ArticlePDF Available

Passive Sensor Technology Interface to Assess Elder Activity in Independent Living


Abstract and Figures

The effectiveness of clinical information systems to improve nursing and patient outcomes depends on human factors, including system usability, organizational workflow, and user satisfaction. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent residents, family members, and clinicians find a sensor data interface used to monitor elder activity levels usable and useful in an independent living setting. Three independent expert reviewers conducted an initial heuristic evaluation. Subsequently, 20 end users (5 residents, 5 family members, 5 registered nurses, and 5 physicians) participated in the evaluation. During the evaluation, each participant was asked to complete three scenarios taken from three residents. Morae recorder software was used to capture data during the user interactions. The heuristic evaluation resulted in 26 recommendations for interface improvement; these were classified under the headings content, aesthetic appeal, navigation, and architecture, which were derived from heuristic results. Total time for elderly residents to complete scenarios was much greater than for other users. Family members spent more time than clinicians but less time than residents did to complete scenarios. Elder residents and family members had difficulty interpreting clinical data and graphs, experienced information overload, and did not understand terminology. All users found the sensor data interface useful for identifying changing resident activities. Older adult users have special needs that should be addressed when designing clinical interfaces for them, especially information as important as health information. Evaluating human factors during user interactions with clinical information systems should be a requirement before implementation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5, 318–325
Passive Sensor Technology Interface to Assess
Elder Activity in Independent Living
Gregory L. Alexander 4Bonnie J. Wakefield 4Marilyn Rantz 4Marjorie Skubic
Myra A. Aud 4Sanda Erdelez 4Said Al Ghenaimi
bBackground: The effectiveness of clinical information sys-
tems to improve nursing and patient outcomes depends on
human factors, including system usability, organizational
workflow, and user satisfaction.
bObjective: The aim of this study was to examine to what extent
residents, family members, and clinicians find a sensor data
interface used to monitor elder activity levels usable and
useful in an independent living setting.
bMethods: Three independent expert reviewers conducted
an initial heuristic evaluation. Subsequently, 20 end users
(5 residents, 5 family members, 5 registered nurses, and
5 physicians) participated in the evaluation. During the
evaluation, each participant was asked to complete three
scenarios taken from three residents. Morae recorder soft-
ware was used to capture data during the user interactions.
bResults: The heuristic evaluation resulted in 26 recommen-
dations for interface improvement; these were classified
under the headings content, aesthetic appeal, navigation,
and architecture, which were derived from heuristic results.
Total time for elderly residents to complete scenarios was
much greater than for other users. Family members spent
more time than clinicians but less time than residents did to
complete scenarios. Elder residents and family members
had difficulty interpreting clinical data and graphs, experi-
enced information overload, and did not understand ter-
minology. All users found the sensor data interface useful
for identifying changing resident activities.
bDiscussion: Older adult users have special needs that should
be addressed when designing clinical interfaces for them,
especially information as important as health information.
Evaluating human factors during user interactions with clinical
information systems should be a requirement before
bKey Words: gerontology &human factors &passive monitoring &
sensor networks &user-centered design
The use of clinical information systems to gather
health information is increasingly important for cli-
nicians and for patients and their families. Clinical infor-
mation systems are used by healthcare providers to support
clinical decision making to deliver appropriate patient care
and to alert clinicians to potential adverse events. Patients
and their family members are also increasingly savvy in the
use of information systems to access vital healthcare in-
formation (Cresci, Yarandi, & Morrell, 2010). The effec-
tiveness of clinical information systems to provide usable
information for clinicians to appraise and predict nursing
and patient outcomes depends on several factors, including
usability of the information system, presentation of data,
and satisfaction during interactions with the information
system (Alexander & Staggers, 2009).
In independent living settings, use of technology such
as nonwearable sensors can facilitate earlier detection of
changes like reduced activity in an elder’s apartment and
alert providers to intervene earlier (Courtney, Demiris, &
Hensel, 2007). These systems provide new ways of detecting
subtle changes that do not require traditional face-to-face
assessment of individual residents. However, these technol-
ogies must first be evaluated to understand human inter-
actions with them, how the technology functions, and the
environment. This article includes an evaluation of a clinical
information system composed of passive sensors used to
track human motion and physiologic parameters of elders
residing in an independent living facility called TigerPlace.
Residents who are living in independent settings such as
TigerPlace are typically vulnerable to decline, are frail, and
often require some nursing care; therefore, the terms patient
and resident are used interchangeably for the purposes of
this article. The specific aim of this research was to examine
to what extent residents, family members, and clinicians
318 Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5
GregoryL.Alexander,PhD,RN,is Associate Professor, Sinclair
School of Nursing; Bonnie J. Wakefield, PhD, RN, FAAN,
is Associate Research Professor, Sinclair School of Nursing;
Marilyn Rantz, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Professor, Sinclair School of
Nursing; Marjorie Skubic, PhD, is Professor, Electrical and Com-
puter Engineering; Myra A. Aud, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor,
Sinclair School of Nursing; Sanda Erdelez, PhD, is Associate Pro-
fessor, Sinclair School of Nursing; and Said Al Ghenaimi, RN,
MSN, MED-Tech, is Graduate PhD Student, School of Informa-
tion Science and Learning Technologies, University of Missouri,
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct
URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the
HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318225f3e1
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
find the sensor data interface usable and useful in an inde-
pendent living setting.
Clinicians and patients interact with computers on many
levels. Staff nurses and physicians collect information from
their clients, store client information in clinical information
systems, and then retrieve that information for making
clinical decisions. The information is used by clinicians to
keep an ongoing record of events, actions, behaviors, per-
ceptions, and progress made during healthcare encounters.
The effectiveness of clinical information systems that allow
nursing staff to predict nursing and patient outcomes
depends on the usability of the system, organizational work-
flow, and satisfaction with technology. Therefore, under-
standing human interactions with information technology
has the potential to improve clinical processes and patient
outcomes. The following research was guided by a frame-
work for nursing informatics called the NurseYPatient
Trajectory Framework (Alexander, 2007; Figure 1). The
framework utilizes nursing process theory, human factors,
nursing and patient trajectories, and outcomes to evaluate
clinical information systems.
