi-skilled
and unskilled)
11.8
(n=120)
11.64
(n=59)
11.96
(n=61)
Medium SES (non-
manual and skilled
manual)
36.9
(n=375)
37.48
(n=190)
36.27
(n=185)
High SES (professional,
managerial and
technical)
51.3
(n=522)
50.89
(n=258)
51.76
(n=264)
Area (%)
Urban 59.69
(n=619)
57.42
(n=298)
61.97
(n=321)
Rural 40.31
(n=418)
42.58
(n=221)
38.03
(n=197)
a
Underweight mothers were included with those of normal weight as the number of cases was very small
6
A general power analysis was performed using the powerreg
function in Stata. Though this analysis assumes a continuous
dependent variable it should give a reasonable indication of the
sample size required. The power analysis suggests that the sample
size in this study should be adequate for conducting the current
analysis.
7
The maximum value for AUC is 1.
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
our model’s ability to discriminate between parents who
can and cannot correctly evaluate their child’s health.
Parents were significantly less likely to be correct about
their sons’ weight status compared to their daughters’
weight status. Parents are more likely to be correct about
the weight status of older children. Parents were over 86%
less likely to be correct about their child’s weight if their
child was overweight and approximately 59% less likely to
be correct if the child was obese compared to parents of
normal weight children. In households with a greater
number of people, parents were more likely to be correct
about their child’s weight status. Parents of medium or high
socioeconomic status were more likely to be correct about
their child’s weight than parents of low socioeconomic
status. Parents were also less likely to be correct the higher
the fat content in the child’s diet and the more active their
child was. However, the latter variable was only significant
at the 10% level.
The age of the mother, mother’s education level,
mother’s weight status, marital status of the parents and
whether the family live in an urban or rural area did not
appear to affect the accuracy of the parent’s perception of
their child’s weight status. Results did not differ signifi-
cantly when disaggregated by gender. In addition, we
created a variable to denote whether the mother correctly
categorised her own weight status and included it in the
model. However, this variable was not included in the final
model as it was not found to be statistically significant and
may be endogenous.
The second column in Table 4contains results for
overweight or obese children only. These results are
qualitatively similar to the analysis including all children
(first column in Table 4). However, gender and activity
level of the child and number of people living in the
household were no longer significant. It was found that
parents of obese children are more likely than parents of
overweight children to correctly identify their child’s
weight status. This is consistent with the results of the full
model.
Table 2 Parental perception of child’s weight by weight status
Is child’s weight
fine for height
and age?
Body mass index categories (UK 1990 cut-offs)
Normal
(%)
Overweight
(%)
Obese
(%)
Total (%)
Boys
Weight not fine 6.3
(n=26)
9.3
(n=5)
42.2
(n=19)
9.8
(n=50)
Weight fine 88.8
(n=364)
83.3
(n=45)
44.4
(n=20)
84.3
(n=429)
Don’t know 4.9
(n=20)
7.4
(n=4)
13.3
(n=6)
5.9
(n=30)
Total 100
(n=410)
100
(n=54)
100
(n=45)
100
(n=509)
Girls
Weight not fine 2.5
(n=10)
12.1
(n=7)
50.9
(n=27)
8.7
(n=44)
Weight fine 93.1
(n=366)
79.3
(n=46)
45.3
(n=24)
86.5
(n=436)
Don’t know 4.3
(n=17)
8.6
(n=5)
3.8
(n=2)
4.8
(n=24)
Total 100
(n=393)
100
(n=58)
100
(n=53)
100
(n=504)
Table 3 Parents’ perception of
their own weight by WHO
weight status
WHO body mass index categories
Underweight
(\18.5)
Normal weight
(18.5–24.9)
Overweight
(25–29.9)
Obese (C30) Total
%(n=2) % (n=382) % (n=259) % (n=126) % (n=769)
Does mother think her weight is fine for her age?
Weight not fine 0
(n=0)
11.3
(n=43)
61.8
(n=160)
95.2
(n=120)
42
(n=323)
Weight fine 100
(n=2)
88.7
(n=339)
38.2
(n=99)
4.8
(n=6)
58
(n=446)
Total 100
(n=2)
100
(n=382)
100
(n=259)
100
(n=126)
100
(n=769)
Does father think his weight is fine for his age?
Weight not fine 0
(n=0)
1.9
(n=1)
28.6
(n=32)
79.3
(n=46)
35.4
(n=79)
Weight fine 0
(n=0)
98.1
(n=52)
71.4
(n=80)
20.7
(n=12)
64.6
(n=144)
Total 0
(n=0)
100
(n=53)
100
(n=112)
100
(n=58)
100
(n=223)
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
Discussion
The results from this study confirm that a large proportion
of parents of overweight and obese children do not rec-
ognise their child’s overweight status. Approximately half
of parents of obese children and 81% of parents of over-
weight children reported that their child’s weight was fine
for their age and height. Parental inability to recognise
overweight and obesity (or risk of) in their children is
believed to negatively impact on obesity treatment [16]. In
the current study parents whose children were overweight
or obese were 86 and 59%, respectively, less likely to
correctly perceive their child’s weight.
Successful behaviour change relies on recognition of the
problem that underlies the need for this change [25]. Lack
of parental recognition of the problem may be the first
barrier to successful treatment of childhood overweight.
Towns and D’Auria and Doolen et al. summarise the
possible explanations for parent’s tendency to misclassify
their child’s weight status [13,28]. Parents may not want to
recognise their child’s overweight or label their child as
overweight in case their child is stigmatised or to avoid
being blamed by health professionals for their child’s
overweight problem [33]. It has also been suggested that
parents may not recognise overweight in their children to
avoid acknowledging and taking responsibility for their
own overweight [28]. The theory of cognitive dissonance
proposes that people may try to reduce uncomfortable
beliefs by rationalising them [34] so it is also possible that
parents may choose to believe that their child will simply
‘grow out of it’’. One qualitative study has suggested that
parents find children’s visual or hearing problems easier to
accept than excess body weight and response by parents to
information about their child’s excessive weight was both
angry and defensive [35]. This gives some indication of the
sensitivity of the issue of childhood overweight for parents.
