Evidence of the Trade-Off between Starvation and Predation Risks in Ducks

Université de Strasbourg, IPHC, Strasbourg, France.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 07/2011; 6(7):e22352. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022352
Source: PubMed


The theory of trade-off between starvation and predation risks predicts a decrease in body mass in order to improve flight performance when facing high predation risk. To date, this trade-off has mainly been validated in passerines, birds that store limited body reserves for short-term use. In the largest avian species in which the trade-off has been investigated (the mallard, Anas platyrhynchos), the slope of the relationship between mass and flight performance was steeper in proportion to lean body mass than in passerines. In order to verify whether the same case can be applied to other birds with large body reserves, we analyzed the response to this trade-off in two other duck species, the common teal (Anas crecca) and the tufted duck (Aythya fuligula). Predation risk was simulated by disturbing birds. Ducks within disturbed groups were compared to non-disturbed control birds. In disturbed groups, both species showed a much greater decrease in food intake and body mass during the period of simulated high risk than those observed in the control group. This loss of body mass allows reaching a more favourable wing loading and increases power for flight, hence enhancing flight performances and reducing predation risk. Moreover, body mass loss and power margin gain in both species were higher than in passerines, as observed in mallards. Our results suggest that the starvation-predation risk trade-off is one of the major life history traits underlying body mass adjustments, and these findings can be generalized to all birds facing predation. Additionally, the response magnitude seems to be influenced by the strategy of body reserve management.

Download full-text


Available from: Cedric Zimmer, Mar 05, 2014
  • Source
    • "Songbirds are believed to trade off their body weight between the countering demands of winter survival and escaping predation (Witter & Cuthill 1993;MacLeod, Clark & Cresswell 2008;Creswell, Clark & Macleod 2009;Zimmer et al. 2011), since layering on adipose tissue reduces their chances of emaciation when food is scarce but likely decreases their acceleration when fleeing a predator (Kullberg, Fransson & Jakobsson 1996; Pennycuick 2008; see also Schultner et al. 2013). Similarly, when harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena are regularly preyed upon by dolphins, they become much sleeker, carrying substantially less body fat (MacLeod et al. 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We humans know we are not physically fit unless we do extra, voluntary exercise. Yet we have never asked whether the same is true for animals. If it is, then give that energy will be spent keeping fit this raises important issues about new energetic trade-offs, which have never been considered.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Journal of Animal Ecology
  • Source
    • "Hence, our study shows that the reduction of body mass in a natural situation might as much as double the effect reported in captivity. On the other hand, it is similar to the 6–16 % reduction reported for Anatidae species chased by a radio-controlled car in indoor experiments (Zimmer et al. 2011), but these large animals store much more reserves and face a much lower starvation risk than the passerines (Zimmer et al. 2011). It is also within the range of the daily variation in body mass reported for Titmice (7–12 %; Haftorn 1989) and similar to the seasonal winter variation found in Blackbirds (13 %; McLeod et al. 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The body mass of birds is the result of a trade-off between predation and starvation risks. According to the mass-dependent predation hypothesis, birds reduce their body mass when predation risk increases. Many studies have supported this hypothesis, but it has rarely been possible to investigate the mass-dependent predation risk response by comparing individuals of the same species foraging simultaneously at the same location, in the field and facing a real (not simulated) risk of predation. Wintering Siskins (Carduelis spinus) are divided in two subpopulations: residents, which stay in a foraging area for several weeks or months, and transients, which only remain a few hours or days. In this paper, we present a natural experiment by comparing the body mass variation of resident and transient Siskins between a period of the wintering season without avian predators and another period with a Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) that was hunting regularly. We found that resident Siskins reduced their body mass with the presence of the hawk, while transients did not. Since in a previous study with no avian predators at the study area it was found that the difference in body condition between residents and transients did not vary throughout the wintering season, we can confidently say that the reduction in body mass observed in this study was directly linked to the presence of the hawk. We additionally found that this reduction was not associated with the dominance of residents over transients. We discuss the advantages of residence related to the knowledge of actual predation risk. Our results strongly support the mass-dependent predation hypothesis.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014
  • Source
    • "This can be done by using a widely used methodology scoring the time, the accuracy and the risk of a decision. A growing amount of literature describes economics in humans (Farmer and Foley 2009; Glimcher 2009), and eco-ethology in birds making compromises between starvation, predation and reproduction (Zimmer et al. 2011; Higginson et al. 2012; Grodzinski and Johnstone 2012; Meunier and Kölliker 2012). Numerous studies have been carried out on social cognition in primates (Addessi et al. 2011a; Pelé et al. 2011; Addessi et al. 2011b; Fletcher et al. 2012) but also birds (Mettke-Hofmann et al. 2002; Dufour et al. 2012; Krama et al. 2012) and carnivores (Topal et al. 2009; Leonardi et al. 2012), and other publications describe market or reciprocal exchanges of commodities (Fruteau et al. 2009; van de Waal et al. 2012; Wei et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to maximize their fitness, animals have to deal with different environmental and social factors that affect their everyday life. Although the way an animal behaves might enhance its fitness or survival in regard to one factor, it could compromise them regarding another. In the domain of decision sciences, research concerning decision making focuses on performances at the individual level but also at the collective one. However, between individual and collective decision making, different terms are used resulting in little or no connection between both research areas. In this paper, we reviewed how different branches of decision sciences study the same concept, mainly called speed-accuracy trade-off, and how the different results are on the same track in terms of showing the optimality of decisions. Whatever the level, individual or collective, each decision might be defined with three parameters: time or delay to decide, risk and accuracy. We strongly believe that more progress would be possible in this domain of research if these different branches were better linked, with an exchange of their results and theories. A growing amount of literature describes economics in humans and eco-ethology in birds making compromises between starvation, predation and reproduction. Numerous studies have been carried out on social cognition in primates but also birds and carnivores, and other publications describe market or reciprocal exchanges of commodities. We therefore hope that this paper will lead these different areas to a common decision science.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2013 · Animal Cognition
Show more