ArticlePDF Available

The Traffic Light Diet Can Lower Risk for Obesity and Diabetes

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
152
NASN Sc hool Nurse | May 2011
Diabetes
The Traffic Light Diet
Can Lower Risk for Obesity
and Diabetes
Ryan D. Brown, MD, Oklahoma
Brought to you by the National Diabetes Education Program
Keywords: body mass index; diabe-
tes management; National Diabetes
Education Program; NDEP; obesity
G
REEN LIGHT! RED LIGHT! This is
the sound that you may hear as chil-
dren busily play an interactive game
that promotes physical activity. Little did
we suspect years ago that now those
same words would be used in another
way to help our youth eat healthy food.
Childhood obesity has been on the rise
over the past couple of decades and is
a risk factor for the development of dia-
betes (“An Update,” 2004; Ogden et
al., 2006). One way to combat child-
hood obesity is to help families learn
to eat healthy foods. Although nutri-
tion alone cannot turn the tide against
obesity, proper diet is key to support
a child’s healthy growth and develop-
ment. Because obesity is a family issue,
the whole family needs to be involved
in changing food habits. Parents need to
be role models for their children and not
expect their children to eat broccoli and
salad if they themselves are eating pizza.
Families need to be positive in the pro-
cess of obesity management and celebrate
successes. Children will be more respon-
sive to changes if they feel good about
what they are doing. School nurses can
promote this positive process to students
at school and to their families via counsel-
ing sessions and newsletter articles.
A popular and easy-to-use dietary
education tool is the Traffic Light Diet
(Collins, Warren, Neve, McCoy, & Stokes,
2006). It may also be called the Stop
Light Diet, Red Light Diet, or other vari-
ations of the concept. Simply put, all
foods are categorized into one of three
groups: RED, YELLOW, or GREEN. When
it comes to food choices, GREEN means
“GO,” YELLOW means “SLOW,” and
RED means “WHOA.” The classifica-
tion of foods into the three groups varies
slightly between the programs that devel-
oped or expanded this concept.
GREEN, or GO, foods should be the first
choice when deciding what to eat. These
foods contain less than 2 grams of fat and
are full of nutrients and/or fiber. Most fruit
and vegetables are GREEN foods, as are
whole wheat bread, oatmeal, fat free or 1%
low-fat milk, grilled fish and shellfish, and
skinless chicken or turkey.
YELLOW, or SLOW, foods need to be
the second choice when deciding what
to eat. These foods contain 2 to 5 grams
of fat. Common examples include 2%
milk, 100% fruit juice, sports drinks,
white grains (bread, rice, and pasta), gra-
nola, ham, and peanut butter.
RED, or WHOA, foods need to be
eaten sparingly. They have very
little nutritional value and are high in
fat, sugar, and calories. These foods con-
tain 5 or more grams of fat. Examples of
common foods include whole milk, reg-
ular hot dogs, french fries, butter, choco-
lates, cream cheese, sugary cereals, muf-
fins, and soft drinks.
For a more comprehensive list of
foods, see the chart of GO, SLOW, and
WHOA Foods (Table 1).
Several books have been published
about this diet. Red Light, Green Light,
Eat Right is by Joanna Dolgoff, MD
(2009), a pediatrician and childhood
obesity specialist. The Traffic Light Diet
is by Judith Willis (2004), one of the
leading health experts in the United
Kingdom.
The originator of the Traffic Light Diet
is Leonard Epstein, PhD, and his team
from the State University of New York
in Buffalo. Dr. Epstein developed his
method as a family-based approach to
childhood obesity. The Stoplight Diet for
Children: An Eight-Week Program for
Parents and Children was authored by
Epstein and Sally Squires (1988). His ver-
sion of the tool is the most commonly
used. The Epstein version of the Traffic
Light Diet is also the most studied. Two
main goals of the diet are to limit calo-
ries and encourage the consumption of
nutrient rich foods as opposed to calorie
DOI: 10.1177/1942602X11403491
For reprints and permission queries visit SAGEs Web site, http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
© 2011 The Author(s)
by guest on November 15, 2016nas.sagepub.comDownloaded from
153
May 2011 | NASN Sch ool Nurse
dense foods. Foods are divided into five
categories (fruits and vegetables, grains,
milk and dairy, protein, and other). RED
foods are those with high fat and/or cal-
orie content. All sweets and sugared bev-
erages also belong to this group. GREEN
foods are those that contain low fat and/
or calories per serving. YELLOW foods
fit in between the two categories (see
Table 1).