Given the growing rate of obesity among children it is also
possible that changing social norms mean that parents
simply don’t recognise overweight in their children.
In contrast to their assessment of their children’s weight
status, the results of this study suggest that parents are more
accurate in classifying their own weight status. This finding
was particularly true for mothers, with only 4.8% (n=6)
of obese mothers and 38.2% (n=99) of overweight
mothers reporting that their weight was fine for age/height.
Table 4 Marginal effects and standard errors of parental misper-
ception of their child’s weight status
All children
Marginal
effect/(Std. Err.)
Overweight/obese
children
Marginal
effect/(Std. Err.)
Age (child) 0.009** 0.025**
-0.004 -0.011
Male (child) -0.062** -0.053
-0.026 -0.07
Overweight (child) -0.856***
-0.024
Obese (child) -0.589*** 0.368***
-0.073 -0.078
Rural area 0.009 0.084
-0.027 -0.07
Leaving cert. (mother) -0.025 -0.068
-0.024 -0.092
No. in household 0.019** 0.054
-0.01 -0.033
Medium SES 0.109*** 0.439***
-0.026 -0.159
High SES 0.077** 0.289*
-0.033 -0.172
Percent fat -0.005*** -0.026***
-0.002 -0.008
Very active -0.043* -0.098
-0.022 -0.073
Overweight (mother) -0.013 -0.028
-0.022 -0.077
Obese (mother) -0.077 -0.116
-0.057 -0.073
Married 0.009 -0.147
-0.056 -0.179
Mother’s age 0.001 0.003
-0.002 -0.005
Observations 756 152
Pseudo R
2
0.4 0.3
Standard errors clustered by school. Paternal variables not included
due to large amount of missing data on fathers
*P\0.10, ** P\0.05, *** P\0.01
Fig. 1 ROC curve
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
This finding suggests that although mothers may not rec-
ognise weight problems in their children, overweight
mothers are able to recognise overweight in themselves.
This finding is consistent with previous research [15,22].
In relation to the theory of cognitive dissonance, discussed
above, it may be that parents are more willing to accept a
weight problem in themselves than in their children as they
are less uncomfortable if the problem relates to themselves.
However, it is also worth noting that fathers were less
likely to recognise overweight in themselves compared
with mothers (28% vs. 62%). This finding may suggest that
if fathers are less likely, than mothers, to recognise over-
weight in themselves, they may also be less likely to rec-
ognise overweight in their children. Efforts to address
parental misperceptions need to account for this difference
between mothers and fathers.
While several other parental factors were investigated
including the age of the mother, mother’s education level,
marital status of the parents and whether the family live in
an urban or rural area, these were not predictive of a par-
ent’s ability to correctly identify their child’s weight status.
Mothers’ weight status was shown to influence perception,
with obese mothers less likely to be correct about their
child’s weight compared to normal weight mothers. Chil-
dren with obese parents are at increased risk of being
overweight or obese [3], which together with the finding
that obese parents are less likely to correctly classify their
child’s weight could have significant implications for those
children to avail of opportunities for behaviour change and
obesity treatment. Although maternal education was not
shown to be a significant predictor of correctness in this
analysis, socioeconomic status was. Parents with a medium
or high socioeconomic status were more likely to be cor-
rect, suggesting that children from a low socioeconomic
status family may be at greatest risk of their excess weight
going unnoticed or ignored.
Child characteristics including gender, weight and age
were all found to be associated with parental ability to
correctly classify their child’s body weight. With regard to
gender, similar to the findings of other studies, parents
were more likely to incorrectly classify, as fine, their obese/
overweight sons than daughters [14,18,36]. Although this
may simply reflect gender differences in body composition,
it is generally believed more likely to be explained by
social norms and pressures relating to ideal body size for
girls and boys [36]. Parents may be influenced by the social
desirability for lower weight for girls, whereas larger body
size for boys is generally more acceptable.
Age was also found to be significantly associated with
the correctness of the parent. Parents were found to be less
likely to be correct about their child’s weight if the child
was younger. Maynard et al. [18] suggested that the finding
that mother’s are more likely to misclassify younger
children may be because mothers believe that their child
will outgrow being overweight. Failure to identify exces-
sive body weight in early childhood has serious implica-
tions for future health. Daniels et al. suggested that obesity
that begins in childhood may exacerbate the damage
obesity causes to body systems [37]. Equally, a growing
body of research has emphasised how interventions later in
the life-cycle build on interventions that have taken place
earlier [3841]. Therefore, early identification of over-
weight and obesity and early interventions may present a
key opportunity for both obesity treatment and prevention.
Efforts to address the mismatch between reality and
perception in relation to parental perception of child
weight need to focus on de-stigmatising overweight as well
as identifying and addressing parental issues underlying
this mismatch. To date interventions with families of
overweight and obese children have not specifically
addressed body weight misperceptions. However, suc-
cessful interventions from other public health arenas, such
as HIV or eating disorders, which have focused on
addressing stigma or reducing cognitive dissonance [42,
43], could inform the development of educational tools
and communications programmes to address body weight
misperceptions.
This study has many strengths including a nationally
representative sample, measured body weights in children
and parents, and the measurement of key characteristics in
both parents and children. However, a number of limita-
tions of this study must be acknowledged. Firstly, BMI is
often criticised as an imperfect measure of adiposity, yet it
is one of the best measures available for large scale use.