The NurseYPatient Trajectory Framework
The NurseYPatient Trajectory Framework can be used to
predict which information structures, processes, and tech-
nologies can be used to achieve desired outcomes for patients
and providers (Bakken, Stone, & Larson, 2008). Research
using this framework was designed to focus specifically on
how nurses and patients interact with information systems
and how those interactions influence decision making and
outcomes. However, it is also important to consider other
people who interact with nurses and patients as they make
decisions and arrive at outcomes along their trajectories. For
example, nurses assess resident conditions, determine from
these assessments that resident needs may have changed,
take action, and alert physicians or family members that
needs have changed. A thorough discussion of the compo-
nents of the NurseYPatient Trajectory Framework has been
published elsewhere (Alexander, 2007) and will not be
discussed here. However, human factors are a central con-
cept for this article and will be described briefly.
Human Factors For the purpose of this article, human
factors refers to a discipline focused on optimizing the re-
lationship between technology and humans (Alexander,
in press; Czaja & Nair, 2006). For example, in a study com-
paring older users and nonusers in the use of Internet health
information resources, nonusers are more likely to make
healthcare decisions based on information found offline when
compared with Internet users with access to more information
(Taha, Sharit, & Czaja, 2009). Nonusers who do not use
the Internet typically obtain a larger percentage of health
information from newspapers, popular magazines, or the
television, but most of the time, they turn to family and
friends as a source of information (Taha et al., 2009). In
healthcare, human-factors researchers investigate the re-
lationships between patients, their families, and providers;
tools they use, such as the Internet; the environments in
which they live and work; and the tasks they perform.
Human factors concepts guided the selection of methods
for this study.
Passive Sensor Systems in TigerPlace
The purpose of this article was to evaluate whether res-
idents in an independent living center (TigerPlace), resi-
dents’ family members, and healthcare providers find an
interface designed to monitor resident activity levels useful
and usable. During the research, human factors that are
important for the design of sensor systems were examined.
A variety of passive infrared sensors are available for de-
tecting motion, location, falls, and functional activity and
are installed in resident’s apartments in an independent
living setting called TigerPlace. A thorough description of
all sensor modalities and other references used are described
elsewhere (Skubic, Alexander, Popescu, Rantz, & Keller,
2009). Sensor systems are becoming much more common
in research literature, but mostly in other disciplines than
nursing, such as engineering and lived environments and
aging. For example, remote monitoring technology has been
installed in community-living elders’ residences to monitor
meal preparation, physical activity, vitamin use, and per-
sonal care (Reder, Ambler, Philipose, & Hedrick, 2010).
Researchers indicated that elders and their caregivers
experienced peace of mind and greater perceived safety, well-
being, and independence as a result of new monitoring sys-
tems. Another instance includes an Automated Technology for
Elder Assessment, Safety and Environment remote monitoring
system for elders in independent living residences (Feeney-
Mahoney, Mahoney, & Liss, 2009). User subgroups inter-
viewed (residents, family members, management) all shared
concerns about safety and well-being and stated that there is a
need for enhanced monitoring using sensors.
In this study, sensor information was operationalized
as where a patient who is a resident in independent living
spends most of his or her time in an apartment, location
in his or her residence, and physiological data including
FIGURE 1. The NurseYPatient Trajectory Framework.
Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5 Passive Sensor Interface 319
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
measures of restlessness and vital signs, and where certain
activities occur in the elder person’s apartment. For ex-
ample, functional activity data might show that a resident
spends some time during the day in the kitchen and uses
the stove, is frequently up and out of bed during the night
using the bathroom, and while in bed experiences some
periods of restlessness. These data provide an assessment
of the baseline trajectories experienced by patients in
TigerPlace, can be linked to declining activity levels, and
can be used as another source of information for the elec-
tronic health record (Rantz et al., 2010).
Every data element in the network of sensor data can
be visualized on a computer screen through a Web-based
interface that can be used to determine baseline activity
patterns. During this study, researchers wanted to provide
an opportunity for all types of end users, including resi-
dents who lived with the sensors and their family members,
nurses, and physicians, to interact with the interface using
scenario-based think-aloud methods. The aim was to deter-
mine if these end users perceived the sensor interface as
usable and useful.
Interface Development for Sensor Network A subgroup of
the larger Eldertech research team interested in human com-
puter interaction began meeting biweekly in April 2007.
Members of the interdisciplinary group included nurses
with specific expertise in gerontology and others with ex-
pertise in health informatics, engineering, clinical medi-
cine, information science, and physical therapy. By August
2007, the interdisciplinary researchers have developed a
data sensor interface with capability to illustrate sensor data
in different formats. For example, data could be viewed in
histograms, line graphs, and pie charts; users could query
sensor data by date and time of day for each sensor location
(e.g., bed, bedroom, bathroom, closet, front door, kitchen,
living room shower); and users could drill down into smaller
increments of time, ranging across month, week, day, and
hour, to observe trends in different sensor data over a length
of time. Maps of residents’ apartments indicating sensor
placement and range of sensors were integrated into the in-
terface for users. Development occurred through iterative
reviews of the sensor interface and discussions between cli-
nicians who had expertise in caring for gerontological pop-
ulations and designers of the information system. Examples
of the interface are shown in Figures 2a and 2b. The inter-
face was then evaluated using sequential approaches, includ-
ing an expert heuristic review.
Expert Review of the Sensor Interface Three reviewers
trained in usability research and who were independent of the
research team were hired to complete an expert review of the
sensor data interface (Alexander et al., 2008). This review
was completed prior to end user assessments. A heuristic
evaluation checklist was created to suit the interface being
evaluated, keeping in mind the audience of the Web siteV
elderly residents, family members, and healthcare providers.
Individual reviews were conducted before the reviewers
came together for a meeting to discuss each of the items
under the criteria. An overview of this heuristic evaluation is
provided (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which
includes a listing of heuristics used, with a brief heuristic de-
scription, ratings given by expert reviewers, and selected com-
ments made by the reviewers,
Expert Heuristic Evaluation of the Interface Therewere87
items distributed under the 16 heuristic criteria. Twenty-nine
of these items were not applicable to the interface, primarily
because the interface was at a very early stage of develop-
ment. The number of criteria meeting and not meeting
heuristic criteria (or not applicable), percentage agreement
with applicable criteria, and severity ratings have been
described previously (Alexander et al., 2008). On the basis
of this review, the expert team made 26 recommendations
for improvement; these recommendations were categorized
under four themes derived from the heuristic evaluation, in-
cluding content (n= 4), aesthetic appeal (n= 12), navigation
(n= 9), and architecture (n= 1). Interface improvements in
each of these categories would make the interface more
usable and useful for end users. Interface design issues were
addressed by the research team during iterative reviews prior
to the usability assessment.