To encourage weight loss, participants
are instructed to follow three mandates:
1. Eat a core of 900 calories per day.
2. Do not exceed 1200 to 1500 calories
per day.
3. Do not eat more than four RED foods
per week.
During the program, a family learns
about the definition of calories and the
basics of healthy nutrition, is given a
food reference guide listing foods accord-
ing to their color code and group, and is
strongly encouraged to remove all RED
foods from their home.
In addition to the diet, participants in
Epstein’s family-based research program
may be provided with a number of other
supports to help them manage their eat-
ing behaviors, food selection, and food
preparation. These supports include
self-monitoring training that empha-
sizes independent control of food intake
by the participants. Families are taught
how to use a food diary, how to chart
their weight, and, if appropriate, how
to record their physical activity. Parents
are encouraged to review their children’s
records with their children and to praise
them for accurately completing their
records.
Parents and children are taught the
importance of serving as models for other
family members as well as the impor-
tance of praise for family members who
make progress toward their goals. Family
members also may have weekly to
monthly contact with a behavioral ther-
apist. The therapist is appointed to the
family by the research staff to aid the
family in self-monitoring, to get feedback
on progress, and to answer questions. In
some cases, parents may engage in phys-
ical activity with the therapist.
Table 1
GO, SLOW, and WHOA Foods
Food Group GO (Almost Anytime Foods) SLOW (Sometimes Foods) WHOA (Once in a While Foods)
Nutrient-Dense Calorie-Dense
Vegetables Almost all fresh, frozen, and canned
vegetables without added fat and
sauces
All vegetables with added fat and
sauces; oven-baked French fries;
avocado
Fried potatoes, like French fries
or hash browns; other deep-fried
vegetables
Fruits All fresh, frozen, canned in juice 100 percent fruit juice; fruits canned
in light syrup; dried fruits
Fruits canned in heavy syrup
Breads and Cereals Whole-grain breads, including pita
bread; tortillas and whole-grain pasta;
brown rice; hot and cold unsweetened
whole-grain breakfast cereals
White refined flour bread, rice, and
pasta. French toast; taco shells;
cornbread; biscuits; granola; waffles
and pancakes
Croissants; muffins; doughnuts;
sweet rolls; crackers made with
trans fats; sweetened breakfast
cereals
Milk and Milk
Products
Fat-free or 1 percent low-fat milk; fat-
free or low-fat yogurt; part-skim,
reduced fat, and fat-free cheese; low-
fat or fat-free cottage cheese
2 percent low-fat milk; processed
cheese spread
Whole milk; full-fat American,
cheddar, Colby, Swiss, cream
cheese; whole-milk yogurt
Meats, Poultry, Fish,
Eggs, Beans, and
Nuts
Trimmed beef and pork; extra lean
ground beef; chicken and turkey with-
out skin; tuna canned in water; baked,
broiled, steamed, grilled fish and
shellfish; beans, split peas, lentils,
tofu; egg whites and egg substitutes
Lean ground beef, broiled hamburg-
ers; ham, Canadian bacon; chicken
and turkey with skin; low-fat hot
dogs; tuna canned in oil; peanut
butter; nuts; whole eggs cooked
without added fat
Untrimmed beef and pork; regular
ground beef; fried hamburgers;
ribs; bacon; fried chicken, chicken
nuggets; hot dogs, lunch meats,
pepperoni, sausage; fried fish and
shellfish; whole eggs cooked
with fat
Sweets and Snacks* Ice milk bars; frozen fruit juice bars;
low-fat or fat-free frozen yogurt and
ice cream; fig bars, ginger snaps,
baked chips; low-fat microwave pop-
corn; pretzels
Cookies and cakes; pies; cheese
cake; ice cream; chocolate;
candy; chips; buttered
microwave popcorn
Fats/Condiments Vinegar; ketchup; mustard; fat-free
creamy salad dressing; fat-free may-
onnaise; fat-free sour cream
Vegetable oil, olive oil, and oil-based
salad dressing; soft margarine;
low-fat creamy salad dressing; low-
fat mayonnaise; low-fat sour cream**
Butter, stick margarine; lard; salt
pork; gravy; regular creamy salad
dressing; mayonnaise; tartar
sauce; sour cream; cheese sauce;
cream sauce; cream cheese dips
Beverages Water, fat-free milk, or 1 percent low-
fat milk; diet soda; unsweetened ice
tea or diet iced tea and lemonade
2 percent low-fat milk; 100 percent
fruit juice; sports drinks
Whole milk; regular soda; calori-
cally sweetened iced teas and
lemonade; fruit drinks with less
than 100 percent fruit juice
*Not all snacks are poor in nutritional value.