Although a BMI reference chart has not been developed for
Irish children, O’Neill et al. found that the the BMI ref-
erence curves for the UK 1990 are most appropriate for
Irish children [44]. In addition, dueto lack of data, parental
variables were excluded from the analysis which meant
that a more complete analysis of parental variables was
restricted.
Parents in this study were asked whether they thought
their child’s weight was fine for his/her age. The wording
of this question leads to subjective interpretation of the
word ‘‘fine’’. It would be useful to know whether the parent
meant that the child was overweight or underweight. In the
case of the normal weight children it is quite possible that
the parents may have been concerned with the child being
underweight.
It is recommended that future research collect longitu-
dinal data to allow for unobserved factors relevant to the
analysis to be controlled for and to examine the effect of
changes in weight on ability to perceive weight over time.
In addition, it would be interesting to conduct a detailed
analysis of parental weight perception using a much larger
sample of overweight and obese children.
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
Conclusion
Despite an increased emphasis on obesity prevention in
children, obesity as a potential health problem for children,
may fail to resonate with parents. The current study has
shown that a large proportion of parents of overweight and
obese children do not recognise unhealthy weight status in
their children. This study examined key parental and child
characteristics to gain insight into predictors of parental
inability to correctly classify their child’s weight status.
However, it is clear that further research is required to
elucidate these findings and to examine the more emotive
issues that may be involved for parents.
Acknowledgments This project was funded by the Irish Government
under the National Development Plan 2000–2006. We acknowledge
the Irish Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, for funding
this analysis. The authors also acknowledge Professor Mario Cleves for
his valuable advice on the analysis.
References
1. Ogden, C. L., Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., et al. (2002). Prev-
alence and trends in overweight among US children and ado-
lescents, 1999–2000. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 288(14), 1728–1732. doi:10.1001/jama.288.14.1728.
2. Lobstein, T., Baur, L., & Uauy, R. (2004). Obesity in children
and young people: A crisis in public health. Obesity Reviews, 5,
4–85.
3. Whitaker, R. C., Wright, J. A., Pepe, M. S., et al. (1997). Pre-
dicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental
obesity. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(13), 869–873.
4. Kelly, J. L., Stanton, W. R., McGee, R., et al. (1992). Tracking
relative weight in subjects studied longitudinally from ages 3 to
13 years. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 28(2),
158–161.
5. Hill, J. O., & Trowbridge, F. L. (1998). Childhood obesity: Future
directions and research priorities. Pediatrics, 101(3), 570–574.
6. Kiess, W., Galler, A., Reich, A., et al. (2001). Clinical aspects of
obesity in childhood and adolescence. Obesity Reviews, 2(1),
29–36.
7. Birch, L., & Fisher, J. (1998). Development of eating behaviors
among children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 101(3), 539.
8. Moore, L., Lombardi, D., White, M., et al. (1991). Influence of
parents’ physical activity levels on activity levels of young
children?.The Journal of pediatrics, 118(2), 215–219.
9. Patrick, H., & Nicklas, T. (2005). A review of family and social
determinants of children’s eating patterns and diet quality.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 24(2), 83.
10. Golan, M. (2006). Parents as agents of change in childhood
obesity-from research to practice. International Journal of
Pediatric Obesity, 1(2), 66–76.
11. Prochaska, J., DiClemente, C., & Norcross, J. (1992). In search of
how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. The
American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102.
12. Rhee, K. E., De Lago, C. W., Arscott-Mills, T., et al. (2005).
Factors associated with parental readiness to make changes for
overweight children. Pediatrics, 116(1), e94–e101. doi:10.1542/
peds.2004-2479.
13. Doolen, J., Alpert, P. T., & Miller, S. K. (2009). Parental dis-
connect between perceived and actual weight status of children:
A metasynthesis of the current research. Journal of the American
Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 21(3), 160–166.
14. Campbell, M. W., Williams, J., Hampton, A., & Wake, M.
(2006). Maternal concern and perceptions of overweight in
Australian preschool-aged children. Medical Journal of Austra-
lia, 184(6), 274–277.
15. Baughcum, A. E., Chamberlin, L. A., Deeks, C. M., et al. (2000).
Maternal perceptions of overweight preschool children. Pediat-
rics, 106(6), 1380–1386. doi:10.1542/peds.106.6.1380.
16. Etelson, D., Brand, D. A., Patrick, P. A., et al. (2003). Childhood
obesity: Do parents recognize this health risk? Obesity Research,
11(11), 1362–1368.
17. Hackie, M., & Bowles, C. L. (2007). Maternal perception of their
overweight children. Public Health Nursing, 24(6), 538–546.
18. Maynard, L. M., Galuska, D. A., Blanck, H. M., et al. (2003).
Maternal perceptions of weight status of children. Pediatrics,
111(5), 1226–1231.
19. Huang, J. S., Becerra, K., Oda, T., et al. (2007). Parental ability to
discriminate the weight status of children: Results of a survey.
Pediatrics, 120(1), e112.
20. He, M., & Evans, A. (2007). Are parents aware that their children
are overweight or obese? Do they care? Canadian Family Phy-
sician, 53(9), 1493–1499.
21. Carnell, S., Edwards, C., Croker, H., et al. (2005). Parental per-
ceptions of overweight in 3–5 y olds. International Journal of
Obesity, 29, 353–355.
22. Genovesi, S., Giussani, M., Faini, A., et al. (2005). Maternal
perception of excess weight in children: A survey conducted by
paediatricians in the province of Milan. Acta Paediatrica, 94(6),
747–752.
23. Jeffery, A. N., Voss, L. D., Metcalf, B. S., et al. (2005). Parents’
awareness of overweight in themselves and their children: cross
sectional study within a cohort (EarlyBird 21). British Medical
Journal, 330(7481), 23.
24. Jansen, W., & Brug, J. (2006). Parents often do not recognize
overweight in their child, regardless of their socio-demographic
background. The European Journal of Public Health, 16(6), 645.
