ArticlePDF Available
HBR.ORGJUNE 
reprint F1106D
DEFEND YOUR RESEARCH
What Makes a
Team Smarter?
More Women
by Anita Woolley and Thomas Malone
Defend Your Research
HBR: But gender does play a role?
Malone: It’s a preliminary nding—and
not a conventional one. The standard
argument is that diversity is good and you
should have both men and women in a
group. But so far, the data show, the more
women, the better.
Woolley: We have early evidence that per-
formance may atten out at the extreme
end—that there should be a little gender
diversity rather than all women.
You realize you’re saying that groups of
women are smarter than groups of men.
Woolley: Yes. And you can tell I’m hesitat-
ing a little. It’s not that I don’t trust the data.
I do. It’s just that part of that nding can be
The finding: There’s little correlation between a group’s collective
intelligence and the IQs of its individual members. But if a group
includes more women, its collective intelligence rises.
The research: Professors Woolley and Malone, along with Chris-
topher Chabris, Sandy Pentland, and Nada Hashmi, gave subjects
aged 18 to 60 standard intelligence tests and assigned them
randomly to teams. Each team was asked to complete several
tasks—including brainstorming, decision making, and visual
puzzles—and to solve one complex problem. Teams were given
intelligence scores based on their performance. Though the
teams that had members with higher IQs didn’t earn much higher
scores, those that had more women did.
The challenge: Are brainy people overrated? Are women the true
key to success? Professors Woolley and Malone, defend your
research.
Thomas Malone
(malone@mit.edu)
is the Patrick J.
McGovern Professor
of Management at
the MIT Sloan School
of Management
and the founding
director of the MIT
Center for Collective
Intelligence.
explained by dierences in social sensitiv-
ity, which we found is also important to
group performance. Many studies have
shown that women tend to score higher on
tests of social sensitivity than men do. So
what is really important is to have people
who are high in social sensitivity, whether
they are men or women.
So you didn’t see a negative correlation
with individual IQs—just a very weak
positive correlation. In theory the 10
smartest people could still make a great
group, right?
Woolley: In theory, yes, the 10 smartest
people could make the smartest group,
but it wouldn’t be just because they were
the most intelligent individuals. What do
you hear about great groups? Not that the
members are all really smart but that they
listen to each other. They share criticism
constructively. They have open minds.
They’re not autocratic. And in our study
we saw pretty clearly that groups that had
smart people dominating the conversation
were not very intelligent groups.
Can teams be too group oriented?
Everyone is so socially sensitive that
there’s no leader?
Woolley: Anecdotally, we know that
groups can become too internally focused.
Our ongoing research suggests that teams
need a moderate level of cognitive diver-
sity for eectiveness. Extremely homoge-
neous or extremely diverse groups aren’t
as intelligent.
In some ways, your findings seem
blindingly obvious: that teams are
more than just a collection of the best
talent.
Anita Woolley
(awoolley@
cmu.edu) is an
assistant professor
of organizational
behavior and
theory at Carnegie
Mellon University.
Woolley: We’ve replicated the nd-
ings twice now. Many of the factors you
might think would be predictive of group
performance were not. Things like group
satisfaction, group cohesion, group
motivation—none were correlated with
collective intelligence. And, of course,
individual intelligence wasn’t highly cor-
related, either.
Malone: Before we did the research, we
were afraid that collective intelligence
would be just the average of all the
individual IQs in a group. So we were
surprised but intrigued to nd that group
intelligence had relatively little to do with
individual intelligence.
What Makes a
Team Smarter?
More Women
2 Harvard Business Review June 2011
IDEA WATCH
HBR puts some surprising findings to the test
Malone: Sure. This is well-known in sports.
Our study shows it with intellectual tasks.
We realized that intelligence tests are a way
to predict individuals’ performance on a
range of tasks, but no one had thought of
using the same approach to predict group
performance.
Woolley: There was a step change in
psychology once the eld had an empirical
method of measuring individual intelli-
gence through IQ tests. We’re hopeful that
this work can create a similar seismic shift
in how we study groups.
Can we design teams to perform better?
Malone: We hope to look at that in the fu-
ture. Though you can change an individu-
al’s intelligence only so much, we think it’s
completely possible to markedly change
a group’s intelligence. You could increase
it by changing members or incentives for
collaboration, for instance.
Woolley: There is some evidence to sug-
gest that collective intelligence exists at the
organizational level, too. Some companies
that do well at scanning the environment
and setting targets also excel at manag-
ing internal operations and mentoring
employees—and have better nancial per-
formance. Consistent performance across
disparate areas of functioning suggests
an organizational collective intelligence,
which could be used to predict company
performance.
So this phenomenon could extend beyond
the small groups you studied?
Malone: Families, companies, and cities
all have collective intelligence. But as
face-to-face groups get bigger, they’re less
able to take advantage of their members.