Source: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (n.d.).
by guest on November 15, 2016nas.sagepub.comDownloaded from
154
NASN Sc hool Nurse | May 2011
Studies of the Epstein program report
significant weight loss and mainte-
nance of weight loss. In one of the most
extensive studies, there was a 25.5%
decrease in overweight at the end of
treatment across groups. At 24 months,
the percentage overweight decrease was
12.9% (Epstein, Paluch, Gordy, & Dorn,
2000).
The National Institutes of Health have
also joined the colorful diet parade
with the We Can!® campaign. We Can!
(Ways to Enhance Children’s Activity
& Nutrition) is a national movement
designed to give parents, caregivers, and
entire communities a way to help chil-
dren 8 to 13 years old stay at a healthy
weight. The We Can! campaign’s GO,
SLOW, and WHOA Foods chart is listed
in Table 1. For more information, includ-
ing lesson plans and handouts, visit the
We Can! website (http://www.nhlbi.nih.
gov/health/public/heart/obesity/wecan/
eat-right/choosing-foods.htm).
Whatever the name, the Stoplight/
Traffic Light Diet has shown benefits.
The Traffic Light Diet has not been stud-
ied or implemented in the school setting.
However, school nurses may find that
the simple introduction of the GREEN,
YELLOW, and RED food concept along
with food selection lists may help
families make better food choices. Using
innovative ways to help children and
their families change eating habits and
food selection practices will contribute to
lowering the risk for childhood obesity
and diabetes.
Resources
Body mass index (BMI) gender-appropriate
graphs for children can be downloaded from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
website at http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts.
All books mentioned in this article can be pur-
chased from Amazon (http://www.Amazon.
com).
The Weight-control Information Network pro-
vides the general public and health care pro-
fessionals with information on weight con-
trol, obesity, physical activity, and nutrition
(http://www.win.niddk.nih.gov/, http://www
.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/obesity/
wecan/downloads/go-slowwhoa.pdf).
References
An update on type 2 diabetes from the National
Diabetes Education Program. (2004).
Pediatrics, 114, 239-263.
Collins, C. E., Warren, J., Neve, M., McCoy, P.,
& Stokes, B. J. (2006). Measuring effective-
ness of dietetic interventions in child obesity.
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine,
160, 906-922.
Dolgoff, J. (2009). Red light, green light, eat
right: The food solution that lets kids be kids.
New York, NY: Rodale Books.
Epstein, L. H., Paluch, R. A., Gordy, C. C., &
Dorn, J. (2000). Decreasing sedentary behav-
iors in treating pediatric obesity. Archives
of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 154,
220-226.
Epstein, L. H., & Squires, S. (1988). The stoplight
diet for children: An eight-week program for
parents and children. New York, NY: Little,
Brown.
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L. R.,
McDowell, M. A., Tabak, C. J., & Flegal, K. M.
(2006). Prevalence of overweight and obesity
in the United States, 1999-2004. The Journal
of the American Medical Association, 295,
1549-1555.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
(n.d.). Choosing foods for your family: GO,
SLOW, and WHOA foods. Chart available at
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/
obesity/wecan/downloads/go-slow-whoa.pdf
Willis, J. (2004). The traffic light diet. London:
Orion.
