Hyaline Globules in Neuroendocrine and Solid-pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas A Clue to the Diagnosis

Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
The American journal of surgical pathology (Impact Factor: 5.15). 07/2011; 35(7):981-8. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821a9a14
Source: PubMed


Distinguishing between solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) may pose a diagnostic dilemma. Both can demonstrate solid growth patterns, and both can be immunoreactive with neuroendocrine markers such as synaptophysin and CD56. One well-established feature of SPNs is the presence of hyaline globules, which in contrast has only rarely been reported in PanNETs. Clinicopathologic features of 361 cases originally classified as PanNETs were examined. Of these, 24 tumors (6.6%) had hyaline globules, raising the possibility of SPN. Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin was performed on these 24 neoplasms, and showed nuclear labeling in 6 cases. These 6 cases, which also demonstrated cytoplasmic CD10 staining, were reclassified as SPNs. The remaining 18 cases maintained their original diagnosis as PanNETs, and the hyaline globules in these cases were periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) positive, diastase resistant, and immunoreactive with α-1-antitrypsin. All 24 cases were histologically re-evaluated, and the pattern of invasion, presence of clear cells, and nuclear grooves were found to be helpful in distinguishing SPNs from PanNETs. We conclude that the presence of hyaline globules should raise SPNs in the differential diagnosis of a solid cellular neoplasm of the pancreas. However, this should not be used as the sole criterion in the diagnosis of SPNs, as hyaline globules may also be seen in 5% of PanNETs. Immunohistochemical and histologic features supporting the diagnosis of SPNs over PanNETs include CD10 and nuclear β-catenin labeling, an insidious pattern of invasion, clear cells, and nuclear grooves.

Download full-text


Available from: Toby Charles Cornish, May 05, 2015

  • No preview · Article · Dec 2011 · Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are rare pancreatic tumors, with a low potential for malignancy. The clinical and pathological features of 33 SPNs were reviewed. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 33 patients who underwent surgery for a pathologically confirmed SPN from 2000 to 2011. Results: Thirty of the 33 patients (91 %) were female, and the median age at diagnosis was 29.2 years (range 12-59). The most common symptom was abdominal discomfort with dull pain (58 %). Others included asymptomatic lesions that were only detected incidentally during imaging (21 %), a palpable abdominal mass (15 %) and indigestion (6 %). All 33 patients underwent surgery with a curative intent and 3 (9 %) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The mean diameter of the tumors was 4.9 cm (range 2-15 cm), and they occurred in the head (9, 27 %), neck (5, 15 %), body or tail (19, 58 %) of the pancreas. One patient had lymph node metastases, one patient had portal venous invasion and 8 patients had perineural invasion. The patient follow-up ranged from 4 to 118 months, and 32 patients were alive and well without recurrence. One patient relapsed 10 months after distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and underwent a second surgery via laparotomy. Unfortunately, the patient died of multiple organ failure 12 days after the second surgery. Conclusion: SPNs are rare neoplasms with malignant potential but excellent prognosis. Adequate surgical resection, including laparoscopic surgery, may therefore be performed safely and is associated with a long-term survival, even in invasive cases.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2012 · Surgery Today
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are typically solid neoplasms but in rare instances may present as cystic lesions. This unusual presentation can make clinical diagnosis challenging. In addition, the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of cystic PanNETs are poorly defined. We identified 53 cystic PanNETs in our single-institution experience of 491 surgically resected PanNETs. Similar to solid PanNETs, cystic PanNETs developed with an equal sex distribution and over a wide age range (23 to 91 y; mean, 52 y). The unusual cystic appearance made radiologic differentiation from other cystic pancreatic neoplasms difficult with a misdiagnosis in 23 of 53 (43%) cases. An association between cystic PanNETs and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or multifocal disease [5 of 53 (9%) and 7 of 53 (13%), respectively] was not observed as compared with solid PanNETs (P=0.34 and P=0.31, respectively). Grossly, cystic PanNETs were predominantly located in the tail of the pancreas (n=28, 53%) and were similar in size (mean, 3.3 cm) to solid PanNETs (mean, 4.1 cm; P=0.12). All cysts were unilocular (n=53, 100%) and filled with clear to straw-colored fluid. Larger cysts were sometimes noted to be hemorrhagic. Histologically, the cysts were lined by a thin fibrous band that separated the cyst from the neoplastic cells. In comparison with their solid counterparts, cystic PanNETs were less likely to demonstrate tumor necrosis (6%; P=0.04), perineural invasion (8%; P<0.001), vascular invasion (4%; P<0.001), regional lymph node metastasis (13%; P<0.001), and synchronous distant metastasis (4%; P=0.015). The neoplastic cells of the cystic PanNETs were well differentiated (n=53, 100%) with a low mitotic rate and low Ki-67 proliferation index (range, 0.2% to 11%; mean, 1.8%). On the basis of both the American Joint Cancer Committee and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging systems, the majority of cystic PanNETs presented at a lower pathologic stage as compared with solid PanNETs. In summary, cystic PanNETs are a distinctive subgroup of PanNETs with unique clinical, radiographic, and pathologic features.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2012 · The American journal of surgical pathology
Show more