All in a Sniff: Olfaction as a Model for Active Sensing

Department of Physiology and Brain Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA.
Neuron (Impact Factor: 15.05). 09/2011; 71(6):962-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.030
Source: PubMed


Sensation is an active process involving the sampling and central processing of external stimuli selectively in space and time. Olfaction in particular depends strongly on active sensing due to the fact that-at least in mammals-inhalation of air into the nasal cavity is required for odor detection. This seemingly simple first step in odor sensation profoundly shapes nearly all aspects of olfactory system function, from the distribution of odorant receptors to the functional organization of central processing to the perception of odors. The dependence of olfaction on inhalation also allows for profound modulation of olfactory processing by changes in odor sampling strategies in coordination with attentional state and sensory demands. This review discusses the role of active sensing in shaping olfactory system function at multiple levels and draws parallels with other sensory modalities to highlight the importance of an active sensing perspective in understanding how sensory systems work in the behaving animal.

Download full-text


Available from: Matt Wachowiak, Mar 24, 2014
  • Source
    • "Perception is necessary for action (Goodale, 2008); likewise, action plays a pivotal role in perception, in what has become known as active sensing. Active sensing has been shown to play a vital role in perception of various modalities, including the visual, auditory, tactile, and olfactory systems (Schroeder, Wilson, Rad- man,Scharfman, & Lakatos, 2010;Wachowiak, 2011), in humans as well as a variety of other species (Nelson & MacIver, 2006). Active sensing is the movement of the sensors for optimization of sensing performance (Mitchinson & Prescott, 2013), and it plays a central role in the process of perception (Ahissar & Arieli, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vision is the dominant sense for perception-for-action in humans and other higher primates. Advances in sight restoration now utilize the other intact senses to provide information that is normally sensed visually through sensory substitution to replace missing visual information. Sensory substitution devices translate visual information from a sensor, such as a camera or ultrasound device, into a format that the auditory or tactile systems can detect and process, so the visually impaired can see through hearing or touch. Online control of action is essential for many daily tasks such as pointing, grasping and navigating, and adapting to a sensory substitution device successfully requires extensive learning. Here we review the research on sensory substitution for vision restoration in the context of providing the means of online control for action in the blind or blindfolded. It appears that the use of sensory substitution devices utilizes the neural visual system; this suggests the hypothesis that sensory substitution draws on the same underlying mechanisms as unimpaired visual control of action. Here we review the current state of the art for sensory substitution approaches to object recognition, localization, and navigation, and the potential these approaches have for revealing a metamodal behavioral and neural basis for the online control of action.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015
  • Source
    • "We propose that volition may therefore be a primitive capability of vertebrate brains that precedes the advanced cognitive capacities of primates. Animals actively sample their environment using, for example, whisking, sniffing and saccadic eye movements; these active sensing behaviours (Nelson and MacIver, 2006; Kleinfeld et al., 2006; Otero-Millan et al., 2008; Wachowiak, 2011) occur more frequently during periods of active exploration (Poulet and Petersen, 2008; Schroeder et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cortical activity precedes self-initiated movements by several seconds in mammals; this observation has led into inquiries on the nature of volition. Preparatory neural activity is known to be associated with decision making and movement planning. Self-initiated locomotion has been linked to increased active sensory sampling; however, the precise temporal relationship between sensory acquisition and voluntary movement initiation has not been established. Based on long-term monitoring of sensory sampling activity that is readily observable in freely behaving pulse-type electric fish, we show that heightened sensory acquisition precedes spontaneous initiation of swimming. Gymnotus sp. revealed a bimodal distribution of electric organ discharge rate (EODR) demonstrating down- and up-states of sensory sampling and neural activity; movements only occurred during up-states and up-states were initiated before movement onset. EODR during voluntary swimming initiation exhibited greater trial-to-trial variability than the sound-evoked increases in EODR. The sampling variability declined after voluntary movement onset as previously observed for the neural variability associated with decision making in primates. Spontaneous movements occurred randomly without a characteristic timescale, and no significant temporal correlation was found between successive movement intervals. Using statistical analyses of spontaneous exploratory behaviours and associated preparatory sensory sampling increase, we conclude that electric fish exhibit key attributes of volitional movements, and that voluntary behaviours in vertebrates may generally be preceded by increased sensory sampling. Our results suggest that comparative studies of the neural basis of volition may therefore be possible in pulse-type electric fish, given the substantial homologies between the telencephali of teleost fish and mammals.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Journal of Experimental Biology
  • Source
    • "However , recent studies have shown a much more complex scenario in awake animals, requiring re-evaluation of our notions of olfactory processing (Kato et al., 2012; Wachowiak et al., 2013). MCs in awake, behaving animals are spontaneously active (Rinberg and Gelperin, 2006; Rinberg et al., 2006; Davison and Katz, 2007) with firing that is often locked to the respiration cycle (Cury and Uchida, 2010; Wachowiak, 2011). Odor-evoked responses are not encoded in simple changes in firing frequencies; instead, the OB adopts various sophisticated mechanisms, involving the activity of MCs, to detect and encode odors. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The tractable, layered architecture of the olfactory bulb (OB), and its function as a relay between odor input and higher cortical processing, makes it an attractive model to study how sensory information is processed at a synaptic and circuit level. The OB is also the recipient of strong neuromodulatory inputs, chief among them being the central cholinergic system. Cholinergic axons from the basal forebrain modulate the activity of various cells and synapses within the OB, particularly the numerous dendrodendritic synapses, resulting in highly variable responses of OB neurons to odor input that is dependent upon the behavioral state of the animal. Behavioral, electrophysiological, anatomical, and computational studies examining the function of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors expressed in the OB have provided valuable insights into the role of acetylcholine (ACh) in regulating its function. We here review various studies examining the modulation of OB function by cholinergic fibers and their target receptors, and provide putative models describing the role that cholinergic receptor activation might play in the encoding of odor information.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
Show more