That suggests size could diminish group
intelligence. But we suspect that technol-
ogy may allow a group to get smarter as it
goes from 10 people to 50 to 500 or even
5,000. Google’s harvesting of knowledge,
Wikipedia’s high-quality product with
almost no centralized control—these are
just the beginning. What we’re starting to
ask is, How can you increase the collective
intelligence of companies, or countries,
or the whole world?
HBR Reprint FD
The Female Factor
HIGH
AVERAGE
LOW
COLLECTIVE
INTELLIGENCE
 
% OF
WOMEN
The chart plots the collective
intelligence scores of the 192
teams in the study against the
percentage of women those
teams contained. The red bars
indicate the range of scores in
the group of teams at each level,
and the blue circles, the average.
Teams with more women tended
to fall above the average; teams
with more men tended to fall
below it.
Harvard
Business
Review
Follow
the
Reader
hbr.org
The Revival of Smart
16425_HBR_1third_vert.indd 3 12/3/10 1:16 PM
FOR ARTICLE REPRINTS CALL  OR , OR VISIT HBR.ORG
Many factors you
might think would
be predictive of
group performance
were not. Group
intelligence had little
to do with individual
intelligence.
... Conventional literature emphasizes the economic and structural factors, such as organizational structures, resources, capabilities, skills, approaches, systems, styles, and so on (Christensen et al. 2004;Tanveer et al. 2013;Usman et al. 2021). However, with the current advancement in the literature, human capital is now considered an important element of innovation (Woolley and Malone, 2011). Consequently, attention has also been diverted to identifying women's role/contribution/impact as a leader in shaping corporate innovation (Carayannis, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
The nexus between women leadership and corporate innovation in the context of developing world is key objective of this. To evaluate such narrative, firm-level data is acquired using World Bank data, and a sample of approximately 20,000 observations from 29 developing nations was collected over a four-year period (2015–2018). The findings support the hypothesis and verify significantly positive relationship between women in leadership roles and corporate innovation. These findings verify the Upper Echelons (UE) and Critical Mass (CM) theories which state that gender-based diversity among business leaders/top management impacts strategic decision-making, such as corporate innovation. Moreover, female representation in top management can bring diverse viewpoints, capabilities, knowledge, and customs which improve the functions and outcomes of the organization.
... A well-publicised finding in Woolley et al. [9] stems from the claim that a higher proportion of women improves the groups' collective intelligence [47,48]. We therefore performed a robustness check using one-way ANOVA, which corroborated our correlational analysis by revealing that the proportion of females in the groups had no discernible effect on the group-IQ composite performance, F(6, 22) = 1.2, p = .34 ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/objectives The concept of a general factor of collective intelligence, proposed by Woolley et al. in 2010, has spurred interest in understanding collective intelligence within small groups. This study aims to extend this investigation by examining the validity of a general collective intelligence factor, assessing its underlying factor structure, and evaluating its utility in predicting performance on future group problem-solving tasks and academic outcomes. Methods Employing a correlational study design, we engaged 85 university students in a series of complex cognitive tasks designed to measure collective intelligence through individual, group, and predictive phases. Results Contrary to the hypothesized single-factor model, our findings favor a two-factor model influenced by Cattell’s theory of crystalized and fluid intelligence. These two factors accounted for substantial variance in group performance outcomes, challenging the prevailing single-factor model. Notably, the predictive validity of these factors on group assignments was statistically significant, with both individual and collective intelligence measures correlating moderately with group assignment scores (rs = .40 to .47, p < .05). Conclusions Our research suggests that collective intelligence in small group settings may not be uniformly governed by a single factor but rather by multiple dimensions that reflect established theories of individual intelligence. This nuanced understanding of collective intelligence could have significant implications for enhancing group performance in both educational and organizational contexts. Future research should explore these dimensions and their independent contributions to group dynamics and outcomes.
... Diverse teams tend to have more divergent thinking, higher productivity, and better-quality end-products [35,77,78]. Having more women on teams can improve team processes [79,80]. Yet, diversity can increase conflict and reduce trust, which can negatively affect team performance [81]. ...
Chapter
This descriptive study reports norms for team process and outcome measures for various populations. We collected the data using the Comprehensive Assessment of Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME) Team Tools system. We observed gender differences for Task Conflict and Psychological Safety with small effect sizes. We observed differences on multiple team process variables with a range of effect sizes based on reported race/ethnicity, with some effect sizes approaching moderate (d > 0.5). We discuss possible explanations for systematic differences, but report no evidence that can support any particular explanation. Instructors should know that such differences exist to consider how those differences might affect their interpretation of peer evaluation data.
... Research indicates that groups operate with greater intelligence than individuals. 53 When more women engage in the group, collective intelligence grows. Additionally, cohesion is not tied to race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender, but rather to shared goals and objectives. ...