25. Eckstein, K. C., Mikhail, L. M., Ariza, A. J., et al. (2006). Par-
ents’ perceptions of their child’s weight and health. Pediatrics,
117(3), 681–690.
26. Parry, L. L., Netuveli, G., Parry, J., et al. (2008). A systematic
review of parental perception of overweight status in children.
The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 31(3), 253.
27. Mamun, A. A., McDermott, B. M., O’Callaghan,M. J., et al. (2008).
Predictors of maternal misclassifications of their offspring’s weight
status: A longitudinal study. Int J Obes, 32(1), 48–54.
28. Towns, N., & D’Auria, J. (2009). Parental Perceptions of their
child’s overweight: An integrative review of the literature.
Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 24(2), 115–130.
29. Jansen, W., & Brug, J. (2006). Parents often do not recognize
overweight in their child, regardless of their socio-demographic
background. The European Journal of Public Health, 16,
645–647.
30. De La, O. A., Jordan, K. C., Ortiz, K., et al. (2009). Do parents
accurately perceive their child’s weight status? Journal of Pedi-
atric Health Care, 23(4), 216–221.
31. Cole, T. J., Freeman, J. V., & Preece, M. A. (1995). Body mass
index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of Disease in
Childhood, 73(1), 25–29.
32. Cleves, M. (2000). Receiver operator characteristic curve analy-
sis. Stata Technical Bulletin, 9(52), 19–33.
33. Edmunds, L. (2005). Parents’ perceptions of health professionals’
responses when seeking help for their overweight children.
Family Practice, 22(3), 287.
34. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston:
Row Peterson.
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
35. Glacken, M., & Evans, D. S. (2006). Measuring height and
weight in school children as a public health indicator. Department
of Public Health, Health Service Executive West, Galway, Ire-
land. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10147/44887.
36. Manios, Y., Kondaki, K., Kourlaba, G., et al. (2008). Maternal
perceptions of their child’s weight status: The genesis study.
Public Health Nutrition, 12(8), 1099–1105.
37. Daniels, S. (2006). The consequences of childhood overweight
and obesity. The Future of Children, 16(1), 47–67.
38. Reynolds, A. J., Ou, S.-R., & Topitzes, J. W. (2004). Paths of
effects of early childhood intervention on educational attainment
and delinquency: A confirmatory analysis of the Chicago child–
parent centers. Child Development, 75(5), 1299–1328.
39. Reynolds, A. J., & Temple, J. A. (1996). Extended early child-
hood intervention and school achievement: Age thirteen findings.
40. Datar, A., & Sturm, R. (2004). Physical education in elementary
school and body mass index: Evidence from the early childhood
longitudinal study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9),
1501–1506.
41. Dietz, W. H., & Gortmaker, S. L. (2001). Preventing obesity in
children and adolescents. Annual Review of Public Health, 22,
337–353.
42. Ciao, A. C., & Latner, J. D. (2011). Reducing obesity stigma: The
effectiveness of cognitive dissonance and social consensus
interventions. Obesity, 19(9), 1768–1774.
43. Klein, S. J., Karchner, W. D., & O’Connell, D. A. (2002).
Interventions to prevent HIV-related stigma and discrimination:
Findings and recommendations for public health practice. Jour-
nal of Public Health Management and Practice, 8(6), 44–53.
44. O’Neill, J. L., McCarthy, S. N., Burke, S. J., et al. (2006).
Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Irish school children,
using four different definitions. European Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, 61, 743–751.
Matern Child Health J
123
Author's personal copy
... Clearly, taking into account the opinion and perception of fathers can be justified by the increasing involvement of fathers in the household (e.g. feeding their children) as more and more mothers have a professional occupation outside home (Khandpur et al., 2014) (Hudson et al., 2012). In the present study, data were collected simultaneously for both parents and compared. ...
... Mamun et al. (Mamun et al., 2008) reported that the body perception of daughters with a normal weight or overweight was better evaluated than the body perception of boys. More recently, another study confirmed that child's gender could influence parental perception (Hudson et al., 2012). Demographic criteria such as parental education are often explored in studies related to perception. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Maternal perception of child weight status in children with overweight or obesity has received a lot of attention but data on paternal perception of children from presumably healthy cohorts are lacking. Objective We aimed to investigate paternal and maternal perception of child weight status at the age of 8 years in a cohort of 591 children from 5 European countries. Material and Methods Included were 8-year-old children and their parents participating in the European Childhood Obesity Project (EU CHOP). Weight and height of children and parents were measured and Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m ² ) was calculated. Both parents were asked to assess their perception of child weight status using Eckstein scales and their concern about child overweight. The agreement between mother and father perceptions was assessed by Cohen kappa coefficient and their relationship was analyzed by linear mixed effects models based on ordinal logistic regression, accounting for country, child gender and BMI, parental BMI, level of education, concern and type of feeding during first year of life. Results Data from children and both parents were available for 432 girls and boys. Mean BMI was comparable in boys and girls (16.7 ± 2.31 vs. 16.9 ± 2.87 kg/m ² , P = 0.55). In total, 172 children (29.3%) were overweight or obese. There was a high degree of agreement between mother and father perceptions of their child’s weight status (Cohen kappa 0.77). Multivariate modelling showed that perception levels significantly increased with child BMI but were globally lower than assessed. They differed between countries, gender and types of feeding during first year of life, were influenced by education level of the father but were not related to parental BMI and concern about childhood overweight. Conclusions The study showed no overall differences between mothers and fathers in rating their child’s weight status but both parents had a propensity to underestimate their child’s actual weight, particularly in boys. The EU CHOP trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00338689.
