Rasch analysis of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science (Impact Factor: 3.4). 09/2011; 52(12):8630-5. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8027
Source: PubMed


The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a 12-item scale for the assessment of symptoms related to dry eye disease and their effect on vision. Its reliability and validity have been investigated within the classical test theory framework and, more recently, using Rasch analysis. The purpose of the present analysis was to more completely investigate the functioning of its response category structure, the validity of its three subscales, and the unidimensionality of the latent construct it is intended to assess.
Responses to the OSDI from 172 females participating in the Dry Eye in Postmenopause (DEiM) study who had previously been diagnosed with dry eye or reported significant ocular irritation and dryness were analyzed. Response category structure and item fit statistics were evaluated for assessment of model fit. Person separation statistics were used to examine the validity of the subscales. Unidimensionality was assessed by principal component analysis (PCA) of model residuals.
The recommended five-category response structure resulted in disordered response thresholds. A four-category structure resulted in ordered thresholds. Item infit statistics were acceptable for all 12 items. Person separation with this category structure was adequate, with a person separation index of 2.16. None of the three subscales demonstrated adequate person separation. PCA showed one other significant factor onto which the three environmental items loaded significantly.
All items demonstrated acceptable fit to the model after collapsing categories to order the response thresholds. The original subscales did not prove valid, and there is some evidence of multidimensionality and poor targeting.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computer vision syndrome (CVS) is a complex of eye and vision problems related to computer use which has been reported in up to 90% of computer users. Ocular symptoms may include asthenopia, accommodative and vergence difficulties and dry eye. Previous studies have reported that uncorrected astigmatism may have a significant impact on symptoms of CVS. However, its effect on task performance is unclear. This study recorded symptoms after a 10 min period of reading from a computer monitor either through the habitual distance refractive correction or with a supplementary -1.00 or -2.00D oblique cylinder added over these lenses in 12 young, visually-normal subjects. Additionally, the distance correction condition was repeated to assess the repeatability of the symptom questionnaire. Subjects' reading speed and accuracy were monitored during the course of the 10 min trial. There was no significant difference in reading rate or the number of errors between the three astigmatic conditions. However, a significant change in symptoms was reported with the median total symptom scores for the 0, 1 and 2D astigmatic conditions being 2.0, 6.5 and 40.0, respectively (p < 0.0001). Further, the repeatability coefficient of the total symptom score following the repeated zero astigmatism condition was ± 13.46. The presence of induced astigmatism produced a significant increase in post-task symptoms but did not affect reading rate or the number of reading errors. The correction of small astigmatic refractive errors may be important in optimizing patient comfort during computer operation.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2011 · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine vision-related quality of life (QoL) measured with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) in dry eye patients, and establish potential correlations with the Zung Self Rating Anxiety Scales (SAS), the Zung Self Rating Depression Scales (SDS), ocular surface parameters, and sociodemographic measures. The comparative study included 87 dry eye patients and 71 healthy volunteers who visited the department of ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Nose and Throat (EENT) Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China, between June 2009 and December 2009. Surveys were administered to participants to evaluate their sociodemographic characteristics and disease-related factors. Data collected from the NEI-VFQ and OSDI survey instruments were analyzed to identify potential differences between the dry eye group and the control group. Correlations with sociodemographic characteristics, clinical parameters, and psychological status were evaluated. Compared with the control group, our patient group had lower (worse) NEI-VFQ scores for the subscales of general health, general vision, ocular pain, short distance vision activities, long distance vision activities, vision related social function, vision related mental health, vision related role difficulties, vision related dependency, and driving (all P < 0.05), and higher (worse) OSDI composite and subscale scores of ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers (all P < 0.001). Significant correlations were found between QoL scores and patient anxiety and depression levels. Vision-related QoL in dry eye patients was impaired and was correlated with anxiety and depression, further implicating this condition as an important public health problem deserving increased attention and resources.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2012 · Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
  • No preview · Article · Sep 2012 · Clinical and experimental rheumatology
Show more