Ryan D. Brown, MD
Clinical Associate Professor
University of Oklahoma
College of Medicine
Oklahoma City, OK
Dr. Brown is a clinical associate
professor at the University of
Oklahoma College of Medicine,
Department of Pediatrics,
Section on Pediatric Diabetes
and Endocrinology. His clinical
interests are obesity and type
2 diabetes.
by guest on November 15, 2016nas.sagepub.comDownloaded from
... Dietary choices were assessed using a traffic light system where food items were categorized as green (best choices), yellow (choose carefully), or red (limit) [26][27][28]. This approach enabled the evaluation of participants' adherence to the recommend dietary guidelines throughout the intervention period. ...
Article
Full-text available
Effective weight management interventions involve a combination of behavioral strategies focusing on dietary changes. Tracing the change through mobile apps has been proven to be a valuable platform for facilitating weight management in many countries. However, the effectiveness of mobile app-based dietary intervention on weight management in Taiwan remains to be determined. By using the designated mobile app, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of the diet intervention, which is based on a 2:1:1 portion control plate and a flexible low-carbohydrate (FLC) diet. This 8-week retrospective cohort study involved 10,297 participants who were divided into two groups: the intervention group (joined an 8-week diet intervention program with the daily diet record assessed by registered dietitians) and the control group (voluntarily using the app without instructional materials or coaching). After eight weeks of intervention, the intervention group showed a higher weight loss percentage (−4.78% vs. −1.54%), body mass index (BMI) (−1.26 kg/m² vs. 0.69 kg/m²), and diet record completeness (73.52% vs. 28.91%) compared with the control group. With respect to gender, male participants showed higher baseline weight and higher weight loss (−6.02%) in the intervention group. In the intervention group, 2871 participants (33.4%) lost less than 4% of their weight, 5071 participants (58.9%) lost 4–8% of their body weight, and 662 participants (7.7%) lost >8% of their weight. Compared to the low-effectiveness group (weight lost <4%), the high-effectiveness group (weight lost >8%) had a significantly higher diet record completeness (91.61 ± 15.99 vs. 55.81 ± 32.92), dietary compliance (green light %) (88.93 ± 9.9 vs. 77.75 ±17.5), protein intake % (26.34 ± 2.85 vs. 23.49 ± 3.56), and fat intake % (49.66 ± 6.36 vs. 44.05 ± 7.37). Most importantly, the high-effectiveness group had a lower carbohydrate intake % (24.1 ± 7.86 vs. 32.46 ± 9.61). The results remained significant after being stratified by gender. This study found that the use of online applications plus the intervention of dietitians is beneficial for short-term weight loss. The composition of nutrients and dietary compliance also significantly impacted weight loss.
... YELLOW foods fit between the two categories. Do not exceed 1200 to 1500 calories per day and do not eat more than four RED foods per week [144]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Childhood obesity is one of the most important problems of public health. Searching was conducted by using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, MEDLINE, and EBSCO databases, from January 2022 to June 2022, for English language meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and observational studies from all over the world. Five main topics were defined in a consensus join statement of the Polish Society of Pediatrics, Polish Society for Pediatric Obesity, Polish Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes and Polish Association for the Study on Obesity: (1) definition, causes, consequences of obesity; (2) treatment of obesity; (3) obesity prevention; (4) the role of primary care in the prevention of obesity; (5) Recommendations for general practitioners, parents, teachers, and regional authorities. The statement outlines the role of diet, physical activity in the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity, and gives appropriate recommendations for interventions by schools, parents, and primary health care. A multisite approach to weight control in children is recommended, taking into account the age, the severity of obesity, and the presence of obesity-related diseases. Combined interventions consisting of dietary modification, physical activity, behavioral therapy, and education are effective in improving metabolic and anthropometric indices. More actions are needed to strengthen the role of primary care in the effective prevention and treatment of obesity because a comprehensive, multi-component intervention appears to yield the best results.
... The overall goals of the Traffic Light Diet are to limit energy intake and encourage intake of nutrient dense as opposed to energy dense foods. 34 This approach was chosen as a low-burden, evidence-based method for participants to assess their dietary patterns and quality using photographs, 28,32,33 and because the photo tracking app did not have a built-in mechanism for providing feedback on diet quality or intake. Participants were added to a study-specific group and were encouraged to provide feedback by rating pictures from other participants according to the Traffic Light Diet system. ...