Specific recommendations within the content area in-
cluded constructing clearer more descriptive titles, for ex-
ample, better labeling methods, adding a description of the
interface on the home page by including descriptions about
interface utilities, and consistently maintaining the same or-
der of legends and keys throughout.
Aesthetic appeal improves as dialogue on the interface
becomes more relevant to the users. The sensor interface
could be improved by adding error messages when a user
clicks on an item not associated with hyperlinks, such as a
graph title. Furthermore, aesthetic appeal would be im-
proved by minimizing the number of new windows that
open with every click of the mouse and when using
zooming in features such as date fields. Finally, providing
greater distinction between line colors on graphs would
improve visibility and readability.
Navigation through the sensor interface could be
enhanced by making the hyperlinked texts more visible with
conventional hyperlink colors, that is, blue for unvisited sites
and purple for visited sites. Another improvement would be
to add navigation options that direct users to specific parts of
the interface, such as a ‘‘Home’’ link that would send users
back to the home page of the interface where they can choose
a new resident. Furthermore, it was recommended to add
prompts that need to be approved by the user before the
application closes. This feature would prevent users from
accidently exiting from a page before they complete reviews.
Finally, the architecture of the interface could be im-
proved by giving users better options for viewing data, for
example, giving users the ability to decide how they want to
look at the data. Architectural options could enhance effi-
ciency of use by enabling users to look at graphs all at one
time on one scrollable page or individual graphs one at a
time. Anchors could be used after each graph to navigate the
user automatically and consistently back to the top of a page
to select preferred views of each graph.
After the expert heuristic review, researchers continued
to meet, and the interface was refined using some of the
suggestions mentioned. Once the research team had ad-
dressed all the recommendations through iterative reviews
of the interface, we began conducting usability assessments.
320 Passive Sensor Interface Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Approval for all research was granted through the uni-
versity’s institutional review board.
Since 2005, the Eldertech research team has been develop-
ing a passive sensor technology system that detects motion
activities in residents in an independent living setting,
TigerPlace (Rantz et al., 2005). Sensor systems have been
installed in 34 residents’ apartments who desire to age in
place. The longevity of the sensor data collection enables
collection of data and developing algorithms for identifying
declining patient trajectories such as increased bed restless-
ness or decline in a resident’s normal daily activity patterns.
Usability Assessments
Both the expert review and end user assessments were
completed with the assistance of the Information Experience
(IE) Lab located on the campus of the University of Missouri.
The IE Lab functions as a testing and evaluation area with
network-enabled data collection workstations using ad-
vanced data collection software such as Morae usability as-
sessment software (Techsmith, Inc., Okemos, MI).
End User Usability Assessments After the expert review,
updates were made to the interface during iterative reviews
conducted by the research team to correct some of findings
from the heuristic evaluation before end user assessments
were conducted. For example, labels were added to graphs,
color schemes were modified, and font sizes were adjusted
so that users could find information more easily on the
interface. After the updates, four groups of end users
(residents, family members, nurses, and physicians) were
recruited to evaluate the interface. The target was five
members per group. This decision was based on evidence
that most usability problems are detected with the first five
FIGURE 2. (a) Activity Motion Sensor Data. (b) Bed breathing sensor data.
Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5 Passive Sensor Interface 321
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
participants, that running additional participants is not
likely to reveal new information, and that great return on
investment is realized with small groups (Turner, Lewis, &
Nielsen, 2006).
Residents who participated in this usability evaluation
were frail and had multiple chronic conditions and most
had mobility problems, representative of most TigerPlace re-
sidents. Therefore, resident usability assessments were con-
ducted at the independent living facility with the assistance of
the IE Lab. Family members and healthcare providers came to
the IE Lab for their usability assessment.
Interviews were conducted with each participant indi-
vidually in a quiet private location. Individual assessments
were recorded directly to a computer hard drive for later
review and analysis. Participants were informed that they
would be participating in a usability study designed to
explore their interactions with a sensor data interface. Each
testing site had two rooms: one for private usability testing
and one for observation of usability participants and cap-
turing interactions using Morae software. Networked com-
puters were used by IE Lab staff and other researchers to
observe the interactions of participants and record obser-
vations simultaneously.
Data Acquisition Morae recorder software was used to
capture data during each interaction. Observational notes
were also recorded by remote observers during the testing.
The interaction data included a video of the participant using
the sensor data interface; audio in the immediate environ-
ment; quantitative data such as keystrokes, mouse clicks, and
window events; text presented to the user; and Web page
changes. Event markers and comments were recorded and
are summarized in the heuristic table (see Table, Supplemen-
tal Digital Content 1,
Event markers were preset to represent situations like ‘‘user
needs help,’’ ‘‘user frustrated,’’ ‘‘start task,’’ and ‘‘end task.’’
Test Setup Prior to testing, each participant was given in-
struction on the user interface by one of the research team
members (a registered nurse certified in humanYcomputer
interaction methods and who had experience with the
interface) using a training manual designed to provide stan-
dardized training about the sensor system for each partici-
pant. This instruction provided information on the purpose
of the sensor systems, how to navigate through the screens to
get through the data, and details about how the data can be
used. Each participant also was informed that Morae
software was used to capture and record his or her inter-
actions with the sensor data interface.
Participants were given three scenarios to complete on three
distinct residents who had sensors installed in their apartments
(see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 2, which provides
study training scenarios, Sce-
narios were developed by expert geriatric registered nurses
who were part of the research team investigating the sensor
data network. Scenarios were developed around periods
when residents experienced known sentinel events (e.g.,
hospitalization, decline in health, falls). Scenario 1 included
sensor data around a period when a resident experienced a
hospitalization after an acute illness at home. Scenario 2
included a period when a resident was not feeling well, had
decreased activity levels in the apartment, and was spending
more time in bed. Scenario 3 included information on a
restless resident who was moving back and forth between a
bed and a chair at night to get more comfortable during sleep.
Actual resident data were deidentified.
