A 10-year experience with treatment of high and standard risk Hodgkin disease: Six cycles of tailored BEACOPP, with interim scintigraphy, are effective and female fertility is preserved

Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
American Journal of Hematology (Impact Factor: 3.8). 01/2012; 87(1):32-6. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.22187
Source: PubMed


Therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is designed to prolong survival and minimize toxicity. A total of 124 patients with newly diagnosed HL and adverse prognostic factors were prospectively studied between July, 1999 and August, 2005. Patients with early unfavorable and advanced disease were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned to therapy based on international prognostic score (IPS). Those with IPS ≥ 3 received three cycles of escalated BEACOPP (EB). All others received two cycles of standard BEACOPP (SB). Subsequent therapy was prospectively assigned according to early interim GA(67) or positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT). Four cycles of EB or SB were administered following a positive or negative scan, respectively. Complete remission rate, 10-year progression free (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 97, 87, and 88%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 89 months (5-144). PFS and OS were similar in both groups. Fertility status was assessed in 38 females aged <40 years; 94% of females younger than 40 years preserved their cyclic ovarian function. Nineteen conceived during follow-up for 30 pregnancies, delivering 24 babies. Deliveries were reported up to 7 years from diagnosis. Predictive value of negative interim Ga(67) or PET/CT was 87 and 93%, respectively. Six cycles of tailored BEACOPP, for patients with adverse prognostic factors, provide encouraging long-term PFS and OS, and fertility is preserved in most females.

Download full-text


Available from: Diana Gaitini, Nov 03, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract We assessed the diagnostic performance of interim 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) with regard to the final outcome of adult patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The predefined outcome was treatment failure at the end of follow-up. Bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic data was used to calculate combined (pooled) estimates. Demographics, quality data and study characteristics were used as potential moderators of outcome in subgroup analysis and meta-regression. A total of 14 studies (16 arms stratified by staging or therapy, 1328 evaluable patients) were deemed eligible for final analysis, after excluding intention-to-treat studies (i.e. those where treatment decision was based on interim PET). The combined effect (95% confidence interval) for sensitivity was 0.67 (0.57-0.76) and specificity 0.89 (0.84-0.93). The corresponding likelihood ratios (LRs) were 6.2 (3.9-10.0) for LR + and 0.37 (0.27-0.50) for LR -, with moderate heterogeneity (I(2) =67%). The estimated negative predictive value was 0.93 (0.85-1.00). The diagnostic performance was influenced by most covariates tested, including age, duration of follow-up, criteria used and time of interim PET. Interim PET retains a high specificity for final outcome, but the sensitivity is low. The use of a PET + study as a surrogate marker is hampered by inconsistent interpretation criteria and study populations. However, the high negative predictive value may permit treatment stratification based on a negative outcome.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2012 · Leukemia & lymphoma
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current therapy of Hodgkin disease (HD) is based on risk assessment, taking into consideration both staging and risk factors. Interim positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) has proven to distinguish between patients with advanced disease who have early response and good prognosis and those with interim positive response who have inferior progression free survival (PFS) with current therapy. Several issues need to be elucidated: (1) Which interim study should be defined as positive? (2) Should the same cutoff value be used for decision-making about escalation vs de-escalation of therapy? (3) Should it apply to different chemotherapy protocols? Currently, there are several ongoing studies where treatment is modified based on interim PET/CT. These studies may enable the medical community to establish whether bleomycin or radiation therapy could be omitted in early responders, whether chemotherapy could be shortened in these patients, and whether therapy escalation for patients with interim positive PET/CT could decrease disease progression rate.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2012 · Current Oncology Reports
  • Source

    Preview · Article · Dec 2012 · Journal of Clinical Oncology
Show more