... Indeed, largely using samples of reported sexual assault, scholars have analyzed relevant characteristics linked to decision-making and have found practitioners relied on both case and extralegal characteristics. Existing literature on the impact of case and extralegal characteristics have been mixed, however, and some have found availability of physical evidence, presences of witness(es), victim injury, offender weapon use, prompt report of victimization, victim resistance, high assessment of victim credibility, victim substance use, non-white victims, and non-stranger relationships were significantly and positively related to officers' decisions to arrest (Alderden & Ullman, 2012a, 2012bKaiser et al., 2017;O'Neal et al., 2019;Spohn & Tellis, 2019;Tasca, Rodriguez, Spohn, & Koss, 2013;Venema et al., 2021) and prosecutors' decisions to charge (Beichner & Spohn, 2005;Kerstetter, 1990;Spohn & Holleran, 2001;Wentz & Keimig, 2019). Conversely, others found nonsignificant or negative associations between availability of physical evidence, witness(es) availability, victim injury, offender weapon use, prompt report of victimization, victim resistance, high assessment of victim credibility (e.g., no risktaking behaviors, high moral character, no discrepancies in legal statements, no arrest history), victim substance use, non-white victims, and non-stranger relationships and decisions to arrest (Alderden & Ullman, 2012a;Bouffard, 2000;O'Neal et al., 2019;Scott & Beaman, 2004;Spohn & Tellis, 2019;Wentz, 2020;Ylang & Holtfreter, 2020) or charge a suspect (Bouffard, 2000;Holleran, Beichner, & Spohn, 2010;Kerstetter, 1990;Spears & Spohn, 1997;Spohn & Holleran, 2001;. ...