Genome-wide study identifies PTPRO and WDR72 and FOXQ1-SUMO1P1 interaction associated with neurocognitive function
Epi-Gen, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Journal of Psychiatric Research
(Impact Factor: 3.96).
11/2011; 46(2):271-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.001
Several aspects of neurocognitive function have high heritability, but the molecular genetic mechanisms underlying neurocognition are not known. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genes associated with neurocognition.
700 Subjects (schizophrenia spectrum disorder, n=190, bipolar disorder n=157 and healthy individuals n=353) were tested with an extensive neuropsychological test battery, and genotyped using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0. After quality control, linear regression analysis of each of the 24 cognitive tests on the SNP dosage was performed, including age, gender, education and disease group as covariates. Additionally, 9 SNPs trending toward genome-wide significance were considered for epistatic interactions.
Four SNPs and 2 independent association signals achieving genome-wide significance were identified. Three intronic SNPs in PTPRO were associated with learning and memory (CVLT-II LDFR) (rs17222089, p=1.55×10(-8); rs11056571, p=1.68×10(-8); and rs2300290, p=1.09×10(-8)). rs719714 downstream of WDR72 was associated with executive functioning (CW-3: Inhibition, D-KEFS) (p=4.32×10(-8)). A highly significant epistatic interaction was found between rs9378605 upstream of FOXQ1 and rs11699311 downstream of SUMO1P1 for the Grooved Pegboard test (p=7.6×10(-14)).
We identified four novel loci associated with neurocognitive function and one novel epistatic interaction. The findings should be replicated in independent samples, but indicate a role of PTPRO in learning and memory, WDR72 with executive functioning, and an interaction between FOXQ1 and SUMO1P1 for psychomotor speed.
Available from: Tyler Barrett Grove
- "Known predictors were determined by similar reports that controlled for age and education (cf. Meyer et al., 2005; LeBlanc et al., 2012). Education was based on the previously described continuous SCID levels of education (1–8) and categorized as low or high. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a well-described complication of schizophrenia, however, mechanisms connecting CVD with other facets of psychotic disorders, such as neurocognition, are not understood. The current study examined folate metabolism as a potential mechanism of CVD and neurocognitive deficits by: 1) using endothelial dysfunction as a biomarker of CVD, and 2) comparing enzymes associated with neurocognition, CVD, and critical to folate metabolism, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT). Endothelial function was assessed in 147 participants with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified grouped by MTHFR and COMT allele status. Regression models were used to compare neurocognitive performance based on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Overall, endothelial function predicted BACS composite z-scores after controlling for age, race, level of education, serum folate levels, and MTHFR/COMT risk allele status. Participants with at least one or more MTHFR and/or COMT risk alleles had lower BACS Composite and BACS Symbol Coding adjusted mean z-scores than those with both MTHFR CC and COMT Met/Met genotypes. Thus, endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the neurocognitive deficits seen in psychotic disorders. CVD interventions may not only reduce CVD-related morbidity, but also lessen progressive neurocognitive deficits reported in psychotic disorders.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Available from: PubMed Central
- "In a GWAS, a SNP (rs2023454) in DOK5 (docking protein 5) gene involved in the neurotrophin signaling pathway was found to be associated with right amygdala activation.88 Another GWAS performed on neurocognition in 157 BD patients and 353 controls89 identified three intronic SNPs in the PTPRO (protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O) gene associated with learning and memory (rs17222089, rs11056571, and rs2300290) and rs719714 near WDR72 (WD repeat domain 72) associated with executive functioning as well as highly significant interaction between FOXQ1 (forkhead box Q1) and SUMO1P1 (SUMO1 pseudogene 1) SNPs for psychomotor speed. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a complex disorder with a number of susceptibility genes and environmental risk factors involved in its pathogenesis. In recent years, huge progress has been made in molecular techniques for genetic studies, which have enabled identification of numerous genomic regions and genetic variants implicated in BD across populations. Despite the abundance of genetic findings, the results have often been inconsistent and not replicated for many candidate genes/single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Therefore, the aim of the review presented here is to summarize the most important data reported so far in candidate gene and genome-wide association studies. Taking into account the abundance of association data, this review focuses on the most extensively studied genes and polymorphisms reported so far for BD to present the most promising genomic regions/SNPs involved in BD. The review of association data reveals evidence for several genes (SLC6A4/5-HTT [serotonin transporter gene], BDNF [brain-derived neurotrophic factor], DAOA [D-amino acid oxidase activator], DTNBP1 [dysbindin], NRG1 [neuregulin 1], DISC1 [disrupted in schizophrenia 1]) to be crucial candidates in BD, whereas numerous genome-wide association studies conducted in BD indicate polymorphisms in two genes (CACNA1C [calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, alpha 1C subunit], ANK3 [ankyrin 3]) replicated for association with BD in most of these studies. Nevertheless, further studies focusing on interactions between multiple candidate genes/SNPs, as well as systems biology and pathway analyses are necessary to integrate and improve the way we analyze the currently available association data.
Available from: Wolfgang Froestl
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cognitive enhancers (nootropics) are drugs to treat cognition deficits in patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, stroke, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or aging. Cognition refers to a capacity for information processing, applying knowledge, and changing preferences. It involves memory, attention, executive functions, perception, language, and psychomotor functions. The term nootropics was coined in 1972 when memory enhancing properties of piracetam were observed in clinical trials. In the meantime, hundreds of drugs have been evaluated in clinical trials or in preclinical experiments. To classify the compounds, a concept is proposed assigning drugs to 18 categories according to their mechanism(s) of action, in particular drugs interacting with receptors, enzymes, ion channels, nerve growth factors, re-uptake transporters, antioxidants, metal chelators, and disease-modifying drugs meaning small molecules, vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies interacting with amyloid-β and tau. For drugs, whose mechanism of action is not known, they are either classified according to structure, e.g., peptides, or their origin, e.g., natural products. The review covers the evolution of research in this field over the last 25 years.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.