Patient-provider Sex and Race/Ethnicity Concordance A National Study of Healthcare and Outcomes

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 11/2011; 49(11):1012-20. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31823688ee
Source: PubMed


Increasing patient-provider sex and race/ethnicity concordance has been proposed to improve healthcare and help mitigate health disparities, but the relationship between concordance and health outcomes remains unclear.
To examine associations of patient-provider sex, race/ethnicity, and dual concordance with healthcare measures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Analyses of data from adult respondents indicating a usual source of healthcare (N=22,440) in the 2002 to 2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (each a 2-year panel).
Year 1 provider communication, sex-neutral (colorectal cancer screening, influenza vaccination) and sex-specific (mammography, Papanicolaou smear, prostate-specific antigen) prevention; and year 2 health status (SF-12). Analyses adjusted for patient sociodemographics and health variables, and healthcare provider (usual source of care) sex and race/ethnicity.
Of 24 concordance assessments, 3 were statistically significant. Women with female providers were more likely to report mammography adherence [average adjusted marginal effect=3.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6%, 6.2%; P<0.01]. Respondents reporting dual concordance were less likely to rate provider communication in the highest quartile (average adjusted marginal effect =-4.2%, 95% CI: -8.1%, -0.2%; P=0.04), but dual concordance was associated with higher adjusted SF-12 Physical Component Summary scores (0.58 points, 95% CI: 0.00, 1.15; P=0.05).
Little evidence of clinical benefit resulting from sex or race/ethnicity concordance was found. Greater matching of patients and providers by sex and race/ethnicity is unlikely to mitigate health disparities.

Download full-text


Available from: Joshua J Fenton, Jan 15, 2016
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Knowledge and beliefs about influenza vaccine that differ across racial or ethnic groups may promote racial or ethnic disparities in vaccination. OBJECTIVE: To identify associations between vaccination behavior and personal beliefs about influenza vaccine by race or ethnicity and education levels among the U.S. elderly population. METHODS: Data from a national telephone survey conducted in 2004 were used for this study. Reponses for 3875 adults ≥65 years of age were analyzed using logistic regression methods. RESULTS: Racial and ethnic differences in beliefs were observed. For example, whites were more likely to believe influenza vaccine is very effective in preventing influenza compared to blacks and Hispanics (whites, 60%; blacks, 47%, and Hispanics, 51%, p<0.01). Among adults who believed the vaccine is very effective, self-reported vaccination was substantially higher across all racial/ethnic groups (whites, 93%; blacks, 76%; Hispanics, 78%) compared to adults who believed the vaccine was only somewhat effective (whites 67%; blacks 61%, Hispanics 61%). Also, vaccination coverage differed by education level and personal beliefs of whites, blacks, and Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge and beliefs about influenza vaccine may be important determinants of influenza vaccination among racial/ethnic groups. Strategies to increase coverage should highlight the burden of influenza disease in racial and ethnic populations, the benefits and safety of vaccinations and personal vulnerability to influenza disease if not vaccinated. For greater effectiveness, factors associated with the education levels of some communities may need to be considered when developing or implementing new strategies that target specific racial or ethnic groups.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2012 · Vaccine
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: The aim of this study was to understand care managers' experiences in caring for depressed mothers in an integrated behavioral health program. Methods: As part of a quality improvement project, we conducted a focus group interview with six care managers caring for low income mothers with behavioral health needs in a safety net program in King County, WA. Using thematic analysis, codes were organized into themes that described the care managers' experiences. Results: Two organizing themes along with associated themes emerged: (1) Assets for improving depression outcomes: patient-provider interactions, including the importance of engagement; program resources such as care coordination and (2) Barriers to improved depression outcomes: patient-provider interactions, including difficulty engaging patient; patient-related factors such as multiple stressors; program resources such as need for more psychiatric support; and difficulty accessing outside resources. Conclusions: Numerous potentially modifiable factors including levels of engagement, motivational interviewing, and increased psychiatric support were identified by care managers as affecting depression care and outcomes. Implications for care management training and approaches to psychiatric consultations are discussed.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2012 · Psychosomatics

  • No preview · Article · Jan 2013 · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Show more