Participants were asked to complete each scenario using
the sensor data interface; they were asked to ‘‘think aloud’’
as they progressed through the scenarios, verbally indicat-
ing their thought processes as they began to search through
the sensor activity data using the scenarios as their guide.
The Morae software was activated at the beginning of the
instruction for the sensor data interface and digital record-
ings made throughout each scenario for later comparison.
Each participant’s interaction was timed using the Morae
After the usability test, each participant was asked to
complete a short survey. The survey asked participants to
provide demographic information about their age, job ex-
perience, how much Web experience they have had, educa-
tion level, and daily use of Web.
Data Analysis Time statistics by activities and tasks were
analyzed, including total time spent on introduction and tu-
torials. Timed tests and interface-related issues were com-
pared within the group of residents and clinician users.
Results are described using the 16 heuristic categories and
summarized qualitative and quantitative data collected dur-
ing the interviews.
Usability Assessments
A total of 20 end usersV5 from each group of residents,
family members, nurses, and physiciansVparticipated in
this study. The demographics of the users obtained from a
short survey collected at the time of assessments are de-
scribed next, followed by results of data collected during
user interactions. Total time on activities and scenarios was
collected using Morae software.
Residents Participating residents were all over the age of
70 years. Four female residents and one male resident com-
pleted usability assessments. Two of the users had used com-
puters before; three had never used computers. None of the
residents had seen the sensor data interface before.
Generally, the total time to complete activities and
tasks on the interface was higher for elderly residents when
compared with other users. Every resident took nearly an
hour to get through the tutorial. Interviewers halted the
interactions at an hour to limit respondent burden during
interactions. Most residents only partially completed the
scenarios in this amount of time. Residents required
assistance by interviewers during their interactions with
the sensor data interface. In fact, one resident did not get
through the tutorial to be able to use scenarios and view
sensor data. Residents had difficulty manipulating the
mouse, and the interviewer had to assist the residents in
entering date ranges into fields, which increased time to
complete activities. Residents experienced difficulty manip-
ulating the mouse over text boxes, often repeatedly clicking on
parts of the interface just next to text boxes. (For other issues,
322 Passive Sensor Interface Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 3, which describes
resident interactions,
Family Members Participating family members were between
the ages of 35 and 65 years old. Four women and one man
were interviewed. Two of these participants had 10 or more
years, two had 5Y9 years, and one had less than 4 years of
Internet experience. Participant relations were son-in-law,
daughter, and stepdaughter. None of the family members had
used the interface before.
Family members’ time spent learning the interface during
the tutorial ranged from 7 to 19 minutes. Similarly, family
members individually spent 8Y15 minutes reviewing sensor
data after each scenario was read and after initial data entry
was accomplished to retrieve sensor data. Family members
spent more time reviewing sensor data on the Scenario 3
(average of 13 minutes) and the least time on Scenario 2
(average of 10 minutes).
Nurses Participating nurses ranged in age from 40 to 60 years
old. The nurses were women with 20 or more years of work
experience and included one clinical educator, two assistant
professors, one nurse clinician, and one nurse care coordina-
tor. All the nurse participants had 9 or more years of Internet
experience. None of the nurses had seen the sensor data in-
terface before.
Nurses took nearly 8 minutes to complete the sensor
interface tutorial. They consistently spent between 10 and
12 minutes completing each of the scenarios after reading
the scenario and providing initial data entry. Nurses spent
most of their time, nearly 12 minutes, on Scenario 1. They
spent the least amount of time, just under 11 minutes, on
Scenario 2.
Physicians Physicians were 40Y60 years old and included
two women and three men. Practice disciplines were family
practice, geriatrics, and general internal medicine. All par-
ticipants had 10 or more years of Internet experience. Only
one of the physicians had seen the interface.
Physicians spent 7Y12 minutes learning how to use the
interface before moving on to scenarios. Physicians each
averaged 9Y13 minutes completing the scenarios. They spent
the most time reviewing sensor data on Scenario 1 (just more
than 15 minutes). They took the least time (just less than
8 minutes) reviewing data related to Scenario 2.
Group Observations Observations from the four user groups
were performed (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 3, which
categorized within heuristics,
Overall, and not surprisingly, a greater number of issues
were identified in the resident group, which substantially
increased their time to complete activities. For example,
residents had more difficulty viewing data; they had some
difficulty interpreting graphs, thought there was too much
information, and did not understand the terminology.
However, all of the users found the information com-
forting. Family members thought the interface would be
very useful for remotely monitoring the health and physi-
cal activities of their family; for example, one family
member expressed that she would use the sensor data to
monitor her mother’s sleep patterns because her mother has
Alzheimer’s and tends to forget (see Table, Supplemental
Digital Content 4, which provides comments by user group, All residents stated that
collecting this information made them feel safer, knowing
that someone was watching for changes in activity levels and
potential health problems.
Users identified some persistent problems previously
identified by the expert review panel using the heuristic
criteria (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, For example, under Heu-
ristic 4, the expert reviewer noted color usage in the graphs as
problematic. In some instances, colors lacked adequate contrast
and were too similar, so locations of sensors within the apart-
ment could be confused. All user groups noted problems with
color selections on the interface (see Table, Supplemental
Digital Content 3, Another
color issue was identified via Heuristic 2, indistinctive color
(e.g., it is difficult to discriminate orange and red restlessness).
Size of the data points (too small) was identified in Heuristic 7,
and font size issues were addressed in Heuristic 12. Most
residents had difficulty seeing the information on the screen
because the font was too small and there was no way to adjust it
on the screen. To overcome this problem, some residents
selected contrasting backgrounds of black or white to enhance
Under Heuristic 10, the experts identified that navigation
was difficult and information was not easy to find. Again, the
residents had problems because there was too much informa-
tion displayed or they felt overwhelmed by the charts. All
users found some parts of the display confusing; for exam-
ple, the stove temperature sensor was listed in the same
vicinity on the interface with other physiological parameters.
The placement and labeling of the stove sensor information
confused users because the labels did not represent the users’
terminology consistently (temperature in a healthcare record
usually means body temperature, but in this case, it meant
stove temperature).
During the test session, the nurses and physicians often
used the data to interpret clinical information. For example,
healthcare providers watched for warning signs by paying
close attention to resident activities within the apartment.