... Ipak, kako većina djece doručkuje kod kuće, u središte pozornosti se ponovo stavlja važnost roditeljske edukacije o kvalitetnim prehrambenim navikama. Roditelji uvelike odre-đuju koja će hrana biti djetetu dostupna, imaju nadzor nad trajanjem i količinom obroka, određuju socijalni kontekst i emocionalni ton za vrijeme obroka te su zbog toga ključne osobe u intervencijama kontrole tjelesne mase u djece(20).Naša studija ima nekoliko ograničenja. Mjerenje struka i bokova ima određenu varijabilnost te ovisi o dobu dana kad su mjere uzete, odnosno o prethodnom uzimanju jela i pića. ...
Article
Full-text available
Bolesti srca i krvnih žila glavni su uzrok smrti u Hrvatskoj. Jedan od čimbenika rizika za nastanak kardiovaskularnih bolesti je abdominalna pretilost. U novije vrijeme kao pouzdanija metoda za utvrđivanje te pretilosti primjenjuje se omjer opsega struka i visine, tzv.WHtR kriterij. Prema dosadašnjim istraživanjima problem debljine počinje već od pete godine života. Radovi koji su obuhvaćali i ovudobnu skupinu primijenili su vrijednosti WHtR ≥ 0,5 kao povišenu za sve dobne skupine i oba spola. No najnovija istraživanja ograničena su na djecu od 6. do 18. godine i definiraju WHtR graničnu vrijednost za djevojčice ≥ 0,459, a za dječake ≥ 0,473. Cilj ovogistraživanja bio je utvrditi u kojoj su mjeri kod djece prisutni čimbenici rizika, prepoznaju li ih njihovi roditelji te jesu li svjesni potreberazvijanja zdravih životnih navika radi prevencije kardiovaskularnih bolesti u odrasloj dobi. Istraživanjem je obuhvaćeno 1418-erodjece, 730 dječaka i 688 djevojčica u dobi od 5 do 15 godina, koji se nalaze u pedijatrijskoj skrbi triju ordinacija Doma zdravlja Zagrebzapad. Prema WHtR kriteriju ≥ 0,5, 7,3% dječaka i 8,8% djevojčica ima povećan zdravstveni rizik za kardiovaskularne bolesti. Noprema najnovijim WHtR kriterijima takvih je 25,1% djevojčica i 21,4% dječaka. Čak 79,6% roditelja ne prepoznaje čimbenike rizika zapojavu kardiovaskularnih bolesti kod vlastite djece. Rezultati našeg istraživanja slični su rezultatima drugih istraživanja te pokazujukako većina roditelja nije svjesna problema pretilosti, pa samim time ni potrebe za odgovarajućom promjenom životnih navikavlastite djece. Iz svega ovoga zaključujemo da bi bilo nužno poduzeti dodatne edukacijske mjere kako u ordinacijama primarnepedijatrijske skrbi tako i u odgojno-obrazovnim ustanovama, radi pravodobne i učinkovite intervencije koja bi očekivano pridonijelasmanjenju pobola i smrtnosti u odrasloj dobi.
... For parents to be promising change agents, they must first recognize that their child has overweight (Faith et al., 2012). Studies have shown that parents often misperceive their children's weight and growth development and may not realize their children, especially young children, have overweight or obesity (Hudson et al., 2012;McKee et al., 2016;Toftemo et al., 2013). According to McKee et al. (2016), parents who misperceive their child's weight are more likely to have overweight children. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explored the experiences of public health nurses (PHN) in preventing obesity in preschool children and following national guidelines. We used a descriptive qualitative design with an online open-ended questionnaire based on vignettes describing fictitious practical situations during the follow-up of children presenting with overweight issues in child health clinics. Following qualitative content analysis, we identified one main theme: Strong but complex feelings of responsibility toward supporting parents in preventing obesity in preschool children and adhering to the guidelines. We also identified four subthemes: (a) Difficulties in deciding if the child’s weight is a concern. (b) Challenges with meeting children’s healthcare needs when weight is a concern. (c) Approaches for engagement and caring weight talks with parents. (d) The need for resources and interdisciplinary collaboration. PHNs suggested improvements for preventing childhood obesity and called for municipal prioritizing of organizational and personnel-related resources to ensure PHNs can efficiently follow national guidelines.
... This result was parallel to previous studies. (14,15) They were less likely to categorize their children as overweight and obese and to correct it. Misperceived children's weight status may cause them overlook and neglect the obese problem. ...
... As shown by our results and other studies in the literature, parents tend to underestimate their children's weight status, especially among overweight children; this is worrying because parents play a crucial role in influencing positive behaviour and thus influencing future lifestyles [18]. One motivation is social desirability: parents are reluctant to label their child as "obese" and "overweight" because of prejudice and the negative connotation associated with the words [19,20]. The stigmatisation of obesity is often related to fear of fatness, anti-fat attitudes, low self-esteem, negative body image and poor quality of life among overweight and obese children [21]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Childhood obesity is a social health problem in the Western World and an important goal is to analyze and correct risk factors. However, part of the problem could be determined by a different perception of the weight. Material and methods In October 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional study in which a questionnaire was administered to the parents of primary and secondary school children in South-East Tuscany, Italy. The aim was to determine the association between children’s Body Mass Index (BMI) and the parent’s perception. Results Analysis was carried out on 1,405 complete questionnaires. We found that most parents wrongly perceive the weight of their children. 88.3% of parents with obese children believe that their children are of normal weight or only “a little overweight”. 67.6% of parents who have overweight children think that their children are of normal weight (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our results show a misperception of the weight of the children in the parents eyes. The acquisition of healthy behaviour during childhood is extremely important for health in adulthood and for avoiding the onset of associated diseases. Therefore, food education becomes a crucial objective. Children and parents need to increase consciousness of the correct weight and diseases resulting from bad nutrition.
