ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

This article looks at some ethical challenges in cosmetic surgery. Enhancement versus therapy, risks, patient autonomy, beneficence and informed consent are issues that need to be considered when considering cosmetic surgery in today's world.
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics Vol IV No 4 October- December 2007
[ 171 ]
C0MMent
Concerns about cosmetic surgery
AVINASH DE SOUSA
Consultant psychiatrist. Carmel 18 St Francis Avenue, Willingdon colony, Santacruz West, Mumbai 400 054 INDIA
e-mail: avinashdes999@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
This article looks at some ethical challenges in cosmetic surgery.
Enhancement versus therapy, risks, patient autonomy, beneficence
and informed consent are issues that need to be considered when
considering cosmetic surgery in today’s world.
Altering human physical appearance is as old as recorded
history. Evolutionary biologists have linked our desire for
altering the body to innate biological drives for partner
selection and reproduction. We currently stand at a unique
point in the history of such practices. Our unprecedented
ability to alter human appearance raises new questions
about the nature of non-therapeutic, cosmetic surgery, and
the justification for altering the body for purposes other than
to cure diseases. Science and technology offer us genetic
engineering and gene therapy, prosthetic limbs and brain
computer interfaces that change what we mean by human
enhancement (1).
People have often questioned the justification for undergoing
surgery to alter appearance rather than to cure infirmity. Many
studies have failed to demonstrate the safety and long-term
efficacy of certain cosmetic surgery procedures. There are
additional risks in surgeries of long duration and in multiple
surgeries. There is little work in this field on issues such as
surgical experimentation and innovation; nor has it drawn up
accepted guidelines of practice (2). Such issues are important
because implicit in the practice of cosmetic surgery is the
notion that physical beauty as defined by certain social norms
is not only a goal to strive for, but also a goal for which one
might undergo a potentially risky procedure. There is also the
question of whether cosmetic surgery should resist or cater to
a patient’s desires (3).
Enhancement versus therapy
Ethical arguments in support of cosmetic surgery have focused
on the notion of altering the human form for benefits that lie
on the hazy boundary between enhancement and therapy (4).
Others view the pursuit of aesthetic improvement as either a
personal vanity or a lamentable submission to the superficial
priority placed on appearance in a corrupted society (5).
Major questions arise from these tensions. Should cosmetic
surgery be a matter of consumer desire alone, that does not
need medical justification? Is it then removed from the realm of
medicine as we commonly understand it? As it becomes more
widely used one must ask: what are appropriate or “correct”
applications for such surgery? When is it inappropriate?
Should cosmetic surgery be used to help people conform to
media messages of what is considered beautiful? Given that
beauty is defined by the culture dominant within a society,
should cosmetic surgery be used to change ethnic traits?
Does cosmetic surgery violate some notion of justice when
it is available only to those who are wealthy? Should there
be guidelines for the use of cosmetic surgery on children
and teenagers? Should there be an age for consent to such
procedures? While there are no definitive answers to these
questions they are of critical importance today with the
increase in cosmetic surgery in ethnic alteration, and with the
emergence of new possibilities. It is thus essential to define the
legitimate and illegitimate uses of cosmetic surgery (6).
Beneficence and nonmaleficence
Beneficence means an ethical duty to maximise benefit. Non-
maleficence refers to the duty to reduce risk. Physicians have a
duty not only to avoid harm to the patient but also to weigh
the risks of the surgery with the needs of the patient and to
offer a plan that will provide him or her maximum benefit. If
patient benefit is not the ultimate outcome then the principle
of beneficence is violated. Taking this argument forward, one
must ask whether catering to the patients desire for cosmetic
change is in the patient’s best interests. It is challenging to
apply this principle with respect to cosmetic surgery. Measuring
benefits like long-term outcomes and quality of life is difficult
and few studies on the long-term positive effects of cosmetic
surgery exist (7).