When clinicians noticed changes in activities, they attempted
to determine if it was prior to a change in patient status, such
as increasing bed restlessness prior to hospitalization. Both
nurses and physicians found the data useful for interpreting
health status. However, residents and family members had
more difficulty interpreting the sensor output because they
did not know what normal activity was for an individual
or age group (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 4, This could have contrib-
uted to their increased time to complete activities. Despite
problems noted by users, comments made during interactions
illuminate how useful the sensor data could be to assist in
monitoring for changing trajectories of frail elderly residents
living independently.
The results support recent research advocating that older
adults have special needs that should be addressed when
designing interfaces for them, especially information as im-
portant as health information used to make decisions about
Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5 Passive Sensor Interface 323
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
their healthcare (Czaja, Sharit, Nair, & Lee, 2008). Design-
ing health information systems with the needs of older end
users in mind is important to maximize their interactions
with these devices. Using these user-centric design principles,
human factors allow older end users to incorporate wanted
technologies into their daily lives more easily, and they find
the information more useful. A result of enhanced usefulness
and usability is greater acceptance and satisfaction with tech-
nology and potentially improved patient trajectories (Figure 1).
Evaluating human factors during user interactions with clin-
ical information systems should be a requirement before any
field implementation. In addition, end user involvement is
critical to identify important problem areas that can be over-
looked during iterative reviews by developers who have dif-
ferent requirements and needs.
In this study, residents, family members, and clinicians
found the interface useful for identifying the level of activ-
ities for residents who had the sensor systems installed;
residents found the data less useful. Residents indicated that
they already know their activity levels, and therefore, they
did not find the information helpful. However, residents did
report a sense of security knowing that someone was watch-
ing out for them when they were alone in their apartment.
The sensors and data provided a safer environment for them.
All resident users felt the sensor data would be useful for
healthcare providers and family members to monitor them
for changes in activity levels. All residents interviewed were
willing to share their sensor data information with their
families and providers.
Clinicians who had experience working with elderly in-
dividuals in the community claimed that access to this type of
sensor interface data would definitely help them make better
decisions in the field about the residents. Usability issues
encountered did not deter them from attempting and, in most
cases, successfully finding altered activity levels within res-
ident’s data. This discovery was completed with minimum
assistance on the part of the investigator conducting the us-
ability interviews. Clinician users discussed important issues
that still need to be addressed with the sensor data and inter-
face, including developing better ways to visualize the data
to detect changes from normal baseline activity levels and
using terminologies and parameters for physiological mea-
sures that match the real world of healthcare providers. Im-
proving visual acuity and screen readability has the effect of
improving clinician interactions with technology by making
clinical information more accessible, understandable, and
consistent with clinician work. These attributes of clinical
information improve information flow along trajectories and
can enhance nursing and patient outcomes (Figure 1).
Methodological Issues
Important methodological issues were discovered. First,
although a standardized training manual was used, the in-
troduction and tutorial to familiarize users with the interface
could have been delivered in a more standardized way. This
would ensure that the participants knew all the necessary
details about the interface before testing began. Second, to
conduct quantitative user analysis, clear instructions should
be given to the evaluator for the scenario start and end to
compare these times consistently between users and user
groups. The users should be asked to read the scenario and
their understanding of the scenario should be clarified before
starting the usability assessment. Third, evaluators should
decide beforehand when tasks or scenarios should begin.
Time frames to consider include when the user starts reading
the scenario, when the user starts typing in the details to
access the data related to the scenario, or when the user starts
interpreting the graphs that are illustrated. Finally, the
evaluator should decide beforehand what would be the task
end measure, for example, when the user says they are done
or when the user clicks on the Home button.
The effectiveness of clinical information systems to provide
useful information for clinical decision making is depen-
dent on the usability of system, data presentation, the match
between the real world of end users and the system, and the
satisfaction of users during interactions. There are important
considerations for different types of users based on age, vo-
cation, and experience. This is particularly true in healthcare
settings, where users are of a wide range of age and expe-
rience and have multiple types of jobs. Evaluation of human-
to-computer interactions in healthcare settings will lead to
improvements in the development of clinical information
systems and greater understanding of how information can
be used, which will positively impact care delivery processes,
clinical decision making, and healthcare outcomes.
Accepted for publication April 27, 2011.
This project was supported by Grant K08HS016862 from the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Grant 90AM3013
from the U.S. Administration on Aging’s Technology to Enhance
Aging in Place at TigerPlace, and Grant IIS-0428420 from the
National Science Foundation’s ITR Technology Interventions for
Elders With Mobility and Cognitive Impairments projects.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not
necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality, the U.S. Administration on Aging, or the
National Science Foundation.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Corresponding author: Gregory L. Alexander, PhD, RN, Sinclair School
of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 (e-mail:
Alexander, G. L. (2007). The NurseYPatient Trajectory Framework.
MEDINFO, 910Y914.
Alexander, G. L. (in press). Human factors. In V. Saba & K.
McCormick (Eds.), Essentials of nursing informatics (5th ed.,
chap. 8). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Alexander, G. L., Rantz, M. J., Skubic, M., Aud, M. A., Wakefield,
B., Florea, E., et al. (2008). Sensor systems for monitoring func-
tional status in assisted living facility residents. Research in Ger-
ontological Nursing,1,238Y244.
Alexander, G. L., & Staggers, N. (2009). A systematic review of the
designs of clinical technology: Findings and recommendations
for future research. Advances in Nursing Science,32,252Y279.
Bakken, S., Stone, P. W., & Larson, E. L. (2008). A nursing in-
formatics research agenda for 2008Y18: Contextual influences
and key components. Nursing Outlook,56, 206Y214.
Courtney, K. L., Demiris, G., & Hensel, B. K. (2007). Obtrusiveness
of information-based assistive technologies as perceived by older
adults in residential care facilities: A secondary analysis. Medical
Informatics and the Internet in Medicine,32,241Y249.
324 Passive Sensor Interface Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Cresci, M. K., Yarandi, H. N., & Morrell, R. W. (2010). The
digital divide and urban older adults. Computer, Informatics,
Czaja, S. J., & Nair, S. N. (2006). Human factors engineering
and systems design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human
factors and ergonomics (3rd ed., pp. 32Y53). Hoboken, NJ:
Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Nair, S. N., & Lee, C. C. (2008). Older adults
and the use of e-health information. Gerontechnology,7, 97.
