Article

Recognition and understanding of goals and roles: The key internal features of mental health court teams

Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 1.19). 11/2011; 34(6):406-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The increasing involvement of people with mental illness in the criminal justice system has led to the formation of specialty programs such as mental health courts (hereafter MHCs). We discuss MHCs and the teams serving these courts. Specifically, we examine team members' perceptions of MHC goals and their own and others' roles on the MHC team. Using a semi-structured interview instrument, we conducted 59 face-to-face interviews with criminal justice and mental health treatment personnel representing 11 Ohio MHCs. Findings from our qualitative data analyses reveal that MHC personnel understand individuals' roles within the teams, recognize and appreciate the importance of different roles, and share common goals. MHCs could foster this level of understanding and agreement by working to recruit and retain individuals with experience in or willingness to learn about both the criminal justice and mental health systems. Future research should explore the impact of MHC team functioning on client outcomes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jennifer L S Teller, Jun 04, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental health courts (MHCs) are problem-solving courts that attempt to redirect individuals with mental illness into treatment rather than incarceration (Wolff, 200365. Wolff , N. ( 2003 ). Courting the court: Courts as agents for treatment and justice . In W.H. Fisher (Ed.), Community-based interventions for criminal offenders of severe mental illness , (pp. 143 – 197 ). Oxford , UK : Elsevier Science . [CrossRef]View all references). The primary purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review of recent evidence on the empirical status of MHCs and suggest directions for future social work research. Such a review is critical given the existence of 300 MHCs in the United States (Council of State Governments Justice Center, 201113. Council of State Governments Justice Center . ( 2011 ). Mental health courts. Retrieved from consensusproject.org/issue_areas/mental-health-courts View all references) with more in development. Four major questions guided our review: (a) How do they work? (b) Does a theoretical basis exist to explain how they work? (c) What is the nature of the evidence? and (d) What are the characteristics of the mentally ill who choose not to participate in MHC programs and of those who are negatively terminated? Though studies have shown reductions in assessed outcomes, a lack of methodologically strong evaluations significantly limits the strength of those results. There exists a need for additional, methodologically rigorous studies to better understand the effectiveness of MHCs.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors offer a framework for modern relapse-preventive, offence-oriented treatment and illustrate the basis and conditions for this work. The vast heterogenity and partial ambiguity of forensic terms warrants some organizing and defining. By illustrating the relevant aspects of modern relapse-prevention therapy the complexity and multifacetness of the subject becomes apparent. The forensic therapist faces the challenge to consider the various aspects of treatment consciously, goal-oriented and meaningfully In his conception and to realize them in his everyday work.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: African Americans are more likely to show such disparities in mental health as misdiagnosis, lack of treatment access, and poorer outcomes. Due in part to stigma in African American communities, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and bipolar illness are often missed. Mental health disparities in diagnosis and treatment have contributed significantly to the overrepresentation of African Americans in correctional settings. The lack of mental health services in such settings has implications for the course of mental illness and overall recidivism. Screening for mental health illness, awareness of substance abuse, recognition of new treatment approaches, and an appreciation of the importance of culture and communications in a comprehensive diagnosis and treatment must be developed for African Americans within correctional populations.
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2013
Show more