... The visual normalization theory suggests that the high prevalence of overweight/obesity in children is an important reason for parental underestimation of plus body shapes in children, which in turn impedes the management of childhood obesity [46]. Consistent with other studies [33,47,48], we found that the age and gender of children were important factors affecting parental misperception of children's weight. Younger children or boys' weights were more likely to be underestimated, whereas girls' weights were more likely to be overestimated by their parents. ...
Article
Full-text available
Parental perception of children’s weight may influence parents’ feeding practices, and in turn, child dietary intake and weight status; however, there is limited evidence generated for preschoolers. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate associations between Chinese parents’ perceptions of child weight, feeding practices and preschoolers’ dietary patterns. Participants (1616 parent-child pairs) were recruited from six kindergartens in Hunan, China. Parents’ misperception, concern, and dissatisfaction on child weight were collected through a self-administered caregiver questionnaire. Parental feeding practices and children’s dietary intake were, respectively, assessed using the Child Feeding Questionnaire and a Food Frequency Questionnaire. Linear regression models were applied to analyze associations between parental weight perceptions, feeding practices, and preschooler’s dietary patterns. Associations between parents’ weight perceptions and dietary patterns were significant only among underweight children. Regardless of child weight status, parental weight underestimation and preference for a heavier child were positively associated with pressure-to-eat. Parental weight concern was positively associated with restriction in normal weight child, but this was not found in other weight groups. In conclusion, Parents’ misperception, concern, and dissatisfaction about child weight are associated with parents’ feeding practices and may influence preschoolers’ dietary quality, but the relationships vary by children’s actual weight status.
... Wyższe wykształcenie matek koreluje z prawidłową masą ciała u ich dzieci i rzadszym występowaniem nieprawidłowości w sposobie ich żywienia, natomiast wykształcenie podstawowe, średnie bądź zawodowe częściej predysponuje do występowania zbyt niskiej masy ciała u dzieci. Odmienne wnioski zaprezentowali Hudson i wsp, którzy w swojej pracy nie stwierdzili istotnej korelacji między poziomem wykształcenia rodziców a nieprawidłowościami masy ciała u dzieci (11) . Inne obserwacje wskazują, że wykształcenie rodziców ma także wpływ na rodzaj i liczbę posiłków lub przekąsek spożywanych przez dziecko w ciągu dnia. ...
Article
Introduction and aim of the study: Creating and strengthening correct eating habits in preschool and school age is a basic element of developing healthy lifestyle in children. The greatest role in this significant period for developing specific eating behaviours is played by parents who are not only responsible for providing healthy food, but also the right example to follow. The aim of the study was to analyse children’s eating habits and physical activity depending on body mass index, level of education, and type of their parents’ activities. Materials and methods: The study was conducted in a randomly selected educational institution after obtaining the consent of the school’s headmaster. The participants of the study were children and their parents (N = 80; 52 girls and 28 boys) aged 6 to 13, residents of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship. Results: This study shows that mothers with a higher level of education are more likely than mothers with a lower level of education to have children with normal body weight or overweight (p = 0.026). More often, physical education classes were attended by children whose parents regularly take up physical activity, and the time spent by parents on physical activity during the week was a factor affecting their children’s participation in additional sports activities. The children of parents regularly taking up physical activity participated in them more often. Conclusions: Parents, through various processes and behaviours, instil in their children certain mechanisms which are important from the health perspective and can be helpful and contribute to the proper development of nutritional practices.
Article
The objective of this cross‐sectional study was to compare the difference in food parenting practices based upon parent concern and/or perception of child weight among siblings. U.S. parents (n = 63) with two or more children between the ages of 2.5 and 10 years old completed the Comprehensive Food Parenting Questionnaire, select items from the Child Feeding Questionnaire, and seven open‐ended questions for each child. There were significant differences in how parents fed siblings. For example, the relationship between concern for child weight and restriction for weight control was stronger for the older child, which was supported by parents' qualitative data.
Presentation
Full-text available
FUNDAMENTACIÓN: Actualmente sabemos, por ejemplo, que estar expuesto a luz artificial por la noche (trabajando en la computadora, con el móvil, la tablet o dejando la luz encendida hasta tarde) trastoca los ritmos circadianos y aumenta el riesgo de padecer ciertas enfermedades como la obesidad. Los hábitos de la sociedad actual, tales como la reducción del tiempo y el sueño, los viajes a larga distancia que provocan el jetlag, el trabajo por turnos, el aumento de la exposición a la luz brillante durante la noche, el elevado consumo de snacks durante el día y la noche, los cambios en la hora de la comida y la cena son factores que actúan sobre el cerebro induciendo una pérdida de la “percepción de los ritmos internos y externos”.1 Por último, se puede mencionar que el rendimiento académico, podría deberse entre otras cosas, a la sincronía entre la hora del día en que se realiza la tarea y el cronotipo de la persona, por lo que establecer horas de sueño adecuadas, ayudaría a evitar modificaciones en los ritmos biológicos y disminuir el riesgo de padecer alteraciones en la calidad de vida y en las actividades diarias.2 OBJETIVO: Brindar información acerca de la relación entre el ritmo circadiano del sueño, la obesidad y el rendimiento académico. SÍNTESIS DE LOS CONTENIDOS: Ritmo circadiano: Los ritmos circadianos son cambios físicos, mentales y conductuales que siguen un ciclo diario, y que responden, principalmente, a la luz y la oscuridad en el ambiente de un organismo.3 Reloj biológico: Los relojes biológicos son el dispositivo de tiempo innato de un organismo. Se componen de moléculas específicas (proteínas) que interactúan en las células de todo el cuerpo.3 Cronotipo: El cronotipo es una característica individual que modula la capacidad de la persona para estar más activo y alerta en un periodo determinado del día. Los Tipos Matutinos (TM) son personas que están más alerta y activas por las mañanas, mientras que los Tipos Vespertinos (TV) son proclives a estar más activas y alertas por la noche.4 Rendimiento académico: Según investigaciones, se encontró que los estudiantes no duermen entre semana el número de horas que ellos mismos creen que deberían dormir. Esto puede entenderse como una deprivación del sueño provocada por las circunstancias académicas o como una percepción errónea del número de horas de sueño requeridas para lograr un descanso satisfactorio.2 Ritmo circadiano y obesidad: De manera independiente al núcleo supraquiasmático (NSQ), los relojes periféricos gastrointestinales juegan un papel importante en los procesos circadianos, por ello, horarios de alimentación anárquicos o irregulares pueden entrar en conflicto y desacoplar los osciladores periféricos del NSQ. Esta desincronización entre el ritmo circadiano y los ritmos fisiológicos durante un periodo crítico del desarrollo favorece un incremento de peso inadecuado.5 CONCLUSIÓN: Son variados los elementos que afectan el cronotipo de un individuo, y cabe reflexionar sobre la repercusión de los hábitos alimenticios y la calidad del sueño en la salud y en la optimización de las tareas realizadas a lo largo del día.
