Acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male Sprague-Dawley rats: Effects of cocaine dose but not initial locomotor response to cocaine

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.88). 08/2011; 219(4):1089-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2438-6
Source: PubMed


We have previously described a model in which adult outbred male Sprague-Dawley rats are classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on acute cocaine-induced open-field activation. This model revealed important individual differences in cocaine's effects, including that LCRs exhibited greater responding than HCRs on a progressive ratio schedule of cocaine reinforcement. However, no LCR/HCR differences in acquisition of cocaine self-administration (0.25 mg/kg/12 s infusion) were observed under these conditions.
To determine if LCRs and HCRs differ in the effectiveness of cocaine to function as a reinforcer under a broader range of conditions, the present study assessed the acquisition of cocaine self-administration (fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement) as a function of i.v. cocaine dose (0.1875, 0.375, 0.5, 1, or 1.5 mg/kg/6 s infusion).
LCRs and HCRs did not differ significantly on any measure of acquisition examined, including the day to meet acquisition criterion, percent acquired, and cocaine intake. The effect of dose on percent acquired and rate of acquisition peaked at the 1-mg/kg/infusion dose of cocaine. In contrast, the effect of dose on cocaine intake was linear, with the highest rate of intake occurring at the 1.5-mg/kg/infusion dose of cocaine.
LCRs and HCRs do not appear to differ in their acquisition of cocaine-reinforced operant responding across a range of cocaine doses, including conditions that lead to high levels of cocaine intake.

Download full-text


Available from: Bruce Mandt, Sep 16, 2014
  • Source
    • "cantly more than controls . In contrast , the RYO TPM group were responding at significantly higher levels than controls during FR1 and throughout the FR2 and FR5 periods . Interestingly , rats rapidly acquire self - administration on FR1 of drugs with relatively high abuse potential , such as methamphetamine ( Brennan et al . 2010a ) or cocaine ( Mandt et al . 2012 ) ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nicotine self-administration in rats is the most widely used animal model of tobacco dependence. There is increasing evidence, however, that non-nicotinic constituents in smoke contribute to addiction and that different tobacco products contain varying levels of these constituents. The present study firstly sought to compare self-administration of pure nicotine to tobacco particulate matter (TPM) to determine if there were differences in reward-efficacy attributable to the non-nicotine constituents. Secondly, cigarette and roll-your-own (RYO) TPM groups were included and compared to determine whether different formulations of non-nicotinic constituents could impact reward. Briefly, male Sprague Dawley rats were implanted with indwelling jugular catheters for self-administration (n = 76). The reinforcing efficacy of infusions of nicotine (0.0 or 30.0 μg/kg/infusion) versus cigarette/RYO TPM (with matched nicotine content) was determined using spontaneous acquisition of self-administration on a fixed ratio schedule. The progressive ratio schedule was then employed to determine the motivation to receive each drug and within-subject dose–response curves were also produced (7.5, 15.0, 30.0 and 60.0 μg/kg/infusion nicotine). The main finding was that the RYO TPM was more reinforcing and produced a different profile of reward-related behaviour compared with both the nicotine and the cigarette TPM groups. The conclusions were that non-nicotinic components have a role in tobacco dependence and that some tobacco products could have higher abuse liability, irrespective of nicotine levels.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2013 · Addiction Biology
  • Source
    • "We have since conducted a more thorough assessment of acquisition in LCRs and HCRs using a wider range of cocaine doses (0.14, 0.29, 0.38, 0.77, and 1.15 mg/kg/i.v. infusion delivered over 6-sec; Mandt et al., 2012b). Despite extensive testing, we have not found LCR/HCR differences in the acquisition of cocaine self-administration. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individual differences are a hallmark of drug addiction. Here, we describe a rat model based on differential initial responsiveness to low dose cocaine. Despite similar brain cocaine levels, individual outbred Sprague-Dawley rats exhibit markedly different magnitudes of acute cocaine-induced locomotor activity and, thereby, can be classified as low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs). LCRs and HCRs differ in drug-induced, but not novelty-associated, hyperactivity. LCRs have higher basal numbers of striatal dopamine transporters (DATs) than HCRs and exhibit marginal cocaine inhibition of in vivo DAT activity and cocaine-induced increases in extracellular DA. Importantly, lower initial cocaine response predicts greater locomotor sensitization, conditioned place preference and greater motivation to self-administer cocaine following low dose acquisition. Further, outbred Long-Evans rats classified as LCRs, versus HCRs, are more sensitive to cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. Overall, results to date with the LCR/HCR model underscore the contribution of striatal DATs to individual differences in initial cocaine responsiveness and the value of assessing the influence of initial drug response on subsequent expression of addiction-like behaviors.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013 · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Source
    • "We are interested in factors that occur earlier in the drug-taking process, and we have recently established a method for measuring cocaine consumption during the earliest stages of self-administration . This method defines acquisition based on intake criteria and then measures each subject's postacquisition intake relative to the day of acquisition (day x), allowing for experimental manipulations after very limited initial cocaine exposure (Mandt et al., 2012). One factor postulated to be important for the transition from recreational drug use to addiction is sensitization (Robinson and Berridge, 1993, 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cocaine addiction is a significant and complex disease. Part of this complexity is caused by the variability of the drug experience early in drug use (initial responsiveness, amount of use, etc.). In rats, individual differences in initial cocaine responsiveness and cocaine self-administration history both predict the development of cocaine sensitization, a putative mechanism contributing to the development of cocaine addiction. Here, we sought to determine the role of these factors and cocaine dose on the development of sensitization to cocaine's motivational effects during the earliest stages of self-administration. Rats were classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on acute cocaine-induced locomotor activity (10 mg/kg i.p.) before learning to self-administer cocaine (0.6 mg/kg/infusion i.v.) under a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement. After acquisition, rats self-administered cocaine (0.6 or 1.2 mg/kg/infusion) under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement either immediately or after an additional five FR1 sessions (0.6 or 1.2 mg/kg/infusion). No LCR/HCR differences in sensitization were observed. However, regardless of LCR/HCR classification, exposure to the higher dose of cocaine produced sensitization to cocaine's motivational effects on the PR schedule (i.e., increased break points) and an escalation of consumption on the FR schedule. Thus, our results reveal a novel model for studying escalation and sensitization very early after acquisition and suggest that sensitization may be important in the earliest stages of the cocaine addiction process.
    Preview · Article · Apr 2012 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Show more