Risk is the probability of negative consequences of a desired
action. All surgery involves risk and this risk must be fairly well
defined before surgery is undertaken. While cosmetic surgery
may involve relatively modest risks, they do exist. Professional
groups must work to ensure, to the extent possible, that
such surgeries are held to the highest medical standards and
complications minimised. The profession is also responsible
for ensuring that the public is always informed of all the
risks involved. The lack of self-regulation and the increase in
ambulatory clinics have increased the risks faced by people
undergoing cosmetic surgery. There is a need to maintain
professional standards and regulate the practice of cosmetic
surgery (8).
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics Vol IV No 4 October-December 2007
[ 172 ]
Autonomy
The principle of autonomy is based on the idea that we have
the capacity to make choices. We have the right to determine
what will happen to our own bodies. Patient autonomy is made
up of negative and positive freedoms. The negative freedom is
freedom from coercion by others; positive freedoms are those
that allow self- determination, self-expression and choice. The
patient must not only have the ability to say “No” but must also
be sovereign in his or her decision-making capacity. All cultures
and races have their concept of beauty. The need to conform
to that norm may put so much pressure on a person that he
or she feels compelled to undergo cosmetic surgery. In some
ways, the media and social pressures work together to force the
decision to undergo cosmetic surgery. The principle of choice
may apply to all aspects of healthcare. A fundamental question
is whether cosmetic surgery constitutes healthcare. Some have
viewed the practice of cosmetic surgery as outside traditional
medicine (9).
Informed consent
Informed consent must be obtained from the patient before
any medical intervention. There is an important distinction
between ethically obtained informed consent and legally
effective consent. Ethical consent denotes a decision-making
process based on mutual respect and full disclosure; it
describes an interaction between doctor and patient over time,
one that is more than just getting a signature on a consent
form. The patient must be informed about the procedure by the
surgeon himself. Patients must be given enough time to assess
risks, make decisions and ask all the questions they wish to ask.
They should never be pressured to make a decision before they
are ready.
Well informed patients will have fewer anxieties during surgery
and better compliance with instructions. They cope better with
complications and express greater satisfaction with the results
of surgery.
The success of informed consent is largely based on effective
communication between doctor and patient and the ability
of the patient to understand what is being communicated.
This process can often fail because of the doctor’s poor
communication skills or because of the patient’s preconceived
notions and expectations (10).
Surgeons also have the responsibility to rule out major
psychiatric disorders in their patients. At the very least, they
must refer patients to a mental health professional prior to
surgery. It is possible that some psychiatric patients have
a diminished autonomy and decision-making capacity.
Surgeons therefore have an ethical responsibility to make that
determination before conducting surgery.
Corporate medicine
The influx of managed care in the US has encouraged medical
professionals in various specialities to treat medicine as a
business. Cosmetic surgery, too, is treated as a commodity.
India is no exception to this trend. False and misleading
advertisements flourish in the media and on the internet in
the fight for a share of the market, and the patient’s welfare
becomes second priority as gimmicks are promoted in the
name of scientific development. This also raises questions
about the nature of voluntariness and full disclosure (11). Even
if one believes that cosmetic surgery can help in the promotion
and maintenance of health, such commercialisation is contrary
to efforts to make the discipline a legitimate medical practice
(12).
Research
As in any medical and surgical specialty, cosmetic surgical
procedures should be subjected to rigorous research protocols
before they are used on patients. Any clinical research initiative
in cosmetic surgery must adhere to the highest standards
of research subject protection. The line between surgical
innovation and human experimentation is a murky one. The
emphasis must always be on safeguarding the health and
welfare of the patients involved.
There is very little regulation of the use of specific products for
cosmetic surgery purposes. There is relatively little monitoring
of the efficacy and safety of cosmetic surgery procedures and
treatments and only limited mechanisms to prevent the use of
demonstrably harmful procedures exist.