Poster
Full-text available
FUNDAMENTACIÓN: En el presente trabajo se desarrollara la elaboración de un producto innovador, descripción de sus características físico-químicas, composición química, procesos de elaboración y su impacto en la salud del consumidor.1,2 Se seleccionó como producto innovador “Dips de Vegetales” y “Nachos” aptos para población vegetariana y personas que padezcan condición celiaca.3,4 Si bien para la realización del producto se seleccionó una población reducida, se recomienda para consumo en general, debido a que sus ingredientes son naturales y sin agregado de aditivos, con bajo aporte de sodio y gran cantidad de fibra alimentaria. Esto lo convierte en un producto beneficioso para la salud del consumidor. OBJETIVO: Ofrecer una opción saludable, agradable e inclusiva, no solo para la población seleccionada sino también para el consumidor en general y a su vez ampliar las posibilidades de elección a la hora de elegir aderezos. METODOLOGÍA, ORGANIZACIÓN Y EJECUCIÓN: La producción se realizó de manera artesanal utilizando ingredientes frescos, naturales y sin la incorporación de aditivos. Por este motivo el producto no tiene una vida útil de más de cinco días. Se realizaron las prácticas higiénicas correspondientes, se aplicaron métodos físicos de cocción y procesos mecánicos de subdivisión y unión, para lograr la consistencia de una salsa cremosa. Para la realización de los nachos se realizaron procesos de unión, moldeado y tratamientos físicos de cocción. CONCLUSIÓN: Se logró desarrollar el producto innovador y el mismo cumplió con las condiciones propuestas y esperadas. Es decir, que se logró adaptar un alimento, para abarcar las necesidades de una amplia población, que además tiene un impacto favorable en la salud. Se tuvo en cuenta que siempre la alimentación y la comensalidad van de la mano y esta opción, al ser apta para población con limitaciones alimentarias y también recomendada para individuos sanos en general, sería una buena opción al momento de seleccionar un menú de consumo no habitual.
Article
Full-text available
The prevalence of childhood obesity increased in the 1980s and 1990s but there were no significant changes in prevalence between 1999-2000 and 2007-2008 in the United States. To present the most recent estimates of obesity prevalence in US children and adolescents for 2009-2010 and to investigate trends in obesity prevalence and body mass index (BMI) among children and adolescents between 1999-2000 and 2009-2010. Cross-sectional analyses of a representative sample (N = 4111) of the US child and adolescent population (birth through 19 years of age) with measured heights and weights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2010. Prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length (≥95th percentile on the growth charts) among infants and toddlers from birth to 2 years of age and obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile of the BMI-for-age growth charts) among children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years. Analyses of trends in obesity by sex and race/ethnicity, and analyses of trends in BMI within sex-specific age groups for 6 survey periods (1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2003-2004, 2005-2006, 2007-2008, and 2009-2010) over 12 years. In 2009-2010, 9.7% (95% CI, 7.6%-12.3%) of infants and toddlers had a high weight-for-recumbent length and 16.9% (95% CI, 15.4%-18.4%) of children and adolescents from 2 through 19 years of age were obese. There was no difference in obesity prevalence among males (P = .62) or females (P = .65) between 2007-2008 and 2009-2010. However, trend analyses over a 12-year period indicated a significant increase in obesity prevalence between 1999-2000 and 2009-2010 in males aged 2 through 19 years (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10) but not in females (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.07) per 2-year survey cycle. There was a significant increase in BMI among adolescent males aged 12 through 19 years (P = .04) but not among any other age group or among females. In 2009-2010, the prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents was 16.9%; this was not changed compared with 2007-2008.
Article
Full-text available
How people intentionally change addictive behaviors with and without treatment is not well understood by behavioral scientists. This article summarizes research on self-initiated and professionally facilitated change of addictive behaviors using the key transtheoretical constructs of stages and processes of change. Modification of addictive behaviors involves progression through five stages—pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance—and individuals typically recycle through these stages several times before termination of the addiction. Multiple studies provide strong support for these stages as well as for a finite and common set of change processes used to progress through the stages. Research to date supports a transtheoretical model of change that systematically integrates the stages with processes of change from diverse theories of psychotherapy.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Very little is known about the factors influencing parental misclassifications of a child's weight status. The aim of this study is to examine the predictors of maternal misclassifications of their adolescent offspring's weight status. Methods: A mother-child linked analysis was carried out using 14-year follow-up data from a population-based prospective birth cohort of 2650 children (52% males) who were participants in the Mater-University Study of Pregnancy in Brisbane (Australia) in 1981. Offspring's observed height and weight and maternal perception of offspring weight were reported when they were 14 years old and predictors were prospectively recorded either at first clinical visit of mothers or at 5 or 14 years follow-up. Maternal misclassifications were defined combining observed body mass index (BMI) categories and maternal perceptions of their offspring's weight status. Results: We found that maternal misclassification of child's weight status was common and included misclassifications both to higher and lower weight categories. Forty percent of mothers of overweight children misclassified their child as normal or underweight, more so in males than females. Fifteen percent of mothers of normal weight children misclassified their child as underweight, again more so in males than females. The main independent predictors of maternal misclassifications of child weight status were gender, child dissatisfaction with appearance, shape, size and weight, dieting to lose weight, general health status, maternal BMI and family meals. Gender, child dissatisfaction, dieting and maternal overweight were especially associated with misclassifications of overweight children. Conclusions: This study identified a number of maternal, child and family factors associated with maternal misclassifications of child weight status. Although relevant for clinical practice, further study is needed, however, to evaluate the benefits and harms of promoting increasing parental and child awareness of the child's weight status at a population level.