Article
Background: Dietary self-monitoring (DSM) of foods and beverages is associated with weight loss in behavioral interventions; however, DSM may be burdensome, and adherence may decrease over time. Novel methods of DSM, including apps that track food using photographs, may decrease burden, increase DSM adherence, and improve weight loss. Objective: The objective was to test a mobile photo DSM app compared to a calorie-tracking DSM app on tracking frequency and weight loss in a remotely delivered behavioral weight-loss intervention. Design: This was a 6-month (October 2016 to April 2017) randomized trial. Participants/setting: Participants were adults (n=41) classified as overweight or obese (body mass index 25 to 49.9) from South Carolina. Intervention: Participants received remotely delivered twice-weekly behavioral weight-loss podcasts and tracked diet using a calorie-tracking DSM app (Calorie Group) or a photo DSM app (Photo Group). Main outcome measures: Main outcomes were the number of days diet was tracked, podcasts downloaded, and weight change at 6 weeks and 6 months. Statistical analyses: Researchers used nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and χ2 analysis to test for differences between groups at baseline; repeated-measures models to estimate weight change and Spearman correlations to determine relationships between DSM frequency, podcasts downloaded, and weight change at 6 months. Results: There were no differences between groups for the number of days that diet was recorded (P=0.18), which was low overall (<30% of days) but was statistically significantly and strongly correlated with weight change for all participants pooled (r=0.63; P<0.001) and for the calorie tracking group (r=0.70; P=0.004), but not the photo tracking group (r=0.51; P=0.06). Participants in both groups had significant weight loss at 6 months (Photo Group, -2.5±0.9 kg; P=0.008; Calorie Group -2.4±0.9 kg; P=0.007), with no differences between groups at either 6 weeks (P=0.66) or at 6 months (P=0.74). Conclusions: As part of a remotely delivered weight loss intervention, frequency of DSM was significantly associated with overall weight loss for participants using a calorie DSM app but not a photo DSM app. DSM was low regardless of group and weight loss was significant, although minimal. Increasing user engagement with any DSM may be important to increase self-monitoring and improve weight loss.
Article
Full-text available
Prior reviews describing approach, methodological quality and effectiveness of dietary policies and programs may be limited in use for practitioners seeking to introduce novel programming, or academic researchers hoping to understand and address gaps in the current literature. This review is novel, assessing the “where, who, and in whom” of dietary policies and programs research in the United States over the past decade – with results intended to serve as a practical guide and foundation for innovation. This study was conducted from October 2018 to March 2019. Papers were selected through a tailored search strategy on PubMed as well as citation searches, to identify grey literature. A total of 489 papers were relevant to our research objective. The largest proportion of papers described school-based strategies (31%) or included economic incentives (19%). In papers that specified demographics, the study populations most often included children, adults and adolescents (54%, 46%, and 42% respectively); and White, Black and Hispanic populations (77%, 76% and 70%, respectively). Results highlight opportunities for future research within workplace and faith-based settings, among racial/ethnic minorities, and older adults.