The media
Cosmetic surgery has increased in the last decade. Not
only has its popularity soared but media coverage has also
increased. Media promotion of cosmetic surgery makes it more
acceptable for individuals to use it to improve their appearance.
Consequently, consumer pressure is responsible for the growth
of cosmetic surgery. Cosmetic surgery is the most prominent
example of a new focus on lifestyle medicine in which tools
that were earlier viewed as appropriate for therapeutic goals
are now finding application as consumer products. This also
leads us to consider our quest for perfection at an individual
and societal level. It also provides an avenue to consider the
limits of capitulation to consumer desires. Parents may request
cosmetic changes in the physical appearance of their children
with Down’s syndrome but this surgery does not mask the
cognitive deficits that would persist in the child. We must make
sure that cosmetic surgery is used to enhance one’s self image
and well being and that it meets the intended goal while
minimising risks to the patient (13).
Definitions of normalcy
The goal of cosmetic as opposed to reconstructive surgery
is to improve the appearance of an individual who has an
abnormal appearance. Some argue that normalcy cannot
be operationally defined and it depends on the individual’s
subjective perception. The judgments of normalcy lie on a
continuum and may be viewed differently not only by the
individual but also society. A cleft lip may be viewed by society
as abnormal in appearance and corrective cosmetic surgery
may be encouraged in such cases. A prominent nose may not
be considered abnormal by society but for the individual, it
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics Vol IV No 4 October- December 2007
[ 173 ]
may be unacceptable enough to prompt him or her to undergo
surgery. Adolescents experience much emotional turmoil as
part of their psychosocial development. When teased about
physical qualities that do not conform to the norm, they may
experience sufficient suffering to consider surgery as a solution.
Teenage breast augmentation is no longer a very unusual
procedure in some parts of the West. The clear ethical mandate
is that cosmetic surgery on adolescents should be discouraged
in general and taken up only if there is a compelling need and
after thoughtful consideration (14).
Conclusion
I have tried to examine the ethical issues in cosmetic surgery
in this article. The increases in demand of this type of surgery
and the advocacy of practice in the media have raised concerns
about the circumstances under which cosmetic surgery is
ethical and permissible. The steps needed to improve the
ethical practice of cosmetic surgery are very clear. Scientific
evidence of the safety and efficacy of cosmetic procedures and
devices is needed to assure the public that the interventions
being offered have been evaluated properly for their efficacy
and safety. Certification of cosmetic surgeons and a closer
regulation of cosmetic surgery facilities will increase quality
and protect patients. The potential for the abuse of cosmetic
surgery must also be considered. It is a good example of the
need to balance beneficence and autonomy. A patient desiring
cosmetic surgery should not be assured of getting it on the
strength of that desire alone. The surgeon should decline
such a request if it is felt that the patient will not benefit
from the surgery or is not mature enough to understand the
ramifications of the procedure. Surgeons must be cognisant of
their actions when conducting a cosmetic surgical procedure
that may enforce a cultural norm. We must respect cosmetic
surgery but be wary of its overuse. The eternal questions are
whether cosmetic surgery can contribute to making us content
with ourselves and what it is that we aim to achieve by altering
ourselves and our bodies.
References
1. Wolpe PR. Treatment, enhancement and the ethics of neurotherapeutics.
Brain Cogn 2002;50:387-95.
2. Ward CM. Surgical research, experimentation and innovation. Br J Plast
Surg 1994;47 (2):90-4.
3. Gilman SL. Making the Body B eautiful : a cultural history of aesthetic
surgery. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999.
4. McGee G. Ethical issues in enhancement - an introduction. Camb Q
Healthc Ethics 2000;9 (3):299-303.
5. Miller FG, Brody H, Chung KC. Cosmetic surgery and the internal morality
of medicine. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2000;9 (3):353-64.
6. Wiggins OP, Barker JH, Martinez S, Vossen M, Maldonado C, Grossi F et
al. On the ethics of facial transplantation research. Am J Bioeth 2004;4
(3):1-12.
7. Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments.
Body Image : An International Journal of Research 2004;1(1): 99-111.
8. Balkrishnan R, Gill IK, Vallee JA, Feldman SR. No smoking gun: findings
from a national survey of office-based cosmetic surgery adverse event
reporting. Dermatological Surgery 2003;29 (11):1093-9.
9. Sullivan DA. Cosmetic surgery - the cutting edge of commercial medicine in
America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2001.
10. Ward CM. Consenting and consulting for cosmetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg
1998;51:547-50.
11. Spilson SV, Chung KC, Greenfield ML, Walters M. Are plastic surgery
advertisements conforming to the ethical codes of the American
Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1181-6.
12. Rohrich RJ. The market of plastic surgery: cosmetic surgery for sale - at
what price? Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107: 1845-7.
13. Sarwer DB, Grossbart TA, Didie ER. Beauty and society. Semin Cutan Med
Surg 2003;22 (2): 79-92.
14. Hillhorst MT. Philosophical pitfalls in cosmetic surgery: a case of
rhinoplasty during adolescence. Med Humanit 2002;28:61-5.
... [11] Ethical aspects Beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy are the key ethical aspects of medical practice. [12] Nonmaleficence is the physician's duty to reduce risk, and beneficence is the duty to maximize benefit. It is the duty of the physician to not only avoid harm to the patient, but also weigh the risks of the surgery versus the needs of the patient. ...
... Patients must be given enough time to assess the risks of the procedure, make decisions, and ask all the questions they wish to ask. [2,12,13] ...
Article
Teenagers between 13 and 19 years are increasingly seeking cosmetic procedures. They are suffering from anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem as a result of an obsession with body image and celebrity culture, fueled by social networking sites. Teenagers seek cosmetic procedures most commonly for traumatic scars, acne and acne scars, pigmentary abnormalities, hypertrichosis, hirsutism, and tattoo removal. They demand plastic surgery for nose deformities, breast asymmetry, ear abnormalities, and congenital deformities. The physical, emotional, psychological, social, ethical, and legal aspects must be considered while counseling adolescents. Not every teenager seeking cosmetic surgery is well suited for a procedure, and teens must demonstrate emotional maturity and an understanding of the limitations of these procedures and the risks involved. There should be a 3-month cooling-off period, followed by another consultation, which should be done in the presence of a parent. Only very essential surgery should be performed, giving realistic expectations on the outcome of procedures, as they rely too much on physical appearance to gain confidence. A psychiatric evaluation is essential to rule out body dysmorphic disorders in those repeatedly seeking treatment for minor defects. Sometimes, procedures are necessary to avoid social withdrawal and loss of self-esteem. Proper informed consent should be taken, explaining the benefits, limitations, and risks involved. Ideally, teenagers should not receive cosmetic or surgical procedures unless there are compelling medical or psychological reasons to do so. A successful aesthetic procedure in a mature teenager can have a positive influence, whereas surgery on an immature, psychologically unstable adolescent can have an adverse impact. This review discusses what is safe and what can wait, still there is limited evidence. There is a strong need for guidelines for the use of cosmetic surgery on children and teenagers.
... Like other specialty in medicine, cosmetic surgery interventions should be placed under careful clinical trials before its application on patients. The boundary between surgery innovation and experiment on humans is ambiguous and should always emphasize the protection of the health and well-being of patients [13]. In this regard, normal mental status in the satisfaction of cosmetic surgery is a central determinant and is more important than surgical technique [14]. ...
