Constructing Preferences in the Physical World: A Distributed-Cognition Perspective on Preferences and Risky Choices

Department of Psychology, Kingston University London Kingston Upon Thames, UK.
Frontiers in Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.8). 11/2011; 2:302. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00302
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Frederic Vallee-Tourangeau
  • Source
    • "documented the many biases that both individuals and teams face when making decision (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982; Manktelow, 2012). Recently, researchers in the field of cognitive psychology have recognized the distributed nature of human cognition, and have shown how cognitive biases can be limited by an effective use of specific material artifacts (e.g., Vallee-Tourangeau, Abadie, & Tourangeau, 2015; Villejoubert & Vallée Tourangeau, 2011). We still do not know, however, the extent to which the use of material artifacts, such as big data decision tools, could exacerbate or, on the contrary, limit some of these cognitive biases (and if so, which ones?); or, if and when decision-making practices associated with the use of big data systems lead to new types of cognitive biases. "
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: Despite the undeniable evidence that firms often engage with more than one business model at the same time, research has mainly overlooked the implications of diversification into business model portfolios. This paper offers a review and theoretical conceptualization of business model portfolios and distinguishes it from other traditional types of diversification, as well as from multi-sided business models. By appreciating the importance of looking at complementarities and substitution effects within portfolios, we suggest that business model portfolios can be of at least three types: independent, complementary, and nested. Our discussion contributes to the literature on strategic diversification by advancing a set of propositions on business model portfolio implications for firm competitive advantage, as well as by introducing the concepts of business model relatedness and isomorphism. Lastly, we discuss implication for future research.
    Full-text · Working Paper · Jan 2016
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recognition of the importance of autopoiesis to biological systems was crucial in building an alternative to the classic view of cognitive science. However, concepts like structural coupling and autonomy are not strong enough to throw light on language and human problem solving. The argument is presented though a case study where a person solves a problem and, in so doing relies on non-local aspects of the ecology as well as his observer’s mental domain. Like Anthony Chemero we make links with ecological psychology to emphasize how embodiment draws on cultural resources as people concert thinking, action and perception. We trace this to human interactivity or sense-saturated coordination that renders possible language and human forms of cognition: it links human sense-making to historical experience. People play roles with natural and cultural artifacts as they act, animate groups and live through relationships drawing on language that is, at once, artificial and natural. Thus, while constrained by wordings, interactivity is able to fine-tune what we do with action-perception loops. Neither language nor human problem solving reduce to biological sense-making.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013 · Adaptive Behavior
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In solving a variety of problems people interact with their external environment, often using artefacts close at hand to supplement and augment their problem solving skills. The role of interactivity in problem solving was investigated using a river-crossing problem. All participants performed the task twice, once in a high interactivity condition and once in a low interactivity condition. Moves to completion were higher in the high interactivity condition but latency per move was much shorter with high than with low interactivity. Moves in the world were easier to implement than to simulate mentally and acted as epistemic actions to facilitate thinking. In addition, when participants experienced the low interactivity version of the task second, their performance reflected little learning. However, when the high interactivity version was completed second, latency to solution and latency per move were substantially reduced. These results underscore the importance of investigating problem solving behaviour from a distributed cognition perspective.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Jul 2013
Show more