Article
Full-text available
The prevalence of overweight in children and adolescents and obesity in adults in the United States has increased over several decades. To provide current estimates of the prevalence and trends of overweight in children and adolescents and obesity in adults. Analysis of height and weight measurements from 3958 children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years and 4431 adults aged 20 years or older obtained in 2003-2004 as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative sample of the US population. Data from the NHANES obtained in 1999-2000 and in 2001-2002 were compared with data from 2003-2004. Estimates of the prevalence of overweight in children and adolescents and obesity in adults. Overweight among children and adolescents was defined as at or above the 95th percentile of the sex-specific body mass index (BMI) for age growth charts. Obesity among adults was defined as a BMI of 30 or higher; extreme obesity was defined as a BMI of 40 or higher. In 2003-2004, 17.1% of US children and adolescents were overweight and 32.2% of adults were obese. Tests for trend were significant for male and female children and adolescents, indicating an increase in the prevalence of overweight in female children and adolescents from 13.8% in 1999-2000 to 16.0% in 2003-2004 and an increase in the prevalence of overweight in male children and adolescents from 14.0% to 18.2%. Among men, the prevalence of obesity increased significantly between 1999-2000 (27.5%) and 2003-2004 (31.1%). Among women, no significant increase in obesity was observed between 1999-2000 (33.4%) and 2003-2004 (33.2%). The prevalence of extreme obesity (body mass index > or =40) in 2003-2004 was 2.8% in men and 6.9% in women. In 2003-2004, significant differences in obesity prevalence remained by race/ethnicity and by age. Approximately 30% of non-Hispanic white adults were obese as were 45.0% of non-Hispanic black adults and 36.8% of Mexican Americans. Among adults aged 20 to 39 years, 28.5% were obese while 36.8% of adults aged 40 to 59 years and 31.0% of those aged 60 years or older were obese in 2003-2004. The prevalence of overweight among children and adolescents and obesity among men increased significantly during the 6-year period from 1999 to 2004; among women, no overall increases in the prevalence of obesity were observed. These estimates were based on a 6-year period and suggest that the increases in body weight are continuing in men and in children and adolescents while they may be leveling off in women.
Article
A formal solution for the stationary distribution of queue-length at a fixed-cycle traffic light is found for a fairly general distribution of arrivals and for a single stream of vehicles which either all turn left or else all go straight on or turn right. (We assume that the vehicles are driving on the right of the road.) Some inequalities are derived for the expected queue-length and for the expected delay per vehicle.
Article
Epidemiological studies have shown television watching to be a risk factor for the development of obesity in children. The effect of reducing television watching and other sedentary behaviors as a component of a comprehensive obesity treatment program has not been thoroughly tested. To compare the influence of targeting decreases in sedentary behavior vs. increases in physical activity in the comprehensive treatment of obesity in 8- to 12-year-old children. Randomized, controlled outcome study. Childhood obesity research clinic. Ninety families with obese 8- to 12-year-old children were randomly assigned to groups that were provided a comprehensive family-based behavioral weight control program that included dietary, and behavior change information but differed in whether sedentary or physically active behaviors were targeted and the degree of behavior change required. Results during 2 years showed that targeting either decreased sedentary behaviors or increased physical activity was associated with significant decreases in percent overweight and body fat and improved aerobic fitness. Self-reported activity minutes increased and targeted sedentary time decreased during treatment. Children substituted nontargeted sedentary behaviors for some of their targeted sedentary behaviors. These results support reducing sedentary behaviors as an adjunct in the treatment of pediatric obesity.
Article
To assess the effectiveness of dietetic treatment for obese children and to report details of dietary interventions. English-language articles from 1975 to 2003 available from health and medical databases. Randomized controlled trials with subjects younger than 18 years of age that included a dietary intervention in isolation or in combination with lifestyle modifications and/or psychological therapies. One person searched the databases; 2 people independently critically appraised the articles for methodological quality and then extracted data using standardized tools. Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; 17 contained sufficient information for a Forest plot of the standardized effects. Eight studies had a true control and were included in a meta-analysis. The random effects model was reported if the Q noncombinability chi(2) statistic was significant at the 10% level because it has low power as a strict test of homogeneity. The 2 strongly qualified meta-analyses suggest that interventions that include a dietary treatment do achieve relative weight loss. Details of the dietary intervention or participant food intake are rarely described. It is not possible to evaluate the effectiveness of dietary treatment for childhood obesity because of the lack of high-quality studies and the heterogeneity of designs, treatment combinations, outcome measures, and follow-up. There is an urgent need to improve the quality of studies in this area because childhood obesity poses major health risks for populations, yet there is limited evidence on which to base treatment strategies.
Red light, green light, eat right: The food solution that lets kids be kids
  • J Dolgoff
Dolgoff, J. (2009). Red light, green light, eat right: The food solution that lets kids be kids. New York, NY: Rodale Books.
The stoplight diet for children: An eight-week program for parents and children
  • L H Epstein
  • S Squires
Epstein, L. H., & Squires, S. (1988). The stoplight diet for children: An eight-week program for parents and children. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
The traffic light diet
  • J Willis
Willis, J. (2004). The traffic light diet. London: Orion.