Feeney-Mahoney, D., Mahoney, E. L., & Liss, E. (2009). AT
EASE: Automated Technology for Elder Assessment, Safety,
and Environmental monitoring. Gerontechnology,8,11Y25.
Rantz, M. J., Marek, K. D., Aud, M., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M.,
Demiris, G., et al. (2005). A technology and nursing collaboration
to help older adults age in place. Nursing Outlook,53,40Y45.
Rantz, M. J., Skubic, M., Alexander, G. L., Popescu, M.,
Aud, M. A., Wakefield, B. J., et al. (2010). Developing a com-
prehensive electronic health record to enhance nursing care
coordination, use of technology, and research. Journal of
Gerontological Nursing,36,13Y17.
Reder, S., Ambler, G., Philipose, M., & Hedrick, S. (2010).
Technology and long-term care (TLC): A pilot evaluation of
remote monitoring of elders. Gerontechnology,9,18Y31.
Skubic, M., Alexander, G. L., Popescu, M., Rantz, M. J., &
Keller, J. (2009). A smart home application to eldercare: Cur-
rent status and lessons learned. Technology and Health Care,
Taha, J., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. J. (2009). Use of and satisfaction
with sources of health information among older internet users
and nonusers. Gerontologist,49, 663Y673.
Turner, C. W., Lewis, J. R., & Nielsen, J. (2006). Determining
usability test sample size. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International
encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (2nd ed., pp.
3084Y3088). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nursing Research September/October 2011 Vol 60, No 5 Passive Sensor Interface 325
Copyright @ 201 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
... Example research-grade devices are the Actigraph w3GTX-BT [10] or Actigraph 9GTX-LINK [11]. Usability testing relies on heuristic evaluations [12][13][14][15][16][17], a smart wearable device evaluation framework from our previous research [18], cognitive walk-throughs with think-aloud protocols [19,20], interviews, surveys to identify user perceptions of ease of use and usefulness such as the System Usability Scale (SUS) [21,22], technology acceptability and appropriateness, and implementation factors. Figure 1 shows an overview of our stepwise evaluation methodology. ...
... Testing involves stepping through scenarios of use based on scripted workflows to validate features and function. Instruments include the SUS [21,22], feature evaluation checklists, heuristic evaluations [12][13][14][15][16][17], and subjective documentation of lab team members' user experiences. Evaluators test technical function by wearing test devices and research-grade devices as control comparisons, performing sets of scripted activities and logging daily activities to compare the relative performance of device measurements. ...
Full-text available
Physiological and behavioral sensors on consumer-grade wearable devices have great potential to inform augmented cognition applications in everyday living. However, lack of understanding of usability and function of new devices when embedded within larger technical systems is a barrier to their implementation in translational research. Practical evaluation methods are needed to overcome this fundamental barrier in a rapidly changing consumer-grade device landscape. We describe a stepwise evaluation methodology developed in our lab that is designed to rapidly evaluate and position consumer-grade sensors for use in larger studies.
... With the lack of offline services, the physical condition of the elderly is in greater danger of worsening, which can cause high levels of stress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, and social isolation. Thus, to respond effectively to the needs of the elderly during the COVID-19 crisis, innovative online solutions based on ICTs are needed for personalized interventions [44]. In the future, as the importance of non-face-to-face service increases, this study is expected to provide basic knowledge for the development of such interventions for the elderly. ...
Full-text available
Elderly people are sensitive to loneliness, which may contribute to mental and physical health, serious illness, and increased mortality. This study investigates the development trend of information communication technology (ICT) interventions designed for the elderly to reduce loneliness and synthesize its effect. We searched relevant articles on 23 May 2020 using three databases: Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two authors. The development is changing from animal robots to online social platforms and from simple emotional support to a multifaceted system that promotes social participation, cognition, physical activity, and nutrition. Our systematic review reported that ICT interventions are being developed to alleviate loneliness and increase social participation. Our study revealed an increase in the use of ICT interventions among the elderly and a positive change in their attitude toward ICT interventions. ICT interventions in the field of nursing should continue to be developed in the future to meet social, health, and safety needs. In the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ICT interventions are needed to respond effectively to the needs of the elderly. This study is expected to provide basic knowledge for the development of ICT interventions for the elderly.
... A direct user interface may not be suitable for some older people, particularly for those living with cognitive decline. A number of systems have been developed that use motion sensor technologies to passively monitor the home environment and send alerts when certain out-of-the-ordinary events occur [37,38], and future developments should consider the integration of such systems. ...
Full-text available
Background Smart home and telemonitoring technologies have often been suggested to assist health care workers in supporting older people to age in place. However, there is limited research examining diverse information needs of different groups of health care workers and their access to appropriate information technologies. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the issues associated with using technologies that connect older people to their health care providers to support aging in place and enhance older people’s health and well-being. Methods Seven focus group discussions were conducted comprising 44 health care professionals who provided clinic-based or in-home services to community-dwelling older people. Participants were asked about their information needs and how technology could help them support older people to age in place. The recordings of the sessions were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results The perspectives varied between the respondents who worked in primary care clinics and those who worked in community-based services. Three overarching themes were identified. The first theme was “access to technology and systems,” which examined the different levels of technology in use and the problems that various groups of health care professionals had in accessing information about their patients. Primary care professionals had access to good internal information systems but they experienced poor integration with other health care providers. The community-based teams had poor access to technology. The second theme was “collecting and sharing of information,” which focused on how technology might be used to provide them with more information about their patients. Primary care teams were interested in telemonitoring for specific clinical indicators but they wanted the information to be preprocessed. Community-based teams were more concerned about gaining information on the patients’ social environment. The third theme was that all respondents identified similar “barriers to uptake”: cost and funding issues, usability of systems by older people, and information security and privacy concerns. Conclusions The participants perceived the potential benefits of technologies, but they were concerned that the information they received should be preprocessed and integrated with current information systems and tailored to the older people’s unique and changing situations. Several management and governance issues were identified, which needed to be resolved to enable the widespread integration of these technologies into the health care system. The disconnected nature of the current information architecture means that there is no clear way for sensor data from telemonitoring and smart home devices to be integrated with other patient information. Furthermore, cost, privacy, security, and usability barriers also need to be resolved. This study highlights the importance and the complexity of management and governance of systems to collect and disseminate such information. Further research into the requirements of all stakeholder groups and how the information can be processed and disseminated is required.
