Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?

Leiden University, The Netherlands.
British Journal of Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.76). 09/2011; 50(3):519-35. DOI: 10.1348/014466610X525280
Source: PubMed


'Queen Bees' are senior women in masculine organizational cultures who have fulfilled their career aspirations by dissociating themselves from their gender while simultaneously contributing to the gender stereotyping of other women. It is often assumed that this phenomenon contributes to gender discrimination in organizations, and is inherent to the personalities of successful career women. We argue for a social identity explanation and examine organizational conditions that foster the Queen Bee phenomenon. Participants were 94 women holding senior positions in diverse companies in The Netherlands who participated in an on-line survey. In line with predictions, indicators of the Queen Bee phenomenon (increased gender stereotyping and masculine self-descriptions) were found mostly among women who indicated they had started their career with low gender identification and who had subsequently experienced a high degree of gender discrimination on their way up. By contrast, the experience of gender discrimination was unrelated to signs of the Queen Bee phenomenon among women who indicated to be highly identified when they started their career. Results are discussed in light of social identity theory, interpreting the Queen Bee phenomenon as an individual mobility response of low gender identified women to the gender discrimination they encounter in their work.

Download full-text


Available from: Colette Van Laar, Dec 01, 2014
  • Source
    • "Despite these similarities in the response patterns observed among women and Hindustanis, there also was a notable difference. While low identified Hindustani workers presented themselves as stereotypically Dutch and reported less positive affect towards their ethnic ingroup in response to discrimination, they were not especially prone to deny the existence of ingroup discrimination, although this has been found as part of the response pattern displayed in QB research (Derks, Van Laar, et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research revealed that one way by which members of minority groups resist disadvantage is through strategic “self-group distancing” by evaluating this group negatively, describing themselves according to outgroup stereotypes and supporting the status hierarchy, hereby limiting societal change. Drawing upon recent work on the Queen Bee phenomenon among women at work, we explain self-group distancing as a coping response of low identified minority employees who experience social identity threat. Whereas queen bee behavior is often discussed as a response typical for women, new experimental data are presented revealing similar responses among ethnic minority employees. In parallel to queen bees, low identified Hindustanis reported less positive ingroup affect and presented themselves as more stereotypically Dutch when reminded of ethnic bias—but not in a control condition. This suggests that the Queen Bee phenomenon exemplifies a more generic individual mobility response to group disadvantage experienced by minority groups at work.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Journal of Social Issues
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this chapter we will discuss the results of a research programme aimed at examining the impact of social identity on the well-being, the motivation and the performance of members of socially devalued groups, such as ethnic minorities.1 The results show that it is essential for the motivation and performance of members of these groups − such as individuals from a particular culture or with particular religious convictions − that their identity be respected and supported by the surrounding community (such as important persons in their school or place of employment). Respect and recognition of ethnic minorities’ social identity improves their well-being, increases their identification with society and raises their ambitions and performance in the areas of education and employment.
    Full-text · Chapter · Jan 2010
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Instances of discriminatory treatment are often ambiguous. Nevertheless, for policy makers to effectively combat discrimination, its targets first need to see that it takes place. Different motives determine whether or not targets see their negative outcomes as resulting from discrimination: to see the world as a just place where people are treated fairly, and to maintain a positive view of the self. We argue that the type of policy needed to combat discrimination is different, depending on which of these motives plays a role. Based on relevant literature and our own recent research, we develop a framework that specifies how different types of threat and different motives are raised when discrimination is perceived as rare or pervasive. We describe the pitfalls associated with each type of threat and the coping strategies people use to deal with rare versus pervasive discrimination. We also outline how policy makers can take advantage of this knowledge to tailor specific measures to the different motives we distinguish, to optimize the effectiveness of their interventions designed to combat discrimination.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2010 · Social Issues and Policy Review
Show more