Article
Context The prevalence of overweight among children in the United States increased between 1976-1980 and 1988-1994, but estimates for the current decade are unknown. Objective To determine the prevalence of overweight in US children using the most recent national data with measured weights and heights and to examine trends in overweight prevalence. Design, Setting, and Participants Survey of 4722 children from birth through 19 years of age with weight and height measurements obtained in 1999-2000 as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a cross-sectional, stratified, multistage probability sample of the US population. Main Outcome Measure Prevalence of overweight among US children by sex, age group, and race/ethnicity. Overweight among those aged 2 through 19 years was defined as at or above the 95th percentile of the sex-specific body mass index (BMI) for age growth charts. Results The prevalence of overweight was 15.5% among 12- through 19-year-olds, 15.3% among 6- through 11-year-olds, and 10.4% among 2- through 5-year-olds, compared with 10.5%, 11.3%, and 7.2%, respectively, in 1988-1994 (NHANES III). The prevalence of overweight among non-Hispanic black and Mexican-American adolescents increased more than 10 percentage points between 1988-1994 and 1999-2000. Conclusion The prevalence of overweight among children in the United States is continuing to increase, especially among Mexican-American and non-Hispanic black adolescents.
Article
OBJECTIVE To compare children's actual weight status with their parents' perceptions of their weight status. DESIGN Cross-sectional study, including a self-administered questionnaire. SETTING Seven elementary schools in Middlesex-London, Ont. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of pupils in grades 4 to 6 and their parents. Of the 770 child-parent pairs targeted, 355 pairs participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Children's weight, height, and body mass index (BMI). Parents' perceptions of their children's weight status, family demographics, and parents' self-reported body weight and height. The United States Centers for Disease Control's BMI-for-age references were used to define children's weight status (underweight, overweight, or obese). RESULTS Response rate was 46%. Children's actual weight status (ie, 29.9% overweight or obese and 1.4% underweight) was different from their parents' perceptions of their weight status (ie, 18.3% overweight or obese and 17.2% slightly underweight or underweight). Factors such as children's sex and ethnicity and mothers' weight influenced parents' ability to recognize their children's weight status. Parents' misperceptions of their children's weight status seemed to be unrelated to their levels of education, their family income, or their children's, ages. CONCLUSION A large proportion of parents did not recognize that their children were overweight or obese. Effective public health strategies to increase parents' awareness of their children's weight status could be the first key steps in an effort to prevent childhood obesity.
Article
Obese individuals experience pervasive stigmatization. Interventions attempting to reduce obesity stigma by targeting its origins have yielded mixed results. This randomized, controlled study examined the effectiveness of two interventions to reduce obesity stigma: cognitive dissonance and social consensus. Participants were college undergraduate students (N = 64, 78% women, mean age = 21.2 years, mean BMI = 23.1 kg/m2) of diverse ethnicities. Obesity stigma (assessed with the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT)) was assessed at baseline (Visit 1) and 1 week later, immediately following the intervention (Visit 2). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups where they received standardized written feedback on their obesity stigma levels. Cognitive dissonance participants (N = 21) were told that their AFAT scores were discrepant from their values (high core values of kindness and equality and high stigma), social consensus participants (N = 22) were told their scores were discrepant from their peers' scores (stigma much higher than their peers), and control participants (N = 21) were told their scores were consistent with both their peers' scores and their own values. Following the intervention, omnibus analyses revealed significant group differences on the AFAT Physical/Romantic Unattractiveness subscale (PRU; F (2, 59) = 4.43, P < 0.05). Planned contrasts revealed that cognitive dissonance group means were significantly lower than control means for AFAT total, AFAT PRU subscale, and AFAT social/character disparagement subscale (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between social consensus and controls. Results from this study suggest that cognitive dissonance interventions may be a successful way to reduce obesity stigma, particularly by changing attitudes about the appearance and attractiveness of obese individuals.
Article
Few studies have evaluated the accuracy of parental perceptions of their child's weight status. A cross-sectional sample of children aged 5 to 12 years and their parents (n = 576 parent-child pairs) was enrolled from four schools. Child height and weight were measured. The parents classified their child on Likert scales ranging from "extremely overweight" to "extremely underweight." Parental perceptions were compared with their child's weight status according to body mass index (BMI) age-gender percentiles. Fisher-Halton-Freeman tests, chi(2), and logistic regression were used to compare demographic factors between parents who inaccurately estimated and those who accurately estimated child weight status. Misclassification occurred 25% of the time (95% confidence interval: 21.4-28.5). All parents of children with a BMI greater than or equal to the 95th percentile classified their child in a category other than "extremely overweight," and 75% of children with a BMI from the 85th to less than the 95th percentile were misclassified as "about right" or "underweight." Boys were more likely to be misclassified than were girls (29% vs 21%, P = .03). The majority of parents of obese and overweight children underestimate their child's weight status. Parents of boys are more likely to perceive their child's weight incorrectly.