Article
Introduction: Every year tens of thousands of cosmetic surgeries done to change the appearance and increase the level of satisfaction and individual self-esteem that be considered the result of a psychological need. This study done to compare psychiatric disorders in rhinoplasty applicants with control group. Materials And Methods: The sample of this cross-sectional study were composed of 80 rhinoplasty applicants with control group over a 1-year period. Results: Of 80 applicants of rhinoplasty, 66.2% were female. The age of 67.5% of them was in the range of 26-35 years. Most of them (53.8%) had bachelor's degree. The differences of personality pattern between two groups were significant in extroversion, agreeableness and openness aspects. The scale of anxiety and depression between two groups based on the Hamilton anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory questionnaire was not statistically significant. In compare of Yale symptoms between two groups, obsessions about contamination, physical obsessions and repeating procedures, were statistically significant. Conclusion: We concluded that extroversion and openness in rhinoplasty applicants was more than the control group. There was no significant relationship between personality traits and obsessive introspection but people with symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, experience more introspective tendencies and negative emotions such as anxiety and depression.
... Stimulant factors) Psychological factors and tendency to beauty (must be reviewed and examined by surgery and considering all facts and considering the psychological measures, the surgeon may make decision for administer the surgery for patient or not [9 -11]. Healthy mental state of applicants is deterministic in their satisfaction after cosmetic surgery [12,13]. Belli et al. also suggested that the evaluation of psychiatric pathology and synergies can help define the clinical profiles of those who apply for rhinoplasty [14]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Medicine is no longer limited to the treatment of diseases — the use of plastic surgical techniques as a commodity to improve the appearance of healthy people has become a trend, and plastic surgeons who invest in the market of cosmetic medicine have quickly gained considerable benefits. Will the transformation of the role of plastic surgeons from aesthetic restoration to commercial embellishment damage the creation and maintenance of their sense of professionalism? Objective The purpose of this study is to determine which aspects of professionalism plastic surgeons value by using Q methodology. Methods Q methodology is a mixed research method that is used to study subjectivity through factor analysis. This study analyzes a rank-ordering of participants’ level of agreement with a set of subjective statements related to a given topic. Q statements were developed on the basis of a literature review, expert panels, and medical organizations’ codes of conduct. After face and construct validity checks, as well as a pilot test, we interviewed 31 attending plastic surgeons. Data were collected from April to May 2017. Results This study concluded that the main types of medical professionalism held by the respondents can be represented in four factors: (1) mastery of clinical skills; (2) leadership and management; (3) knowledge sharing; and (4) multifaceted. Conclusions Respondents in this study highly emphasized surgical skill and sought to maintain good relationships with their patients based on their settings. Although they were reluctant to place community service as a top priority, our respondents tended to emphasize the healer aspect over commercialization.
Article
A variety of procedures are available for the cosmetic enhancement of female genitalia. Despite controversy, they continue to grow in popularity. Familiarity with the terminology and spectrum of the aesthetic options described herein permits a realistic assessment of the ways in which the female patient's concerns may be addressed. There are important aspects of patient evaluation and counseling unique to cosmetic surgery that must be learned by those contemplating the delivery of these services.
Article
Plastic, reconstructive, and cosmetic surgery refers to a variety of operations performed in order to repair or restore body parts to look normal or to enhance a certain structure or anatomy that is already normal. Several ethical considerations such as a patient's right for autonomy, informed consent, beneficence, and nonmalfeasance need to be given careful consideration. The principal objective of the medical profession is to render services to humanity with full respect for human dignity. Plastic surgeons should merit the confidence of patients entrusted to their care, rendering to each a full measure of service and devotion. They require an extensive amount of education and training. The increases in demand for aesthetic plastic surgery and the advocacy of practice in the media have raised concerns about the circumstances under which cosmetic surgery is ethical and permissible. Innovative research, and new technologies derived from such research, almost always raises ethical and policy concerns. Medical ethics regulate what is, and what is not, correct in promoting plastic surgery to the public. It is essential to create an educated and informed public about the ethical issues in the plastic and reconstructive surgery field. Plastic surgeons need to carefully evaluate the degree of deformity, physical and emotional maturity, and desired outcome of patients who request plastic surgery procedures. Science is a powerful force for change in modern society and plastic surgeons have a responsibility to shepherd that change with thoughtful advocacy and careful ethical scrutiny of their own behavior.
