Article

Use of Administrative Data to Identify Potential Service Gaps for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, לאנג איילענד סיטי, New York, United States
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 2.41). 09/2011; 62(9):1094-7. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.9.1094
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The New York City Mental Health Care Monitoring Initiative uses Medicaid claims data to identify individuals with serious mental illness who are experiencing or at risk for gaps in services. In this study the authors assessed whether proposed service use algorithms accurately identified such individuals.
A random sample of 500 individuals with serious mental illness was identified. Individuals belonged to specific high-need cohorts and met predefined claims-based criteria for potential service gaps. Clinical staff initiated reviews with prior service providers for 230 individuals.
Over a two-week period staff completed reviews for 188 cases (88%). In 66 cases (35%) the individual was fully engaged in care; 84 (45%) had a recent episode of disengagement that was appropriately addressed, and 38 (20%) were not receiving adequate services.
The proposed service use algorithms successfully identified high-need individuals with serious mental illness at risk for gaps in services.

Full-text preview

Available from: 75.126.76.160
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: This study sought to describe reasons for disengagement from services and practical guidelines to enhance engagement among individuals with serious mental illness and high need for treatment. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 56 individuals with serious mental illness and 25 providers recruited from a larger project that used administrative data to identify individuals with serious mental illness who had disengaged from care. Individuals with serious mental illness and providers described reasons for disengagement and effective provider engagement strategies. Results: Individuals with serious mental illness and providers differed in reported reasons for disengagement. Reasons reported by individuals with serious mental illness included services that were not relevant to their needs, inability to trust providers, and a belief that they were not ill. Providers cited lack of insight, stigma, and language and cultural barriers as common reasons for disengagement. Strategies for increasing engagement were grouped into a framework of acceptable, accessible, and available services. Acceptable services reflect a partnership model that fosters support and instills hope; accessible services minimize barriers related to transportation and intake procedures; and available services address recovery needs in addition to treatment of general medical and psychiatric problems. Conclusions: Individuals with serious mental illness and providers often do not agree on reasons for seeking care. The framework of acceptable, accessible, and available services identifies opportunities for providers to adjust practices and maximize engagement in services among individuals with serious mental illness who are in high need of treatment.
    Preview · Article · May 2013 · Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined whether Medicaid claims and other administrative data could identify high-need individuals with serious mental illness in need of outreach in a large urban setting. A claims-based notification algorithm identified individuals belonging to high-need cohorts who may not be receiving needed services. Reviewers contacted providers who previously served the individuals to confirm whether they were in need of outreach. Over 10,000 individuals set a notification flag over 12-months. Disengagement was confirmed in 55 % of completed reviews, but outreach was initiated for only 30 %. Disengagement and outreach status varied by high-need cohort.
    No preview · Article · May 2013 · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with serious mental illness are overrepresented in the criminal justice system and face difficulties accessing mental health services both during incarceration and upon re-entry into the community. This study examines how such individuals describe their experiences receiving care both during and after their time in custody and explores the perspectives of mental health service providers who treat this population upon re-entry. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 individuals identified as having a history of serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement, as well as with 25 providers who have worked with this population. Clients noted the stress of transitioning to criminal justice settings, the uneven availability of services within jail and prison, and the significant challenges faced upon re-entry. Providers reported barriers to working with this population, including minimal coordination with the criminal justice system and challenging behaviors and attitudes on the part of both clients and providers. Findings identify potential target areas for improved care coordination as well as for additional provider education regarding the unique needs of this population. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2013 · Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Show more