... However, the use of such technologies raises many concerns and challenges around privacy and decision autonomy of older adults (Nambiar et al., 2016). Examples of successful applications of these sensor technologies can be observed in facilities such as Tiger Place, which utilize sensor technologies to create an aging in place living environment (Alexander et al., 2011b;Rantz et al., 2008Rantz et al., , 2015Tyrer et al., 2006). Moreover, Tiger Place has developed a care model, which intertwines personal care while leveraging existing and emerging technologies to help promote early illness recognition, fall detection, and enhanced health outcomes (TigerPlace Institute, 2020). ...
Full-text available
Gerontological Social Work education has been substantially altered by the advancement of today’s digital technologies, influencing both the training and tools required to ensure student success in social work research, policy, and practice. The goal of this paper is to present the state of the science on gerontological digital social work education, identify implications for emerging technologies, and define areas for social work student competencies and proficiencies to advance the field of gerontological digital social work. This paper underlines the role of gerontological digital social work education in preparing future researchers, practitioners, and policymakers when engaging in Digital Therapeutic Teams. We provide insightful considerations pertaining to emerging technologies which present unique opportunities for innovation. Furthermore, this paper presents training and education opportunities for social work education in preparing future gerontologist practitioners, researchers, and policymakers to engage in multidisciplinary team efforts and leverage digital technologies and digital therapeutics.
Full-text available
This paper proposes and describes an unsupervised computational model that monitors an elderly person who lives alone and issues alarms when a risk to the elderly person’s well-being is identified. This model is based on data extracted exclusively from passive infrared motion sensors connected to a ZigBee wireless network. The proposed monitoring system and model is non-intrusive, does not capture any images, and does not require any interaction with the monitored person. Thus, it is more likely to be adopted by members of the elderly population who might reject other more intrusive or complex types of technology. The developed computational model for activity discovery employs a kernel estimator and local outlier factor calculation, which are reliable and have a low computational cost. This model was tested with data collected over a period of 25 days from two elderly volunteers who live alone and have fairly different routines. The results demonstrate the model’s ability to learn relevant behaviors, as well as identify and issue alarms for atypical activities that can be suggestive of health problems. This low-cost, minimalistic sensor network approach is especially suited to the reality of underdeveloped (and developing) countries where assisted living communities are not available and low cost and ease of use are paramount.
Full-text available
A literature review to support the development of a technology roadmap for the Australian aged care sector.
Background: Our purpose is to provide evidence that health information technology should be a mainstay of all future health and social support services for older people globally, both within and across community and residential care services. Methods: This work was conducted in two phases. In phase I, the authors conducted a focused exploration by selecting a convenience sample of four long term care health information technology roadmaps, developed by members of four different long term care health information technology collaboratives in United States, Australia, United Kingdom, and New Zealand. During Phase II the research team carried out an extensive systematic review of existing literature sources (2000-2018) to support roadmap assumptions. Results: Using converging domains and content, we offer recommendations among five aged care roadmap domains: Strategy/Vision, Continuing Care Community, Services and Support Provided, External Clinical Support, and Administrative. Within these domains we provide recommendations in five content areas: Innovation, Policy, Evaluation, Delivery Systems and Human Resources. We recommend future strategies for LTC HIT roadmaps that include 61 emphasis areas in aged care in these content areas and domains. Conclusions: The roadmap provides a navigation tool for LTC leaders to take a strategic and comprehensive approach as they harness the potential of health information technologies to address the challenges and opportunities of LTC in the future.
Full-text available
Background The increase in life expectancy and recent advancements in technology and medical science have changed the way we deliver health services to the aging societies. Evidence suggests that home telemonitoring can significantly decrease the number of readmissions, and continuous monitoring of older adults’ daily activities and health-related issues might prevent medical emergencies. Objective The primary objective of this review was to identify advances in assistive technology devices for seniors and aging-in-place technology and to determine the level of evidence for research on remote patient monitoring, smart homes, telecare, and artificially intelligent monitoring systems. Methods A literature review was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Xplore, ProQuest Central, Scopus, and Science Direct. Publications related to older people’s care, independent living, and novel assistive technologies were included in the study. Results A total of 91 publications met the inclusion criteria. In total, four themes emerged from the data: technology acceptance and readiness, novel patient monitoring and smart home technologies, intelligent algorithm and software engineering, and robotics technologies. The results revealed that most studies had poor reference standards without an explicit critical appraisal. Conclusions The use of ubiquitous in-home monitoring and smart technologies for aged people’s care will increase their independence and the health care services available to them as well as improve frail elderly people’s health care outcomes. This review identified four different themes that require different conceptual approaches to solution development. Although the engineering teams were focused on prototype and algorithm development, the medical science teams were concentrated on outcome research. We also identified the need to develop custom technology solutions for different aging societies. The convergence of medicine and informatics could lead to the development of new interdisciplinary research models and new assistive products for the care of older adults.
Full-text available
Background: Independent Living Residences (ILRs) for elders are becoming a popular and less expensive option than assisted living facilities. ILRs, however, operate with minimal professional staffing and new ways are needed to provide oversight of increasingly frail and/or confused elders who live alone. Objective: To gain an understanding of the elders, families and staff concerns in ILRs and to investigate whether remote residential monitoring, using off-the-shelf wireless sensors, might address these concerns. Methods: Mixed methods approach. Phase 1 qualitative research involved eight sets of focus groups comprised of either elderly residents from ILRs, relatives of residents, building managers and superintendents, or affiliated nurse practitioners (NPs) providing residential services. Phase 2 implementation built the system in response to end users input. Detailed testing of signal reliability and validity occurred. Phase 3 involved an 18 month implementation period with 10 sets of end users using the system for at least 4 months each. End user sets –residents, family members, building staff and nurse practitioners were assessed pre and post implementations. Results: Across the end user subgroups concerns varied but they all shared in common worries about the safety and well-being of the residents. Specific memory related issues included medications, meals, and shutting off the toilet/bath water. The Automated Technology for Elder Assessment, Safety and Environment (AT EASE) remote home monitoring system was developed to uniquely tailor the type of sensor and activities monitored to the individual’s particular concern(s). Initial reliability trials uncovered severe signal interference for the X10 based wireless sensor system. This resulted in a redesign and successful deployment of a Zigbee based system. Moreover for the first time alert information was triaged to multiple parties, authorized as recipients, and occurred without any data security breaches. For example, only the building superintendent would receive the toilet overflow alert, the family member the missed meal or medication alert and the nurse practitioner when several medications were missed. Conclusions: Multiple safety and well being concerns arose that could be addressed through sensor based residential monitoring but most residents underestimated their personal vulnerability. Key to acceptance was the residents' perceived need and usefulness of the system to maintain independence and prevent being relocated to a more restrictive environment. Families found the system easy to use and were very satisfied. Building staff highly valued the water overflow alerts and having an additional means to oversee residents’ safety that did not increase their workload. NPs were non-adopters (feared information overload) favoring personal interaction with residents to medication compliance monitoring. End users favored passive alert notices, (over proactively monitoring the website site for residents’ status) that were few in number, and valid. They did not want to monitor the monitoring data and believed that accurate alerting was critical and achieved.