Article
Full-text available
Advances in plastic and reconstructive surgery have revolutionized the management of patients suffering from disfiguring congenital abnormalities, burns and skin cancers. The demand for aesthetic surgery has increased in recent years, as our culture has become more concerned with image and appearance. Several ethical considerations such as patient's right for informed counseling, beneficience and maleficience need to be given careful consideration.
Article
Cosmetic surgery is big business. With demand rising, this commercial medical practice has become a modern body custom. To explain the emergence and growth of this demand, Deborah A. Sullivan looks beyond the cultural imperatives of appearance and examines the market dynamics inherent in the business and politics of cosmetic surgery. In so doing, she also considers the effect of commercialization on the medical profession. After reviewing prevailing beauty trends, Sullivan looks at the social, psychological and economic rewards and penalties resulting from the way we look. Following an historical overview of the technological advances that made cosmetic surgery possible she explores the relationship between improved surgical techniques and the resulting increased demand. The book also examines the ensuing conflict within the profession over recognition of commercial cosmetic surgery as a specialty. Among the topics covered are sensitive areas such as physician advertising, unregulated practice and ambulatory surgery, and the consequences of commercialism on medical judgement. Finally, it reveals how physicians and their professional organizations have shaped the ways in which cosmetic surgery is presented in advertisements and women's magazines that would promote patient demand.
Article
Cosmetic surgery is a fast-growing medical practice. In 1997 surgeons in the United States performed the four most common cosmetic procedures—liposuction, breast augmentation, eyelid surgery, and facelift—443,728 times, an increase of 150% over the comparable total for 1992. Estimated total expenditures for cosmetic surgery range from $1 to $2 billion. As managed care cuts into physicians' income and autonomy, cosmetic surgery, which is not covered by health insurance, offers a financially attractive medical specialty.
Article
The role of the healer is expanding. Attempts by physicians to enhance human capacity are but one among many new medical projects. The twentieth century ushered in significant changes in therapeutic modalities, and the past two decades have seen the role of the physician reshaped by economic, political, and dramatic new social mores. People ask new and different things of their clinicians. Under managed care, the primary care clinician is expected to have much more skill than was traditionally expected of a general internist, and new incentives force physicians to much more explicitly ration the care they provide to patients and to patient populations. But perhaps no change in the contemporary world of health portends more long-term effects than the introduction of enhancement technologies.
Article
Cosmetic surgeons have increasingly come under fire for using advertisements that may be deceptive or intended for the solicitation of vulnerable consumers. However, aesthetic surgery is a growing business that relies heavily on advertising to survive. To prevent the use of deceptive advertisements, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons has developed a code of ethics for its physician members. We conducted a study to determine the prevalence of cosmetic surgery advertisements considered objectionable by the lay public. These advertisements were published in the Yellow Pages of the 10 largest U.S. cities. Because all of the advertisements in this study contained the American Society of Plastic Surgeons logo, we also determined whether its members are upholding the ethical code of advertising. We asked a convenience sample of 50 participants to rate 104 advertisements using four yes/no questions derived from the code of ethics and one overall yes/no question regarding whether the advertisement was objectionable. We obtained the mean percentage of "yes" responses for each advertisement, from the total sample, for each question. We found that the study participants felt that 25 percent of the advertisements used images of persons or facsimiles that falsely and deceptively created unjustified expectations of favorable results. The participants responded that 22 percent of the advertisements appealed primarily to the layperson's fears, anxieties, or emotional vulnerabilities. In addition, 18 percent of the advertisements were considered to be objectionable. Discretion is currently left up to physicians as to the ethical nature of their advertisements. Although the majority of American Society of Plastic Surgeons members uphold the ethical code of advertising, there are still a substantial number of published advertisements that the average consumer considers to be in violation of this code.