Maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety is associated with child executive function at 6-9 years age

Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine, Orange 92868, USA.
Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (Impact Factor: 2.72). 11/2011; 14(6):665-76. DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2011.623250
Source: PubMed


Because fetal brain development proceeds at an extremely rapid pace, early life experiences have the potential to alter the trajectory of neurodevelopment, which may increase susceptibility for developmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. There is evidence that prenatal maternal stress and anxiety, especially worries specifically related to being pregnant, influence neurodevelopmental outcomes. In the current prospective longitudinal study, we included 89 women for whom serial data were available for pregnancy-specific anxiety, state anxiety, and depression at 15, 19, 25, 31, and 37 weeks gestation. When the offspring from the target pregnancy were between 6 and 9 years of age, their executive function was assessed. High levels of mean maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety over the course of gestation were associated with lower inhibitory control in girls only and lower visuospatial working memory performance in boys and girls. Higher-state anxiety and depression also were associated with lower visuospatial working memory performance. However, neither state anxiety nor depression explained any additional variance after accounting for pregnancy-specific anxiety. The findings contribute to the literature supporting an association between pregnancy-specific anxiety and cognitive development and extend our knowledge about the persistence of this effect until middle childhood.

Download full-text


Available from: Elysia Poggi Davis
    • "Anxiety during pregnancy is associated with several adverse maternal and child outcomes, such as postpartum depression (Ahluwalia et al., 2004; Heron et al., 2004; Skouteris et al., 2009), preterm birth, low birth weight (Littleton et al., 2007; O'Donnell et al., 2011; Teixeira et al., 1999), and subsequent developmental and mental health challenges in children (Buss et al., 2011; Davis and Sandman, 2012; Kingston et al., 2012; Loomans et al., 2012). Available data suggest that PrA may be more strongly associated with maternal and child outcomes than general anxiety or depressive symptoms are and may predict these outcomes more accurately (Blair et al., 2011; Kramer et al., 2009; Lobel et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence suggests that pregnancy-related anxiety is more strongly associated with maternal and child outcomes than general anxiety and depression are and that pregnancy-related anxiety may constitute a distinct concept. However, because of its poor conceptualization, the measurement and assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety have been limited. Efforts to analyze this concept can significantly contribute to its theoretical development. The first objective of this paper was to clarify the concept of pregnancy-related anxiety and identify its characteristics and dimensions. The second aim was to examine the items of current pregnancy-related anxiety measures to determine the dimensions and attributes that each scale addresses, noting any gaps between the current assessment and the construct of the concept.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · International journal of nursing studies
    • "This finding is consistent with earlier reports of poorer reaction time of 15-year-old boys of highly anxious (>75th percentile) women, along with decreased performance on two IQ subtests (Van den Bergh et al., 2005, 2006). In contrast, analysis of school-age children revealed that higher maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety interfered with inhibitory control in girls but not boys (Buss et al., 2011). Maternal depressive symptoms are often measured within the constellation of maternal stress and anxiety. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite long-standing interest in the role of sex on human development, the functional consequences of fetal sex on early development are not well understood. Here we explore the gestational origins of sex as a moderator of development. In accordance with the focus of this special issue, we examine evidence for a sex differential in vulnerability to prenatal and perinatal risks. Exposures evaluated include those present in the external environment (e.g., lead, pesticides), those introduced by maternal behaviors (e.g., alcohol, opioid use), and those resulting from an adverse intrauterine environment (e.g., preterm birth). We also provide current knowledge on the degree to which sex differences in fetal neurobehavioral development (i.e., cardiac and motor patterns) are present prior to birth. Also considered are contemporaneous and persistent sex of fetus effects on the pregnant woman. Converging evidence confirms that infant and early childhood developmental outcomes of male fetuses exposed to prenatal and perinatal adversities are more highly impaired than those of female fetuses. In certain circumstances, male fetuses are both more frequently exposed to early adversities and more affected by them when exposed than are female fetuses. The mechanisms through which biological sex imparts vulnerability or protection on the developing nervous system are largely unknown. We consider models that implicate variation in maturation, placental functioning, and the neuroendocrine milieu as potential contributors. Many studies use sex as a control variable, some analyze and report main effects for sex, but those that report interaction terms for sex are scare. As a result, the true scope of sex differences in vulnerability is unknown. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2015 · Neuroscience
  • Source
    • "to each mother, in order to obtain information about three temperamental dimensions (i.e., surgency , negative affect, effortful control). Additionally, we used the Anxiety and Depression Hamilton scale [85] to assess these two aspects of the mother's mental health involved in selfregulation from the early stages of child development [86]. This information was used to evaluate potential differences between control and intervention groups at the beginning of the study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current study presents a 32-week intervention for kindergarten children from low socio-economic backgrounds. The main contribution of this study resides in the interdisciplinary development of the intervention, made in close collaboration between educational researchers, and researchers in cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology. The intervention was implemented by teachers through class activities, to promote executive functions and academic achievement. These activities were articulated into the current kindergarten curriculum and, at the same time, built upon concepts and methodologies of developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience for executive functions training. Results showed: (1) non-significant differences between groups in cognitive performance from pre- to post-training assessment, and (2) significant differences in academic achievement for Language, Mathematics, Autonomy, and Contact with peers in first grade. Our study sets a precedent for future interdisciplinary work bridging the gap between developmental psychology and education, which we believe will prove key to improving academic success.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015 · Trends in Neuroscience and Education
Show more