Full-text available
Purpose of the study To conduct a pilot implementation and evaluation of how a new sensor technology for remote monitoring of elders can support elders living at home. Design and Methods The study population is community-dwelling elders and their family and/or paid caregivers. The technology was installed in twelve elders’ homes. For three months the sensors monitored four activities (meal preparation, physical activity, vitamin use, and personal care) and conveyed summary information to the elder, family caregiver and/or paid caregiver. This study evaluated the use of and satisfaction with the technology, change in the elders’ perceived safety and well-being, change in elders’ and family caregivers’ communication patterns, and change in family caregiver burden. Results All subjects used the technology, would recommend it to others, and were generally satisfied with the technology. Elders and caregivers used the technology as a passive alert system, a reminder for elders to conduct daily activities, and as communication enhancement. Elders reported an increase in their perceived safety, well-being, peace of mind and independence. Family caregivers also reported an increase in their peace of mind. An absence of privacy issues and good usability facilitated user satisfaction while intermittent mechanical and software problems were identified as barriers. Implications The remote monitoring technology has promise for supporting elders in independent living situations. A study with a larger sample size and fully operational equipment should be conducted prior to large scale implementation. A cost analysis of our technology for long term care is also recommended.
Full-text available
The cumulative binomial probability formula (given appropriate adjustment of p when estimated from small samples) provides a quick and robust means of estimating problem discovery rates (p). This estimate can be used to estimate usability test sample size requirements (for studies that are underway) and to evaluate usability test sample size adequacy (for studies that have already been conducted). Further research is needed to answer remaining questions about when usability testing is reliable, valid, and useful.
Full-text available
This article provides results of an expert review of data displays for a sensor system used to monitor functional abilities in older adults. The research took place at TigerPlace, an assisted living facility where the sensor system is currently being evaluated. A checklist of 16 heuristic criteria was used to evaluate the sensor data displays, with consideration to the users of the system: residents, their families, and health care providers. Results of this expert review indicate that flexibility and efficiency of use, help and documentation, navigation, and skills were not well developed in the sensor data displays. Conversely, sensor data displays were rated highly for their aesthetic value and the ample visual contrast on the main display components. Through the use of a sensor system, new ways of detecting functional decline in elderly residents of assisted living facilities can be accomplished.
Full-text available
As in acute care, use of health information technology in long-term care holds promise for increased efficiency, better accuracy, reduced costs, and improved outcomes. A comprehensive electronic health record (EHR), which encompasses all health care measures that clinicians want to use-both standard health care assessments and those acquired through emerging technology-is the key to improved, efficient clinical decision making. New technologies using sensors to passively monitor older adults at home are being developed and are commercially available. However, integrating the clinical information systems with passive monitoring data so that clinical decision making is enhanced and patient records are complete is challenging. Researchers at the University of Missouri (MU) are developing a comprehensive EHR to: (a) enhance nursing care coordination at TigerPlace, independent senior housing that helps residents age in place; (b) integrate clinical data and data from new technology; and (c) advance technology and clinical research.
IntroductionDefinition of a SystemSystem Design ProcessConclusions References
Computers and the Internet offer older adults opportunities and resources for independent living. However, many urban older adults do not use computers. This study examined the demographic, health, and social activities of urban older adults to determine variables that might predict the use and nonuse of computers in this population. A secondary data analysis was performed using the 2001 Detroit City-Wide Needs Assessment of Older Adults (n = 1410) data set. Logistic regression was used to explore potential differences in predictor variables between computer users and nonusers. Overall, computer users were younger (27%), had a higher level of education, were more likely to be employed, had an annual income greater than $20,000, and were healthier and more active than nonusers. They also were more likely to have memberships in community organizations and do volunteer work. Preferred computer activities included conducting Internet searches, playing games, writing, and communicating with family members and friends. The results suggest significant differences in demographic and health-related characteristics between computer users and nonusers among urban older adults. Although about a quarter of participants in this study used computers, the Digital Divide continues to exist in urban settings for scores of others.
Older adults generally have an increased need for health care information. Whereas some use the Internet to look for this information, others use more traditional sources. This study gathered data from older adults to determine their health information needs, the perceived usefulness of sources of health information, and if there are differences in perceptions and use of health information between Internet users and nonusers. We conducted 9 focus groups-4 groups of Internet users (n = 27) and 5 groups of non-Internet users (n = 26)-to determine reasons for seeking health information, satisfaction with information, and use of the Internet to fulfill information needs. Data from focus groups were supplemented with questionnaire data. Those who do not use the Internet were found to be just as satisfied with the health information they find as those who search for information online. We also found that nonusers are more likely to make health care decisions based upon information found offline than Internet users who have access to more information. Nonusers may find it quicker to look for information through traditional media sources and stay offline, thus limiting their information options. Strategies for encouraging Internet use and programs to teach effective searching skills are needed. Physicians could also direct older patients toward credible health information Web sites.
Human factors (HF) studies are increasingly important as technology infuses into clinical settings. No nursing research reviews exist in this area. The authors conducted a systematic review on designs of clinical technology, 34 articles with 50 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings were classified into 3 categories on the basis of HF research goals. The majority of studies evaluated effectiveness of clinical design; efficiency was fewest. Current research ranges across many interface types examined with no apparent pattern or obvious rationale. Future research should expand types, settings, and participants; integrate displays; and expand outcome variables.