Article
Full-text available
The 2022 National Security Strategy underscores the United States' challenges amid the era of great-power competition, characterized by shifting geopolitical dynamics and a complex rules-based order. Meeting these challenges necessitates forging partnerships and alliances, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, a region of paramount importance to US security and prosperity. This study focuses on the implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) initiative in the Indo-Pacific, capturing insights from US personnel on the ground. It delves into the progress and hurdles of the WPS initiative, exploring its potential contributions to bolstering partnerships. Moreover, the study examines partner nations' perceptions and responses to this agenda. The findings not only shed light on the current landscape but also offer recommendations for future strategic endeavors. In a dynamic global context, this research informs strategies to enhance US engagement and security. *** T he 2022 National Security Strategy illuminates the considerable challenges confronting the United States within the current dynamics of international relations during the era of the great-power competition. Strategic competition plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of the international order. In contrast to the post-Cold War era, heightened geopolitical rivalries, nationalism, and populism are prevalent, presenting formidable obstacles to the maintenance of a rules-based order that underpins global peace and prosperity. The trajectory of these challenges and opportunities navigated by the United States will profoundly influence the nation's future security and prosperity. A cornerstone strategy emphasized in the National Security Strategy involves cultivating a network of alliances and partnerships that uphold and solidify US principles and institutions. A robust and cohesive NATO, alliances in the Indo-Pacific, and security partnerships spanning various geographical regions offer platforms that foster collaboration among nations, thereby fortifying the international order. Within the Indo-Pacific region, the People's Republic of China
Article
The gender gap in engineering is one of the problems in achieving gender equality in society. In this context, the "Engineering with a Gender Perspective" project, an equality initiative developed at the Higher Polytechnic School of Zamora (HPSZ), University of Salamanca, aims to understand the university community’s perception of the gender gap and gender equality and to promote interest in STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) subjects, particularly among female students. To achieve these objectives, a questionnaire tailored to Engineering and Architecture, which had previously been validated for Computer Engineering, was administered and discussed to the entire educational community at the HPSZ. The first WE (Women in Engineering) Challenge Competition was also launched for pre-university students. The challenges, devised by women, were designed to demonstrate the relevance of engineering in everyday life, to inspire pre-university students to pursue STEAM disciplines. The study examines responses to the questionnaire from both students and faculty at the HPSZ, analysing differences in perceptions between men and women regarding gender equality, the gender gap, and gender stereotypes. The findings indicate significant differences in perceptions of the gender gap, particularly among the student population. However, there are no significant differences in views on gender equality and gender stereotypes. Overall, the university community at the HPSZ recognises the importance of achieving gender equality and eliminating stereotypes. Nevertheless, there seems to be some uncertainty regarding their stance on the gender gap issue. Active engagement across all educational levels, focusing on early education, is crucial for reducing inequality in the STEAM field, eradicating gender stereotypes, and fostering interest in STEAM disciplines.
Chapter
Private higher education has made a significant contribution to Kenya’s capacity to meet demand for tertiary education, enrolling between 15 and 20% of the university students for the past three decades. The sector remains central to Kenya’s development agenda, particularly in meeting its ambition to improve gross enrollment in higher education from 7% to 15% as outlined in the National Education Sector Strategic Plan, 2018–2022. The policy environment has been supportive with the state formulating policies to encourage public–private partnerships in the provision of higher education. The legal basis for the participation of the private sector in the provision of university education is derived from the Universities Education Act No. 42 of 2012, which established the Commission for University Education. The supportive policy environment notwithstanding, the contribution of the private higher education sector to the growth of higher education in Kenya is not well-researched and understood. This chapter examines the contribution of the sector to the development of higher education in Kenya, focusing on its history, ownership, financing and management, programs of study, staff and student establishment. The chapter also delves into critical concerns such as the role of the sector in addressing gender inequities, marginalization of poor households on matters of access to higher education, quality, and quality assurance issues including employability of graduates from private universities and their level of participation in research.
Article
Full-text available
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector in Serbia is fast growing and in constant high demand for qualified workforce. In order to continuously fulfil the demand, the National strategy for gender equality defined as one of the actions, requalification of the unemployed women for different ICT profiles. Investing in education is the policy of creating human capital that influences the overall development of the society. Women empowerment through education is recognized as one of the prerequisite for sustainable ICT workforce generation. Data science represents particularly important field of ICT which is still in its development phase in Serbia. All industries with transaction-based processes and industries that use connected or mobile devices or similar, which generate high volumes of data on a daily bases can benefit from application of data science in terms of increased profits and ROI. While developing data science in Serbia and during the peak of productivity in the overall ICT sector, it is important to acknowledge the lack of women in technology, why that is detrimental to progression, and to take intentional actions to overcome this issue. This paper addresses these issues and points to the large gender gap in ICT higher education which consequently shapes the ICT labor market and the workplace. In the paper we give an overview of the state of the art and perspective actions in the domain of higher education of female data scientists in Serbia, and highlight the opportunities for further improvements.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.