Rapid Community Participatory Assessment of Health Care in Post-Storm New Orleans

University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
American journal of preventive medicine (Impact Factor: 4.53). 12/2009; 37(6 Suppl 1):S237-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.007
Source: PubMed


Hurricane Katrina and levee failures disrupted healthcare access for hundreds of thousands of New Orleans residents. Few models exist to explain community stakeholders' priorities for post-disaster recovery while building capacity for response. This project engaged community stakeholders in a rapid, participatory assessment of health priorities 1 year post-disaster, to inform the policy process and build capacity for recovery planning among community members.
This project combined community-based participatory research methods and rapid assessment procedures to engage diverse community members in design, conduct, data interpretation, and dissemination of results. Thirty stakeholders in the health and healthcare fields were interviewed in Summer 2006, and four grassroots community discussion groups were held in New Orleans neighborhoods to assess perceptions of the disaster's impacts on healthcare access. Interview transcripts were reviewed in Summer 2006, and themes were elicited using methods rooted in grounded theory. Findings were shared at a public community feedback conference, and recovery-relevant community action steps were set in motion.
Three main themes emerged from the data: (1) healthcare access challenges; (2) unmet needs of specific vulnerable populations; (3) opportunities, resources, and community adaptations to improve healthcare access.
This rapid, community-based participatory assessment provided new information on diverse community members' concerns and priorities, and it produced a sustainable community-academic partnership dedicated to improving both access to care and the public's health following this major disaster.

Download full-text


Available from: Lawrence A Palinkas
  • Source

    Preview · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Journal publication is only one of many obstacles to increased and fuller flow of research into practice, from the process by which research is conceived, reviewed and funded, to how researchers are trained and promoted, to how studies are synthesized for guidelines and other policy decisions. Some of these factors have been examined recently, specifically in relation to HIV-AIDS studies.35 The RWJF Clinical Scholars and their colleagues have demonstrated in their papers in this supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine several of the ways more participatory and practice-based research can contribute to closing some of these gaps. A meeting of journal editors and other organizations came to consensus on the need to address issues of external validity more systematically and on a series of practical measures to improve the applicability of the research they publish. Similar attention needs to be paid to other opportunities between the conception of research questions and the dissemination of research products to increase their relevance to practice (Table 1).
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2009 · American journal of preventive medicine
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Population-based demands for trauma services have accelerated interest in the rapid deployment of efficacious interventions to address the diverse mental health consequences of traumatic experiences. However, optimal strategies for supporting either implementation or dissemination of trauma-focused interventions within healthcare or mental healthcare systems are underdeveloped. This work offers suggestions for adapting treatment research parameters in order to advance the science on the implementable and practical use of trauma-focused interventions within a public health framework. To this end, we briefly examine the current status of research evidence in this area and discuss efficacy and effectiveness treatment research parameters with specific attention to the implications for developing the research base on the implementation and dissemination of effective trauma practices for children and adolescents. Examples from current studies are used to identify approaches for developing, testing and enhancing strategies to roll out effective treatment practices in real-world settings. New approaches that reflect the contexts in which these practices are implemented may enhance the feasibility, acceptability, replicability and sustainability of trauma treatments and services, and thus improve outcomes for a broader population of youth and families.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2010 · General hospital psychiatry
Show more