Age and ethnic differences in the onset, persistence and recurrence of alcohol use disorder

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Addiction (Impact Factor: 4.74). 11/2011; 107(4):756-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03721.x
Source: PubMed


To estimate ethnic differences in three components of alcohol use disorder and alcohol dependence course (onset, persistence and recurrence) in a developmental framework.
Longitudinal data from The National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), collected using face-to-face interviews.
Civilian non-institutionalized US population aged 18 years and older, with oversampling of Hispanics, blacks and those aged 18-24 years.
Individuals who completed both NESARC assessments, were not life-long abstainers and were either white (n = 17,458), black (n = 4995), US-born Hispanic (n = 2810) or Hispanic-born outside the United States (n = 2389).
Alcohol dependence (AD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD; abuse or dependence) onset, persistence and recurrence were examined using the Alcohol Use Disorders and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, DSM-IV version.
Among men: relative to whites aged 18-29, AUD onset and persistence were elevated only in US-born Hispanics aged 40 years and older; odds were reduced for all non-US-born Hispanics, older whites, most blacks and US-born Hispanics aged 30-39. For AD, onset risk was elevated for all younger minority men and only reduced among non-US-born aged Hispanics 40 or older. For women: compared to young whites, non-US-born Hispanics were at decreased AUD and AD onset risk; AUD and AD onset and persistence were increased for older blacks and US-born Hispanics.
In the United States, ethnic differences in alcohol disorder transitions (onset, persistence, and recurrence) vary across age, gender and whether a broad (alcohol use disorder) or narrow (alcohol dependence) alcohol definition is used. Evidence of increased risk for some transitions in minority groups suggests that attention should be paid to the course of alcohol use disorders, and that differences in prevalence should not be assumed to reflect differences in specific transitions.

Download full-text


Available from: Timothy J Trull
  • Source
    • "We would add to this set of recommendations that sample characteristics and additional potential methodological factors , such as route and total duration of alcohol administration be carefully considered as well. For example, when predicting future risk for alcoholism or describing subjective response as a risk factor and treatment target, it is critical to consider that social drinkers that are past the peak age of risk for alcoholism (Grant et al., 2012) are unlikely to adequately inform the literature, ultimately aimed at high risk and/or affected individuals. Additionally, it is currently unclear whether subjective response reliably differs between oral and intravenous alcohol administration, as only a single study has systematically examined differences in alcohol responses between these 2 methods (Ray et al., 2007) and reported greater levels of intoxication, but lower alcohol craving, from intravenous alcohol (possibly due to the absence of alcohol cues). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Individual differences in the subjective experience of the pharmacological effects of alcohol have long been implicated in the likelihood that one will drink heavily and develop alcoholism. The theme of this conceptual review and perspective article is to synthesize the literature on subjective responses to alcohol and to set an agenda for the next generation of research in the area. Specifically, we contend that in order for subjective response to alcohol to play a prominent role in alcoholism research, it is critical that it be studied as a multimodal phenotype. Methods: First, we review the human research on subjective response to alcohol measured under controlled laboratory conditions and draw recommendations for the application of these findings to understanding alcoholism neurobiology in humans. Second, we highlight multimodal approaches, including studies of the genetic and neural substrates of individual differences in subjective response to alcohol. Third, we review treatment implications with a focus on subjective response to alcohol as an intervention target. Upon review of the research on subjective response to alcohol across levels of analyses, we provide recommendations for leveraging these phenotypes in a systematic and methodologically rigorous fashion that can address central questions about alcoholism etiology, disease progression, and personalized treatment. Discussion: The approach recommended herein is largely consistent with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative across the National Institute of Mental Health. The defining feature of such domains is that they inform behavior yet be amenable to examination through multiple units of analysis, such as molecular, genetic, circuit-level, and behavioral measurements. To that end, we contend that subjective response to alcohol represents a behaviorally and biologically plausible phenotype upon which to build using the RDoC framework for understanding alcohol use disorder.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Source
    • "When compared with non-Latino White men, Latino and Black men report higher percentage of abstention from alcohol (Galvan & Caetano, 2003); however, among those who do drink, Latino and Black men report higher frequency of heavy drinking and higher number of drinks consumed by month than White men (Galvan & Caetano, 2003). While White persons are more likely to receive a diagnosis of alcohol dependence in their lifetime (Hasin et al., 2007), Latino and Black individuals are more likely to experience recurrent or persistent alcohol dependence (Dawson et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2012). Among individuals with AUD, Latinos experience more severe alcohol problems compared to White and Black persons (Schmidt, Ye, Greenfield, & Bond, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has shown differences in alcohol use and problems across race/ethnicity. This study examines whether there are differential effects of alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms on drinking outcomes across race/ethnicity. Data from 1483 patients admitted to a hospital for treatment of an injury were utilized (19% Black, 45% non-Latino White, and 36% Latino). AUD symptoms and race/ethnicity reported at baseline and their interaction were the predictor variables. Drinking patterns and associated problems measured at the 6- and 12-month follow-up were the outcome variables of interest. Linear regression was the analytic method employed. Endorsement of "spending a great deal of time to obtain, use, or recover from effects of drinking," "craving," "failure to fulfill major role obligations," and "alcohol use in physically hazardous situations" at baseline was associated with greater levels of subsequent alcohol use and alcohol-related problems at both 6- and 12-month follow-ups, regardless of race/ethnicity. Endorsement of "important social, occupational, or recreational activities given up because of drinking" was differentially associated with greater alcohol-related problems at both 6- and 12-month follow-ups dependent on race/ethnicity. Follow-up analyses indicated that this symptom was a significant predictor of alcohol problems among Latino and Black participants, but not non-Latino White participants. Brief interventions targeting these AUD symptoms could increase the effectiveness of brief motivational interventions among different racial/ethnic groups. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015 · Journal of substance abuse treatment
  • Source
    • "Hispanic adolescents in the United States are disproportionately more likely than their peers to use and abuse alcohol (CDC, 2012; Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2013) and to subsequently develop alcohol use disorders as adults (Grant et al., 2012). Compared to non-Hispanic whites and African-Americans, Hispanics initiate alcohol use at younger ages (CDC, 2012) and tend to use alcohol and become intoxicated with substantially greater frequency during early and middle adolescence (Johnston et al., 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Few studies have examined the behavioral and protective correlates of alcohol use among young Hispanics. Using a national sample (N = 7,606), logistic regression and latent profile analysis (LPA) are employed to examine the relationships between alcohol use, psychosocial factors, and externalizing behavior among Hispanics during early adolescence. Early drinkers are more likely to report truancy, fighting, smoking, and drug use. LPA results revealed a three class solution. Classes identified included: psychosocial risk (41.11%), moderate protection (39.44%), and highly religious (19.44%). Alcohol use is clearly associated with externalizing behavior; however, an important degree of psychosocial and behavioral heterogeneity nevertheless exists.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2014 · Substance Use & Misuse
Show more