Reoperations After the Ross Procedure in Adults: Towards Autograft-Sparing/Ross Reversal

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
The Journal of heart valve disease (Impact Factor: 0.75). 07/2011; 20(4):425-32.
Source: PubMed


BaCKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The risk of reoperation and loss of a second native valve is a major drawback of the Ross operation. The study aim was to examine the indications, pathologies, procedures, and outcomes for reoperation after the Ross procedure, emphasizing the potential for autograft salvage.
Between 1994 and 2009, a total of 60 reoperations was performed on 55 patients who previously had undergone the Ross procedure. Attention was focused on 49 patients with first-time reoperation for autograft or allograft-related problems (37 males, 12 females; mean age 49 +/- 14 years). At the original operation, 23% of patients had a history of endocarditis, 14% a previous valve replacement, and 61% a bicuspid aortic valve. The original implant technique was full root in 88% of cases, inclusion root in 2%, or subcoronary implant in 9%. Autograft and aortic indications (n = 38) included root and ascending aorta dilatation (53%), structural valve cusp deterioration (32%), endocarditis (11%), and technical failure (5%). Regurgitation was moderate to severe in 97% of cases. Pulmonary indications (n = 21) were allograft degeneration (71%), endocarditis (10%), and Ross reversal (19%). The autograft and aorta reoperation procedures (n = 38) included ascending aorta replacement (n = 2), David reimplantation (n = 1), valve repair (n = 2), valve replacement (n = 13), and root replacement (n = 22). Pulmonary valve replacements (n = 21) were with pulmonary allograft in 12 cases and autograft (Ross reversal) in nine. Twelve of the pulmonary valve replacement group, including the Ross reversals, were combined aortic and pulmonary. During the last 13 reoperations, only two autografts were lost, both of which were potentially salvageable.
No intraoperative adverse events or postoperative deaths occurred, and minimal morbidity was observed. During the follow up period there was one death, while two patients required reoperation (one for endocarditis and one non-valve-related).
Reoperation at up to 12 years after a Ross procedure was most commonly required for autograft failure, and less often for allograft degeneration. Of reassurance to prospective Ross patient was the finding that reoperation can be performed safely, and that the autograft can be salvaged either by repair and valve-sparing reimplantation in the aortic position, or by Ross reversal.

Download full-text


Available from: Sreekumar Subramanian
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reinterventions after the Ross procedure are a concern for patients and treating physicians. The scope of the present report was to provide an update on the reinterventions observed in the large patient population of the German-Dutch Ross Registry. From 1988 to 2011, 2023 patients (age, 39.05 ± 16.5 years; male patients, 1502; adults, 1642) underwent a Ross procedure in 13 centers. The mean follow-up was 7.1 ± 4.6 years (range, 0-22 years; 13,168 patient-years). In the adult population, 120 autograft reinterventions in 113 patients (1.03%/patient-year) and 76 homograft reinterventions in 67 patients (0.65%/patient-year) and, in the pediatric population, 14 autograft reinterventions in 13 patients (0.91%/patient-year) and 42 homograft reinterventions in 31 patients (2.72%/patient-year) were observed. Of the autograft and homograft reinterventions, 17.9% and 21.2% were performed because of endocarditis, respectively. The subcoronary technique in the adult population resulted in significantly superior autograft durability (freedom from autograft reintervention: 97% at 10 years and 91% at 12 years; P < .001). The root replacement technique without root reinforcement (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.1) and the presence of pure aortic insufficiency preoperatively (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.5) were statistically significant predictors for a shorter time to reoperation. The center volume had a significant influence on the long-term results. The freedom from homograft reoperation for the adults and pediatric population was 97% and 87% at 5 years and 93% and 79% at 12 years, respectively (P < .001), with younger recipient and donor age being significant predictors of a shorter time to homograft reoperation. The autograft principle remains a valid option for young patients requiring aortic valve replacement. The risk of reoperation depends largely on the surgical technique used and the preoperative hemodynamics. Center experience and expertise also influence the long-term results. Adequate endocarditis prophylaxis might further reduce the need for reoperation.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2012 · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Reports of the long-term outcome after the David procedure in different valve pathologies are limited. We compared our results in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves, including those who required additional cusp repair. Methods: Between 1997 and 2011, 236 patients (76% males; mean age, 56 ± 15; range, 12 to 79 years) underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) for aortic regurgitation and were prospectively followed up clinically and echocardiographically. Results: The follow-up was 94% complete. Cumulative follow-up time was 896 patient-years (mean follow-up time, 4.5 ± 2.7; range, 0.6 to 13.7 years). The 30-day mortality was 1.7% (4 of 236), and late mortality was 4% (10 of 232), with one cardiac-related death due to aortic valve regurgitation. Overall freedom from valve replacement was 94% and 87% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In 201 patients with tricuspid aortic valves, freedom from reoperation was 94% and 90% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. This was comparable to the 53 patients with bicuspid aortic valves, with a freedom from reoperation of 97% at 5 years (p = 0.632). Forty-two patients (18%) required additional cusp repair and had a 100% freedom from reoperation at 5 years. Overall, 10 patients (4%) required reoperation, with a mean interval of 11.5 ± 10.7 months. Reasons for reoperation were recurrent aortic valve regurgitation grade II (n = 6), aortic stenosis (n = 2), endocarditis (n = 1), and a ruptured central plication (n = 1). Conclusions: The David procedure revealed excellent long-term outcomes independently from the valve morphology. Rates of reoperations and valve-related morbidity were acceptably low. Additional cusp repair was no predictor for failure of this procedure.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2012 · The Annals of thoracic surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Dilatation of the pulmonary autograft is a major fear after the Ross procedure. We analyzed the results after reoperation for autograft dysfunction using a valve-sparing reimplantation technique (David procedure). Methods From 1995 to 2012, 645 Ross operations were performed, with 630 (98%) of these as freestanding root replacements (mean follow-up, 8.3 ± 4.6 years). Forty-nine autograft reoperations occurred in 46 patients (0.89%/patient-year). Between 2005 and 2013, reoperation using a David procedure was performed in 18 of 35 patients (52%) with autograft dilatation at a mean interval of 11 ± 3.2 years after the Ross operation. Results The mean age of 18 patients receiving a David procedure as reoperation was 49.8 ± 13.9 years; 83% were male. The 30-day reoperative mortality was zero. The mean vascular graft size used for reimplantation was 29.5 ± 1.7 mm. At a mean follow-up time of 3.2 ± 2.3 years (100% complete), all patients (18 of 18) were alive and in New York Heart Association functional class I. One patient (5%) needed valve replacement for recurrent aortic regurgitation 2.6 years after the David procedure. In the remaining patients (95%), freedom from aortic regurgitation of grade 2 or greater was 100% at 3 years (regurgitation grade <1, 14 of 17; 82%). Aortic valve gradients were clinically insignificant at 5.8 ± 2.1 mm Hg. Conclusions Performing a David procedure was successful in the vast majority of patients with dilatation of the pulmonary autograft after a Ross operation and revealed good function of the preserved autograft at midterm follow-up. Reoperations could be performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2014 · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery