The Effect of Poly Sterilization on Wear, Osteolysis and Survivorship of a Press-fit Cup at 10-Year Followup

Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, PO Box 7088, Alexandria, VA 22307, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.77). 09/2011; 470(2):462-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2052-2
Source: PubMed


During the mid-1990s when our institution was using a press-fit porous-coated cup without supplemental initial fixation for primary THA, the manufacturer transitioned from gamma irradiation to gas plasma for the terminal sterilization of their polyethylene liners.
At minimum 10-year followup, we asked whether the fixation achieved by solely relying on a press-fit would be durable and how different liner sterilization methods affected radiographic wear, osteolysis, and survivorship.
We retrospectively reviewed 373 patients who underwent 398 primary THAs with a press-fit porous-coated cup between March 1995 and December 1996. Mean age at time of surgery was 61.5 ± 13.3 years and mean followup was 10.4 ± 3.7 years. We determined reasons for revision, survivorship, femoral head penetration, osteolysis, and wear-related complications.
Among 20 revisions involving any component, seven were associated with wear and osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survivorship, using component revision for any reason as an end point, was 95.7% (95% confidence interval, 93.6%-97.9%) at 10 years. Noncrosslinked liners sterilized with gas plasma demonstrated a mean head penetration rate of 0.20 ± 0.09 mm/year compared with 0.13 ± 0.07 mm/year for liners sterilized with gamma irradiation in air and 0.09 ± 0.04 mm/year for liners sterilized with gamma-irradiation with barrier packaging without oxygen. THAs with increased volumetric wear tended to demonstrate larger osteolytic lesions (r = 0.40) and there tended to be less osteolysis among the liners sterilized with gamma-irradiation with barrier packaging without oxygen. However, there was no difference in survivorship among the sterilization groups and there has been no cup or stem loosening associated with osteolysis.
Durable biologic fixation through 10-year followup can be achieved by solely relying on an initial press-fit. Noncrosslinking gas plasma for terminal sterilization of the polyethylene liners was associated with greater head penetration rate than gamma irradiation.
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text


Available from: Charles Anderson Engh, Jr., Aug 05, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical interventions devised in modern times. Attempts to change the current THA procedure with unproven innovations bring the risk of increased failure rates while trying to improve the benefit of the surgery. This manuscript examines the evolution of THA at the Rothman Institute illustrating the key elements that lead the success of this procedure at this institution. These key elements include femoral stem design, use of highly crossed-linked polyethylene and use of pain and rehabilitation protocols. We attempted to describe the long-term results regarding safety, effectiveness, and durability of specific THA implant designs used at this institution drawing on reported evidence in the literature. The authors performed a review of peer-reviewed articles related to the Rothman Institute's experience with THA. Total hip arthroplasty is an efficient, safe, and durable procedure. It is a highly successful operation to restore function and improve pain. The survivorship of THA procedures at the Rothman Institute is higher than 99% at 10 years based on mechanical failure. The use of collarless, tapered wedge femoral stem, highly crossed-linked polyethylene, and improved pain rehabilitation protocols have contributed to this success. There is a well-documented long-term survivorship after THA. Future innovation in THA should address new challenges with younger and more demanding patients, rather than change current methods that have a proven good survivorship. This innovation depends mainly upon improvements in the bearing surfaces and advances in pain control and rehabilitation.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2012 · HSS Journal
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of cementless acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity over the past decade. Most total hip arthroplasties being performed in North America currently use cementless acetabular components. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survivorship and revision rate of cemented and cementless acetabular components utilized in total hip arthroplasty. A primary literature search in PubMed identified 3488 articles, of which 3407 did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. Only English-language articles on either the survivorship or revision rate of primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up were included. The present study analyzed forty-five articles reporting the long-term outcome of cementless acetabular components, twenty-nine reporting the outcome of cemented acetabular components, and seven comparing cemented and cementless acetabular components. Meta-analysis (with a random-effects model) was performed on the data from the seven comparative studies, and study-level logistic regression analysis (with a quasibinomial model) was performed on the pooled data on the eighty-one included articles to determine a consensus. The studies were weighted according to the number of total hip arthroplasties performed. The meta-analysis did not reveal any effect of the type of acetabular component fixation on either survivorship or revision rate. The regression analysis revealed the estimated odds ratio for survivorship of a cemented acetabular component to be 1.60 (95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 2.40; p = 0.002) when adjustments for factors including age, sex, and mean duration of follow-up were made. The preference for cementless acetabular components on the basis of improved survivorship is not supported by the published evidence. Although concerns regarding aseptic loosening of cemented acetabular components may have led North American surgeons toward the nearly exclusive use of cementless acetabular components, the available literature suggests that the fixation of cemented acetabular components is more reliable than that of cementless components beyond the first postoperative decade.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2013 · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total hip replacement (THR) has become one of the most successful procedures in the last decades (Learmonth et al. 2007). Sir John Charnley developed low-friction arthroplasty using cemented fixation, a 22.225 mm stainless-steel femoral head and an all-polyethylene (PE) cup during the early 1960s of the last century, an operation with excellent long-term results worldwide (Charnley 1961) (Fig. 9.1). Cemented THRs usually show higher survivorship rates than uncemented designs; nevertheless some contemporary implants are providing very low rates of loosening with their improved primary and secondary bone fixation. In a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Hailer et al. observed increased use of uncemented THR despite a lower revision rate at 10 and 15 years (Hailer et al. 2010). In their analysis they found better results for cemented arthroplasties regardless of the age or the diagnosis of the patient; when they assessed the cup and the stem, they concluded that the worse outcomes of uncemented THR were due to a higher revision rate of the cup produced by wear-related problems. So the most important problem in a long term is PE wear in both cemented and uncemented THRs as this is the main source of osteolysis and loosening (Harris 1995).
    No preview · Article · Dec 2013
Show more